I sent a get request to below url (I replaced my company's real domain name with xxx here)
http://lyncdiscover.xxx.com/?sipuri=abc#xxx.com
instead of getting this format according to many blog.
{
"_links":{
"self":{
"href":"https://lyncweb.sipdomain.co.uk/Autodiscover/AutodiscoverService.svc/root?originalDomain=sipdomain.co.uk"
},
"user":{
"href":"https://lyncweb.sipdomain.co.uk/Autodiscover/AutodiscoverService.svc/root/oauth/user?originalDomain=sipdomain.co.uk"
},
"xframe":{
"href":"https://lyncweb.sipdomain.co.uk/Autodiscover/XFrame/XFrame.html"
}
}
}
I got this format returned back without xframe (I replaced the domain with xxx):
{
"AccessLocation": "External",
"Root": {
"Links": [
{
"href": "https://lswebservice.xxx.com/Autodiscover/AutodiscoverService.svc/root/domain",
"token": "Domain"
},
{
"href": "https://lswebservice.xxx.com/Autodiscover/AutodiscoverService.svc/root/user",
"token": "User"
}
]
}
}
what do I miss here?
You will want to update your Lync Server 2013 environment - Updates for Lync Server 2013. UCWA went live with Lync Server 2013 (CU1) and what you initially hit is the Autodiscovery service which was updated in CU1 to return the format you are expecting above.
The information was contained on the last paragraph on ITAdmin-Configuration documentation.
Related
I'm experiencing a MashupValueException while creating a Web Table Linked Service and I wonder if someone here have come across the same issue.
The config of the Linked Service is as follows:
{
"name": "WikipediaLS",
"properties": {
"annotations": [],
"type": "Web",
"typeProperties": {
"url": "https://www.the-numbers.com/",
"authenticationType": "Anonymous"
},
"connectVia": {
"referenceName": "MySelfHostedIR",
"type": "IntegrationRuntimeReference"
}
}
}
The error happens after filling the info on the form and clicking on "Test Connection". Then the following error pops up:
Connection failed
'Type=Microsoft.Data.Mashup.MashupValueException,Message=The supplied URL must be a valid 'http:' or 'https:' URL.,Source=Microsoft.Data.Mashup.ProviderCommon,' Activity ID: c8d924b9-cc81-49c1-85c8-70abfa85c859.
I have tested the extraction of the web table using Office 2016 and it works all right.
The aim is to extract the index 0 table from "https://www.the-numbers.com/movie/budgets/all".
This is what you are facing:
You can try to use below url, it can connect to the web successfully on my side:
https://www.the-numbers.com/movie/budgets/all
The website you give seems not stable. Sometimes you cannot visit the database.
When I invoke the skill with 'okay Google, ask {skillname} to {utterance}' I get the response 'The agent returned an empty tts" and the conversation closes. It doesn't even seem to hit my backend - I've tried hosting the backend code on both a local server and on AWS and the same issue happens in both cases. There's no log of the request being made either on Stackdriver on Google or on CloudWatch on AWS. The only response I get is the following in the debug tab:
{
"response": "The agent returned an empty TTS.",
"expectUserResponse": false,
"conversationToken": "EosDS2o4d0...",
"audioResponse": "",
"ssmlMarkList": [],
"debugInfo": {
"sharedDebugInfoList": [
{
"name": "Response Validation",
"debugInfo": "The agent returned an empty TTS.",
"subDebugEntryList": []
}
],
"conversationBuilderExecutionEventsList": []
},
"visualResponse": {
"visualElementsList": [
{
"displayText": {
"content": "The agent returned an empty TTS."
}
}
],
"suggestionsList": [],
"agentLogoUrl": ""
},
"clientError": 0,
"is3pResponse": true,
"clientOperationList": [],
"projectName": "",
"renderedHtml": ""
}
Nothing in any of the other tabs. When I try invoking the phrases in the same way on my phone, I just see a loading symbol and again nothing in the logs to say it's even hitting the backend.
Weirdly, this doesn't happen when I say 'okay Google, talk to {skillname} {utterance}' - this works absolutely fine.
All the intents work perfectly well when I've opened my action first, and then invoke them. I've built this using Jovo and published on Alexa also and the problem is only happening on Google.
In this link there is a quiz when you click on Start Now:
https://www.clinique.com/diagnostics
After the quiz finished, it posts data to a link and immediately redirects to another page with quiz results.
How to find out what data have been posted to the page and is there a way to simulate the final results with the Postman?
Looks like what you're looking for is the Postman Interceptor feature. It allows you to capture and inspect all the requests made from the browser/system you configure it to proxy to.
Then, once your request was captured, and after a bit of filtering (it'll capture every single request made to the server, not only the POST you're interested into) You will be able to replicate it with the Postman client like you'll do with a regular request. e.g. with the quiz you posted:
You'll find the data posted being sent as x-www-form-urlencoded (what a mess!) on a JSON key with the value:
{
"ProfileName":"04-NA-USA ELC Online 4.05.2017",
"QuizVersion":6,
"QuizAnswers":[
{
"attributeName":"welcome",
"attributeRecapValuesLocalized":"mens_concerns",
"recapColumn":1
},
{
"attributeName":"mens_concerns",
"attributeRecapValuesLocalized":"Eye Area",
"recapColumn":0
},
{
"attributeName":"mens_age",
"attributeRecapValuesLocalized":"50 - 59",
"recapColumn":1
},
{
"attributeName":"mens_eye_area_where",
"attributeRecapValuesLocalized":"Lines/Wrinkles",
"recapColumn":0
},
{
"attributeName":"mens_skintype",
"attributeRecapValuesLocalized":"oily-shiny,tight-uncomfortable",
"recapColumn":0
},
{
"attributeName":"mens_sensitivity_frequency",
"attributeRecapValuesLocalized":"Rarely",
"recapColumn":1
},
{
"attributeName":"mens_sensitivity_redness",
"attributeRecapValuesLocalized":"No",
"recapColumn":1
},
{
"attributeName":"recap",
"attributeRecapValuesLocalized":"",
"recapColumn":1
}
],
"SkinType":"2",
"SKUs":[
{
"Eye Area":[
"7YXH-01",
"7ELF-01",
"6TCR-01"
]
},
{
"Daily Care":[
"ZE4L-01",
"ZF7E-01",
"65EM-01",
"Z219-01",
"Z5WW-01"
]
}
],
"UPCs":[
{
"Eye Area":[
"020714632670",
"020714506827",
"020714382742"
]
},
{
"Daily Care":[
"020714734510",
"020714744762",
"020714104726",
"020714649562",
"020714682255"
]
}
],
"Concerns#1":"Eye Area",
"Concerns#2":"Daily Care",
"UsageOrderSKUs":[
"ZE4L-01",
"ZF7E-01",
"65EM-01",
"7YXH-01",
"Z219-01",
"Z5WW-01",
"7ELF-01",
"6TCR-01"
],
"UsageOrderUPCs":[
"020714734510",
"020714744762",
"020714104726",
"020714632670",
"020714649562",
"020714682255",
"020714506827",
"020714382742"
]
}
Using PowerShell, how can I query Team Foundation Server 2017 Update 2 (on-premises) to get the code coverage percentage metric from the latest completed gated check-in?
I've not found a clear API call to use in the MS reference documentation. In the web interface, I can see in the dashboard for a given completed build the percentage value and a link to download the entire Visual Studio coverage file. I don't want the file, though. I just want to make an API call and get the percent coverage value for the last successful build of a given definition.
Unfortunately, the docs for VSTS's REST API are down right now, but this should get you started (pulled from Google's Cache).
This endpoint handles everything related to Tests and Code Coverage.
https://{instance}/DefaultCollection/{project}/_apis/test/codeCoverage?api-version={version}[&buildId={int}&flags={int}]
Provide values for the following and then run this Invoke-RestMethod to get the data back.
$Instance = 'fabrikam-fiber-inc.visualstudio.com' #your URL here
$ProjectName = #YourProjectNameHere
$buildID = #YourBuildIDHere
$version = '2.0-preview'
Invoke-RestMethod -uri https://$Instance/DefaultCollection/$ProjectName/_apis/test/codeCoverage?api-version=$version
Here's a sample response you can get back:
Status code: 200
{
"value": [
{
"configuration": {
"id": 51,
"flavor": "Debug",
"platform": "Any CPU",
"uri": "vstfs:///Build/Build/363",
"project": {}
},
"state": "0",
"lastError": "",
"modules": [
{
"blockCount": 2,
"blockData": "Aw==",
"name": "fabrikamunittests.dll",
"signature": "c27c5315-b4ec-3748-9751-2a20280c37d5",
"signatureAge": 1,
"statistics": {
"blocksCovered": 2,
"linesCovered": 4
},
"functions": []
}
],
"codeCoverageFileUrl": "..."
}
],
"count": 1
}
It looks like blocksCovered and livesCovered are probably the closest you'll get from the API. Let me know if you need some help or get stuck. Eventually, the docs will be back online at this URL.
I would like to know the name of the user, however I cannot use the nodejs sdk since I use another language.
How can I ask for permission?
I would prefer a way with the normal json responses.
I hacked this minimal script to get the JSON reponse which the nodejs sdk would return:
gaction.js:
const DialogflowApp = require('actions-on-google').DialogflowApp;
const app = new DialogflowApp({
request: {
body: {
result: {
action: 'Test',
contexts: []
}
},
get: (h) => h
},
response: {
append: (h, v) => console.log(`${h}: ${v}`),
status: (code) => {
return {send: (resp) => console.log(JSON.stringify(resp, null, 2))}
}
}
});
function testCode(app) {
app.askForPermission('To locate you', app.SupportedPermissions.DEVICE_PRECISE_LOCATION);
}
app.handleRequest(new Map().set('Test', testCode));
I'm still no node.js expert so this might be not an optimal solution. When you have installed node and run the command npm install actions-on-google, this will install the necessary dependencies.
When done you just need to run node gaction which will create this output:
Google-Assistant-API-Version: Google-Assistant-API-Version
Content-Type: application/json
{
"speech": "PLACEHOLDER_FOR_PERMISSION",
"contextOut": [
{
"name": "_actions_on_google_",
"lifespan": 100,
"parameters": {}
}
],
"data": {
"google": {
"expect_user_response": true,
"no_input_prompts": [],
"is_ssml": false,
"system_intent": {
"intent": "assistant.intent.action.PERMISSION",
"spec": {
"permission_value_spec": {
"opt_context": "To locate you",
"permissions": [
"DEVICE_PRECISE_LOCATION"
]
}
}
}
}
}
}
If you send now the JSON above you will be asked from Google Home. Have fun!
The request/response JSON formats for the API.AI webhooks with Actions is documented at https://developers.google.com/actions/apiai/webhook
As you've discovered, the data.google.permissions_request attribute contains two fields regarding the request:
opt_context contains a string which is read to give some context about why you're asking for the information.
permissions is an array of strings specifying what information you're requesting. The strings can have the values
NAME
DEVICE_COARSE_LOCATION
DEVICE_PRECISE_LOCATION
If you are using Java or Kotlin there is an Unofficial SDK. It matches the official SDK api nearly exactly.
https://github.com/TicketmasterMobileStudio/actions-on-google-kotlin