AutoMapper from DTO to Entity Framework with nested collection - entity-framework

I have this model:
And I want to add a new Autor like below:
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
try
{
AutorServiceClient service = new AutorServiceClient();
LivroContract[] livros = {
new LivroContract { id_tipo = 1, nome_livro = "Asp.Net MVC 5" },
new LivroContract { id_tipo = 1, nome_livro = "Asp.Net Entity Framework" }
};
AutorContract autorContract = new AutorContract()
{
nome_autor = "Novo Autor",
Livros = livros
};
if (service.Add(autorContract))
Console.WriteLine("Adicionado com Sucesso");
}
catch (Exception)
{
Console.WriteLine("Erro !!!");
}
}
}
My Autor class has a nested Livro collection and I want to insert a new Autor with its respective Livro entities.
Below is part of my Data Access code to make the insert:
public class AutorDA
{
private readonly BibliotecaEntities _context;
private readonly DbSet<Autor> _dbSet;
public AutorDA()
{
_context = new BibliotecaEntities();
_dbSet = _context.Set<Autor>();
Mapping();
}
public void Mapping()
{
Mapper.Initialize(cfg =>
{
cfg.CreateMap<Autor, AutorDTO>();
cfg.CreateMap<AutorDTO, Autor>();
cfg.CreateMap<ICollection<Autor>, IEnumerable<AutorDTO>>();
cfg.CreateMap<IEnumerable<AutorDTO>, ICollection<Autor>>();
cfg.CreateMap<Biblioteca, BibliotecaDTO>();
cfg.CreateMap<BibliotecaDTO, Biblioteca>();
cfg.CreateMap<ICollection<Biblioteca>, IEnumerable<BibliotecaDTO>>();
cfg.CreateMap<IEnumerable<BibliotecaDTO>, ICollection<Biblioteca>>();
cfg.CreateMap<Livro, LivroDTO>();
cfg.CreateMap<LivroDTO, Livro>();
cfg.CreateMap<ICollection<Livro>, IEnumerable<LivroDTO>>();
cfg.CreateMap<IEnumerable<LivroDTO>, ICollection<Livro>>();
cfg.CreateMap<Tipo_Livro, TipoLivroDTO>();
cfg.CreateMap<TipoLivroDTO, Tipo_Livro>();
cfg.CreateMap<ICollection<Tipo_Livro>, IEnumerable<TipoLivroDTO>>();
cfg.CreateMap<IEnumerable<TipoLivroDTO>, ICollection<Tipo_Livro>>();
});
}
public bool Add(AutorDTO dto)
{
try
{
Mapping();
Autor autor = Mapper.Map<Autor>(dto);
_dbSet.Add(autor);
_context.SaveChanges();
return true;
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
throw ex;
}
}
....
Here is my DTOs:
public class AutorDTO
{
public int id { get; set; }
public string nome_autor { get; set; }
public IEnumerable<LivroDTO> Livros { get; set; }
}
public class LivroDTO
{
public int id { get; set; }
public int id_tipo { get; set; }
public string nome_livro { get; set; }
public ICollection<AutorDTO> Autores { get; set; }
public ICollection<BibliotecaDTO> Bibliotecas { get; set; }
public TipoLivroDTO TipoLivro { get; set; }
}
I know that there is something wrong here, but I dont know what... I am trying to insert Autor and a couple of Livros entities, but I dont know how to do that, using AutoMapper and EF.
But with this code, I am only inserting Autor.
So, I have two situations I dont know how to do:
Insert a new Autor and new Livro entities
Insert a new Autor and associate it with already inserted Livro entities
How I configure AutoMapper to those two situations above ?
Finally, my last questions are:
What is the better approach for situations where we have a main entity, which has one or more child entities (1:n / n:n) ?
Is it a good idea to insert/update simultanneosly all those entities, or it is a bad idea ? If it is a bad idea, so what is best way to do insert a main class and its relations ?
As we can see, my Livro entity has other child relations, but I want to use only Autor and Livro. I need to map all model/entities just to use those two ones ?
Thanks.

Related

Update Navigation Property with Entity.CurrentValues.SetValues

I have a Kalem Entity with a collection of DigerKalemMaliyetleri property, which is a collection of MaliyetBirimi objects. DigerKalemMaliyetleri is of JSON type and stored at the same table as a JSON column.
public class Kalem
{
public int Id { get; set; }
[Column(TypeName = "json")]
public ICollection<MaliyetBirimi> DigerKalemMaliyetleri { get; set; }
}
public class MaliyetBirimi
{
public int? DovizCinsi { get; set; }
public decimal? Maliyet { get; set; }
}
When I try to update entity with only DigerKalemMaliyetleri property changed:
DataContext.Entry<Kalem>(first).CurrentValues.SetValues(second);
SQL Update command isn't executed and database record is not updated.
How could I update the entity without explicitly setting DigerKalemMaliyetleri property?
Regards
I had the same problem, you cann't actually use SetValues to update navigation property, you nead instead use DataContext.Update(YourNewObj) and then DataContext.SaveChanges();, or if you want to use SetValues approach, you need:
-Get the exist entry
Kalem existObj = DataContext.Kalems.Find(YourNewObj.Id);
-Loop in navigations of updating entry and the existing one to set the values of updating entry:
foreach(var navObj in DataContext.Entry(YourNewObj).Navigations)
{
foreach(var navExist in DatatContext.Entry(existObj).Navigations)
{
if(navObj.Metadata.Name == navExist.MetaData.Name)
navExist.CurrentValue = navObj.CurrentValue;
}
}
-Update also changes of direct properties:
DataContext.Entry(existObj).CurrentValues.SetValues(YourNewObj);
-Save your Updating:
DataContext.SaveChanges();
You can also check if you need to load your Navigations before going in foreach loop, otherwise you will get an error.
Please if you see beter scenario, correct me.
It's hard to know exactly what you're doing without a complete code sample. Note also that you're trying to set all properties of first from second, including e.g. the Id, which is probably not what you want.
Here's a complete code sample which works for me:
await using (var ctx = new BlogContext())
{
await ctx.Database.EnsureDeletedAsync();
await ctx.Database.EnsureCreatedAsync();
ctx.Kalem.Add(new()
{
DigerKalemMaliyetleri = new List<MaliyetBirimi>()
{
new() { DovizCinsi = 1, Maliyet = 2 }
}
});
await ctx.SaveChangesAsync();
}
await using (var ctx = new BlogContext())
{
var first = ctx.Kalem.Find(1);
var second = new Kalem
{
DigerKalemMaliyetleri = new List<MaliyetBirimi>()
{
new() { DovizCinsi = 3, Maliyet = 4 }
}
};
ctx.Entry(first).Property(k => k.DigerKalemMaliyetleri).CurrentValue = second.DigerKalemMaliyetleri;
await ctx.SaveChangesAsync();
}
public class BlogContext : DbContext
{
public DbSet<Kalem> Kalem { get; set; }
static ILoggerFactory ContextLoggerFactory
=> LoggerFactory.Create(b => b.AddConsole().AddFilter("", LogLevel.Information));
protected override void OnConfiguring(DbContextOptionsBuilder optionsBuilder)
=> optionsBuilder
.UseNpgsql(#"Host=localhost;Username=test;Password=test")
.EnableSensitiveDataLogging()
.UseLoggerFactory(ContextLoggerFactory);
}
public class Kalem
{
public int Id { get; set; }
[Column(TypeName = "json")]
public ICollection<MaliyetBirimi> DigerKalemMaliyetleri { get; set; }
}
public class MaliyetBirimi
{
public int? DovizCinsi { get; set; }
public decimal? Maliyet { get; set; }
}

Add include on DbContext level

I want to implement something similar to lazy loading, but don't understand how to implement that. I want to force entity framework core include navigation property for all queries for type which implements my interface
public interface IMustHaveOrganisation
{
Guid OrganisationId { get; set; }
Organisation Organisation { get; set; }
}
public class MyEntity : IMustHaveOrganisation {
public Guid OrganisationId { get; set; }
public virtual Organisation Organisation { get; set; }
}
Without lazy loading I need to add .Include(x=>x.Organisation) to each query literally , and I can't use implementation of lazy loading provided by Microsoft. I need kind of custom implementation of that with loading just one property.
Or even force DbContext somehow to Include that property, it also fine for me.
How can I achieve that?
You can make this work by rewriting the expression tree, before it gets translated by EF Core.
To make this work in a way, where you don't have to specify anything additional in the query, you can hook into the very beginning of the query pipeline and inject the Include() call as needed.
This can be done, by specifying a custom IQueryTranslationPreprocessorFactory implementation.
The following fully working console project demonstrates this approach:
using System.Diagnostics;
using System.Linq;
using System.Linq.Expressions;
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Query;
using Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection;
using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging;
namespace IssueConsoleTemplate
{
public class Organisation
{
public int OrganisationId { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
public interface IMustHaveOrganisation
{
int OrganisationId { get; set; }
Organisation Organisation { get; set; }
}
public class MyEntity : IMustHaveOrganisation
{
public int MyEntityId { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public int OrganisationId { get; set; }
public virtual Organisation Organisation { get; set; }
}
public class CustomQueryTranslationPreprocessorFactory : IQueryTranslationPreprocessorFactory
{
private readonly QueryTranslationPreprocessorDependencies _dependencies;
private readonly RelationalQueryTranslationPreprocessorDependencies _relationalDependencies;
public CustomQueryTranslationPreprocessorFactory(
QueryTranslationPreprocessorDependencies dependencies,
RelationalQueryTranslationPreprocessorDependencies relationalDependencies)
{
_dependencies = dependencies;
_relationalDependencies = relationalDependencies;
}
public virtual QueryTranslationPreprocessor Create(QueryCompilationContext queryCompilationContext)
=> new CustomQueryTranslationPreprocessor(_dependencies, _relationalDependencies, queryCompilationContext);
}
public class CustomQueryTranslationPreprocessor : RelationalQueryTranslationPreprocessor
{
public CustomQueryTranslationPreprocessor(
QueryTranslationPreprocessorDependencies dependencies,
RelationalQueryTranslationPreprocessorDependencies relationalDependencies,
QueryCompilationContext queryCompilationContext)
: base(dependencies, relationalDependencies, queryCompilationContext)
{
}
public override Expression Process(Expression query)
{
query = new DependenciesIncludingExpressionVisitor().Visit(query);
return base.Process(query);
}
}
public class DependenciesIncludingExpressionVisitor : ExpressionVisitor
{
protected override Expression VisitConstant(ConstantExpression node)
{
// Call Include("Organisation"), if SomeEntity in a
// DbSet<SomeEntity> implements IMustHaveOrganisation.
if (node.Type.IsGenericType &&
node.Type.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Query.Internal.EntityQueryable<>) &&
node.Type.GenericTypeArguments.Length == 1 &&
typeof(IMustHaveOrganisation).IsAssignableFrom(node.Type.GenericTypeArguments[0]))
{
return Expression.Call(
typeof(EntityFrameworkQueryableExtensions),
nameof(EntityFrameworkQueryableExtensions.Include),
new[] {node.Type.GenericTypeArguments[0]},
base.VisitConstant(node),
Expression.Constant(nameof(IMustHaveOrganisation.Organisation)));
}
return base.VisitConstant(node);
}
}
public class Context : DbContext
{
public DbSet<MyEntity> MyEntities { get; set; }
public DbSet<Organisation> Organisations { get; set; }
protected override void OnConfiguring(DbContextOptionsBuilder optionsBuilder)
{
// Register the custom IQueryTranslationPreprocessorFactory implementation.
// Since this is a console program, we need to create our own
// ServiceCollection for this.
// In an ASP.NET Core application, the AddSingleton call can just be added to
// the general service configuration method.
var serviceProvider = new ServiceCollection()
.AddEntityFrameworkSqlServer()
.AddSingleton<IQueryTranslationPreprocessorFactory, CustomQueryTranslationPreprocessorFactory>()
.AddScoped(
s => LoggerFactory.Create(
b => b
.AddConsole()
.AddFilter(level => level >= LogLevel.Information)))
.BuildServiceProvider();
optionsBuilder
.UseInternalServiceProvider(serviceProvider) // <-- use our ServiceProvider
.UseSqlServer(#"Data Source=.\MSSQL14;Integrated Security=SSPI;Initial Catalog=62849896")
.EnableSensitiveDataLogging()
.EnableDetailedErrors();
}
protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
modelBuilder.Entity<MyEntity>(
entity =>
{
entity.HasData(
new MyEntity {MyEntityId = 1, Name = "First Entity", OrganisationId = 1 },
new MyEntity {MyEntityId = 2, Name = "Second Entity", OrganisationId = 1 },
new MyEntity {MyEntityId = 3, Name = "Third Entity", OrganisationId = 2 });
});
modelBuilder.Entity<Organisation>(
entity =>
{
entity.HasData(
new Organisation {OrganisationId = 1, Name = "First Organisation"},
new Organisation {OrganisationId = 2, Name = "Second Organisation"});
});
}
}
internal static class Program
{
private static void Main()
{
using var context = new Context();
context.Database.EnsureDeleted();
context.Database.EnsureCreated();
var myEntitiesWithOrganisations = context.MyEntities
.OrderBy(i => i.MyEntityId)
.ToList();
Debug.Assert(myEntitiesWithOrganisations.Count == 3);
Debug.Assert(myEntitiesWithOrganisations[0].Name == "First Entity");
Debug.Assert(myEntitiesWithOrganisations[0].Organisation.Name == "First Organisation");
}
}
}
Even though no explicit Include() is being made in the query in Main(), the following SQL is being generated, that does join and retrieve the Organisation entities:
SELECT [m].[MyEntityId], [m].[Name], [m].[OrganisationId], [o].[OrganisationId], [o].[Name]
FROM [MyEntities] AS [m]
INNER JOIN [Organisations] AS [o] ON [m].[OrganisationId] = [o].[OrganisationId]
ORDER BY [m].[MyEntityId]

Using sets of Entity Framework entities at runtime

I have an EF6 setup against a sql server db with about 60 tables in it.
I have entities for each table. What i'm trying to do is run the same method against a set of these entities that will be known at runtime.
The method is a qa/qc routine that does some data check on particular fields that are assured to be in each table.
I guess what i want to do is make the entity a parameter to the method so i can call it consecutive times.
I would also want to make a set of entities to pass as the parameter.
something like this:
List<string> entList = new List<string>(){"Table1","Table2","Table3"};
foreach (entName in entList)
{
//create an entity with the string name
//call myQAQCMethod with the entity
}
MyQAQCMethod (entity SomeEntity)
{
//run against this entity
doQAQC(SomeEntity);
}
Can this be done? Is it a job for reflection?
EDIT
using (var context = new Context())
{
var results = context.EntityAs.Where(a => a.Prop1 == e.Prop1)
.Where(a => a.Prop2 == e.Prop2)
.Select(a => new
{
APropertyICareAbout = a.Prop1,
AnotherPropertyICareAbout = a.Prop2
}).ToArray();
}
is precisely want i want to do. The thing is I want to avoid typing this loop 60 times. I think i'm looking for a way to "feed" a set of entities to this single method.
Also, thank you very much for helping me. I'm learning a lot.
You need to abstract an interface (entity framework won't even notice):
interface IQaQcable
{
int CommonInt { get; set; }
string CommonString { get; set; }
}
public class EntityA : IQaQcable
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int CommonInt { get; set; }
public string CommonString { get; set; }
// other properties and relations
}
public class EntityB : IQaQcable
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int CommonInt { get; set; }
public string CommonString { get; set; }
// other properties and relations
}
// in some unknown utility class
void MyQaQcMethod<T>(T entity) where T : IQaQcable
{
doSomethingWithIQaQcableProperties(entity.CommonInt, entity.CommonString);
}
// in some unknown test class
void Test()
{
var entities = new List<IQaQcable> { new EntityA(), new EntityB() };
foreach (var e in entities)
MyQaQcMethod(e);
}
Now, you could extract a base class from which each derives that actually implements the CommonInt and CommonString properties for each entity needing them, but that can get kind of tricky with Table-Per-Type/Table-Per-Hierarchy, so I'd start with this, and then consider introducing either an abstract or concrete base class as an improvement.
EDIT
Maybe your looking for something simpler than I first thought, based on your last comment.
Let's give ourselves what the DbContext for this might look like:
class Context : DbContext
{
public virtual DbSet<EntityA> EntityAs { get; set; }
public virtual DbSet<EntityB> EntityBs { get; set; }
}
So, it could just be that you wish to do this:
using (var context = new Context())
{
var results = context.EntityAs.Where(a => a.Prop1 == e.Prop1)
.Where(a => a.Prop2 == e.Prop2)
.Select(a => new
{
APropertyICareAbout = a.Prop1,
AnotherPropertyICareAbout = a.Prop2
}).ToArray();
}
Keeping in mind, if there is some set of properties in common across entity classes, you could still do something like the following:
IEnumerable<T> MyQaQcMethod(IQueryable<T> entities, T referenceEntity) where T : IQaQcAble
{
return entities.Where(e => SomePredicate(e, referenceEntity));
}
void Test()
{
using (var context = new Context())
{
// EntityA implements IQaQcAble
var resultsForA = MyQaQcMethod(context.EntityAs, defaultEntity).ToArray();
// so does EntityB, so can call with either
var resultsForB = MyQaQcMethod(context.EntityBs, defaultEntity).ToArray();
}
}
Keep in mind, to avoid modifying the generated entity classes, you could implement the interface members — and the interface — in a separate source file using partial classes. E.g.
// IQaQcAble.cs
internal interface IQaQcAble
{
int CommonInt { get; set; }
string CommonString { get; set; }
}
// a class whose existing property names match the interface
public partial class EntityA : IQaQcAble
{
int IQaQcAble.CommonInt
{
get { return CommonInt; }
set { CommonInt = value; }
}
string IQaQcAble.CommonString
{
get { return CommonString; }
set { CommonString = value; }
}
}
// a class whose property names differ
public partial class EntityB : IQaQcAble
{
int IQaQcAble.CommonInt
{
get { return SomeOtherInt; }
set { SomeOtherInt = value; }
}
string IQaQcAble.CommonString
{
get { return SomeOtherInt.ToString(); }
set { SomeOtherInt = Convert.ToInt32(value); }
}
}

Entity framework with IN Clause in Repository Pattern

I looking for some help on how to implement IN clause in the repository pattern. Rather than making single call for each and every record, I will have set of IDs, pass on this IDs to Context to get entities which satisfies the condition using Repository Pattern with EF.
I knew we can have something like this:
context.Students.Where( x => StudentIDs.contains(x.ID))
How to implement same in the repository layer or pattern with single call to DB?
If you really are a purist, yes you should abstract the DbContext entirely as you seem to imply.
I'm not sure I completely understand the issue, but something like that should do the job:
namespace EFRepo
{
class Student
{
public long Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
class SchoolContext : DbContext
{
public DbSet<Student> Students { get; set; }
}
class SchoolRepository
{
private SchoolContext context = new SchoolContext();
public Student Add(string name)
{
Student student = new Student { Name = name };
context.Students.Add(student);
context.SaveChanges();
return student;
}
public IEnumerable<Student> GetStudentsByIds(IEnumerable<long> ids)
{
return context.Students.Where(x => ids.Contains(x.Id));
}
}
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
SchoolRepository repo = new SchoolRepository();
repo.Add("Bully");
repo.Add("Crawler");
repo.Add("Tart");
foreach (Student s in repo.GetStudentsByIds(new[] { 1L, 3 }))
{
Console.WriteLine(s.Name);
}
}
}
}

Custom Model Binder, asp.net mvc 2 rtm 2, Parsing ID to ComplexModel

I have found myself with at little problem, and I think a custom model binder is the way to go.
My Domain model looks like this,readly standard
I got a Page and a Template. The Page has the Template as a ref.
So the Default asp.net mvc Binder, does not know how to bind it, therefore I need to make some rules for it. (Custom Model Binder)
public class PageTemplate
{
public virtual string Title { get; set; }
public virtual string Content { get; set; }
public virtual DateTime? Created { get; set; }
public virtual DateTime? Modified { get; set; }
}
public class Page
{
public virtual string Title { get; set; }
public virtual PageTemplate Template { get; set; }
public virtual string Content { get; set; }
public virtual DateTime? Created { get; set; }
public virtual DateTime? Modified { get; set; }
}
So I have Registreted the ModelBinder in globals.asax
ModelBinders.Binders.Add(typeof(Cms.Domain.Entities.Page),
new Cms.UI.Web.App.ModelBinders.PageModelBinder(
new Services.GenericApplicationService<Cms.Domain.Entities.Page>().GetEntityStore()
)
);
My ModelBinder tage a paremeter, witch is my Repository, where I get all my Entities ( Page, Template )
My Controller for a Page looks like this.
I have posted into a Create Controler, it does not matter for now, if it was a Update method.
Since I in this case have a dropdown, that represents the Template, I will get an ID in my form collection.
I then call: TryUpdateModel and I got a hit in my PageModelBinder.
[AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post), ValidateAntiForgeryToken]
[ValidateInput(false)]
public ActionResult Create(FormCollection form)
{
Page o = new Page();
string[] exclude = new { "Id" }
if (base.TryUpdateModel<Page>(o, string.Empty, null, exclude, form.ToValueProvider()))
{
if (ModelState.IsValid)
{
this.PageService.Add(o);
this.CmsViewData.PageList = this.PageService.List();
this.CmsViewData.Messages.AddMessage("Page is updated.", MessageTypes.Succes);
return View("List", this.CmsViewData);
}
}
return View("New", this.CmsViewData);
}
So I end op with the Model Binder.
I have search the internet dry for information, but im stock.
I need to get the ID from the FormCollection, and parse it to at Model from my IEntityStore.
But how ?
public class PageModelBinder : IModelBinder
{
public readonly IEntityStore RepositoryResolver;
public PageModelBinder(IEntityStore repositoryResolver)
{
this.RepositoryResolver = repositoryResolver;
}
public object BindModel(ControllerContext controllerContext, ModelBindingContext bindingContext)
{
if (bindingContext == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException("bindingContext");
}
if (modelType == typeof(Cms.Domain.Entities.Page))
{
// Do some magic
// Get the Id from Property and bind it to model, how ??
}
}
}
// Dennis
I hope, my problom is clear.
Did find a work around.
I download the sourcecode for asp.net r2 rtm 2
And did copy all code for the default ModelBinder, and code it need. Did some minor change, small hacks.
the work around is doing a little hack in this method:
[SuppressMessage("Microsoft.Globalization", "CA1304:SpecifyCultureInfo", MessageId = "System.Web.Mvc.ValueProviderResult.ConvertTo(System.Type)",
Justification = "The target object should make the correct culture determination, not this method.")]
[SuppressMessage("Microsoft.Design", "CA1031:DoNotCatchGeneralExceptionTypes",
Justification = "We're recording this exception so that we can act on it later.")]
private static object ConvertProviderResult(ModelStateDictionary modelState, string modelStateKey, ValueProviderResult valueProviderResult, Type destinationType)
{
try
{
object convertedValue = valueProviderResult.ConvertTo(destinationType);
return convertedValue;
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
try
{
// HACK if the binder still fails, try get the entity in db.
Services.GenericApplicationService<Cms.Domain.Entities.PageTemplate> repo;
repo = new Services.GenericApplicationService<Cms.Domain.Entities.PageTemplate>();
int id = Convert.ToInt32(valueProviderResult.AttemptedValue);
object convertedValue = repo.Retrieve(id);
return convertedValue;
}
catch (Exception ex1)
{
modelState.AddModelError(modelStateKey, ex1);
return null;
}
}
}
This question is closed.