how to merge RDD tuples - scala

I want to use reduceByKey merge many tuples with same key,
here is the code:
val data = Array(DenseMatrix((2.0,1.0,5.0),(4.0,3.0,6.0)),
DenseMatrix((7.0,8.0,9.0),(10.0,12.0,11.0)))
val init = sc.parallelize(data,2)
//getColumn
def getColumn(v:DenseMatrix[Double]) : Map[Int, IndexedSeq[(Int, Double)]]={
val r = Random
val index = 0 to v.size - 1
def func(x:Int, y:DenseMatrix[Double]):(Int,(Int, Double)) =
{
( x,( r.nextInt(10), y.valueAt(x)))
}
val rest = index.map{x=> func(x,v)}.groupBy(x=>x._1).mapValues(x=>x.map(_._2))
rest
}
val out= init.flatMap{ v=> getColumn(v) }
val reduceOutput = tmp.reduceByKey(_++_)
val out2 = out.map{case(k,v)=>k}.collect() // keys here are not I want
here is two pic, the first one is the [key,value] pairs I thought it would be, the second one shows the real keys ,they are not I want,so the ouput is not right.
What should I do?

Related

spark: join rdd based on sequence of another rdd

I have an rdd say sample_rdd of type RDD[(String, String, Int))] with 3 columns id,item,count. sample data:
id1|item1|1
id1|item2|3
id1|item3|4
id2|item1|3
id2|item4|2
I want to join each id against a lookup_rdd this:
item1|0
item2|0
item3|0
item4|0
item5|0
The output should give me following for id1, outerjoin with lookuptable:
item1|1
item2|3
item3|4
item4|0
item5|0
Similarly for id2 i should get:
item1|3
item2|0
item3|0
item4|2
item5|0
Finally output for each id should have all counts with id:
id1,1,3,4,0,0
id2,3,0,0,2,0
IMPORTANT:this output should be always ordered according to the order in lookup
This is what i have tried:
val line = rdd_sample.map { case (id, item, count) => (id, (item,count)) }.map(row=>(row._1,row._2)).groupByKey()
get(line).map(l=>(l._1,l._2)).mapValues(item_count=>lookup_r‌​dd.leftOuterJoin(ite‌​m_count))
def get (line: RDD[(String, Iterable[(String, Int)])]) = { for{ (id, item_cnt) <- line i = item_cnt.map(tuple => (tuple._1,tuple._2)) } yield (id,i)
Try below. Run each step on your local console to understand whats happening in detail.
The idea is to zipwithindex and form seq based on lookup_rdd.
(i1,0),(i2,1)..(i5,4) and (id1,0),(id2,1)
Index of final result wanted = [delta(length of lookup_rdd seq) * index of id1..id2 ] + index of i1...i5
So the base seq generated will be (0,(i1,id1)),(1,(i2,id1))...(8,(i4,id2)),(9,(i5,id2))
and then based on the key(i1,id1) reduce and calculate count.
val res2 = sc.parallelize(arr) //sample_rdd
val res3 = sc.parallelize(cart) //lookup_rdd
val delta = res3.count
val res83 = res3.map(_._1).zipWithIndex.cartesian(res2.map(_._1).distinct.zipWithIndex).map(x => (((x._1._1,x._2._1),((delta * x._2._2) + x._1._2, 0)))
val res86 = res2.map(x => ((x._2,x._1),x._3)).reduceByKey(_+_)
val res88 = res83.leftOuterJoin(res86)
val res91 = res88.map( x => {
x._2._2 match {
case Some(x1) => (x._2._1._1, (x._1,x._2._1._2+x1))
case None => (x._2._1._1, (x._1,x._2._1._2))
}
})
val res97 = res91.sortByKey(true).map( x => {
(x._2._1._2,List(x._2._2))}).reduceByKey(_++_)
res97.collect
// SOLUTION: Array((id1,List(1,3,4,0,0)),(id2,List(3,0,0,2,0)))

how to join two datasets by key in scala spark

I have two datasets and each dataset have two elements.
Below are examples.
Data1: (name, animal)
('abc,def', 'monkey(1)')
('df,gh', 'zebra')
...
Data2: (name, fruit)
('a,efg', 'apple')
('abc,def', 'banana(1)')
...
Results expected: (name, animal, fruit)
('abc,def', 'monkey(1)', 'banana(1)')
...
I want to join these two datasets by using first column 'name.' I have tried to do this for a couple of hours, but I couldn't figure out. Can anyone help me?
val sparkConf = new SparkConf().setAppName("abc").setMaster("local[2]")
val sc = new SparkContext(sparkConf)
val text1 = sc.textFile(args(0))
val text2 = sc.textFile(args(1))
val joined = text1.join(text2)
Above code is not working!
join is defined on RDDs of pairs, that is, RDDs of type RDD[(K,V)].
The first step needed is to transform the input data into the right type.
We first need to transform the original data of type String into pairs of (Key, Value):
val parse:String => (String, String) = s => {
val regex = "^\\('([^']+)',[\\W]*'([^']+)'\\)$".r
s match {
case regex(k,v) => (k,v)
case _ => ("","")
}
}
(Note that we can't use a simple split(",") expression because the key contains commas)
Then we use that function to parse the text input data:
val s1 = Seq("('abc,def', 'monkey(1)')","('df,gh', 'zebra')")
val s2 = Seq("('a,efg', 'apple')","('abc,def', 'banana(1)')")
val rdd1 = sparkContext.parallelize(s1)
val rdd2 = sparkContext.parallelize(s2)
val kvRdd1 = rdd1.map(parse)
val kvRdd2 = rdd2.map(parse)
Finally, we use the join method to join the two RDDs
val joined = kvRdd1.join(kvRdd2)
// Let's check out results
joined.collect
// res31: Array[(String, (String, String))] = Array((abc,def,(monkey(1),banana(1))))
You have to create pairRDDs first for your data sets then you have to apply join transformation. Your data sets are not looking accurate.
Please consider the below example.
**Dataset1**
a 1
b 2
c 3
**Dataset2**
a 8
b 4
Your code should be like below in Scala
val pairRDD1 = sc.textFile("/path_to_yourfile/first.txt").map(line => (line.split(" ")(0),line.split(" ")(1)))
val pairRDD2 = sc.textFile("/path_to_yourfile/second.txt").map(line => (line.split(" ")(0),line.split(" ")(1)))
val joinRDD = pairRDD1.join(pairRDD2)
joinRDD.collect
Here is the result from scala shell
res10: Array[(String, (String, String))] = Array((a,(1,8)), (b,(2,4)))

obtain a specific value from a RDD according to another RDD

I want to map a RDD by lookup another RDD by this code:
val product = numOfT.map{case((a,b),c)=>
val h = keyValueRecords.lookup(b).take(1).mkString.toInt
(a,(h*c))
}
a,b are Strings and c is a Integer. keyValueRecords is like this: RDD[(string,string)]-
i got type missmatch error: how can I fix it ?
what is my mistake ?
This is a sample of data:
userId,movieId,rating,timestamp
1,16,4.0,1217897793
1,24,1.5,1217895807
1,32,4.0,1217896246
2,3,2.0,859046959
3,7,3.0,8414840873
I'm triying by this code:
val lines = sc.textFile("ratings.txt").map(s => {
val substrings = s.split(",")
(substrings(0), (substrings(1),substrings(1)))
})
val shoppingList = lines.groupByKey()
val coOccurence = shoppingList.flatMap{case(k,v) =>
val arry1 = v.toArray
val arry2 = v.toArray
val pairs = for (pair1 <- arry1; pair2 <- arry2 ) yield ((pair1,pair2),1)
pairs.iterator
}
val numOfT = coOccurence.reduceByKey((a,b)=>(a+b)) // (((item,rate),(item,rate)),coccurence)
// produce recommend for an especial user
val keyValueRecords = sc.textFile("ratings.txt").map(s => {
val substrings = s.split(",")
(substrings(0), (substrings(1),substrings(2)))
}).filter{case(k,v)=> k=="1"}.groupByKey().flatMap{case(k,v) =>
val arry1 = v.toArray
val arry2 = v.toArray
val pairs = for (pair1 <- arry1; pair2 <- arry2 ) yield ((pair1,pair2),1)
pairs.iterator
}
val numOfTForaUser = keyValueRecords.reduceByKey((a,b)=>(a+b))
val joined = numOfT.join(numOfTForaUser).map{case(k,v)=>(k._1._1,(k._2._2.toFloat*v._1.toFloat))}.collect.foreach(println)
The Last RDD won't produced. Is it wrong ?

Spark column wise word count

We are trying to generate column wise statistics of our dataset in spark. In addition to using the summary function from statistics library. We are using the following procedure:
We determine the columns with string values
Generate key value pair for the whole dataset, using the column number as key and value of column as value
generate a new map of format
(K,V) ->((K,V),1)
Then we use reduceByKey to find the sum of all unique value in all the columns. We cache this output to reduce further computation time.
In the next step we cycle through the columns using a for loop to find the statistics for all the columns.
We are trying to reduce the for loop by again utilizing the map reduce way but we are unable to find some way to achieve it. Doing so will allow us to generate column statistics for all columns in one execution. The for loop method is running sequentially making it very slow.
Code:
//drops the header
def dropHeader(data: RDD[String]): RDD[String] = {
data.mapPartitionsWithIndex((idx, lines) => {
if (idx == 0) {
lines.drop(1)
}
lines
})
}
def retAtrTuple(x: String) = {
val newX = x.split(",")
for (h <- 0 until newX.length)
yield (h,newX(h))
}
val line = sc.textFile("hdfs://.../myfile.csv")
val withoutHeader: RDD[String] = dropHeader(line)
val kvPairs = withoutHeader.flatMap(retAtrTuple) //generates a key-value pair where key is the column number and value is column's value
var bool_numeric_col = kvPairs.map{case (x,y) => (x,isNumeric(y))}.reduceByKey(_&&_).sortByKey() //this contains column indexes as key and boolean as value (true for numeric and false for string type)
var str_cols = bool_numeric_col.filter{case (x,y) => y == false}.map{case (x,y) => x}
var num_cols = bool_numeric_col.filter{case (x,y) => y == true}.map{case (x,y) => x}
var str_col = str_cols.toArray //array consisting the string col
var num_col = num_cols.toArray //array consisting numeric col
val colCount = kvPairs.map((_,1)).reduceByKey(_+_)
val e1 = colCount.map{case ((x,y),z) => (x,(y,z))}
var numPairs = e1.filter{case (x,(y,z)) => str_col.contains(x) }
//running for loops which needs to be parallelized/optimized as it sequentially operates on each column. Idea is to find the top10, bottom10 and number of distinct elements column wise
for(i <- str_col){
var total = numPairs.filter{case (x,(y,z)) => x==i}.sortBy(_._2._2)
var leastOnes = total.take(10)
println("leastOnes for Col" + i)
leastOnes.foreach(println)
var maxOnes = total.sortBy(-_._2._2).take(10)
println("maxOnes for Col" + i)
maxOnes.foreach(println)
println("distinct for Col" + i + " is " + total.count)
}
Let me simplify your question a bit. (A lot actually.) We have an RDD[(Int, String)] and we want to find the top 10 most common Strings for each Int (which are all in the 0–100 range).
Instead of sorting, as in your example, it is more efficient to use the Spark built-in RDD.top(n) method. Its run-time is linear in the size of the data, and requires moving much less data around than a sort.
Consider the implementation of top in RDD.scala. You want to do the same, but with one priority queue (heap) per Int key. The code becomes fairly complex:
import org.apache.spark.util.BoundedPriorityQueue // Pretend it's not private.
def top(n: Int, rdd: RDD[(Int, String)]): Map[Int, Iterable[String]] = {
// A heap that only keeps the top N values, so it has bounded size.
type Heap = BoundedPriorityQueue[(Long, String)]
// Get the word counts.
val counts: RDD[[(Int, String), Long)] =
rdd.map(_ -> 1L).reduceByKey(_ + _)
// In each partition create a column -> heap map.
val perPartition: RDD[Map[Int, Heap]] =
counts.mapPartitions { items =>
val heaps =
collection.mutable.Map[Int, Heap].withDefault(i => new Heap(n))
for (((k, v), count) <- items) {
heaps(k) += count -> v
}
Iterator.single(heaps)
}
// Merge the per-partition heap maps into one.
val merged: Map[Int, Heap] =
perPartition.reduce { (heaps1, heaps2) =>
val heaps =
collection.mutable.Map[Int, Heap].withDefault(i => new Heap(n))
for ((k, heap) <- heaps1.toSeq ++ heaps2.toSeq) {
for (cv <- heap) {
heaps(k) += cv
}
}
heaps
}
// Discard counts, return just the top strings.
merged.mapValues(_.map { case(count, value) => value })
}
This is efficient, but made painful because we need to work with multiple columns at the same time. It would be way easier to have one RDD per column and just call rdd.top(10) on each.
Unfortunately the naive way to split up the RDD into N smaller RDDs does N passes:
def split(together: RDD[(Int, String)], columns: Int): Seq[RDD[String]] = {
together.cache // We will make N passes over this RDD.
(0 until columns).map {
i => together.filter { case (key, value) => key == i }.values
}
}
A more efficient solution could be to write out the data into separate files by key, then load it back into separate RDDs. This is discussed in Write to multiple outputs by key Spark - one Spark job.
Thanks for #Daniel Darabos's answer. But there are some mistakes.
mixed use of Map and collection.mutable.Map
withDefault((i: Int) => new Heap(n)) do not create a new Heap when you set heaps(k) += count -> v
mix uasage of parentheses
Here is the modified code:
//import org.apache.spark.util.BoundedPriorityQueue // Pretend it's not private. copy to your own folder and import it
import org.apache.log4j.{Level, Logger}
import org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD
import org.apache.spark.{SparkConf, SparkContext}
object BoundedPriorityQueueTest {
// https://stackoverflow.com/questions/28166190/spark-column-wise-word-count
def top(n: Int, rdd: RDD[(Int, String)]): Map[Int, Iterable[String]] = {
// A heap that only keeps the top N values, so it has bounded size.
type Heap = BoundedPriorityQueue[(Long, String)]
// Get the word counts.
val counts: RDD[((Int, String), Long)] =
rdd.map(_ -> 1L).reduceByKey(_ + _)
// In each partition create a column -> heap map.
val perPartition: RDD[collection.mutable.Map[Int, Heap]] =
counts.mapPartitions { items =>
val heaps =
collection.mutable.Map[Int, Heap]() // .withDefault((i: Int) => new Heap(n))
for (((k, v), count) <- items) {
println("\n---")
println("before add " + ((k, v), count) + ", the map is: ")
println(heaps)
if (!heaps.contains(k)) {
println("not contains key " + k)
heaps(k) = new Heap(n)
println(heaps)
}
heaps(k) += count -> v
println("after add " + ((k, v), count) + ", the map is: ")
println(heaps)
}
println(heaps)
Iterator.single(heaps)
}
// Merge the per-partition heap maps into one.
val merged: collection.mutable.Map[Int, Heap] =
perPartition.reduce { (heaps1, heaps2) =>
val heaps =
collection.mutable.Map[Int, Heap]() //.withDefault((i: Int) => new Heap(n))
println(heaps)
for ((k, heap) <- heaps1.toSeq ++ heaps2.toSeq) {
for (cv <- heap) {
heaps(k) += cv
}
}
heaps
}
// Discard counts, return just the top strings.
merged.mapValues(_.map { case (count, value) => value }).toMap
}
def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = {
Logger.getRootLogger().setLevel(Level.FATAL) //http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27781187/how-to-stop-messages-displaying-on-spark-console
val conf = new SparkConf().setAppName("word count").setMaster("local[1]")
val sc = new SparkContext(conf)
sc.setLogLevel("WARN") //http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27781187/how-to-stop-messages-displaying-on-spark-console
val words = sc.parallelize(List((1, "s11"), (1, "s11"), (1, "s12"), (1, "s13"), (2, "s21"), (2, "s22"), (2, "s22"), (2, "s23")))
println("# words:" + words.count())
val result = top(1, words)
println("\n--result:")
println(result)
sc.stop()
print("DONE")
}
}

spark scala get uncommon map elements

I am trying to split my data set into train and test data sets. I first read the file into memory as shown here:
val ratings = sc.textFile(movieLensdataHome+"/ratings.csv").map { line=>
val fields = line.split(",")
Rating(fields(0).toInt,fields(1).toInt,fields(2).toDouble)
}
Then I select 80% of those for my training set:
val train = ratings.sample(false,.8,1)
Is there an easy way to get the test set in a distributed way,
I am trying this but fails:
val test = ratings.filter(!_.equals(train.map(_)))
val test = ratings.subtract(train)
Take a look here. http://markmail.org/message/qi6srcyka6lcxe7o
Here is the code
def split[T : ClassManifest](data: RDD[T], p: Double, seed: Long =
System.currentTimeMillis): (RDD[T], RDD[T]) = {
val rand = new java.util.Random(seed)
val partitionSeeds = data.partitions.map(partition => rand.nextLong)
val temp = data.mapPartitionsWithIndex((index, iter) => {
val partitionRand = new java.util.Random(partitionSeeds(index))
iter.map(x => (x, partitionRand.nextDouble))
})
(temp.filter(_._2 <= p).map(_._1), temp.filter(_._2 > p).map(_._1))
}
Instead of using an exclusion method (like filter or subtract), I'd partition the set "by hand" for a more efficient execution:
val probabilisticSegment:(RDD[Double,Rating],Double=>Boolean) => RDD[Rating] =
(rdd,prob) => rdd.filter{case (k,v) => prob(k)}.map {case (k,v) => v}
val ranRating = rating.map( x=> (Random.nextDouble(), x)).cache
val train = probabilisticSegment(ranRating, _ < 0.8)
val test = probabilisticSegment(ranRating, _ >= 0.8)
cache saves the intermediate RDD sothat the next two operations can be performed from that point on without incurring in the execution of the complete lineage.
(*) Note the use of val to define a function instead of def. vals are serializer-friendly