The following works in Playground:
func stringToInt(numberStr: String!) -> Int {
print(numberStr)
return Int(numberStr)!
}
let strNum1: String?
strNum1 = "1"
let result = stringToInt(numberStr: strNum1)
It returns 1 as expected.
In Xcode, a similar approach fails:
func stringToInt(numberStr: String!) -> Int {
print("\(numberStr!)")
let str = "\(numberStr!)"
print(Int(str))
return Int(str)!
}
The first print produces: Optional(1)
The second print produces: nil
The return statement fails because it is attempting to create an Int from a nil.
It must be something simple but I haven't been able to determine why it's not working. This is in Swift 3 and Xcode 8 BTW.
#Hamish:
In Xcode, I have a string with a numeric value. This:
print("number: (selectedAlertNumber) - unit: (selectedAlertUnit)")
...produces this:
number: Optional(1) - unit: Day
Then, I'm checking to see if either selectedAlertNumber of selecterAlertUnit != "-"
if selectedAlertNumber != "-" && selectedAlertUnit != "-" {
// set alert text
var unitStr = selectedAlertUnit
let alertNumber = stringToInt(numberStr: selectedAlertNumber)
if alertNumber > 1 {
unitStr.append("s")
}
let alertText = "...\(selectedAlertNumber) \(unitStr) before event."
alertTimeCell.setAlertText(alertText: alertText)
// set alert date/time
}
The let alertNumber = stringToInt... line is how I'm calling the function. I could just attempt the conversion there but I wanted to isolate the problem by wrapping the conversion in it's own function.
Using string interpolation to convert values to a String is usually not advised since the output may differ depending on optional status of the value. For example, consider these two functions:
func stringToInt(numberStr: String!) -> Int
{
print("\(numberStr!)")
let str = "\(numberStr!)"
return Int(str)!
}
func otherStringToInt(numberStr: String!) -> Int
{
print(numberStr)
let str = "\(numberStr)"
return Int(str)!
}
The only difference between these two is the ! in the second function when using string interpolation to get a String type value from numberStr. To be more specific, at the same line in function 1 compared to function 2, the string values are very different depending on whether or not the interpolated value is optional:
let str1: String = "1"
let str2: String! = "1"
let str3: String? = "1"
let otherStr1 = "\(str1)" // value: "1"
let otherStr2 = "\(str2)" // value: "Optional(1)"
let otherStr3 = "\(str2!)" // value: "1"
let otherStr4 = "\(str3)" // value: "Optional(1)"
let otherStr5 = "\(str3!)" // value: "1"
Passing otherStr2 or otherStr4 into the Int initializer will produce nil, since the string "Optional(1)" is not convertible to Int. Additionally, this will cause an error during the force unwrap. Instead of using string interpolation in your function, it would be better to just use the value directly since it's already a String.
func stringToInt(numberStr: String!) -> Int
{
return Int(numberStr)!
}
Let me know if this makes sense.
Also, my own personal feedback: watch out force unwrapping so frequently. In many cases, you're running the risk of getting an error while unwrapping a nil optional.
Related
I am trying to get my head around creating closures. I get the simpler ones like:
let squaredNumber = { (num: Int) -> (Int) in
return num * num
}
print( squaredNumber(9) ) // 81
and I understand how the sorting one works:
let team = ["Bob", "Rick", "Peter"]
print( team.sorted() ) // ["Bob", "Peter", "Rick"]
print( team.sorted(by: { $0 > $1 }) ) //["Rick", "Peter", "Bob"]
So now I am trying to create my own version of sorting one, in terms of setup.
In the sorting one, there is a plain function sorted() and a sorted(by:...) option.
The code I am playing with so far is (commented code is just to play with):
struct Person {
let name_given = { (fn: String?, ln: String?) -> String in
// return a different value if a nil is supplied
guard let fn1 = fn else { return "No First Name" }
guard let ln1 = ln else { return "No Last Name" }
// Only returns value if not nil
// if let fn1 = fn { return fn1 }
// if let ln1 = ln { return ln1 }
// returns what has been decided above
return "\(fn!) \(ln!)"
}
let no_name = {() -> String in
return "Hello"
}
}
let dad = Person()
print( dad.name_given("Jeff", "Smith") )
print( dad.no_name() )
but I can only get this to work dad.something() but I would like the option of a parameter closure in a function that is I am guessing an optional.
Am I even on the right track in terms of thinking this through.
Basically I want to create a function that execute different code based on wether they have a parameter or not.
So something like dad() or dad(name: {"Jeff", "Smith"}) or dad(age: {35})
The closures would combine strings or do something with the code and then return the result or something.
There is no story to the code above, I just want to understand how to create it.
/////////////////
Edit for clarity:
So I realise my aim was explained with a lot of confusion, because I am trying to figure this out.
Here is hopefully a better attempt:
So this code still doesn't work, but bare with me.
Take for example this:
static func closure(both: (_ a: String, _ b: String) -> String { a, b in
return "\(a) \(b)"
})
and then this:
static func closure(single: (_ a: String) -> String { a in
return "\(a)"
})
So then I would effectively be able to do something like this:
Person.closure(both: {"First", "Last"}) -> This would output "First Last"
and
Person.closure(single: {"First"}) -> This would output "First"
My outcome would be that I could have a static class that has a bunch of closures, but that are grouped.
So if I want to a bunch of string type closures, it would be easy to find them because you could do something like:
StaticStruct.string(<thing1>: {<closure params>})
StaticStruct.string(<thing2>: {<closure params>})
StaticStruct.string(<thing3>: {<closure params>})
or if I want to do something with numbers, it would be:
StaticStruct.numbers(<thing1>: {<closure params>})
StaticStruct.numbers(<thing2>: {<closure params>})
StaticStruct.numbers(<thing3>: {<closure params>})
I hope this makes more sense.
I like the way it looks when you do an array sort, that is why I started thinking like this.
What you are asking is flawed for Swift:
If you don't provide anything at all, not even nil, how can Swift know what's missing?
Think about this example:
print( dad.name_given("Connor") )
How can Swift know if you provided only the first name, or only the last name? In your example, you will need to be specific on what is not provided:
print( dad.name_given(nil, "Connor") ) // Surely only last name is provided
A function would solve this problem by providing a default value to the parameters, so you don't have to pass nil, but then you would need to specifically tell what you're passing, or Swift will assume:
func person(fn: String? = "", ln: String? = "") -> String {...}
print( dad.person(ln: "Connor")) // Surely passing the second parameter
func person(_ fn: String? = "", _ ln: String? = "") -> String {...}
print( dad.person("Connor")) // It will assume that you are passing the first parameter
But with closures, you can't provide a default value to parameters:
let name_given = { (fn: String? = "", ln: String? = "") -> String in...}
// Error: Default arguments are not allowed in closures
It might not solve your problem, but you can create a function that provides default values to the parameters (no need to pass nil), and accepts a closure to treat those parameters.
func describe(fn: String = "", ln: String = "", _ action: #escaping (String?, String?)->String) -> String {
let first: String? = fn == "" ? nil : fn
let second: String? = ln == "" ? nil : ln
return action(first, second)
}
print( dad.describe(ln: "Connor", dad.name_given)) // No first Name
I have below func in my class.
static func getFirstCharInName(strName: String) -> String {
let firstCharInName = String(strName.first)
return firstCharInName.trim()
}
I encountered this err:
Value of optional type 'Character?' must be unwrapped to a value of type 'Character'
What seems to be the problem?
Thanks
func getFirstCharInName(strName: String) -> String {
let indexStartOfText = strName.index(strName.startIndex, offsetBy: 0)
let indexEndOfText = strName.index(strName.startIndex, offsetBy: 0)
let firstChar = String(strName[indexStartOfText...indexEndOfText])
return firstChar
}
This error means that the expression has optional value (the value can be nil) that is not yet unwrapped, strName.first returns an optional value of Character?, but your function demands a returning type of String which is not an optional type.
So, in order to fix this, you need to unwrap the optional value strName.first, it seems like you are not familiar with optionals, here's the code for your case (choose one from two options):
func getFirstCharInName(strName: String) -> String {
// option 1: force unwrap - can cause fatal error
return String(strName.first!)
// option 2: optional binding
if let firstCharInName = strName.first {
return String(firstCharInName)
} else {
// if the optional value is nil, return an empty string
return ""
}
}
PS. I don't really understand the function trim() in your question, but if you mean to strip away the blank spaces like " ", you can do:
firstCharInName.trimmingCharacters(in: .whitespaces)
Avoid the optional simply with prefix, it's totally safe. if there is no first character you'll get an empty string.
static func getFirstChar(in name: String) -> String { // the function name getFirstChar(in name is swiftier
return String(name.prefix(1))
}
I don't know what the trim function is supposed to do.
It means that value of optional type 'Character?' (as result of your part of code strName.first) must be unwrapped to a value of type 'Character' before you will be gonna cast it to String type.
You may use this variant:
func getFirstCharInName(strName: String) -> String {
return strName.count != 0 ? String(strName.first!) : ""
}
As you can see, the exclamation point is in the string strName.first! retrieves the optional variable as it was needed.
you can do something like that:
extension String {
var firstLetter: String {
guard !self.isEmpty else { return "" }
return String(self[self.startIndex...self.startIndex])
}
}
then
let name = "MilkBottle"
let first = name.firstLetter // "M"
I have received this response from the server and I am sure there must be a more efficient way to convert it into an object.
I have the following response:
[
id=2997,rapidViewId=62,state=ACTIVE,name=Sprint7,startDate=2018-11-20T10:28:37.256Z,endDate=2018-11-30T10:28:00.000Z,completeDate=<null>,sequence=2992,goal=none
]
How do I convert it nicely into a well formed swift object in the simplest way?
Here is my attempt which gives me just the Sprint Value
if sprintJiraCustomField.count > 0 {
let stringOutput = sprintJiraCustomField.first?.stringValue // convert output to String
let name = stringOutput?.components(separatedBy: "name=") // get name section from string
let nameFieldRaw = name![1].components(separatedBy: ",") // split out to the comma
let nameValue = nameFieldRaw.first!
sprintDetail = nameValue// show name field
}
Not sure what format you want but the below code will produce an array of tuples (key, value) but all values are strings so I guess another conversion is needed afterwards
let items = stringOutput.components(separatedBy: ",").compactMap( {pair -> (String, String) in
let keyValue = pair.components(separatedBy: "=")
return (keyValue[0], keyValue[1])
})
This is a work for reduce:
let keyValueStrings = yourString.components(separatedBy: ",")
let dictionary = keyValueStrings.reduce([String: String]()) {
(var aggregate: [String: String], element: String) -> [String: String] in
let elements = element.componentsSeparatedByString("=")
let key = elements[0]
// replace nil with the value you want to use if there is no value
let value = (elements.count > 1) ? elements[1] : nil
aggregate[key] = value
return aggregate
}
This is a functional approach, but you can achieve the same using a for iteration.
So then you can use Swift’s basic way of mapping. for example you will have your custom object struct. First, you will add an init method to it. Then map your object like this:
init(with dictionary: [String: Any]?) {
guard let dictionary = dictionary else { return }
attribute = dictionary["attrName"] as? String
}
let customObjec = CustomStruct(dictionary: dictionary)
We already have some suggestion to first split the string at each comma and then split each part at the equals sign. This is rather easy to code and works well, but it is not very efficient as every character has to be checked multiple times. Writing a proper parser using Scanner is just as easy, but will run faster.
Basically the scanner can check if a given string is at the current position or give you the substring up to the next occurrence of a separator.
With that the algorithm would have the following steps:
Create scanner with the input string
Check for the opening bracket, otherwise fail
Scan up to the first =. This is the key
Consume the =
Scan up to the first , or ]. This is the value
Store the key/value pair
If there is a , consume it and continue with step 3
Consume the final ].
Sadly the Scanner API is not very Swift-friendly. With a small extension it is much easier to use:
extension Scanner {
func scanString(_ string: String) -> Bool {
return scanString(string, into: nil)
}
func scanUpTo(_ delimiter: String) -> String? {
var result: NSString? = nil
guard scanUpTo(delimiter, into: &result) else { return nil }
return result as String?
}
func scanUpTo(_ characters: CharacterSet) -> String? {
var result: NSString? = nil
guard scanUpToCharacters(from: characters, into: &result) else { return nil }
return result as String?
}
}
With this we can write the parse function like this:
func parse(_ list: String) -> [String: String]? {
let scanner = Scanner(string: list)
guard scanner.scanString("[") else { return nil }
var result: [String: String] = [:]
let endOfPair: CharacterSet = [",", "]"]
repeat {
guard
let key = scanner.scanUpTo("="),
scanner.scanString("="),
let value = scanner.scanUpTo(endOfPair)
else {
return nil
}
result[key] = value
} while scanner.scanString(",")
guard scanner.scanString("]") else { return nil }
return result
}
I have written a swift function that takes a String and a Range as its parameters. How can I check that the range is valid for the string?
Edit: Nonsensical Example
func foo(text: String, range: Range<String.Index>) ->String? {
// what can I do here to ensure valid range
guard *is valid range for text* else {
return nil
}
return text[range]
}
var str = "Hello, world"
let range = str.rangeOfString("world")
let str2 = "short"
let text = foo(str2, range: range!)
In Swift 3, this is easy: just get the string's character range and call contains to see if it contains your arbitrary range.
Edit: In Swift 4, a range no longer "contains" a range. A Swift 4.2 solution might look like this:
let string = // some string
let range = // some range of String.Index
let ok = range.clamped(to: string.startIndex..<string.endIndex) == range
If ok is true, it is safe to apply range to string.
Swift 5
extension String {
func hasRange(_ range: NSRange) -> Bool {
return Range(range, in: self) != nil
}
}
Unfortunately, I was not able to test Matt's solution as I am using swift 2.2. However, using his idea I came up with ...
func foo(text: String, range: Range<String.Index>) -> String? {
let r = text.startIndex..<text.endIndex
if r.contains(range.startIndex) && r.contains(range.endIndex) {
return text[range]
} else {
return nil
}
}
If the start and end indices are ok then so must be the entire range.
I want to convert the index of a letter contained within a string to an integer value. Attempted to read the header files but I cannot find the type for Index, although it appears to conform to protocol ForwardIndexType with methods (e.g. distanceTo).
var letters = "abcdefg"
let index = letters.characters.indexOf("c")!
// ERROR: Cannot invoke initializer for type 'Int' with an argument list of type '(String.CharacterView.Index)'
let intValue = Int(index) // I want the integer value of the index (e.g. 2)
Any help is appreciated.
edit/update:
Xcode 11 • Swift 5.1 or later
extension StringProtocol {
func distance(of element: Element) -> Int? { firstIndex(of: element)?.distance(in: self) }
func distance<S: StringProtocol>(of string: S) -> Int? { range(of: string)?.lowerBound.distance(in: self) }
}
extension Collection {
func distance(to index: Index) -> Int { distance(from: startIndex, to: index) }
}
extension String.Index {
func distance<S: StringProtocol>(in string: S) -> Int { string.distance(to: self) }
}
Playground testing
let letters = "abcdefg"
let char: Character = "c"
if let distance = letters.distance(of: char) {
print("character \(char) was found at position #\(distance)") // "character c was found at position #2\n"
} else {
print("character \(char) was not found")
}
let string = "cde"
if let distance = letters.distance(of: string) {
print("string \(string) was found at position #\(distance)") // "string cde was found at position #2\n"
} else {
print("string \(string) was not found")
}
Works for Xcode 13 and Swift 5
let myString = "Hello World"
if let i = myString.firstIndex(of: "o") {
let index: Int = myString.distance(from: myString.startIndex, to: i)
print(index) // Prints 4
}
The function func distance(from start: String.Index, to end: String.Index) -> String.IndexDistance returns an IndexDistance which is just a typealias for Int
Swift 4
var str = "abcdefg"
let index = str.index(of: "c")?.encodedOffset // Result: 2
Note: If String contains same multiple characters, it will just get the nearest one from left
var str = "abcdefgc"
let index = str.index(of: "c")?.encodedOffset // Result: 2
encodedOffset has deprecated from Swift 4.2.
Deprecation message:
encodedOffset has been deprecated as most common usage is incorrect. Use utf16Offset(in:) to achieve the same behavior.
So we can use utf16Offset(in:) like this:
var str = "abcdefgc"
let index = str.index(of: "c")?.utf16Offset(in: str) // Result: 2
When searching for index like this
⛔️ guard let index = (positions.firstIndex { position <= $0 }) else {
it is treated as Array.Index. You have to give compiler a clue you want an integer
✅ guard let index: Int = (positions.firstIndex { position <= $0 }) else {
Swift 5
You can do convert to array of characters and then use advanced(by:) to convert to integer.
let myString = "Hello World"
if let i = Array(myString).firstIndex(of: "o") {
let index: Int = i.advanced(by: 0)
print(index) // Prints 4
}
To perform string operation based on index , you can not do it with traditional index numeric approach. because swift.index is retrieved by the indices function and it is not in the Int type. Even though String is an array of characters, still we can't read element by index.
This is frustrating.
So ,to create new substring of every even character of string , check below code.
let mystr = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz"
let mystrArray = Array(mystr)
let strLength = mystrArray.count
var resultStrArray : [Character] = []
var i = 0
while i < strLength {
if i % 2 == 0 {
resultStrArray.append(mystrArray[i])
}
i += 1
}
let resultString = String(resultStrArray)
print(resultString)
Output : acegikmoqsuwy
Thanks In advance
Here is an extension that will let you access the bounds of a substring as Ints instead of String.Index values:
import Foundation
/// This extension is available at
/// https://gist.github.com/zackdotcomputer/9d83f4d48af7127cd0bea427b4d6d61b
extension StringProtocol {
/// Access the range of the search string as integer indices
/// in the rendered string.
/// - NOTE: This is "unsafe" because it may not return what you expect if
/// your string contains single symbols formed from multiple scalars.
/// - Returns: A `CountableRange<Int>` that will align with the Swift String.Index
/// from the result of the standard function range(of:).
func countableRange<SearchType: StringProtocol>(
of search: SearchType,
options: String.CompareOptions = [],
range: Range<String.Index>? = nil,
locale: Locale? = nil
) -> CountableRange<Int>? {
guard let trueRange = self.range(of: search, options: options, range: range, locale: locale) else {
return nil
}
let intStart = self.distance(from: startIndex, to: trueRange.lowerBound)
let intEnd = self.distance(from: trueRange.lowerBound, to: trueRange.upperBound) + intStart
return Range(uncheckedBounds: (lower: intStart, upper: intEnd))
}
}
Just be aware that this can lead to weirdness, which is why Apple has chosen to make it hard. (Though that's a debatable design decision - hiding a dangerous thing by just making it hard...)
You can read more in the String documentation from Apple, but the tldr is that it stems from the fact that these "indices" are actually implementation-specific. They represent the indices into the string after it has been rendered by the OS, and so can shift from OS-to-OS depending on what version of the Unicode spec is being used. This means that accessing values by index is no longer a constant-time operation, because the UTF spec has to be run over the data to determine the right place in the string. These indices will also not line up with the values generated by NSString, if you bridge to it, or with the indices into the underlying UTF scalars. Caveat developer.
In case you got an "index is out of bounds" error. You may try this approach. Working in Swift 5
extension String{
func countIndex(_ char:Character) -> Int{
var count = 0
var temp = self
for c in self{
if c == char {
//temp.remove(at: temp.index(temp.startIndex,offsetBy:count))
//temp.insert(".", at: temp.index(temp.startIndex,offsetBy: count))
return count
}
count += 1
}
return -1
}
}