I have a problem using the MATLAB DAE-solvers.
I'm trying to simulate the behaviour of a mechanical system using lagrangien mechanics. To do so, I followed the following tutorial to use MATLAB'sDAE-solvers.
But when I ran my code, I got the following error message:
Warning: Failure at t=5.076437e-01. Unable to meet integration tolerances without reducing the step size below the smallest value allowed
(1.803513e-15) at time t.
In ode15i (line 406)
Trying to find my mistake, I literally copied the code from the tutorial and ran it. The code is as follows:
syms l g m real
syms x(t) y(t) T(t)
eqns = [(m*diff(x(t),2) - T(t)/l*x(t)),
(m*diff(y(t),2) - T(t)/l*y(t) + m*g),
(x(t)^2 + y(t)^2 - l^2) ];
vars = [x(t); y(t); T(t)];
[eqns, vars] = reduceDifferentialOrder(eqns, vars);
if(~isLowIndexDAE(eqns, vars))
[DAEs, DAEvars] = reduceDAEIndex(eqns, vars);
[DAEs, DAEvars] = reduceRedundancies(DAEs, DAEvars);
end
%change to function, set parameters
f = daeFunction(DAEs, DAEvars, m, l, g);
m = 1.0;
r = 1.0;
g = 9.81;
F = #(t, Y, YP) f(t, Y, YP, m, r, g);
%get initial conditions
y0est = [0.5*r; -0.8*r; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0];
yp0est = zeros(7,1);
opt = odeset('RelTol', 10.0^(-7), 'AbsTol' , 10.0^(-7));
[y0, yp0] = decic(F, 0, y0est, [], yp0est, [], opt);
%simulate
[t,y] = ode15i(F, [0, 5], y0, yp0, opt);
Related
I am not very used to MATLAB and I'm trying to solve the following problem using MATLAB ode45, however, it's not working.
I was working on a problem in reaction engineering, using a Semi-Batch Reactor.
The reaction is given by
A + B ---> C + D
A is placed in the reactor and B is being continuously added into the reactor with a flowrate of v0 = 0.05 L/s. Initial volume is V0 = 5 L. The reaction is elementary. The reaction constant is k = 2.2 L/mol.s.
Initial Concentrations: for A: 0.05 M, for B: 0.025 M.
Performing a mole balance of each species in the reactor, I got the following 4 ODEs, and the expression of V (volume of the reactor is constantly increasing)
Solving this system and plotting the solution against time, I should get this
Note that plots of C(C) and C(D) are the same.
And let's set tau = v0/V.
Now for the MATLAB code part.
I have searched extensively online, and from what I've learned, I came up with the following code.
First, I wrote the code for the ODE system
function f = ODEsystem(t, y, tau, ra, y0)
f = zeros(4, 1);
f(1) = ra - tau*y(1);
f(2) = ra + tau*(y0(2) - y(2));
f(3) = -ra - tau*y(3);
f(4) = -ra - tau*y(4);
end
Then, in the command window,
t = [0:0.01:5];
v0 = 0.05;
V0 = 5;
k = 2.2;
V = V0 + v0*t;
tau = v0./V;
syms y(t);
ra = -k*y(1)*y(2);
y0 = [0.05 0.025 0 0];
[t, y] = ode45(#ODEsystem(t, y, tau, ra, y0), t, y0);
plot(t, y);
However, I get this...
Please if anyone could help me fix my code. This is really annoying :)
ra should not be passed as parameter but be computed inside the ODE system. V is likewise not a constant. Symbolic expressions should be used for formula transformations, not for numerical methods. One would also have to explicitly evaluate the symbolic expression at the wanted numerical values.
function f = ODEsystem(t, y, k, v0, V0, cB0)
f = zeros(4, 1);
ra = -k*y(1)*y(2);
tau = v0/(V0+t*v0);
f(1) = ra - tau*y(1);
f(2) = ra + tau*(cB0 - y(2));
f(3) = -ra - tau*y(3);
f(4) = -ra - tau*y(4);
end
Then use the time span of the graphic, start with all concentrations zero except for A, use the concentration B only for the inflow.
t = [0:1:500];
v0 = 0.05;
V0 = 5;
k = 2.2;
cB0 = 0.025;
y0 = [0.05 0 0 0];
[t, y] = ode45(#(t,y) ODEsystem(t, y, k, v0, V0, cB0), t, y0);
plot(t, y);
and get a good reproduction of the reference image
Basically I would like to use the fsolve command in order to find the roots of an equation.
I think I should create a function handle that evaluates this equation in the form "right hand side - left hand side =0", but I've been struggling to make this work. Does anyone know how to do this?
The equation itself is 1/sqrt(f) = -1.74log((1.254/((1.27310^8)sqrt(f)))+((110^-3)/3.708)). So I would like to find the point of intersection of the left and right side by solving for 1/sqrt(f)+(1.74log((1.254/((1.27310^8)sqrt(f)))+((110^-3)/3.708))) = 0 using fsolve.
Thanks a lot!
The code so far (not working at all)
f = #(x) friction(x,rho,mu,e,D,Q, tol, maxIter) ;
xguess = [0, 1];
sol = fsolve(x, xguess ) ;
function y = friction(x,rho,mu,e,D,Q, tol, maxIter)
D = 0.1;
L = 100
rho = 1000;
mu = 0.001;
e = 0.0001;
Q = 0.01;
U = (4*Q)/(pi*D^2);
Re = (rho*U*D)/mu ;
y = (1/sqrt(x))-(-1.74*log((1.254/(Re*sqrt(x)))+((e/D)/3.708)))
end
Error message:
Error using lsqfcnchk (line 80)
FUN must be a function, a valid character vector expression, or an inline function object.
Error in fsolve (line 238)
funfcn = lsqfcnchk(FUN,'fsolve',length(varargin),funValCheck,gradflag);
Error in Untitled (line 6)
sol = fsolve(x, xguess ) ;
opt = optimset('Display', 'Iter');
sol = fsolve(#(x) friction(x), 1, opt);
function y = friction(x)
D = 0.1;
L = 100; % note -- unused
rho = 1000;
mu = 0.001;
e = 0.0001;
Q = 0.01;
U = (4*Q)/(pi*D^2);
Re = (rho*U*D)/mu ;
y = (1/sqrt(x))-(-1.74*log((1.254/(Re*sqrt(x)))+((e/D)/3.708)));
end
sol = 0.0054
the first argument of fsolve should be the function not variable. Replace:
sol = fsolve(x, xguess );
with
sol = fsolve(f, xguess );
And define Rho, mu, e etc before you define f (not inside the friction function).
I'm having some issues getting my RK2 algorithm to work for a certain second-order linear differential equation. I have posted my current code (with the provided parameters) below. For some reason, the value of y1 deviates from the true value by a wider margin each iteration. Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Code:
f = #(x,y1,y2) [y2; (1+y2)/x];
a = 1;
b = 2;
alpha = 0;
beta = 1;
n = 21;
h = (b-a)/(n-1);
yexact = #(x) 2*log(x)/log(2) - x +1;
ye = yexact((a:h:b)');
s = (beta - alpha)/(b - a);
y0 = [alpha;s];
[y1, y2] = RungeKuttaTwo2D(f, a, b, h, y0);
error = abs(ye - y1);
function [y1, y2] = RungeKuttaTwo2D(f, a, b, h, y0)
n = floor((b-a)/h);
y1 = zeros(n+1,1); y2 = y1;
y1(1) = y0(1); y2(1) = y0(2);
for i=1:n-1
ti = a+(i-1)*h;
fvalue1 = f(ti,y1(i),y2(i));
k1 = h*fvalue1;
fvalue2 = f(ti+h/2,y1(i)+k1(1)/2,y2(i)+k1(2)/2);
k2 = h*fvalue2;
y1(i+1) = y1(i) + k2(1);
y2(i+1) = y2(i) + k2(2);
end
end
Your exact solution is wrong. It is possible that your differential equation is missing a minus sign.
y2'=(1+y2)/x has as its solution y2(x)=C*x-1 and as y1'=y2 then y1(x)=0.5*C*x^2-x+D.
If the sign in the y2 equation were flipped, y2'=-(1+y2)/x, one would get y2(x)=C/x-1 with integral y1(x)=C*log(x)-x+D, which contains the given exact solution.
0=y1(1) = -1+D ==> D=1
1=y1(2) = C*log(2)-1 == C=1/log(2)
Additionally, the arrays in the integration loop have length n+1, so that the loop has to be from i=1 to n. Else the last element remains zero, which gives wrong residuals for the second boundary condition.
Correcting that and enlarging the computation to one secant step finds the correct solution for the discretization, as the ODE is linear. The error to the exact solution is bounded by 0.000285, which is reasonable for a second order method with step size 0.05.
Introduction
I am using Matlab to simulate some dynamic systems through numerically solving systems of Second Order Ordinary Differential Equations using ODE45. I found a great tutorial from Mathworks (link for tutorial at end) on how to do this.
In the tutorial the system of equations is explicit in x and y as shown below:
x''=-D(y) * x' * sqrt(x'^2 + y'^2)
y''=-D(y) * y' * sqrt(x'^2 + y'^2) + g(y)
Both equations above have form y'' = f(x, x', y, y')
Question
However, I am coming across systems of equations where the variables can not be solved for explicitly as shown in the example. For example one of the systems has the following set of 3 second order ordinary differential equations:
y double prime equation
y'' - .5*L*(x''*sin(x) + x'^2*cos(x) + (k/m)*y - g = 0
x double prime equation
.33*L^2*x'' - .5*L*y''sin(x) - .33*L^2*C*cos(x) + .5*g*L*sin(x) = 0
A single prime is first derivative
A double prime is second derivative
L, g, m, k, and C are given parameters.
How can Matlab be used to numerically solve a set of second order ordinary differential equations where second order can not be explicitly solved for?
Thanks!
Your second system has the form
a11*x'' + a12*y'' = f1(x,y,x',y')
a21*x'' + a22*y'' = f2(x,y,x',y')
which you can solve as a linear system
[x'', y''] = A\f
or in this case explicitly using Cramer's rule
x'' = ( a22*f1 - a12*f2 ) / (a11*a22 - a12*a21)
y'' accordingly.
I would strongly recommend leaving the intermediate variables in the code to reduce chances for typing errors and avoid multiple computation of the same expressions.
Code could look like this (untested)
function dz = odefunc(t,z)
x=z(1); dx=z(2); y=z(3); dy=z(4);
A = [ [-.5*L*sin(x), 1] ; [.33*L^2, -0.5*L*sin(x)] ]
b = [ [dx^2*cos(x) + (k/m)*y-g]; [-.33*L^2*C*cos(x) + .5*g*L*sin(x)] ]
d2 = A\b
dz = [ dx, d2(1), dy, d2(2) ]
end
Yes your method is correct!
I post the following code below:
%Rotating Pendulum Sym Main
clc
clear all;
%Define parameters
global M K L g C;
M = 1;
K = 25.6;
L = 1;
C = 1;
g = 9.8;
% define initial values for theta, thetad, del, deld
e_0 = 1;
ed_0 = 0;
theta_0 = 0;
thetad_0 = .5;
initialValues = [e_0, ed_0, theta_0, thetad_0];
% Set a timespan
t_initial = 0;
t_final = 36;
dt = .01;
N = (t_final - t_initial)/dt;
timeSpan = linspace(t_final, t_initial, N);
% Run ode45 to get z (theta, thetad, del, deld)
[t, z] = ode45(#RotSpngHndl, timeSpan, initialValues);
%initialize variables
e = zeros(N,1);
ed = zeros(N,1);
theta = zeros(N,1);
thetad = zeros(N,1);
T = zeros(N,1);
V = zeros(N,1);
x = zeros(N,1);
y = zeros(N,1);
for i = 1:N
e(i) = z(i, 1);
ed(i) = z(i, 2);
theta(i) = z(i, 3);
thetad(i) = z(i, 4);
T(i) = .5*M*(ed(i)^2 + (1/3)*L^2*C*sin(theta(i)) + (1/3)*L^2*thetad(i)^2 - L*ed(i)*thetad(i)*sin(theta(i)));
V(i) = -M*g*(e(i) + .5*L*cos(theta(i)));
E(i) = T(i) + V(i);
end
figure(1)
plot(t, T,'r');
hold on;
plot(t, V,'b');
plot(t,E,'y');
title('Energy');
xlabel('time(sec)');
legend('Kinetic Energy', 'Potential Energy', 'Total Energy');
Here is function handle file for ode45:
function dz = RotSpngHndl(~, z)
% Define Global Parameters
global M K L g C
A = [1, -.5*L*sin(z(3));
-.5*L*sin(z(3)), (1/3)*L^2];
b = [.5*L*z(4)^2*cos(z(3)) - (K/M)*z(1) + g;
(1/3)*L^2*C*cos(z(3)) + .5*g*L*sin(z(3))];
X = A\b;
% return column vector [ed; edd; ed; edd]
dz = [z(2);
X(1);
z(4);
X(2)];
I'm using ode45 to solve second order differential equation. the time span is determined based on how many numbers in txt file, therefore, the time span is defined as follows
i = 1;
t(i) = 0;
dt = 0.1;
numel(theta_d)
while ( i < numel(theta_d) )
i = i + 1;
t(i) = t(i-1) + dt;
end
Now the time elements should not exceed the size of txt (i.e. numel(theta_d)). In main.m, I have
x0 = [0; 0];
options= odeset('Reltol',dt,'Stats','on');
[t, x] = ode45('ODESolver', t, x0, options);
and ODESolver.m header is
function dx = ODESolver(t, x)
If I run the code, I'm getting this error
Attempted to access theta_d(56); index out of bounds because numel(theta_d)=55.
Error in ODESolver (line 29)
theta_dDot = ( theta_d(i) - theta_dPrev ) / dt;
Why the ode45 is not being fixed with the time span?
Edit: this is the entire code
main.m
clear all
clc
global error theta_d dt;
error = 0;
theta_d = load('trajectory.txt');
i = 1;
t(i) = 0;
dt = 0.1;
numel(theta_d)
while ( i < numel(theta_d) )
i = i + 1;
t(i) = t(i-1) + dt;
end
x0 = [pi/4; 0];
options= odeset('Reltol',dt,'Stats','on');
[t, x] = ode45(#ODESolver, t, x0, options);
%e = x(:,1) - theta_d; % Error theta
plot(t, x(:,2), 'r', 'LineWidth', 2);
title('Tracking Problem','Interpreter','LaTex');
xlabel('time (sec)');
ylabel('$\dot{\theta}(t)$', 'Interpreter','LaTex');
grid on
and ODESolver.m
function dx = ODESolver(t, x)
persistent i theta_dPrev
if isempty(i)
i = 1;
theta_dPrev = 0;
end
global error theta_d dt ;
dx = zeros(2,1);
%Parameters:
m = 0.5; % mass (Kg)
d = 0.0023e-6; % viscous friction coefficient
L = 1; % arm length (m)
I = 1/3*m*L^2; % inertia seen at the rotation axis. (Kg.m^2)
g = 9.81; % acceleration due to gravity m/s^2
% PID tuning
Kp = 5;
Kd = 1.9;
Ki = 0.02;
% theta_d first derivative
theta_dDot = ( theta_d(i) - theta_dPrev ) / dt;
theta_dPrev = theta_d(i);
% u: joint torque
u = Kp*(theta_d(i) - x(1)) + Kd*( theta_dDot - x(2)) + Ki*error;
error = error + (theta_dDot - x(1));
dx(1) = x(2);
dx(2) = 1/I*(u - d*x(2) - m*g*L*sin(x(1)));
i = i + 1;
end
and this is the error
Attempted to access theta_d(56); index out of bounds because numel(theta_d)=55.
Error in ODESolver (line 28)
theta_dDot = ( theta_d(i) - theta_dPrev ) / dt;
Error in ode45 (line 261)
f(:,2) = feval(odeFcn,t+hA(1),y+f*hB(:,1),odeArgs{:});
Error in main (line 21)
[t, x] = ode45(#ODESolver, t, x0, options);
The problem here is because you have data at discrete time points, but ode45 needs to be able to calculate the derivative at any time point in your time range. Once it solves the problem, it will interpolate the results back onto your desired time points. So it will calculate the derivative many times more than at just the time points you specified, thus your i counter will not work at all.
Since you have discrete data, the only way to proceed with ode45 is to interpolate theta_d to any time t. You have a list of values theta_d corresponding to times 0:dt:(dt*(numel(theta_d)-1)), so to interpolate to a particular time t, use interp1(0:dt:(dt*(numel(theta_d)-1)),theta_d,t), and I turned this into an anonymous function to give the interpolated value of theta_p at a given time t
Then your derivative function will look like
function dx = ODESolver(t, x,thetaI)
dx = zeros(2,1);
%Parameters:
m = 0.5; % mass (Kg)
d = 0.0023e-6; % viscous friction coefficient
L = 1; % arm length (m)
I = 1/3*m*L^2; % inertia seen at the rotation axis. (Kg.m^2)
g = 9.81; % acceleration due to gravity m/s^2
% PID tuning
Kp = 5;
Kd = 1.9;
Ki = 0.02;
% theta_d first derivative
dt=1e-4;
theta_dDot = (thetaI(t) - theta(I-dt)) / dt;
%// Note thetaI(t) is the interpolated theta_d values at time t
% u: joint torque
u = Kp*(thetaI(t) - x(1)) + Kd*( theta_dDot - x(2)) + Ki*error;
error = error + (theta_dDot - x(1));
dx=[x(2); 1/I*(u - d*x(2) - m*g*L*sin(x(1)))];
end
and you will have to define thetaI=#(t) interp1(0:dt:(dt*(numel(theta_d)-1)),theta_d,t); before calling ode45 using [t, x] = ode45(#(t,x) ODESolver(t,x,thetaI, t, x0, options);.
I removed a few things from ODESolver and changed how the derivative was computed.
Note I can't test this, but it should get you on the way.