I'm trying to hide Advance search in value help by default.
When this dialog opens, by default the category and category description Advance search options appears, I want this to be hidden.
Please help on how to approach this issue.
This is what I have
This is what I want: (Advance search to be hidden, not removed altogether)
It seems, you have used the Explored-Example from here
There you can also download the coding. Maybe you need to adjust the paths to the mockdata to get it up and running.
What happens if you try: sap:filterable="false" in your metadata.xml ?
Please see also the corresponding docu.
There it says:
“We notice that we have set sap:filterable="false" for the CURR property.
We do this, since we would otherwise also have a currency code search field in the dialog that we wish to avoid (default of sap:filterable is true).”
Now your adjusted metadata.xml from the SmartField example above could look like:
<EntityType Name="VL_SH_H_CATEGORY" sap:content-version="1">
<Key>
<PropertyRef Name="CATC" />
</Key>
<Property Name="CATC" Type="Edm.String" Nullable="false" MaxLength="4" sap:display-format="UpperCase" sap:label="Category" sap:text="LTXT" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="LTXT" Type="Edm.String" Nullable="false" sap:label="Category Description" sap:filterable="false"/>
</EntityType>
…
Is this what you are looking for ?
Related
Is it possible to make a Property in SAPUI5 Smart Table mandatory so that a user can't leave a field empty while editing it?
I have found this document saying that it should be possible to set mandatory field control on Property in metadata.xml file with annotation like this:
<Property Name="NameLast" Type="Edm.String" Nullable="false" MaxLength="40" sap:label="Last name" sap:field-control="7" />
But with this setting I am getting following error in console:
2017-04-14 11:37:36.691429 MockServer: Resource not found for the segment '7'
2017-04-14 11:37:36.707985 The following problem occurred: HTTP request failed404,Not Found,{"error":{"code":404,"message":{"lang":"en","value":"Resource not found for the segment '7'"}}} -
EDIT:
Later I found out that sap:field-control should not contain number, but a path expression to another property which contains the number. However this also doesn't work:
<Property Name="NameLast" Type="Edm.String" Nullable="false" MaxLength="40" sap:label="Last name" sap:field-control="Name_fc" />
<Property Name="Name_fc" Type="Edm.Byte" />
Value of Name_fc property is '7'. I don't see any console error now, however I can still leave the input (NameLast) field empty without any validation and send it to OData service, which is not what I expect.
Here is a link to an example from sap where they use required fields. I have no idea though how they made it.
https://sapui5.netweaver.ondemand.com/sdk/explored.html#/sample/sap.ui.comp.sample.smartfield/code/SmartField.view.xml
For OData v2 the sap:field-control annotation on the Property can be
used to specify whether the field is mandatory.
<Property Name="Customer" ... sap:field-control="mandatory"/>
<Property Name="CompanyCode" ... sap:field-control="mandatory"/>
https://sapui5.hana.ondemand.com/#docs/api/symbols/sap.ui.comp.smartfield.SmartField.html
The mandatory property of the entity has to be nullable="false". That's it.
Have a look at the smart field example from your link:
<Property Name="Name" Type="Edm.String" Nullable="false"
MaxLength="30" sap:label="Name" sap:creatable="false"
sap:quickinfo="Property annotation DataFieldWithUrl"
sap:updatable="true" sap:sortable="false" />
Btw. thanks for sharing your smart table example!
From my understanding there are 2 options:
1) Define a specific property as Mandatory --> Nullable="false"
2) Link a property to another property in the entity, the "field-control".
This field control can contain numbers and "7" means mandatory.
The linking from option 2 can be done in the MPC_EXT class (redefine the define method).
The actual value in the "field-control" property is set in the get_entity / get_en
However I am also having an issue with the smarttable. The mandatory fields do not light up red when empty.
Do it in brute force way in the Object Page extension controller.
var oField = this.getView().byId(<FieldId>)
oField.getDataProperty().property.nullable = "false" or "true".
"false" and "true" must be a string.
To convert a boolean to string use <boolean>.toString();
I am using EF in .NET V4.0 in Visual Basic (VS2010) with SQL Compact Edition 4.0. We are building a set of simple forms to maintain some tables. One table 'Companies' is linked to 2 other tables (People,CalibrationInfo) with Companies as the parent table. The Entity Type Definition is:
<EntityType Name="Company">
<Documentation>
<Summary>Provides a list of Companies and shipping addresses.</Summary>
</Documentation>
<Key>
<PropertyRef Name="CompanyID" />
</Key>
<Property Name="CompanyID" Type="Int32" Nullable="false" annotation:StoreGeneratedPattern="Identity" />
<Property Name="Name" Type="String" MaxLength="100" Unicode="true" FixedLength="false" Nullable="false" />
<Property Name="Address1" Type="String" MaxLength="100" Unicode="true" FixedLength="false" />
<Property Name="Address2" Type="String" MaxLength="100" Unicode="true" FixedLength="false" />
<Property Name="Address3" Type="String" MaxLength="100" Unicode="true" FixedLength="false" />
<Property Name="Telephone" Type="String" MaxLength="30" FixedLength="false" Unicode="true" />
<Property Name="PrimaryContactID" Type="Int32" a:GetterAccess="Public" xmlns:a="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2006/04/codegeneration" a:SetterAccess="Public" Nullable="true" >
<Documentation>
<Summary>Optional Primary Contact ID for the primary contact for this company.</Summary>
</Documentation>
</Property>
<Property Name="Disabled" Type="Boolean" Nullable="false" DefaultValue="false" />
<NavigationProperty Name="Calibrations" Relationship="NWCUDataStoreModel.FK_CalibrationInfo_Company" FromRole="Companies" ToRole="CalibrationInfo" />
<NavigationProperty Name="PrimaryContact" Relationship="NWCUDataStoreModel.FK_Company_PrimaryContact" FromRole="Company" ToRole="Person" />
</EntityType>
The form uses a binding source set to the Company set in the context:
bsCompanies = ctx.Companies.OrderBy("it.Name")
The Binding Source is linked to a Navigation Bar. Pressing the BindingNavigatorAddNewItem button gets a new record created. I enter only the company name tab to the next field and press the Save button. The link to the Primary Contact is set to nothing so there are no other relationships for this record. The Save button executes the following:
RowsSaved = ctx.SaveChanges()
This generates the InvalidOperationException. The Inner exception is:
AcceptChanges cannot continue because the object's key values conflict with another object...
There are no other records in the database with the name set to 'Test'. The exception indicates that the record was saved, but was unable to accept the changes. The record is still marked as Added. Calling ctx.AcceptChanges after this error generates an exception.
If I were doing this directly in code, instead of with BindingSource on a form, it would essentially look like this:
dim company as New Company
company.Name="Test"
company.PrimaryContactID = nothing
ctx.Companies.Add(company)
ctx.Save
I have looked at other examples of this on multipe sites, and have applied any fixes I could find, including setting the PrimaryContact id directly to a the correct Person record ID and setting the PrimaryContact to Nothing. Nothing makes any difference.
I have also deleted the three tables from the model and then reloaded them. No difference.
I have used this same code with no problems in SQL Server, but almost nothing seems to work with SQL Compact edition V4.0. You would think it should not be so difficult to store a single record into a table. If we have to go back to data sets, I have a lot of recoding to do.
Any suggestions or insights appreciated.
Thanks, Neil
BTW, the answer to this was to use Nuget to download Entity Framework 6.0, Entity Framework SQL Server Compact and Microsoft SQL Server Compact 4.0. I then downloaded the EF Framework 5 DB Generator .tt file as the EF 6 version does not work in Visual Studio 2010. You do this from the Add Code Generation menu item, and select Online Templates->EF 5 DBContext Generator... Finally, I modified the file using this Microsoft article: Databinding with WinForms. After that, things started to work. EF 4.0 does not work with SQL Server Compact, out of the box, without the changes described above. Using the ObservableListSource class described in the article also helped with parent-child relationships on forms, which did not work until I switched to this class.
I have a master report with 2 subreports. I use the same report to generate PDF and xls. Pagination is enabled but for excel, i need to disable pagination, which i do by rendering all in one sheet. The page header/column header get repeat for each page. These page header/column header are from the sub reports. This is fine for PDF but in case of excel, i want to get rid of the repeating header.
I set these properties:
<property name="net.sf.jasperreports.export.xls.exclude.origin.band.3" value="pageHeader" />
<property name="net.sf.jasperreports.export.xls.exclude.origin.keep.first.band.3" value="pageHeader" />
<property name="net.sf.jasperreports.export.pdf.exclude.origin.keep.first.band.1" value="pageHeader" />
<property name="net.sf.jasperreports.export.xls.exclude.origin.band.1" value="columnHeader" />
<property name="net.sf.jasperreports.export.xls.exclude.origin.keep.first.band.1" value="columnHeader" />
<property name="net.sf.jasperreports.export.xls.exclude.origin.band.2" value="pageFooter" />
<property name="net.sf.jasperreports.export.xls.remove.empty.space.between.rows" value="true" />
<property name="net.sf.jasperreports.export.xls.remove.empty.space.between.columns" value="true" />
But these arent reflected in the data rendered by the subreport. In xls, i still see the pageHeader/columnHeader gets repeated. Please let me know, how to fix this.
For XLS (and HTML) reports, you may want to set the parameter IS_IGNORE_PAGINATION to true. See http://jasperreports.sourceforge.net/api/net/sf/jasperreports/engine/JRParameter.html for documentation.
I know this is an old question, but I keep forgetting how to do this myself and each time I search I seem to find this question so thought I'd put something so I find it next time.
In the main report file you also need to add the sub report to the filter:
<property name="net.sf.jasperreports.export.xls.exclude.origin.band.1" value="columnHeader" />
<property name="net.sf.jasperreports.export.xls.exclude.origin.keep.first.band.1" value="columnHeader" />
<property name="net.sf.jasperreports.export.xls.exclude.origin.report.1" value="sub-report-name" />
<property name="net.sf.jasperreports.export.xls.exclude.origin.keep.first.report.1" value="sub-report-name" />
I'm using EF4. I want to insert a new MyObject into the database. MyObject has two fields:
Id: int (Identity) and
Name: string
As I've seen in documentation Entity Framework is supposed to set MyObject.Id to the value generated by database after the call to SaveChanges() but in my case that doesn't happen.
using (var context = new MyEntities())
{
var myObject = MyObjects.CreateMyObject(0, "something"); // The first parameter is identity "Id"
context.MyObjects.AddObject(myObject);
context.SaveChanges();
return myObject.Id; // The returned value is 0
}
UPDATE:
This happens in one of my entities and others work fine. By the way, I checked and the DB column is identity and StoreGeneratedPattern is set to Identity.
Here is the SSDL. I don't see any difference. The first one isn't working right:
<EntityType Name="OrgUnit">
<Key>
<PropertyRef Name="Srl" />
</Key>
<Property Name="Srl" Type="int" Nullable="false" StoreGeneratedPattern="Identity" />
<Property Name="TypeId" Type="smallint" Nullable="false" />
<Property Name="Name" Type="varchar" Nullable="false" MaxLength="80" />
</EntityType>
<EntityType Name="OrgType">
<Key>
<PropertyRef Name="Srl" />
</Key>
<Property Name="Srl" Type="smallint" Nullable="false" StoreGeneratedPattern="Identity" />
<Property Name="Title" Type="varchar" Nullable="false" MaxLength="120" />
<Property Name="Options" Type="int" Nullable="false" />
</EntityType>
The update is done successfully in the database and the identity is generated but the entity object is not updated with the new identity.
In that case, you EF model is probably not up to date - EF should automagically get your new ID from the database. Try refreshing your EF model.
Your identity column's properties should look like this in your EDMX model:
If you're using Oracle Entity Framework 4 Provider, like I do, from ODP.NET, there is a bug in Designer. Just selecting the Identity value in drop down box will not do. It will annotate the conceptual property in conceptual model with
annotation:StoreGeneratedPattern="Identity"
like in
<Property Type="Int32" Name="Id" Nullable="false" cg:SetterAccess="Private" annotation:StoreGeneratedPattern="Identity" />
But, it will fail to do the same for Storage Model, ie. you need to do it manually. Find the Property (in my case ID) in EntityType of interest and add StoreGeneratedPattern="Identity".
<EntityType Name="PROBLEMI">
<Key>
<PropertyRef Name="ID" />
</Key>
<Property Name="ID" Type="number" Nullable="false" Precision="10" StoreGeneratedPattern="Identity" />
I'm not aware of the same bug in SQL EF provider 'cos I didn't use it.
This should "just work." Make sure the DB column actually is IDENTITY, and that StoreGeneratedPattern is set to Identity in EDMX.
wow! that was a nightmare but at last I solved it, although I didn't understand what the problem was. Maybe this helps someone with the same problem.
Generate the script for creating the table and its data.
Drop the table.
Run the script.
If you are using Linq To Entities, and get this error even if you followed the advices of marc_s (that are really good), you should look at your entites directly in the edmx (xml view) and check if they have the following attribute :
<EntityType Name="MyEntity">
<Key>
<PropertyRef Name="pk" />
</Key>
<Property Name="pk" Type="bigint" Nullable="false" StoreGeneratedPattern="Identity" />
<Property Name="value" Type="float" Nullable="false" />
</EntityType>
The StoreGeneratedPattern="Identity" is also required.
Try using refresh method after Save Changes, it has been documented in MSDN
"To ensure that objects on the client have been updated by data source-side logic, you can call the Refresh method with the StoreWins value after you call SaveChanges."
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb336792.aspx
Though i feel what #Craig has suggested might also work.
I ran into this today. The difference though was I was using an insert function, where the above person doesn't specify that. What I had to do was make my insert function stored procedure return SCOPE_IDENTITY() and use a result binding for the id returned.
Fixed my issue.
hi i have an error in the entity framework. i imported the sp get() into EF and return results as complex datatype 'GetResult'.In the edmx xml i have set the 'Amount' type to decimal.
<ComplexType Name="Get_Result">
<Property Type="String" Name="Description" Nullable="true" MaxLength="255" />
<Property Type="Decimal" Name="Amount" Nullable="false" />
<Property Type="Decimal" Name="Gst" Nullable="false" Precision="19" />
<Property Type="Decimal" Name="Total" Nullable="true" Precision="19" />
</ComplexType>
I try to bind the result with datagridview
gridview.DataSource = db.Get().ToList();
it kept giving me error message like this. and i couldn't find int32 anywhere in EF and have updated & built the EF multiple times.
The 'Amount' property on 'Get_Result' could not be set to a 'Int32' value. You must set this property to a non-null value of type 'Decimal'.
any help appreciated...
solved the issue by handling null exception