Incorrect value range shown after numeric integration - matlab

Question

I'm trying to plot the probability of error for the following equation using MATLAB, I want to use the command trapz for the numerical integration, the problem is that I get a fine shape for the plot, but the values in the y-axis are wrong, the whole curve should be between 0 and 1.2 but it is between 0.492 and 0.5!! Can anyone just tell me what is wrong in my code, or just give me a hint? I really need help. Here is my formula that I need to plot (written using Maketex):
This is my code:
close all; clear;clc;
Nr=2;Ns=2;
lmda1=.3; lmda2=.3;
lmdas=.1; lmdar=.1;
z= 0.0001:1:40;
k1=2;k2=2;
kr=2.*Nr;ks=2.*Ns;
ax=0;
avg=0.0001:1:40;
em=1;
ch=2;
for alp=1-k1.*.5:ch
for beta=1-k2.*.5:ch
for eta=0:ch
for N=0:ch
for M=0:ch
for Q=0:ch
for id=0:eta
for jd=0:N
for A=0:N-jd
%
up=.25.*exp(-lmda1./2).*(lmda1./2).^(alp).*(lmda2.^2./(4)).^(beta./2).*exp(-lmda2./2).*(lmda1./(4.*em.*avg)).^eta.*(lmda2./(4.*em.*avg)).^N.*exp(-lmdas.*Ns.*.5).*.25.^(ks.*.25-.5).*exp(-lmdar.*Nr.*.5).*.25.^(kr.*.25-.5).*(Ns.*lmdas.*.25).^M.*(Nr.*lmdar.*.25).^Q;
cy=up.*(1./(factorial(eta).*factorial(N).*factorial(M).*factorial(Q).*gamma(eta+alp+1).*gamma(N+beta+1).*gamma(M+ks.*.5).*gamma(Q+kr.*.5)));
cj=cy.*(factorial(eta)./(factorial(id).*factorial(eta-id))).*(factorial(N)./(factorial(jd).*factorial(N-jd))).*gamma(M+id+jd+ks.*.5);
f1=(cj.*(factorial(N-jd)./(factorial(A).*factorial(N-jd-A))).*em.^A.*(((em+1).^(N-jd-A))).*gamma(kr.*.5+Q+A));
f2=f1.*(2.^(kr.*.5+Q+A)).*avg.^(eta+N);
ax=ax+f2;
end
end
end
end
end
end
end
end
end
q2=2;n2=2;N2=1;eta2=1;
fun2 = exp(-z.*avg.*(1+1.5./avg)).*z.^(eta2+N2-1./2).*(1./((1+z).^(q2).*(1./2+z).^(n2)));
out= trapz(z,fun2);
b=.5.*(1-ax.*(1./sqrt(pi)).*out.*avg.^(1./2));
plot(avg,b);grid;

Answer 1

There was a few wrong expressions in your code. Also I suspect you should evaluate the integral within the loop. What is more your integral meshgrid z seems too coarse. The following code gives me a 0~1.2 range for the second term in P(e)
% close all; clear;clc;
Nr=2;Ns=2;
lmda1=.3; lmda2=.3;
lmdas=.1; lmdar=.1;
z= .01:.01:40;
k1=2;k2=2;
kr=2.*Nr;ks=2.*Ns;
ax=0;
avg=z;
em=1;
ch=2;
for alp=1-k1*.5:ch
for beta=1-k2*.5:ch
for eta=0:ch
for N=0:ch
for M=0:ch
for Q=0:ch
for id=0:eta
for jd=0:N
for A=0:N-jd
%
up=.25.*exp(-lmda1./2).*(lmda1.^2./4).^(alp/2).*(lmda2.^2./(4)).^(beta./2).*exp(-lmda2./2).*(lmda1./(4.*em.*avg)).^eta.*(lmda2./(4.*em.*avg)).^N.*exp(-lmdas.*Ns.*.5).*.25.^(ks.*.25-.5).*exp(-lmdar.*Nr.*.5).*.25.^(kr.*.25-.5).*(Ns.*lmdas.*.25).^M.*(Nr.*lmdar.*.25).^Q;
cy=up./((factorial(eta).*factorial(N).*factorial(M).*factorial(Q).*gamma(eta+alp+1).*gamma(N+beta+1).*gamma(M+ks.*.5).*gamma(Q+kr.*.5)));
cj=cy.*(factorial(eta)./(factorial(id).*factorial(eta-id))).*(factorial(N)./(factorial(jd).*factorial(N-jd))).*gamma(M+id+jd+ks.*.5);
f1=(cj.*(factorial(N-jd)./(factorial(A).*factorial(N-jd-A))).*em.^A.*(((em+1).^(N-jd-A))).*gamma(kr.*.5+Q+A));
C=f1.*(2.^(kr.*.5+Q+A)).*avg.^(eta+N);
q2=Q;
n2=M+id+jd+ks/2;
N2=N;
eta2=eta;
fun2 = exp(-z.*avg.*(1+1.5./avg)).*z.^(eta2+N2-1./2).*(1./((1+z).^(q2).*(1./2+z).^(n2)));
itgrl= trapz(fun2)*.01*.01;
v = avg.^(eta2+N2+1./2);
ax=ax+v.*C.*itgrl;
end
end
end
end
end
end
end
end
end
b=.5-.5/pi^.5 *ax;
plot(avg,b);grid;
I don't know why I need to multiply dz twice but this gives me the correct value range. But I think it has something to do with the v vector values.
>> [min(.5/pi^.5 *ax),max(.5/pi^.5 *ax)]
ans =
0.0002 1.2241