In our project, we were using Enterprise library 5.0 for exception handling. Now, we are planning to use Enterprise library 6.0 and we are facing issues that EnterpriseLibraryContainer.Current is not available in Enterprise library 6.0.
I have found this link
Fluent API takes effect only once (Enterprise Library)
and it mentioned for LogWriter migration for 6.0. Same Way i would like to do for ExceptionHandling.
Below is sample code that are similar to our project.
EHConfigMgr.cs
var builder = new ConfigurationSourceBuilder();
var exceptionHandlingBuilder = builder.ConfigureExceptionHandling();
ServiceLocator.Current.GetAllInstances<IExceptionHandlingConfigurator>().ToList().ForEach(c => c.ConfigureExceptinHandling(exceptionHandlingBuilder));
exceptionHandlingBuilder.GivenPolicyWithName("WCF Exception Shielding")
.ForExceptionType<FaultException<ValidationFault>>()
.HandleCustom<WcfRethrowValidationFaultHandler>()
.ThenThrowNewException();
var tempAppConfigPath = Path.GetTempFileName();
File.Copy(AppDomain.CurrentDomain.SetupInformation.ConfigurationFile, tempAppConfigPath, true);
File.SetAttributes(tempAppConfigPath, FileAttributes.Normal);
var configSource = new FileConfigurationSource(tempAppConfigPath, false);
var s = new DictionaryConfigurationSource();
builder.UpdateConfigurationWithReplace(configSource);
EnterpriseLibraryContainer.Current = EnterpriseLibraryContainer.CreateDefaultContainer(configSource);
Proxybase.cs
protected ProxyBase()
{
ExceptionManager = EnterpriseLibraryContainer.Current.GetInstance<ExceptionManager>();
}
Please help me to change the proxybase without affecting exisiting functionality.
Related
I am trying to incorporate "Checkmarx" Static code scans as a stage into my devops pipeline. Currently our code uses "cake" files to excute the stages (invoked by PowerShell).
I was checking the cake support for Checkmarx.Api but could not find any neither in the Checkmarx site or in the Cake website. The NuGet gallery has a tab for the cake addin - https://www.nuget.org/packages/Checkmarx.API/
but does not share any information on the contracts exposed.
So reaching out to the community to see if anyone has done any work on this or has any references. Any other way you have incorporated "Checkmarx" into your build pipeline (without directly using the plugin rather using the CxCLi) would also be helpful as well.
As answered in the GitHub discussion where you asked the same question:
Cake scripts based on "normal" C#, so whatever the usage of Checkmarx.API, you can simply incorporate that in your cake scripts. Probably something like:
Task("Scan")
.Does(() =>
{
// place your code here..
});
As for using Checkmarx.API, I would suggest asking in the Checkmarx.API repo.
Alternatively, it seems that there is a CLI available. You can use that using the one of the process aliases.
Probably something like:
Task("Scan")
.Does(() =>
{
StartProcess("runCxConsole.cmd", new ProcessSettings
{
Arguments = #"Scan -v -ProjectName ""CxServer/bookname j2"" -CxServer http://localhost -CxUser username -CxPassword admin -LocationType folder -LocationPath ""C:\Data\Projects\Java\bs java"" -preset ""Checkmarx Default"""
});
});
(Note: I took the Arguments to runCxConsole.cmd from the documentation - I did not test that.)
I will mark this as closed as I have been able to get around this using .net HttpClient but unfortunately could not implement using Checkmarx cake addin.
I will paste the sample code, i was getting some ssl eerror until i added the "ServerCertificateCustomValidationCallback" to return true
string accessToken = string.Empty;
try
{
using (var httpClientHandler = new HttpClientHandler())
{
httpClientHandler.ServerCertificateCustomValidationCallback = (message, cert, chain, errors) => { return true; };
using (var client = new HttpClient(httpClientHandler))
{
client.BaseAddress = new Uri(CXUrl+"/auth/identity/connect/token");
client.DefaultRequestHeaders.Accept.Clear();
client.DefaultRequestHeaders.Add("Accept", "*/*");
var content = new FormUrlEncodedContent(new[]
{
new KeyValuePair<string, string>("grant_type", "password"),
new KeyValuePair<string, string>("scope", "access_control_api sast_api"),
new KeyValuePair<string, string>("username", username),
new KeyValuePair<string, string>("password", pwd),
new KeyValuePair<string, string>("client_id", "resource_owner_sast_client"),
new KeyValuePair<string, string>("client_secret", "****************************"),
});
var response = client.PostAsync("", content);
var result = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<CXAccessToken>(response.Result.Content.ReadAsStringAsync().Result);
accessToken = result.access_token;
}
}
}
I am trying to implement an OAuth2 client using ASP.NET Core 3 application. Here is how I add OAuth to my startup
services.AddAuthentication(config =>
{
config.DefaultAuthenticateScheme = "Client.Auth.Cookie";
config.DefaultSignInScheme = "Client.Auth.Cookie";
config.DefaultChallengeScheme = "SelfServer";
})
.AddCookie("Client.Auth.Cookie")
.AddOAuth("SelfServer", config =>
{
config.CallbackPath = "/oauth/callback";
config.AuthorizationEndpoint = "https://Server/oauth/authorize";
config.TokenEndpoint = "https://Server/oauth/token";
config.ClientId = "clientid";
config.ClientSecret = "secret_key";
});
As I read in the documentation, the /oauth/callback is something I do not have to define myself (no need to create OAuthController with Callback action). I kind of by mistake did it and defined it myself, then when I realized, I deleted the OAuthController and now I am getting a 404 on https://client/oauth/callback.
What am I missing?
Alright I realized a few seconds after posting this question that I forgot to call
app.UseAuthentication()
in my Configure() method in the Startup.
I have a .net core 3.0 application using the Microsoft.Azure.Batch 12.0.0 C# nuget package.
I create a job containing one task with a resource file like this (pseudo codeish):
var source = ResourceFile.FromStorageContainerUrl(settings.Input.Container.GetAccessUrl());
var cloudTask = new CloudTask(_taskId, commandline)
{
...
ResourceFiles = new[] { source, },
...
}
await _batchClient.JobOperations.AddTaskAsync("jobid", cloudTask,
cancellationToken: cancellationToken);
when i now request the status of the task
var cloudJob = await _batchClient.JobOperations.GetJobAsync("jobId", cancellationToken:
cancellationToken);
var cloudTask = cloudJob.ListTasks().SingleOrDefault();
var code = cloudTask.ExecutionInformation.FailureInformation,Code
code can be of value "ResourceContainerAccessDenied" if indeed we do not have access to the ResourceCondainer - "ResourceContainerAccessDenied" is not
a member of Microsoft.Azure.Batch.Common.TaskFailureInformationCodes and not documented anywhere as far as i can see.
Is this a bug in the Azure Batch C# SDK? Am i overlooking something? Where can i get a list of all possible code values?
The fact that this error code is not included in the C# SDK is indeed a bug.
I will be fixing this bug as part of an upcoming SDK release (ETA ~1 week).
We are automating Windows based Application using UFT and Client requires us to integrate UFT with VSTS since Functional testing Team is using VSTS Dashboard for all Testing Life Cycle.
Please help me in this regard if anyone has implemented this stuff earlier or currently working on same.
Regards
Raman Kumar
Refer to these steps:
Run UFT scripts through Jenkins build
Call VSTS REST API to create new test run and update test result with a specified bug.
Create new test run
Update test results for a test run
You can call REST API by using Microsoft Team Foundation Server Extended Client.
Simple code:
var u = new Uri("https://[account].visualstudio.com");
VssCredentials c = new VssCredentials(new Microsoft.VisualStudio.Services.Common.VssBasicCredential(string.Empty, "[personal access token]"));
var connection = new VssConnection(u, c);
var testClient = connection.GetClient<TestManagementHttpClient>();
int testpointid = 158;
string teamProject = "scrum2015";
RunCreateModel run = new RunCreateModel(name:"APIRun7",plan:new Microsoft.TeamFoundation.TestManagement.WebApi.ShallowReference("232"),pointIds:new int[] { testpointid });
TestRun testrun = testClient.CreateTestRunAsync(teamProject, run).Result;
TestCaseResultUpdateModel testCaseUpdate = new TestCaseResultUpdateModel() { State="Completed", Outcome="Passed", TestResult=new Microsoft.TeamFoundation.TestManagement.WebApi.ShallowReference("100000") };
var testResults = testClient.UpdateTestResultsAsync(new TestCaseResultUpdateModel[] { testCaseUpdate }, teamProject, testrun.Id).Result;
RunUpdateModel runmodel = new RunUpdateModel(state: "Completed");
TestRun testRunResult= testClient.UpdateTestRunAsync(teamProject, testrun.Id, runmodel).Result;
I have always seen that in all tutorials, databases are made in the form of code-first, but already there is a sqlite database that I want to use in my project. And I want to use entity 7 too. To do so, I made some classes from my database by means of a dll but it didn't work. In fact, I made these classes so that I could use my own database. I didn't want it to create a new database. Any suggestions? Can you recommend me any links,because I couldn't find any useful link
I install Install-Package EntityFramework.SQLite –Pre and Install-Package EntityFramework.Commands –Pre and Install-Package SQLite.Net.Async-PCL /next step: with Extension ،SQL Server Compact/SQLite Toolbox generate classes from db and import my db into project in visual studio and set buildaction to content and in final add
private async Task CopyDatabase()
{
bool isDatabaseExisting = false;
try
{
StorageFile storageFile = await ApplicationData.Current.LocalFolder.GetFileAsync("people.db");
isDatabaseExisting = true;
}
catch
{
isDatabaseExisting = false;
}
if (!isDatabaseExisting)
{
StorageFile databaseFile = await Package.Current.InstalledLocation.GetFileAsync("people.db");
await databaseFile.CopyAsync(ApplicationData.Current.LocalFolder);
}
}
into pp.xaml