MongoDB aggregation pipeline : using $cond to return a $match stage? - mongodb

I'm trying to build queries to have actually interesting ways to interact with a database. One of them is to search for documents in a certain range of years. My thinkingnwas to build an aggregation pipeline where I check if the year range have been selected in the search form, then return the matching documents. If no range is selected, then return all the documents and go to the next stage of the aggregation pipeline.
Here is what I have tried (there's only one stage in the aggregate because i haven't managed to make this first one work, yet) :
db.collection('archives').aggregate([
{ $cond: { if: yearStart.length === 4 && yearEnd === 4 },
then: { $match:
{ $and:
[
{ year: {$gte: yearStart} },
{ year: {$lte: yearEnd} }
]
}
},
else: { $match: {} }
}
]).toArray( (err, docs) => {
if (err) throw (err)
res.json(docs)
})
So, this doesn't work. I get the error MongoError: A pipeline stage specification object must contain exactly one field.. So I thought it was just a matter of enclosing the $cond statement in curlies. But nope. I get a full on unexpected token { crash at this. So I'm thinkning that maybe $cond aren't meant to be used like this (returning $match stages). I'm inclined to think so, as the documentation only shows an example returning a simple value... Is it right?
Thanks in advance!

Create the query object to be used with $match outside the pipeline first with native JavaScript conditionals as using the $cond operator is only applicable within specified pipeline stages. Here you are using
it as a pipeline step hence the error thrown.
Consider the following:
const query = { "year": { } };
if (yearStart.length === 4 && yearEnd === 4) {
query["year"]["$gte"] = yearStart;
query["year"]["$lte"] = yearEnd;
}
db.collection('archives').aggregate([ { "$match": query } ]).toArray((err, docs) => {
if (err) throw (err);
res.json(docs);
});
Or using the find() method as
db.collection('archives').find(query).toArray((err, docs) => {
if (err) throw (err);
res.json(docs);
});

Related

Why should the $search be the first in pipeline stages in mongoDB?

This is my code which searches the whole collection and returns the documents that the value of their name fields are either Dexter or Prison Break or Breaking bad.
Why should $search be at the top of stages; otherwise, I will get an error. Plus, I read on MongoDB doc that "The $match stage that includes a $text must be the first stage in the pipeline."
Here
app.get('/', (req, res) => {
db.collection('subs')
.aggregate([
{ $match: { $text: { $search: 'honey' } } },
{ $match: { name: { $in: ['Dexter', 'Prison Break', 'Breaking Bad'] } } },
])
.toArray((err, result) => {
if (err) {
throw new err();
}
res.json({
length: result.length,
body: { result },
});
});
});
I suppose the second line which filters the documents based on their name should come first; in order to reduce time and get a quick result because in this case, MongoDB will not have to search the whole collection and just search a few documents and returns the result.
why is that? is there any way for optimization?
I think it's because text search is required a special "text" index. Moving the "$search" operator to the second place makes impossible to use this index.

MongoDB Aggregation: Unable to reference fields using $cond

I'm performing an aggregation on a MongoDB collection. The steps preceeding the topical $cond are not important, so I'll redact them for brevity:
db.mycoll.aggregate([
{ $match: ... },
{ $project: ... },
{ /* this is the problem step */ }
])
The documents that are being generated by step 2, $project, are shaped like this:
{
"blueTeam": true,
"redTeam": false,
"winner": true
}
Now assuming I add an additional projection which utilizes $cond - I'm not permitted to address the fields from the projected document. Here's a naive example:
{
$project: {
blueTeam: "$blueTeam",
winnerAsInteger: {
$cond: [ { "$winner": true }, 1, 0 ]
}
}
}
Expectation: The pipeline emits documents in which winning documents have field winnerAsInteger equal to 1, otherwise 0.
Reality: This pipeline step produces an error.
In Node's MongoDB client, the error is as follows:
(node:34380) UnhandledPromiseRejectionWarning: MongoError: Unrecognized expression '$winner'
In MongoDB Compass's aggregation GUI, the error is:
Field must not begin with '$' or '.', field path was: $winner
This seems to directly contradict the documentation regarding this, which references document fields with the $ syntax.
I'm on MongoDB 4.0.5, for what it's worth.
Try
{$eq:[ "$winner", true ]} instead of { "$winner": true }
Courtesy of #s7vr in comments, just added it here so that people don't think it's an unanswered question!

Update my read status in Chat App with Complex SimpleSchema [duplicate]

I have a Mongo document which holds an array of elements.
I'd like to reset the .handled attribute of all objects in the array where .profile = XX.
The document is in the following form:
{
"_id": ObjectId("4d2d8deff4e6c1d71fc29a07"),
"user_id": "714638ba-2e08-2168-2b99-00002f3d43c0",
"events": [{
"handled": 1,
"profile": 10,
"data": "....."
} {
"handled": 1,
"profile": 10,
"data": "....."
} {
"handled": 1,
"profile": 20,
"data": "....."
}
...
]
}
so, I tried the following:
.update({"events.profile":10},{$set:{"events.$.handled":0}},false,true)
However it updates only the first matched array element in each document. (That's the defined behaviour for $ - the positional operator.)
How can I update all matched array elements?
With the release of MongoDB 3.6 ( and available in the development branch from MongoDB 3.5.12 ) you can now update multiple array elements in a single request.
This uses the filtered positional $[<identifier>] update operator syntax introduced in this version:
db.collection.update(
{ "events.profile":10 },
{ "$set": { "events.$[elem].handled": 0 } },
{ "arrayFilters": [{ "elem.profile": 10 }], "multi": true }
)
The "arrayFilters" as passed to the options for .update() or even
.updateOne(), .updateMany(), .findOneAndUpdate() or .bulkWrite() method specifies the conditions to match on the identifier given in the update statement. Any elements that match the condition given will be updated.
Noting that the "multi" as given in the context of the question was used in the expectation that this would "update multiple elements" but this was not and still is not the case. It's usage here applies to "multiple documents" as has always been the case or now otherwise specified as the mandatory setting of .updateMany() in modern API versions.
NOTE Somewhat ironically, since this is specified in the "options" argument for .update() and like methods, the syntax is generally compatible with all recent release driver versions.
However this is not true of the mongo shell, since the way the method is implemented there ( "ironically for backward compatibility" ) the arrayFilters argument is not recognized and removed by an internal method that parses the options in order to deliver "backward compatibility" with prior MongoDB server versions and a "legacy" .update() API call syntax.
So if you want to use the command in the mongo shell or other "shell based" products ( notably Robo 3T ) you need a latest version from either the development branch or production release as of 3.6 or greater.
See also positional all $[] which also updates "multiple array elements" but without applying to specified conditions and applies to all elements in the array where that is the desired action.
Also see Updating a Nested Array with MongoDB for how these new positional operators apply to "nested" array structures, where "arrays are within other arrays".
IMPORTANT - Upgraded installations from previous versions "may" have not enabled MongoDB features, which can also cause statements to fail. You should ensure your upgrade procedure is complete with details such as index upgrades and then run
db.adminCommand( { setFeatureCompatibilityVersion: "3.6" } )
Or higher version as is applicable to your installed version. i.e "4.0" for version 4 and onwards at present. This enabled such features as the new positional update operators and others. You can also check with:
db.adminCommand( { getParameter: 1, featureCompatibilityVersion: 1 } )
To return the current setting
UPDATE:
As of Mongo version 3.6, this answer is no longer valid as the mentioned issue was fixed and there are ways to achieve this. Please check other answers.
At this moment it is not possible to use the positional operator to update all items in an array. See JIRA http://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-1243
As a work around you can:
Update each item individually
(events.0.handled events.1.handled
...) or...
Read the document, do the edits
manually and save it replacing the
older one (check "Update if
Current" if you want to ensure
atomic updates)
What worked for me was this:
db.collection.find({ _id: ObjectId('4d2d8deff4e6c1d71fc29a07') })
.forEach(function (doc) {
doc.events.forEach(function (event) {
if (event.profile === 10) {
event.handled=0;
}
});
db.collection.save(doc);
});
I think it's clearer for mongo newbies and anyone familiar with JQuery & friends.
This can also be accomplished with a while loop which checks to see if any documents remain that still have subdocuments that have not been updated. This method preserves the atomicity of your updates (which many of the other solutions here do not).
var query = {
events: {
$elemMatch: {
profile: 10,
handled: { $ne: 0 }
}
}
};
while (db.yourCollection.find(query).count() > 0) {
db.yourCollection.update(
query,
{ $set: { "events.$.handled": 0 } },
{ multi: true }
);
}
The number of times the loop is executed will equal the maximum number of times subdocuments with profile equal to 10 and handled not equal to 0 occur in any of the documents in your collection. So if you have 100 documents in your collection and one of them has three subdocuments that match query and all the other documents have fewer matching subdocuments, the loop will execute three times.
This method avoids the danger of clobbering other data that may be updated by another process while this script executes. It also minimizes the amount of data being transferred between client and server.
This does in fact relate to the long standing issue at http://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-1243 where there are in fact a number of challenges to a clear syntax that supports "all cases" where mutiple array matches are found. There are in fact methods already in place that "aid" in solutions to this problem, such as Bulk Operations which have been implemented after this original post.
It is still not possible to update more than a single matched array element in a single update statement, so even with a "multi" update all you will ever be able to update is just one mathed element in the array for each document in that single statement.
The best possible solution at present is to find and loop all matched documents and process Bulk updates which will at least allow many operations to be sent in a single request with a singular response. You can optionally use .aggregate() to reduce the array content returned in the search result to just those that match the conditions for the update selection:
db.collection.aggregate([
{ "$match": { "events.handled": 1 } },
{ "$project": {
"events": {
"$setDifference": [
{ "$map": {
"input": "$events",
"as": "event",
"in": {
"$cond": [
{ "$eq": [ "$$event.handled", 1 ] },
"$$el",
false
]
}
}},
[false]
]
}
}}
]).forEach(function(doc) {
doc.events.forEach(function(event) {
bulk.find({ "_id": doc._id, "events.handled": 1 }).updateOne({
"$set": { "events.$.handled": 0 }
});
count++;
if ( count % 1000 == 0 ) {
bulk.execute();
bulk = db.collection.initializeOrderedBulkOp();
}
});
});
if ( count % 1000 != 0 )
bulk.execute();
The .aggregate() portion there will work when there is a "unique" identifier for the array or all content for each element forms a "unique" element itself. This is due to the "set" operator in $setDifference used to filter any false values returned from the $map operation used to process the array for matches.
If your array content does not have unique elements you can try an alternate approach with $redact:
db.collection.aggregate([
{ "$match": { "events.handled": 1 } },
{ "$redact": {
"$cond": {
"if": {
"$eq": [ { "$ifNull": [ "$handled", 1 ] }, 1 ]
},
"then": "$$DESCEND",
"else": "$$PRUNE"
}
}}
])
Where it's limitation is that if "handled" was in fact a field meant to be present at other document levels then you are likely going to get unexepected results, but is fine where that field appears only in one document position and is an equality match.
Future releases ( post 3.1 MongoDB ) as of writing will have a $filter operation that is simpler:
db.collection.aggregate([
{ "$match": { "events.handled": 1 } },
{ "$project": {
"events": {
"$filter": {
"input": "$events",
"as": "event",
"cond": { "$eq": [ "$$event.handled", 1 ] }
}
}
}}
])
And all releases that support .aggregate() can use the following approach with $unwind, but the usage of that operator makes it the least efficient approach due to the array expansion in the pipeline:
db.collection.aggregate([
{ "$match": { "events.handled": 1 } },
{ "$unwind": "$events" },
{ "$match": { "events.handled": 1 } },
{ "$group": {
"_id": "$_id",
"events": { "$push": "$events" }
}}
])
In all cases where the MongoDB version supports a "cursor" from aggregate output, then this is just a matter of choosing an approach and iterating the results with the same block of code shown to process the Bulk update statements. Bulk Operations and "cursors" from aggregate output are introduced in the same version ( MongoDB 2.6 ) and therefore usually work hand in hand for processing.
In even earlier versions then it is probably best to just use .find() to return the cursor, and filter out the execution of statements to just the number of times the array element is matched for the .update() iterations:
db.collection.find({ "events.handled": 1 }).forEach(function(doc){
doc.events.filter(function(event){ return event.handled == 1 }).forEach(function(event){
db.collection.update({ "_id": doc._id },{ "$set": { "events.$.handled": 0 }});
});
});
If you are aboslutely determined to do "multi" updates or deem that to be ultimately more efficient than processing multiple updates for each matched document, then you can always determine the maximum number of possible array matches and just execute a "multi" update that many times, until basically there are no more documents to update.
A valid approach for MongoDB 2.4 and 2.2 versions could also use .aggregate() to find this value:
var result = db.collection.aggregate([
{ "$match": { "events.handled": 1 } },
{ "$unwind": "$events" },
{ "$match": { "events.handled": 1 } },
{ "$group": {
"_id": "$_id",
"count": { "$sum": 1 }
}},
{ "$group": {
"_id": null,
"count": { "$max": "$count" }
}}
]);
var max = result.result[0].count;
while ( max-- ) {
db.collection.update({ "events.handled": 1},{ "$set": { "events.$.handled": 0 }},{ "multi": true })
}
Whatever the case, there are certain things you do not want to do within the update:
Do not "one shot" update the array: Where if you think it might be more efficient to update the whole array content in code and then just $set the whole array in each document. This might seem faster to process, but there is no guarantee that the array content has not changed since it was read and the update is performed. Though $set is still an atomic operator, it will only update the array with what it "thinks" is the correct data, and thus is likely to overwrite any changes occurring between read and write.
Do not calculate index values to update: Where similar to the "one shot" approach you just work out that position 0 and position 2 ( and so on ) are the elements to update and code these in with and eventual statement like:
{ "$set": {
"events.0.handled": 0,
"events.2.handled": 0
}}
Again the problem here is the "presumption" that those index values found when the document was read are the same index values in th array at the time of update. If new items are added to the array in a way that changes the order then those positions are not longer valid and the wrong items are in fact updated.
So until there is a reasonable syntax determined for allowing multiple matched array elements to be processed in single update statement then the basic approach is to either update each matched array element in an indvidual statement ( ideally in Bulk ) or essentially work out the maximum array elements to update or keep updating until no more modified results are returned. At any rate, you should "always" be processing positional $ updates on the matched array element, even if that is only updating one element per statement.
Bulk Operations are in fact the "generalized" solution to processing any operations that work out to be "multiple operations", and since there are more applications for this than merely updating mutiple array elements with the same value, then it has of course been implemented already, and it is presently the best approach to solve this problem.
First: your code did not work because you were using the positional operator $ which only identifies an element to update in an array but does not even explicitly specify its position in the array.
What you need is the filtered positional operator $[<identifier>]. It would update all elements that match an array filter condition.
Solution:
db.collection.update({"events.profile":10}, { $set: { "events.$[elem].handled" : 0 } },
{
multi: true,
arrayFilters: [ { "elem.profile": 10 } ]
})
Visit mongodb doc here
What the code does:
{"events.profile":10} filters your collection and return the documents matching the filter
The $set update operator: modifies matching fields of documents it acts on.
{multi:true} It makes .update() modifies all documents matching the filter hence behaving like updateMany()
{ "events.$[elem].handled" : 0 } and arrayFilters: [ { "elem.profile": 10 } ]
This technique involves the use of the filtered positional array with arrayFilters. the filtered positional array here $[elem] acts as a placeholder for all elements in the array fields that match the conditions specified in the array filter.
Array filters
You can update all elements in MongoDB
db.collectioname.updateOne(
{ "key": /vikas/i },
{ $set: {
"arr.$[].status" : "completed"
} }
)
It will update all the "status" value to "completed" in the "arr" Array
If Only one document
db.collectioname.updateOne(
 { key:"someunique", "arr.key": "myuniq" },
 { $set: {
   "arr.$.status" : "completed",
   "arr.$.msgs":  {
        "result" : ""
        }
   
 } }
)
But if not one and also you don't want all the documents in the array to update then you need to loop through the element and inside the if block
db.collectioname.find({findCriteria })
.forEach(function (doc) {
doc.arr.forEach(function (singlearr) {
if (singlearr check) {
singlearr.handled =0
}
});
db.collection.save(doc);
});
I'm amazed this still hasn't been addressed in mongo. Overall mongo doesn't seem to be great when dealing with sub-arrays. You can't count sub-arrays simply for example.
I used Javier's first solution. Read the array into events then loop through and build the set exp:
var set = {}, i, l;
for(i=0,l=events.length;i<l;i++) {
if(events[i].profile == 10) {
set['events.' + i + '.handled'] = 0;
}
}
.update(objId, {$set:set});
This can be abstracted into a function using a callback for the conditional test
The thread is very old, but I came looking for answer here hence providing new solution.
With MongoDB version 3.6+, it is now possible to use the positional operator to update all items in an array. See official documentation here.
Following query would work for the question asked here. I have also verified with Java-MongoDB driver and it works successfully.
.update( // or updateMany directly, removing the flag for 'multi'
{"events.profile":10},
{$set:{"events.$[].handled":0}}, // notice the empty brackets after '$' opearor
false,
true
)
Hope this helps someone like me.
I've been looking for a solution to this using the newest driver for C# 3.6 and here's the fix I eventually settled on. The key here is using "$[]" which according to MongoDB is new as of version 3.6. See https://docs.mongodb.com/manual/reference/operator/update/positional-all/#up.S[] for more information.
Here's the code:
{
var filter = Builders<Scene>.Filter.Where(i => i.ID != null);
var update = Builders<Scene>.Update.Unset("area.$[].discoveredBy");
var result = collection.UpdateMany(filter, update, new UpdateOptions { IsUpsert = true});
}
For more context see my original post here:
Remove array element from ALL documents using MongoDB C# driver
$[] operator selects all nested array ..You can update all array items with '$[]'
.update({"events.profile":10},{$set:{"events.$[].handled":0}},false,true)
Reference
Please be aware that some answers in this thread suggesting use $[] is WRONG.
db.collection.update(
{"events.profile":10},
{$set:{"events.$[].handled":0}},
{multi:true}
)
The above code will update "handled" to 0 for all elements in "events" array, regardless of its "profile" value. The query {"events.profile":10} is only to filter the whole document, not the documents in the array. In this situation it is a must to use $[elem] with arrayFilters to specify the condition of array items so Neil Lunn's answer is correct.
Actually, The save command is only on instance of Document class.
That have a lot of methods and attribute. So you can use lean() function to reduce work load.
Refer here. https://hashnode.com/post/why-are-mongoose-mongodb-odm-lean-queries-faster-than-normal-queries-cillvawhq0062kj53asxoyn7j
Another problem with save function, that will make conflict data in with multi-save at a same time.
Model.Update will make data consistently.
So to update multi items in array of document. Use your familiar programming language and try something like this, I use mongoose in that:
User.findOne({'_id': '4d2d8deff4e6c1d71fc29a07'}).lean().exec()
.then(usr =>{
if(!usr) return
usr.events.forEach( e => {
if(e && e.profile==10 ) e.handled = 0
})
User.findOneAndUpdate(
{'_id': '4d2d8deff4e6c1d71fc29a07'},
{$set: {events: usr.events}},
{new: true}
).lean().exec().then(updatedUsr => console.log(updatedUsr))
})
Update array field in multiple documents in mongo db.
Use $pull or $push with update many query to update array elements in mongoDb.
Notification.updateMany(
{ "_id": { $in: req.body.notificationIds } },
{
$pull: { "receiversId": req.body.userId }
}, function (err) {
if (err) {
res.status(500).json({ "msg": err });
} else {
res.status(200).json({
"msg": "Notification Deleted Successfully."
});
}
});
if you want to update array inside array
await Booking.updateOne(
{
userId: req.currentUser?.id,
cart: {
$elemMatch: {
id: cartId,
date: date,
//timeSlots: {
//$elemMatch: {
//id: timeSlotId,
//},
//},
},
},
},
{
$set: {
version: booking.version + 1,
'cart.$[i].timeSlots.$[j].spots': spots,
},
},
{
arrayFilters: [
{
'i.id': cartId,
},
{
'j.id': timeSlotId,
},
],
new: true,
}
);
I tried the following and its working fine.
.update({'events.profile': 10}, { '$set': {'events.$.handled': 0 }},{ safe: true, multi:true }, callback function);
// callback function in case of nodejs

Count unique keys - mongo aggregation pipeline

I have a mongo collection of searches. Each search has a criteria object, which can have any combination of criteria. So something like:
{
"_id": 1,
"criteria": {
"state": ["NY", "IL"]
...
},
...
}
I'm building a mongo aggregation pipeline, and I'm wondering how to project only the keys so that I can count them.
So far the first step of my pipeline is:
db.userSearch.aggregate([
{ "$project": { "criteria":1 } },
...
])
This returns all of the criteria objects correctly, now I need to project the keys somehow. Does anyone have any ideas?
Edit:
desired output: {"state":20, "balance":5, "geolocation":10, ...}
In case anyone was wondering, I used mapReduce as follows.
map = function() {
Object.keys(this.criteria).forEach(function(k) {
emit(k, 1)
})
}
reduce = function(k, vals) {
return Array.sum(vals)
}
db.userSearch.mapReduce(map, reduce, 'out')

Mongo aggregation and MongoError: exception: BufBuilder attempted to grow() to 134217728 bytes, past the 64MB limit

I'm trying to aggregate data from my Mongo collection to produce some statistics for FreeCodeCamp by making a large json file of the data to use later.
I'm running into the error in the title. There doesn't seem to be a lot of information about this, and the other posts here on SO don't have an answer. I'm using the latest version of MongoDB and drivers.
I suspect there is probably a better way to run this aggregation, but it runs fine on a subset of my collection. My full collection is ~7GB.
I'm running the script via node aggScript.js > ~/Desktop/output.json
Here is the relevant code:
MongoClient.connect(secrets.db, function(err, database) {
if (err) {
throw err;
}
database.collection('user').aggregate([
{
$match: {
'completedChallenges': {
$exists: true
}
}
},
{
$match: {
'completedChallenges': {
$ne: ''
}
}
},
{
$match: {
'completedChallenges': {
$ne: null
}
}
},
{
$group: {
'_id': 1, 'completedChallenges': {
$addToSet: '$completedChallenges'
}
}
}
], {
allowDiskUse: true
}, function(err, results) {
if (err) { throw err; }
var aggData = results.map(function(camper) {
return _.flatten(camper.completedChallenges.map(function(challenges) {
return challenges.map(function(challenge) {
return {
name: challenge.name,
completedDate: challenge.completedDate,
solution: challenge.solution
};
});
}), true);
});
console.log(JSON.stringify(aggData));
process.exit(0);
});
});
Aggregate returns a single document containing all the result data, which limits how much data can be returned to the maximum BSON document size.
Assuming that you do actually want all this data, there are two options:
Use aggregateCursor instead of aggregate. This returns a cursor rather than a single document, which you can then iterate over
add a $out stage as the last stage of your pipeline. This tells mongodb to write your aggregation data to the specified collection. The aggregate command itself returns no data and you then query that collection as you would any other.
It just means that the result object you are building became too large. This kind of issue should not be impacted by the version. The fix implemented for 2.5.0 only prevents the crash from occurring.
You need to filter ($match) properly to have the data which you need in result. Also group with proper fields. The results are put into buffer of 64MB. So reduce your data. $project only the columns you require in result. Not whole documents.
You can combine your 3 $match objects to single to reduce pipelines.
{
$match: {
'completedChallenges': {
$exists: true,
$ne: null,
$ne: ""
}
}
}
I had this issue and I couldn't debug the problem so I ended up abandoning the aggregation approach. Instead I just iterated through each entry and created a new collection. Here's a stripped down shell script which might help you see what I mean:
db.new_collection.ensureIndex({my_key:1}); //for performance, not a necessity
db.old_collection.find({}).noCursorTimeout().forEach(function(doc) {
db.new_collection.update(
{ my_key: doc.my_key },
{
$push: { stuff: doc.stuff, other_stuff: doc.other_stuff},
$inc: { thing: doc.thing},
},
{ upsert: true }
);
});
I don't imagine that this approach would suit everyone, but hopefully that helps anyone who was in my particular situation.