In a project, I'm using a Common Table Expression (CTE) in Postgres for a recursive expression on a table. The recursive expression figures out all child rows under a parent.
I'm using the Laravel framework with query builder to write this query. I would like to avoid raw queries. I am looking for a way to chain the CTE in the query builder syntax, but I end up with a raw query (DB::select('raw query here')).
Is there a way that I can chain the CTE part? Like below in pseudo code:
DB::statement('WITH RECURSIVE included_parts(sub_part, part, quantity) AS (
SELECT sub_part, part, quantity FROM parts WHERE part = 'our_product'
UNION ALL
SELECT p.sub_part, p.part, p.quantity
FROM included_parts pr, parts p
WHERE p.part = pr.sub_part')
->select('subpart')
->table('included_parts')
->join('bar', 'foo.id', '=', 'bar.foo_id')
->etc etc more query expressions
I've created a package for common table expressions: https://github.com/staudenmeir/laravel-cte
$query = 'SELECT sub_part, part, quantity FROM parts [...]';
DB::table('included_parts')
->withRecursiveExpression('included_parts', $query, ['sub_part', 'part', 'quantity'])
->select('subpart')
->join('bar', 'foo.id', '=', 'bar.foo_id')
->[...]
You can also provide a query builder instance:
$query = DB::table('parts')
->where('part', 'our_product')
->unionAll(
DB::query()->[...]
)
DB::table('included_parts')
->withRecursiveExpression('included_parts', $query, ['sub_part', 'part', 'quantity'])
->select('subpart')
->join('bar', 'foo.id', '=', 'bar.foo_id')
->[...]
Related
EF is producing multiple queries (n+1) instead of a single query with a subquery when the selection contains the entire element instead of just part of it.
Set up a project as per https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/ef/core/get-started/aspnetcore/new-db?tabs=visual-studio
context.Blogs.Select(a => new { a.Url, a.Posts.Count }).ToList(); runs this
SELECT [a].[Url], (
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM [Posts] AS [p]
WHERE [a].[BlogId] = [p].[BlogId]
) AS [Count]
FROM [Blogs] AS [a]
But
context.Blogs.Select(a => new { a, a.Posts.Count }).ToList(); runs this
SELECT [a].[BlogId], [a].[Url]
FROM [Blogs] AS [a];
exec sp_executesql N'SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM [Posts] AS [p0]
WHERE #_outer_BlogId = [p0].[BlogId]',N'#_outer_BlogId int',#_outer_BlogId=2
How can I rework the linq to select the entire Blog object without generating multiple queries? Using include isn't helping from what i can see.
I'm developing an extension for TYPO3 CMS 8.7.8. I'm using query->statement() to select all fields from a single table, plus 1 field from another table. I get a QueryResult with the proper models and I would like to have that 1 extra field added to them. Is that possible?
You can do SQL queries with the ->statement(...) method and in that, use normal JOIN commands
From the documentation
$result = $query->statement('SELECT * FROM tx_sjroffers_domain_model_offer
WHERE title LIKE ? AND organization IN ?', array('%climbing%', array(33,47)));
So you can do JOINs on whatever table you want to (also code from the documentation)
LEFT JOIN tx_blogexample_person
ON tx_blogexample_post.author = tx_blogexample_person.uid
But you will end up with the raw data from the mysql query. If you want to transform it into a object, use the Property Mapper
You can use JOIN in your sql statments like below.
$query = $this->createQuery();
$sql = 'SELECT single.*,another.field_anme AS fields_name
FROM
tx_single_table_name single
JOIN
tx_another_table_name another
ON
single.fields = another.uid
WHERE
O.deleted = 0
AND O.hidden=0
AND O.uid=' . $orderId;
return $query->statement($sql)->execute();
I'm trying to replicate the following query usine Squeryl.
SELECT c.order_number,p.customer,p.base,(
SELECT sum(quantity) FROM "Stock" s where s.base = p.base
) as stock
FROM "Card" c, "Part" p WHERE c."partId" = p."idField";
I have the following code for selecting the Cards and Parts but I cannot see a way to add a sumation into the select clause.
from(cards, parts)((c,p) =>
where(c.partId === p.id)
select(c,p)
Any help is much appreciated!
In Squeryl, you can use any Queryable object in the from clause of your query. So, to create a subquery, something like the following should work for you:
def subQuery = from(stock)(s => groupBy(s.base) compute(sum(s.quantity)))
from(cards, parts, subquery)((c, p, sq) =>
where(c.partId === p.idField and sq.key === p.base)
select(c.orderNumber, p.customer, sq.measures))
Of course the field names may vary slightly, just guessing at the class definitions. If you want the whole object for cards and parts instead of the single fields from the original query - just change the select clause to: select(c, p, sq.measures)
I'm attempting to outer join a table with an inline table valued function in my LINQ query, but I get a query compilation error at runtime:
"The query attempted to call 'OuterApply' over a nested query, but 'OuterApply' did not have the appropriate keys."
My linq statement looks like this:
var testQuery = (from accountBase in ViewContext.AccountBases
join advisorConcatRaw in ViewContext.UFN_AccountAdvisorsConcatenated_Get()
on accountBase.AccountId equals advisorConcatRaw.AccountId into advisorConcatOuter
from advisorConcat in advisorConcatOuter.DefaultIfEmpty()
select new
{
accountBase.AccountId,
advisorConcat.Advisors
}).ToList();
The function definition is as follows:
CREATE FUNCTION dbo.UFN_AccountAdvisorsConcatenated_Get()
RETURNS TABLE
AS
RETURN
SELECT AP.AccountId,
LEFT(AP.Advisors, LEN(AP.Advisors) - 1) AS Advisors
FROM ( SELECT DISTINCT
AP.AccountId,
( SELECT AP2.PropertyValue + ', '
FROM dbo.AccountProperty AP2 WITH (NOLOCK)
WHERE AP2.AccountId = AP.AccountId
AND AP2.AccountPropertyTypeId = 1 -- Advisor
FOR XML PATH('')) AS Advisors
FROM dbo.AccountProperty AP WITH (NOLOCK)) AP;
I can successfully perform the join directly in sql as follows:
SELECT ab.accountid,
advisorConcat.Advisors
FROM accountbase ab
LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.Ufn_accountadvisorsconcatenated_get() advisorConcat
ON ab.accountid = advisorConcat.accountid
Does anyone have a working example of left outer joining an inline TVF to a table in LINQ to entities - or is this a known defect, etc? Many thanks.
Entity Framework needs to know what the primary key columns of the TVF results are to do a left join. Basically you need to create a fake table which has same schema as your TVF results and update TVF in model browser to return the new created table type instead of default complex type. You could refer to this answer to get more details.
I am trying to create an Entity SQL that is a union of two sub-queries.
(SELECT VALUE DISTINCT ROW(e.ColumnA, e.ColumnB, 1 AS Rank) FROM Context.Entity AS E WHERE ...)
UNION ALL
(SELECT VALUE DISTINCT ROW(e.ColumnA, e.ColumnB, 2 AS Rank) FROM Context.Entity AS E WHERE ...)
ORDER BY *??* LIMIT 50
I have tried:
ORDER BY Rank
and
ORDER BY e.Rank
but I keep getting:
System.Data.EntitySqlException: The query syntax is not valid. Near keyword 'ORDER'
Edit:
This is Entity Framework. In C#, the query is executed using:
var esql = "...";
ObjectParameter parameter0 = new ObjectParameter("p0", value1);
ObjectParameter parameter1 = new ObjectParameter("p1", value2);
ObjectQuery<DbDataRecord> query = context.CreateQuery<DbDataRecord>(esql, parameter0, parameter1);
var queryResults = query.Execute(MergeOption.NoTracking);
There is only a small portion of my application where I have to resort to using Entity SQL. Generally, the main use case is when I need to do: "WHERE Column LIKE 'A % value % with % multiple % wildcards'".
I do not think it is a problem with the Rank column. I do think it is how I am trying to apply an order by to two different esql statements joined by union all. Could someone suggest:
How to apply a ORDER BY to this kind of UNION/UNION ALL statment
How to order by the non-entity column expression.
Thanks.