Tinymce 3 Custom Embeded Video Code Not Working - tinymce

I have started with tinyMCE 3. I was trying to copy paste below code into HTML Source Editor like
<video id="testplayer" data-account="4338955589001"
data-player="Bkh63tBcx" data-embed="default"
class="video-js" controls=""
data-video-id="5347595845001"
style="width: 100%; height: 100%;
position: absolute; top: 0px; bottom: 0px; right: 0px;
left: 0px;"></video>
But When I click on updated it appears on Editor but again if I click on HTML Source editor it clear above code . please let me know what am I missing?
go through : http://archive.tinymce.com/tryit/3_x/full.php and copy pasted above code but after re -open HTML Source Editor it clear .

This was my answer before details. See below to see the actual help for this question:
---- BEFORE-------
Please have a look in the documentation.
You have to add the media plugin to the TinyMCE settings so it doesn't rip of the <video> tag.
That plugin also adds a menu option in Insert > Media, which you also can use to add your video.-
------EDIT--------
Using your TinyMCE fiddle, and also the full featured TinyMCE 3, I was able to put your video there. It seems that TinyMCE 3 has some issues with this, to which TinyMCE 4 works fine.
To add your video, instead of using the HTML source feature, use the Media feature. If you click on the video icon on the menu, a popup will appear with options for you to add a video. One of those options is for you to insert directly your source code. If you do it this way, the video won't get ripped off when you view the HTML source. I'm not sure what TinyMCE is doing differently, but adding it through the HTML source it gets cleaned up, while using the Media Source it won't.
------EDIT 2--------
Further investigation, regarding why clicking on "HTML source" twice after adding the video through the "Source" tab of the Media button, I went to check the difference between the HTML on the object that appeared in the rich text editor.
The first time (right after adding the tag), the HTML of the object that appeared in the rich text editor had the following attribute:
data-mce-json="{'video':{'attrs':{'id':'testplayer','data-account':'4338955589001','data-player':'Bkh63tBcx','data-embed':'default','class':'video-js','data-video-id':'5347595845001','style':'width: 100%; height: 100%; position: absolute; top: 0px; bottom: 0px; right: 0px; left: 0px;','preload':'none','controls':'controls','src':null,'poster':null},'sources':[{'src':''}]},'params':{'src':null},'type':'video','class':'mceItemMedia mceItemVideo','id':'testplayer','width':'320','height':'240'}"
Opening the the HTML source and clicking in "Update", and checking again the HTML source of the object, the same attribute was:
data-mce-json="{'video':{'attrs':{'id':'testplayer','width':'320','height':'240','style':'width: 100%; height: 100%; position: absolute; top: 0px; bottom: 0px; right: 0px; left: 0px;','data-account':'4338955589001','data-player':'Bkh63tBcx','data-embed':'default','class':'video-js','data-video-id':'5347595845001','preload':'none','controls':'controls','src':''},'sources':[]},'params':{},'hspace':null,'vspace':null,'align':null,'bgcolor':null}"
As you can see, there are several differences between them. The main difference that is causing the <video> tag to be ripped off after the second time is the fact that the 'sources' is [] instead of [{'src':''}] like it is on the first. If you change this manually in the HTML source of your browser, you'll see that it works.
Now, to fix this, I'm seeing two possible solutions:
Enter a src attribute, other than src="". When it has a non-empty src, it seems to work. However, I don't know if this will break you <video> tag, it depends on what your goal is. So, this might or might not be feasible for you, but it's worth the mention.
Use the protect setting on TinyMCE. With this, you can specify, through a regular expression, what should be protected from TinyMCE cleanup functions. This will make the video invisible in the Editing mode of TinyMCE, but will keep it in the HTML source. For your case, this setting would be like this:
protect: [
/\<\/?video[^>]*\>/g
]
You just need to measure both possible solutions and see if any of them is good for your case.

Related

Annotations not working, not even in Dygraphs' own example on jsFiddle, why?

I'm currently trying out Dygraphs (which seems really great btw!), but for some strange reason, the annotations feature won't work for me, AND it also fails in the exact same way on the jsFiddle version of Dygraphs' own gallery example of annotations, so this is most likely a bug/problem the devs really might want to take a look at(!).
To reproduce (same thing happens in both latest Firefox and latest Chrome):
1.
Look at the "annotations" example in the Dygraphs gallery, here:
http://dygraphs.com/gallery/#g/annotations
It works just fine and looks great, like this:
2.
Press the "Edit in jsFiddle" button, for that very example on that very page.
You are now sent to jsFiddle, and if you press the "Run" button there, the chart itself (colored curves etc) is shown just fine, but, only the "stems" of the annotation "signs" are shown, while the text contents of the annotations are all displayed as normal text to the left of the chart?! Like this:
Seems like some kind of CSS problem or similar to me, am I correct?
Since the example is Dygraphs' own example, which also works on their own site but not on jsFiddle, all suspicions of incorrectly formatted data or code can also be let go, I guess. It also happens to all my own Dygraphs charts on my own computer that I try to annotate, but this native Dygraphs gallery example is a much better example to investigate from I guess?
So, my question is of course, why does this happen, and how do I fix it to get the annotations working and displaying correctly?
ADDITION:
Let's make it even simpler, in order to isolate the problem without any hesitation.
Here is a very simple example for Dygraph annotations that I have put together on my own local disk (i.e. as a stand-alone HTML file):
<html>
<head>
<script type="text/javascript" src="dygraph.js"></script>
<link rel="stylesheet" src="dygraph.css" />
</head>
<body>
<div id="test_chart" style="width:750px; height:350px;"></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
var test_annotations = [
{
series: "TestCol1",
x: "2017-05-26",
shortText: "A",
text: "Test annotation",
cssClass: 'annotation'
}
];
testchart = new Dygraph(
document.getElementById('test_chart'),
"Date,TestCol1\n" +
"2017-05-25,110\n" +
"2017-05-26,80\n" +
"2017-05-27,75\n",
{}
);
testchart.setAnnotations(test_annotations);
</script>
</body>
</html>
When I open this file (locally with file:// in Chrome on my computer, having the latest dygraph.js and dygraph.css in the same directory), this is what I get:
As you can see, exactly the same problem as described above appears here, i.e. only the "stem" of the test annotation is visible in the graph itself, while the annotation text ("A") is displayed to the left of the graph.
The Firebug console is empty after having loaded this file, and no attempts (unsuccessful or otherwise) of loading any images are anywhere to be found in the Firebug network tab either.
Again, this very much feels like some kind of CSS positioning problem to me, but I may of course very well be wrong?
The answer to provide to this question would then be:
How, in as few and simple changes/steps as possible, would I get this local example PoC code for Dygraphs annotations to work as intended, i.e. showing the annotation text "A" inside a square at the correct position inside the graph (i.e. at the position where the "annotation stem" is currently just displayed, just as is done in the working example on the Dygraphs page, in my first screendump above in this question)?
Setting
position: absolute
solved the problem for me.
The gallery example loads images from dygraphs.com. When you load the demo on jsfiddle, it tries to load the images from jsfiddle, which doesn't work. dygraphs annotations are working fine, it's just that the image files are missing.
It seems that I was right about the CSS positioning problem after all.
The annotations are rendered by Dygraphs by adding the following HTML to the DOM of the page (this is the exact HTML for my test annotation in my local example code in the question test above, extracted live using Firebug):
<div style="font-size: 14px; left: 392.5px; top: 241.214px; width: 16px; height: 16px; color: rgb(0, 128, 128); border-color: rgb(0, 128, 128);" class="dygraph-annotation dygraphDefaultAnnotation dygraph-default-annotation annotation" title="Test annotation">A</div>
If I (as suggested by this SO question) add the CSS property position: relative to this div (manually, using Firebug), the graph suddenly looks like this:
See, the annotation text is now correctly positioned! It's still missing its opaque background and colored border though, but I guess this is just the result of even more CSS properties missing for some reason?
So, let's focus then on why there is missing CSS for the annotations I guess?
My best guess is that the dygraph.css file isn't properly loaded under certain conditions (apparently both on jsFiddle and locally on my computer, even though it is indeed there in the same directory as the HTML file and dygraph.js)? Or am I wrong?
A Firebug dump of the applied CSS for the annotation div seems to support this. Here is the CSS from Firebug for the annotation div of my local example (and also same in jsFiddle):
And here is the CSS for the same thing in the working instance in the gallery on the Dygraphs site:
See, the classes from dygraph.css is completely missing in my local example and in the jsFiddle example (even though indeed explicitly referenced in the class attribute of the annotation div's html code, as can be seen above), even though the CSS file is indeed there in the same directory as the dygraph.js file?!
#danvk, do you have any idea why this happens, and if Dygraphs could be patched somehow to avoid this from happening, and thus load all the CSS that it is supposed to for the annotations?
The only working hack-solution I can find for the moment is to dump the entire contents of dygraph.css inline in the <head> of the HTML file, as so:
<style>
/**
* Default styles for the dygraphs charting library.
*/
.dygraph-legend {
position: absolute;
font-size: 14px;
z-index: 10;
width: 250px; /* labelsDivWidth */
/*
dygraphs determines these based on the presence of chart labels.
It might make more sense to create a wrapper div around the chart proper.
top: 0px;
right: 2px;
*/
background: white;
line-height: normal;
text-align: left;
overflow: hidden;
}
...
/* For y2-axis label */
.dygraph-label-rotate-right {
text-align: center;
/* See http://caniuse.com/#feat=transforms2d */
transform: rotate(-90deg);
-webkit-transform: rotate(-90deg);
-moz-transform: rotate(-90deg);
-o-transform: rotate(-90deg);
-ms-transform: rotate(-90deg);
}
</style>
After that it's finally working fine:
Addition:
It seems like others too (1) (2) have this general problem regarding the loading of CSS files. No accepted answer to neither that SO question nor Mozilla support thread though, and indeed, none of the suggested answers work for me either. WTF, how can such a huge problem be generally unknown/unanswered? Please do also note that the same thing happens for me in both Chrome and Firefox, and also on multiple computers, out of which some have never opened the file before, so no strange cache-related effects should be involved either. Either way, it would seem like the bug is outside of Dygraphs' scope.
I'm afraid I'm late to the party, but it looks the problem is still valid (or workaround is not well documented). I was able to have better estimation of position by adding in index.html:
<style>
.dygraph-annotation {
position : relative;
display:inline-block;
}
</style>
However still annotations are not following the chart well:
The option attachAtBottom : true added to annotations might help here a bit, but still annotations are jumping on hovering graph (I guess this is because of legend taking some place)
All day trying to solve the same problem as the author at the beginning of this post. Yes, changing the CSN file allows you to somehow solve the problem, but everything worked by itself without dancing with a tambourine when I added this one line:
link rel = "stylesheet" href = "// cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/dygraph/2.1.0/dygraph.min.css" /
As always, you need to be more attentive to the little things)

Removing Absolute Position from jQuery UI Datepicker

I've had a good search around StackOverflow and have not specifically come across this problem or found a fix to it.
What I want to do is be able to remove the following from the ui-datepicker-div of the jQuery UI Date Picker > https://jqueryui.com/datepicker/
On the div it sets the following inline style
style="position: absolute; top: 557px; left: 20px; z-index: 6; display: block;"
I've had a good look around myself and cannot find away to get rid of this totally. If anyone knows how or has any ideas it would be great to know.
Thanks,
Glen

php mail() with <style> tag and background-size: cover

I want to style a contact email, but I have a few problems:
I sent a test-mail to my gmx mail and it removed the style="background: url('...') center center no-repeat; position: relative;". In the received code I only see style="position: relative;"
Like the first problem, but with "background-size: cover;" and "width: calc(50% - 3px);"
My <style> - tag got commented and looks like this:
Commenting CSS like that does not prevent it working - it just ensures the browser does not treat it as HTML.
gmail strips all classes and ids from HTML, so nothing you put in your style sheet based on those will work anyway. You can style standard elements though, and inline styles still work.
Outlook doesn't support background images at all, so you should probably give up on this path.

I have installed "share this" to my blog and when the I click the facebook like button only a part of it shows up on screen. How do I fix this?

I emailed support and they replied by saying to add this code to my css.
**span.st_fblike_hcount span div.fb-like span iframe#f249dba5d33c086.fb_ltr
{
height: 234px !important;
max-width: 634% !important;
}**
I am new to programming and do not know where exactly I should add this code. Can some one please instruct me on how to correct this problem.
My url My Blog
Thanks
It looks as though you need to go into the plugin folder and modify the CSS file. In the sharthis folder is a file called sharthis.css
Open the file in a text editor and add the following code that they gave you.
span.st_fblike_hcount span div.fb-like span iframe#f249dba5d33c086.fb_ltr
{
height: 234px !important;
max-width: 634% !important;
}
Save and refresh the page and it should work

Fancybox 2 - Include a new Div into Image?

How can I insert a new div (not in .js) into fancybox (when fancybox - image is open)? Like this:
I'm also try to make a div css to fit that description :)) still with no avail. I suck at css styling, will get back on this one when i figured it out. my theory is that it should be a div within a div within the div if you get what i mean :))
!!!!!!!!
UPDATE I tried messing around the css and this is what i got (I'm using 1.3.4v for simplicity's sake in my part) and for reference, these images and codes I used are found in the 1.3.4 demo packege from fancybox.net
If I didn't explain my code well, it just means I'm still working on it so I just hope you get why it is vague, but the point is it's doable and you only need to work out the css file. I hope someone has a nicer looking code
Output:
1.I all of these from jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
just change these 1 2 3 and mess around with example7 there in the demo
#fancybox-outer {
position: relative;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background: #fff;
padding-right:50%; /*this part extends the right side of the photo so it would look like thet're on the same page*/
}
2.This re-positions the original title to the upper right part of the image
.fancybox-title-inside {
padding-bottom: 10px;
text-align: left;
color: #333;
position: absolute;
top:0;
left:65%;
border:1px solid black;/*for you to see how large the div is*/
height:100%;
}
3.My new RED div where I will be
div.fancycontent{ /*saviour do word wrap here*/
border:1px solid black;
padding:2px;
color: #333;
background: #FF0000;
width:50%;
height: 100px;
}
I tried using fancybox in one of my projects but had to revert back to implementing my own popup's using the DIV elements. Its pretty easy to create your own popups instead of using fancybox or facebox if you know a bit of JQuery try to have a look at these links. You can customize your div tags to contain what ever you need.
output
source
In your fancybox JS, set the type to iframe:
$(document).ready(function() {
$('.callout').fancybox({
type: 'iframe',
width: '640px',
height: '480px',
});
});
Then you can open up anything you want in the fancybox by simply applying the class to your link:
<a class="callout" href="{path}">{link}</a>
If you have issues with the iframe display, you might try adding a secondary class to tell fancybox what type of content you are linking to (this is a new convention introduced in the latest version, so I don't know if I'd recommend using it by default):
<a class="callout callout.iframe" href="{path}">{link}</a>
Hope that helps!
ty
It just happened that I created this fancybox "a la" facebook demo that looks pretty much like what you want:
http://picssel.com/playground/jquery/fancyboxALAfacebook_26Mar12.html