Docker volume details for Windows - postgresql

I am learning docker and deploying some sample images from the docker hub. One of them requires postgresql. When I deploy without specifying a volume, it works beautifully. When I specify the volume 'path on host', it fails with inability to fsync properly. My question is when I inspect the volumes, I cannot find where docker is storing those volumes. I'd like to be able to specify a volume so I can move the data if/when needed. Where does Docker store this on a windows machine? I tried enabling volume through Kinematic but the container became unusable.
> docker volume inspect 0622ff3e0de10e2159fa4fe6b7cd7407c6149067f138b72380a5bbe337df8f62
[
{
"Driver": "local",
"Labels": null,
"Mountpoint": "/var/lib/docker/volumes/0622ff3e0de10e2159fa4fe6b7cd7407c6149067f138b72380a5bbe337df8f62/_data",
"Name": "0622ff3e0de10e2159fa4fe6b7cd7407c6149067f138b72380a5bbe337df8f62",
"Options": {},
"Scope": "local"
}
]
I can create a volume through docker but am not sure where it is stored on the harddisk.

If you're on windows 10 and use Docker For Windows, docker will create a VM and run it on your local hyper-v, the volumes you create are then located inside of this VM which is stored in something called MobyLinuxVM.vhdx (you can check it in the settings of docker).
One way to have your data on your host computer for now is to share a drive on docker settings and then map your postgres data folder to your windows hard drive.
Something like docker run -it -v /c/mypgdata:/var/lib/postgresql/data postgres
Another way would be to create a volume with a specific driver, take a look at existing volume drivers if one can do what you want.
This one could be of interest for you : https://github.com/CWSpear/local-persist
You can also enter the MobyLinux VM with this "kind of" hack
#get a privileged container with access to Docker daemon
docker run --privileged -it --rm -v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock -v /usr/bin/docker:/usr/bin/docker alpine sh
#run a container with full root access to MobyLinuxVM and no seccomp profile (so you can mount stuff)
docker run --net=host --ipc=host --uts=host --pid=host -it --security-opt=seccomp=unconfined --privileged --rm -v /:/host alpine /bin/sh
#switch to host FS
chroot /host
#and then go to the volume you asked for
cd /var/lib/docker/volumes/0622ff3e0de10e2159fa4fe6b7cd7407c6149067f138b72380a5bbe337df8f62/_data
Found here : http://docker-saigon.github.io/post/Docker-Beta/

Related

How to reconnect to same postgres database on Docker

I'm very new to using docker and I've created a postgres container using
docker run --name mytrainingdb -e POSTGRES_PASSWORD=mysecretpassword -d postgres. Then I connected to it with docker exec -it <container-id> bash and then psql.
Then I stop the container.
My query is, what do I do reconnect to the same database? I tried to run same docker run command, but it says the name 'mytrainingdb' is used, which means it is trying to create it afresh, which is not what I want. Hope my expectation is right, as in when I restart my laptop or resume work I can just restart the same container and my data/config would be preserved?
The documentation also mentions that we can link a host directory to volume of pg container to have the stored data accessible to us, but I'm ok with docker managing my storage for that database.
You will have error when you try to re-run the same command, because docker is trying to create a new container with same name as the previous one "mytrainingdb". If you close docker and reopen it you will still find your container , but its not running , you can start it again with docker start mytrainingdb or you can remove it with docker rm mytrainingdb .
However , dont restart docker because you want to create a new container with the same name! If you want to start a new container with the same name and your container is still running you can first stop it with docker stop mytrainingdb and docker rm mytrainingdb or you can just do docker rm -f mytrainingdb (this will remove you running container with force ) and then create a new container..
As for the volumes ,you just created one by default which is named is kind of hash , and its found at volumes/var/lib/docker/volumes/ .Because generally containers such PostgreSQL, or databases in general persists volumes. The volume gets created when running the container and is handy to save persistent data, whether you start the container with -v or not.
The volume you talked about in your question , is called mounted volume , is when you basically just bind a certain directory or file from the host (outside) to inside the container
docker run -v /hostdir:/containerdir in your case docker run -v /hostdir:/var/lib/postgresql/data
If you restart docker or your computer running containers won't be automatically restarted. You can start your container again with docker start mytrainingdb (related question), then connect with your docker exec command.
(one tip: instead of running bash, then psql, you can directly run psql, e.g. docker exec -it mytrainingdb psql --user postgres)
Your understanding of data persistence is correct, docker will manage the data and it will still be around.
From the postgres image documentation
There are several ways to store data used by applications that run in Docker containers. We encourage users of the postgres images to familiarize themselves with the options available, including:
Let Docker manage the storage of your database data by writing the database files to disk on the host system using its own internal volume management. This is the default and is easy and fairly transparent to the user. The downside is that the files may be hard to locate for tools and applications that run directly on the host system, i.e. outside containers.
You can add --rm argument so that whenever you stop the container manually, or container stops for any reasons (his task is done or it fails), it will remove that container.
In your case, you can use this:
docker run --name mytrainingdb --rm -e POSTGRES_PASSWORD=mysecretpassword -d postgres

Two Volumes are created when I run a docker container with volume mapping

I am creating postgreSQL container using following command
sudo docker run -d --name=pg -p 5432:5432 -e POSTGRES_PASSWORD=secret -e PGDATA=/pgdata -v pg:/pgdata postgres
After running this container when I check volumes by running following command
sudo docker volume ls
DRIVER VOLUME NAME
local 6d283475c6fe923155018c847f2c607c464244cb6767dd37a579824cf8c7e612
local pg
I get two volumes. pg volume is created in the command but what the second volume is??
If you look at the Docker Hub decomposition of the postgres image you will notice it has a declaration
VOLUME ["/var/lib/postgresql/data"]
If you don't explicitly mount something else on that directory, Docker will create an anonymous volume and mount it there for you. This behaves identically to a named volume except that it doesn't have a specific name.
docker inspect mostly dumps out low-level diagnostic information, but it should include the mount information, and you should see two volume mounts, one with the anonymous volume on the default PostgreSQL data directory and a second matching the explicit mount on /pgdata.

How to add volume mount to running postgreSQL container?

I have a running postgreSQL docker container and need to add a volume mount.
I followed the steps from How can I add a volume to an existing Docker container?, (ran docker commit on the container to save it as an image, and spun up another container based on that image with a named volume mounted in). All the data files from the first container are present in /var/lib/postgres/data of the second container.
However, when I try to query this second postgres database, I cannot see any tables that are in the first container. Been trying to fix this for a few days with no luck, am I missing something here (does mounting a volume obscure the existing data in /var/lib/postres/data)?
Commit will not work as there is the volume defined in the Dockerfile.
Volumes are useful in many cases, for example, for running
database-storage. However, since volumes are not 'part' of a
container, it makes containers no longer portable - which seems in
direct conflict with the slogan "Build once... Run anywhere.."
docker commit data container with VOLUME
One option that you can try is copying data folder to host from an existing container and then launch the container with mount path.
docker cp my_db_cotainer:/var/lib/postgresql/data db_data
then start a new container with this path so it will contain the same data as the previous one
docker run -d --name some-postgres -v $PWD/db_data/:/var/lib/postgresql/data postgres
same for mysql
docker cp some-mysql-old:/var/lib/mysql db_backup
docker run --rm --name some-mysql-new -v $PWD/db_backup:/var/lib/mysql -it mysql

docker-compose mounted volume remain

I'm using docker-compose in one of my projects. During development i mount my source directory to a volume in one of my docker services for easy development. At the same time, I have a db service (psql) that mounts a named volume for persistent data storage.
I start by solution and everything is working fine
$ docker-compose up -d
When I check my volumes I see the named and "unnamed" (source volume).
$ docker volume ls
DRIVER VOLUME NAME
local 226ba7af9689c511cb5e6c06ceb36e6c26a75dd9d619360882a1012cdcd25b72
local myproject_data
The problem I experience is that, when I do
$ docker-compose down
...
$ docker volume ls
DRIVER VOLUME NAME
local 226ba7af9689c511cb5e6c06ceb36e6c26a75dd9d619360882a1012cdcd25b72
local myproject_data
both volumes remain. Every time I run
$ docker-compose down
$ docker-compose up -d
a new volume is created for my source mount
$ docker volume ls
DRIVER VOLUME NAME
local 19181286b19c0c3f5b67d7d1f0e3f237c83317816acbdf4223328fdf46046518
local 226ba7af9689c511cb5e6c06ceb36e6c26a75dd9d619360882a1012cdcd25b72
local myproject_data
I know that this will not happen on my deployment server, since it will not mount the source, but is there a way to not make the mounted source persistent?
You can use the --rm option in docker run. To use it with docker-compose you can use
docker-compose rm -v after stopping your containers with docker-compose stop
If you go through the docs about Data volumes , its mentioned that
Data volumes persist even if the container itself is deleted.
So that means, stopping a container will not remove the volumes it created, whether named or anonymous.
Now if you read further down to Removing volumes
A Docker data volume persists after a container is deleted. You can
create named or anonymous volumes. Named volumes have a specific
source form outside the container, for example awesome:/bar. Anonymous
volumes have no specific source. When the container is deleted, you
should instruct the Docker Engine daemon to clean up anonymous
volumes. To do this, use the --rm option, for example:
$ docker run --rm -v /foo -v awesome:/bar busybox top
This command creates an anonymous /foo volume. When the container is
removed, the Docker Engine removes the /foo volume but not the awesome
volume.
Just remove volumes with the down command:
docker-compose down -v

docker postgres, fail to map volume in windows

I wish to store my persists data in my local D:\dockerData\postgres9.6. Below is my docker command
docker pull postgres
docker run -d -v /d/dockerData/postgres9.6:/var/lib/postgresql/data -p 5432:5432 postgres
It successful create a container and I can use pgAdmin to access and create database.
But I found out that there is no file in my D:\dockerData\postgres9.6. I exec bash into the container, there is at least 20+ files inside /var/lib/postgresql/data.
Anyone can point out which part goes wrong?
It depends what kind of Docker you are using on Windows:
Docker Toolbox with VirtualBox: only C:\Users\mylogin is shared by default. D:\ is not mounted.
Docker for Windows with HyperV: only C:\ is mounted by default. Make sure D:\ is a shared drive: see image