Player controlled node ignoring collisions - sprite-kit

I have a SKShapeNode controlled by the player. I want to keep this node inside a parent node. So I created edges and I use SKPhysicsBody and collision bit mask to prevent my node from moving outside its parent.
When I try to move the node by updating its position each frame, it just ignores the edges. Here is the function used :
func move(direction: MoveDirection, withTimeInterval timeInterval: TimeInterval) {
var x, y: CGFloat
switch direction {
case .North:
x = 0
y = movementSpeed * CGFloat(timeInterval)
case .South:
x = 0
y = -movementSpeed * CGFloat(timeInterval)
case .East:
x = movementSpeed * CGFloat(timeInterval)
y = 0
case .West:
x = -movementSpeed * CGFloat(timeInterval)
y = 0
}
let sprite = spriteComponent.sprite
sprite.position = CGPoint(x: sprite.position.x + x, y: sprite.position.y + y)
}
The moving works great but the node can go everywhere and just doesn't care about the edges (I turned skView.showPhysics on so I can see them).
But, if I replace the line :
sprite.position = CGPoint(x: sprite.position.x + x, y: sprite.position.y + y)
by :
sprite.physicsBody?.applyForce(CGVector(dx: x, dy: y))
collisions work just fine.
It feels like we have to move objects using physics if we want them to collide. But I didn't see anything about this restriction in Apple's doc. So is this behavior expected? Or did I miss something?
Bonus point :
In the TaskBot game provided by Apple, the player's position is (or seems) changed by setting node.position (the code is a bit...complicated, so not really sure). If someone can give me a hint?
Thank you!

If you move an SKSpriteNode manually, there will be no collisions because you are overriding the physics engine by saying "Put this node there no matter what".
If you want the physics engine to reliably generate collisions, then you'll need to use only the physics engine to move your objects via forces or impulses.
If you manually move a node into a position where it generates a collision, the the physics engine will attempt to move it away, but if you carry on trying to move the node, results will be unpredictable.

Related

How to randomly spawn enemies on my screen

Here is my code for enemy spawn:
let randomNumber = arc4random_uniform(2)
let x: CGFloat = randomNumber == 0 ? 1 : -1
enemy.position = CGPoint(x: (CGFloat(arc4random_uniform(UInt32(UIScreen.main.bounds.width))) * x), y: UIScreen.main.bounds.height)
It works but some of my enemies are spawning outside of my screen. What can I change to make them all spawn inside the border?
honestly haven't the foggiest clue what this is, but it seems like something is being multiplied by x, which would put it outside of its bounds, maybe not all, but if they happen to spawn at a particularly large (or negative) number.

Gravity value in SpriteKit game scene

I'm trying to create a game using Apple's SpriteKit game engine.
While implementing some physics-based calculations in the game, I noticed that the calculated results differ from what effectively then happens to objects.
Example: calculating a body's trajectory through projectile motion's equations causes the body to actually fall down much sooner/quicker than what calculated.
How can I make the physics engine match the real-world physics laws when calculating something gravity-related?
I think I know what's going on with the sample code you have supplied on GitHub, which I'll reproduce here as questions on SO should contain the code:
//
// GameScene.swift
// SpriteKitGravitySample
//
// Created by Emilio Schepis on 17/01/2020.
// Copyright © 2020 Emilio Schepis. All rights reserved.
//
import SpriteKit
import GameplayKit
class GameScene: SKScene {
private var subject: SKNode!
override func didMove(to view: SKView) {
super.didMove(to: view)
// World setup (no friction, default gravity)
// Note that this would work with any gravity set to the scene.
physicsBody = SKPhysicsBody(edgeLoopFrom: frame)
physicsBody?.friction = 0
subject = SKShapeNode(circleOfRadius: 10)
subject.position = CGPoint(x: frame.midX, y: 30)
subject.physicsBody = SKPhysicsBody(circleOfRadius: 10)
subject.physicsBody?.allowsRotation = false
// Free falling body (no damping)
subject.physicsBody?.linearDamping = 0
subject.physicsBody?.angularDamping = 0
addChild(subject)
// Set an arbitrary velocity to the body
subject.physicsBody?.velocity = CGVector(dx: 30, dy: 700)
// Inaccurate prediction of position over time
for time in stride(from: CGFloat(0), to: 1, by: 0.01) {
let inaccuratePosition = SKShapeNode(circleOfRadius: 2)
inaccuratePosition.strokeColor = .red
// These lines use the projectile motion equations as-is.
// https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projectile_motion#Displacement
let v = subject.physicsBody?.velocity ?? .zero
let x = v.dx * time
let y = v.dy * time + 0.5 * physicsWorld.gravity.dy * pow(time, 2)
inaccuratePosition.position = CGPoint(x: x + subject.position.x,
y: y + subject.position.y)
addChild(inaccuratePosition)
}
// Actual prediction of position over time
for time in stride(from: CGFloat(0), to: 1, by: 0.01) {
let accuratePosition = SKShapeNode(circleOfRadius: 2)
accuratePosition.strokeColor = .green
// These lines use the projectile motion equations
// as if the gravity was 150 times stronger.
// The subject follows this curve perfectly.
let v = subject.physicsBody?.velocity ?? .zero
let x = v.dx * time
let y = v.dy * time + 0.5 * physicsWorld.gravity.dy * 150 * pow(time, 2)
accuratePosition.position = CGPoint(x: x + subject.position.x,
y: y + subject.position.y)
addChild(accuratePosition)
}
}
}
What you've done is to:
Created an object called subject with a physicsBody and placed it
on screen with a initial velocity.
Plotted predicted positions for an object with that velocity under
gravity via the inaccuratePosition node, using Newton's laws of
motion (v = ut + 1/2at²)
Plotted predicted positions for an object with that velocity under
gravity * 150 via the accuratePosition node, using Newton's laws of
motion
All this is is didMoveTo. When the simulation runs, the path of the node subject follows the accuratePosition path accurately.
I think what's happening is that you are calculating the predicted position using subject's physicsBody's velocity, which is in m/s, but the position is in points, so what you should do is convert m/s into point/s first.
So what's the scale factor? Well from Apple's documentation here; it's.... 150 which is too much of a coincidence 😀, so I think that's the problem.
Bear in mind that you set the vertical velocity of your object to 700m/s - that's 1500mph or 105000 SK point/s. You'd expect it to simply disappear out through the top of the screen at high speed, as predicted by your red path. The screen is somewhere between 1,000 and 2,000 points.
Edit - I created a sample project to demonstrate the calculated paths with and without the multiplier.
https://github.com/emilioschepis/spritekit-gravity-sample
TL;DR - When calculating something gravity-related in SpriteKit multiply the gravity of the scene by 151 to obtain an accurate result.
When trying to solve this issue I first started reading the SpriteKit documentation related to gravity:
https://developer.apple.com/documentation/spritekit/skphysicsworld/1449623-gravity
The documentation says:
The components of this property are measured in meters per second. The default value is (0.0,-9.8), which represent’s Earth’s gravity.
Gravity, however is calculated in m/s^2 and not in m/s.
Thinking that was an error in the implementation of gravity in SpriteKit I began thinking that maybe real-world-based physics laws could not be applied in the scene.
I did, however, come across another documentation page about the linear gravity field that correctly reported that gravity is measured in m/s^2 in SpriteKit.
https://developer.apple.com/documentation/spritekit/skfieldnode/1520145-lineargravityfield
I then setup a simple free falling scene where I applied an initial velocity to a physics body and then calculated the expected trajectory, while comparing it to the actual trajectory.
The x-axis calculations were accurate from the start, suggesting that the only problem was with the gravity's value.
I then tried manually modified the gravity in the scene until the actual trajectory matched the predicted one.
What I found is that there is a "magic" value of ~151 that has to be factored in when using the physics world's gravity property in the game.
Modifying, for example, the y-axis calculations for the trajectory from
let dy = velocity.dy * time + 0.5 * gravity * pow(time, 2)
to
let dy = velocity.dy * time + 0.5 * 151 * gravity * pow(time, 2)
resulted in accurate calculations.
I hope this is useful to anyone who might encounter the same problem in the future.

Placing "SCNNode" at a given position and facing "SCNCamera" with offset around Y-axis

So,
I have the exact position I want to place the node at. If I test things with a sphere geometry I can place spheres in the world by telling the node:
node.simdPosition = position
(I provide the "position" as an input to the function).
That successfully places the object in the world exactly where I want it to go.
What I really want to do is placing a plane:
let plane = SCNPlane(width: 0.2, height: 0.3)
plane.cornerRadius = plane.width / 10
plane.firstMaterial?.diffuse.contents = UIColor.red
plane.firstMaterial?.specular.contents = UIColor.white
let node = SCNNode(geometry: plane)
Then telling it to be placed at the "position":
node.simdPosition = position
All this works with the plane as well. What I have problems with is the angle:
I want to tell the plane's node to be placed with a given "angle" (around Y) offset to the camera. I tried this but it's not working:
node.rotation = SCNVector4Make(0, 1, 0, currentFrame.camera.eulerAngles.z - angle)
So then, the question is, how can a node be placed at a certain position and at the moment it gets placed in the world, also have a certain Y angle offset from the perpendicular to the camera?
I was using the wrong Euler angle... (z)
This made it work:
node.eulerAngles = SCNVector3Make(0, cameraEulerAngles.y - Float(0.7), 0)

How to move a rotated SCNNode in SceneKit, on its "own" axis?

The image below shows a rotated box that should be moved horizontally on the X and Z axes. Y should stay unaffected to simplify the scenario. The box could also be the SCNNode of the camera, so I guess a projection does not make sense at this point.
So lets say we want to move the box in the direction of the red arrow. How to achieve this using SceneKit?
The red arrow indicates -Z direction of the box. It also shows us it is not parallel to the camera's projection or to the global axes that are shown as dark grey lines of the grid.
My last approach is the product of a translation matrix and a rotation matrix that results in a new transformation matrix. Do I have to add the current transform to the new transform then?
If yes, where is the SceneKit function for the addition of matrices like SCNMatrix4Mult for multiplication or do I have to write it myself using Metal?
If no, what I'm missing out with the matrix calculations?
I don't want to make use of GLKit.
So my understanding is that you want to move the Box Node along its own X axis (not it's parents X axis). And because the Box Node is rotated, its X axis is not aligned with its parent's one, so you have the problem to convert the translation between the two coordinate systems.
The node hierarchy is
parentNode
|
|----boxNode // rotated around Y (vertical) axis
Using Transformation Matrices
To move boxNode along its own X axis
// First let's get the current boxNode transformation matrix
SCNMatrix4 boxTransform = boxNode.transform;
// Let's make a new matrix for translation +2 along X axis
SCNMatrix4 xTranslation = SCNMatrix4MakeTranslation(2, 0, 0);
// Combine the two matrices, THE ORDER MATTERS !
// if you swap the parameters you will move it in parent's coord system
SCNMatrix4 newTransform = SCNMatrix4Mult(xTranslation, boxTransform);
// Allply the newly generated transform
boxNode.transform = newTransform;
Please Note: The order matters when multiplying matrices
Another option:
Using SCNNode coordinate conversion functions, looks more straight forward to me
// Get the boxNode current position in parent's coord system
SCNVector3 positionInParent = boxNode.position;
// Convert that coordinate to boxNode's own coord system
SCNVector3 positionInSelf = [boxNode convertPosition:positionInParent fromNode:parentNode];
// Translate along own X axis by +2 points
positionInSelf = SCNVector3Make(positionInSelf.x + 2,
positionInSelf.y,
positionInSelf.z);
// Convert that back to parent's coord system
positionInParent = [parentNode convertPosition: positionInSelf fromNode:boxNode];
// Apply the new position
boxNode.position = positionInParent;
Building on #Sulevus's correct answer, here's an extension to SCNNode that simplifies things by using the convertVector rather than the convertPosition transformation, in Swift.
I've done it as a var returning a unit vector, and supplied an SCNVector3 overload of multiply so you can say things like
let action = SCNAction.move(by: 2 * cameraNode.leftUnitVectorInParent, duration: 1)
public extension SCNNode {
var leftUnitVectorInParent: SCNVector3 {
let vectorInSelf = SCNVector3(x: 1, y: 0, z: 0)
guard let parent = self.parent else { return vectorInSelf }
// Convert to parent's coord system
return parent.convertVector(vectorInSelf, from: self)
}
var forwardUnitVectorInParent: SCNVector3 {
let vectorInSelf = SCNVector3(x: 0, y: 0, z: 1)
guard let parent = self.parent else { return vectorInSelf }
// Convert to parent's coord system
return parent.convertVector(vectorInSelf, from: self)
}
func *(lhs: SCNVector3, rhs: CGFloat) -> SCNVector3 {
return SCNVector3(x: lhs.x * rhs, y: lhs.y * rhs, z: lhs.z * rhs)
}
func *(lhs: CGFloat, rhs: SCNVector3) -> SCNVector3 {
return SCNVector3(x: lhs * rhs.x, y: lhs * rhs.y, z: lhs * rhs.z)
}
}
The far easier way this is usually done:
The usual, normal, and extremely easy way to do this in any game engine or 3D engine is:
You simply have a wrapper node, which, holds the node in question.
This is indeed the entire point of transforms, they enable you to abstract out a certain motion.
That's the whole point of 3D engines - the GPU just multiplies out all the quaternions on the way down to the object; it's wholly pointless to (A) figure out in your head the math and (B) do it manually (indeed in the CPU).
In Unity it's "game objects", in scene kit it's "nodes" and so on.
In all 3D engines, including scene kit, almost everything has one or more "holders" around it.
To repeat, the reasons for this are (A) it's the entire raison d'etre of a game engine, to achieve performance in multiplying out the quaternions of every vertex and (B) sheer convenience and code solidity.
One of a million examples ...
Of course you can trivially do it in code,
cameraHolder.addChildNode(camera)
In the OP's example. It looks like you would use cameraHolder only to rotate the camera. And then for the motion the OP is asking about, simply move camera.
It's perfectly normal to have a chain of a number of nodes to get to an object.
This is often used for "effects". Say you have an object, which sometimes has to "vibrate up and down". You can have one node which only does that movement. Note that then, all the animations etc for that movement only have to be on that node. And critically, they can run independently of any other animations or movements. (And indeed you can just use the node elsewhere to jiggle something else.)

Swift 3 (SpriteKit): Locking the x axis of a SKSpriteNode and its physicsBody

I really need to know how to lock the x axis of an SKSpriteNode and its physicsBody. I need to keep the SKSpriteNode dynamic and affectedByGravity. The node is on a slope, so this is why it's x axis is moved due to gravity. However, I don't want the x axis of this SKSpriteNode to move due to gravity. Is there a way to lock the x axis in order to achieve this?
Thanks for any help :D
Edit: I have tried to apply a constraint to the x value like this:
let xConstraint = SKConstraint.positionX(SKRange(constantValue: 195))
node.constraints?.append(xConstraint)
However this doesn't work and I'm not sure why and how to fix it. Anyone know of a solution?
Edit 2: SKPhysicsJointPin is actually looking more promising. In the comments of the first response/answer to this question, I have been trying to figure how to properly use it in my situation.
An example of my code:
let node = SKSpriteNode(imageNamed: "node")
enum collisionType: UInt32 {
case node = 1
case ground = 2
case other = 4 //the other node is unrelated to the ground and node
}
class GameScene: SKScene, SKPhysicsContactDelegate {
override func didMove(to view: SKView) {
//Setup node physicsBody
node.physicsBody = SKPhysicsBody(rectangleOf: node.size)
node.physicsBody?.categoryBitMask = collisionType.node.rawValue
node.physicsBody?.collisionBitMask = //[other node that isn't the ground or the node]
node.physicsBody?.contactTestBitMask = //[other node that isn't the ground or the node]
node.physicsBody?.isDynamic = true
node.physicsBody?.affectedByGravity = true
addChild(node)
//Physics Setup
physicsWorld.contactDelegate = self
}
The node is on top of the ground, and the ground is composed of various SKSpriteNode lines that have a volumeBased physicsBody. The ground keeps adding new lines at the front, and removing the ones at the back, and changing the x value of each line by a negative (so the ground appears to moving - this process is performed in an SKAction). These lines (the parts of the ground) are on an angle which is why the node's x axis moves. I want the node to always be at the front of the ground (e.g. always on top of the newly created line). Currently, setting the position of the node like this locks the x axis (solving my issue):
override func didSimulatePhysics() {
//Manage node position
node.position.x = 195
node.position.y = CGFloat([yPosition of the first line of the ground - the yPosition keeps changing])
}
Note: ^This^ function is inside the GameScene class
The x axis actually stays the same like this. However, the issue is that now the physicsBody of the node is lower than the centre of the node (which didn't happen before).
A node's constraints property is nil by default. You'll need to create an array of one or more constraints and assign it to the property. For example
let xConstraint = SKConstraint.positionX(SKRange(constantValue: 195))
node.constraints = [xConstraint]
Update
You may want to use a camera node instead of moving the ground in the scene. With a camera node, you move the main character and the camera instead of the ground.
I think you could set the linearDamping property to 0.0
The linearDamping is a property that reduces the body’s linear velocity.
This property is used to simulate fluid or air friction forces on the
body. The property must be a value between 0.0 and 1.0. The default
value is 0.1. If the value is 0.0, no linear damping is applied to the
object.
You should pay attention also to the other forces applied to your SKSpriteNode. The gravitational force applied by the physics world for example where dx value, as you request , should be setted to 0.0:
CGVector(dx:0.0, dy:-4.9)
Remember also that when you apply other forces vectors like velocity you should maintain the dx property to 0.0 as constant if you want to block the x axis.
You could find more details to the official docs
Update (after your details to the comments below):
You could also anchored your sprite to the ground with an SKPhysicsJoint (I don't know your project so this is only for example):
var myJoint = SKPhysicsJointPin.joint(withBodyA: yourSprite.physicsBody!, bodyB: yourGround.physicsBody!, anchor: CGPoint(x: yourSprite.frame.minX, y: yourGround.frame.minY))
self.physicsWorld.add(myJoint)
You can work with the anchor property to create a good joint as you wish or adding more joints.