ShowModal for an associated form - forms

I have a component with bellow properties:
property Form: TForm read FForm write SetForm
property BtnOK: TButton read FBtnOK write SetBtnOK
and a procedure behind like this:
procedure Execute_FormShowModal;
I would like to open the associated form (eg. FormUser) when the Execute_FormShowModal is executed.
I would like to mention that, the associated form is already defined and exist, but is not created.
Is there any possibility to do this?
procedure TMyComp.Execute_FormShowModal;
var
frm: TForm;
begin
frm:= TForm(FForm.ClassName).Create(FParentForm); //Access Violation...
//... here I would like to play also this the elements from this form
//like: BtnOK.Enabled:= False;
frm.ShowModal;
frm.Free;
end;

You added in the comments that you are setting FForm to be equal to a valid existing form. If so, you may not need to create anything:
procedure TMyComp.Execute_FormShowModal;
var
frm: TFormUser;
begin
frm:= TFormUser(FForm);
frm.BtnOK.Enabled:=False;
frm.ShowModal;
//frm.Free;
end;
This assumes that this valid instance you are referring to is declared
type
TFormUser = class(TForm)
BtnOK : TButton;
// etc...
end;
If you trying to make a copy of the form you might use this:
procedure TMyComp.Execute_FormShowModal;
var
frm: TFormUser;
begin
frm:= TFormUser(TFormClass(FForm.ClassType).Create(FParentForm));
// which is no different than:
frm:= TFormUser.Create(FParentForm));
frm.BtnOK.Enabled:=False;
frm.ShowModal;
frm.Free;
end;
If you want to manipulate the controls on the form (i.e. BtnOK), then you need to know the class type of the Form (TFormUser in this case). So it is contradictory to be required to know the exact class type of the form and yet want to instanciate a form from a design-time established type.
Since you may be trying to instanciate the form without "knowing" its absolute type, your FForm property should be the class for the form.
Assuming you weren't publishing the "Form" property in your component, I would make these changes to your component:
TMyComp = class(TComponent)
FFormClass : TFormClass;
procedure SetFormClass(Value : TFormClass);
property FormClass: TFormClass read FFormClass write SetFormClass;
procedure Execute_FormShowModal;
end;
The initialization code you referred to might look like this:
begin
// .....
//MyComp.Form := FormUser1;
MyComp.FormClass := TFormUser;
// .....
end;
And then "Execute_FormShowModal" becomes:
procedure TMyComp.Execute_FormShowModal;
var
frm: TForm;
begin
// Check that FFormClass is not nil and perform some alternate
// action.
// if FFormClass = nil then ......
//
frm:= FFormClass.Create(FParentForm);
frm.ShowModal;
frm.Free;
end;
Of course, you may also want to add some code to check if FFormClass is nil and preform some alternate behavior if so, like raise an exception or showing some message or even instanciating a default form.
If you were publishing the Form property then it won't be able to handle the case where your FForm field value is nil because you don't know or have a specific class type to instanciate the Form. That is:
frm:= TFormClass(FForm.ClassType).Create(FParentForm);
will simply display a blank, empty form.
If you want to publish this property, you could try making it a string type that carries the name of the form class you want to instanciate and then use RTTI to find the class:
uses RTTI;
TMyComp = class(TComponent)
FFormClassName : string;
procedure SetFormClassName(const Value : string);
property FormClassName: string read FFormClassName write SetFormClassName;
procedure Execute_FormShowModal;
end;
procedure TMyComp.Execute_FormShowModal;
var
frmCls : TFormClass;
frm: TForm;
RTTI : TRTTIContext;
RTTIType : TRTTIType;
begin
frmCls := nil;
for RTTIType in RTTI.GetTypes do
begin
if (RTTIType.Name = FFormClassName) and (RTTIType.TypeKind = tkClass) then
begin
if RTTIType.Handle.TypeData.ClassType.InheritsFrom(TForm) then
begin
frmClass := TFormClass(RTTIType.Handle.TypeData.ClassType);
break;
end;
end;
end;
// Check that frmCls is not nil and perform some alternate
// action.
// if frmCls = nil then ......
//
frm:= frmCls.Create(FParentForm);
frm.ShowModal;
frm.Free;
end;

Is there any possibility to do this?
Yes
Try something like this
uses uFForm; // Add the unit name that defined the associated form to your (TMyComp) unit uses clause
procedure TMyComp.Execute_FormShowModal;
begin
with TFForm.Create(Self) do //TFForm is the child form
begin
//... here I would like to play also this the elements from this form
BtnOK.Enabled:= False;
Show;
end;
end;

First problem is that you are trying to typecast the ClassName to a class type that you're trying to instantiate. Instead you want to work with the metaclass that can be obtained by the ClassType method from an object instance. The next issue is that with such metaclass you need to typecast to a metaclass, not to a class, so instead of typecasting to TForm class cast to its metaclass TFormClass.
To the next part of your question, if you can generally access a specific class members of an object that is declared as a common class ancestor, no, that is not possible. As a workaround you must determine the object class type and access it by typecasting to that class, or use RTTI which is more difficult.
Try something like this:
procedure TMyComp.Execute_FormShowModal;
var
frm: TForm;
begin
frm := TFormClass(FForm.ClassType).Create(FParentForm);
{ to acess the class specific members you will have to typecast to a
specific class (or use RTTI, which is even more difficult) }
if frm is TMyForm then
TMyForm(frm).BtnOK.Enabled := False;
frm.ShowModal;
frm.Free;
end;

Related

Delphi, find form by name

how can I find form by name? On this form I have Edit (TEdit) and i would like to write something in this TEdit (its name e.g.: adress) but I have only form name.
Can you help me?
There is a simpler way of finding a form by name. Since all of auto-created form objects become owned by Application object and TApplication inherits from TComponent, you can either iterate thru Application.Components array property or use Application.FindComponent method.
var
Form: TForm;
begin
Form := Application.FindComponent('LostForm1') as TForm;
if Assigned(Form) then
Form.Show
else
{ error, can't find it }
Note that FindComponent is case-insensitive.
This answer assumes you are making a VCL application. I don't know if FireMonkey has a similar solution.
All forms are added to the global Screen (declared in Vcl.Forms) object when they are created. Thus you can make a little helper function like this
function FindFormByName(const AName: string): TForm;
var
i: Integer;
begin
for i := 0 to Screen.FormCount - 1 do
begin
Result := Screen.Forms[i];
if (Result.Name = AName) then
Exit;
end;
Result := nil;
end;
You can use the FindWindow function if you know the form title or the class name of the form.

Delphi: override an assignment proc for components property in Object Inspector

I have a component i.e. TBrandNewComponent, who has published property Jumbo: TJumboClass, which is:
TJumboClass = class
P: Pointer
end;
I had overriden the GetValues procedure to show different components in a list of Jumbos's values in Object Inspector. Now list shows components of TJumboClass and components of TMassiveClass and TRotefulClass.
There is also TBrandNewComponent.JumboSelectedComponentType: integer, which I want to change due to selected component in TBrandNewComponent.Jumbo and also I want something-like cast TMassiveClass and TRotefulClass to TJumboClass saving them something like that: TJumboClass.P = Pointer(TMassiveClass(current)).
By that I mean, that I need to store to a property TBrandNewComponent.JumboClass.P a pointer of appropriate selected component, so that with a JumboSelectedComponentType I can correctly access this pointer and return the right class in further operations.
So, is there any procedure, that affects that and is that possible anyway?
Any suggestions and thoughts are appreciated!
PS: I've already discovered method SetValue. Now I need somehow to override it. What it might be?
What you describe makes no sense.
If you derive TMassiveClass and TRotefulClass from TJumboClass then the Object Inspector will automatically list all component instances of those class types for you, there is no need to write a custom design-time editor to override GetValues(), the default implementation is sufficient.
type
TBrandNewComponent = class(...)
private
fJumbo: TJumboClass;
published
property Jumbo: TJumboClass read fJumbo write fJumbo;
end;
type
TMassiveClass = class(TJumboClass)
...
end;
TRotefulClass = class(TJumboClass)
...
end;
If you do not derive TMassiveClass and TRotefulClass from TJumboClass but still want the Object Inspector to automatically list all component instances of those class types for you, you can use a custom IInterface for that purpose (yes, you can use interfaces in published properties):
type
IJumbo = interface(IInterface)
['{DA51630E-2FFB-425D-A62D-F1BE414DBC6F}']
end;
TBrandNewComponent = class(...)
private
fJumbo: IJumbo;
published
property Jumbo: IJumbo read fJumbo write fJumbo;
end;
type
TJumboClass = class(..., IJumbo)
...
end;
TMassiveClass = class(..., IJumbo)
...
end;
TRotefulClass = class(..., IJumbo)
...
end;
Either way, to update the value of TBrandNewComponent.JumboSelectedComponentType whenever TBrandNewComponent.Jumbo is changed, you can provide a setter method for the Jumbo property, which will be called at both run-time and design-time. Again, no custom design-time editor is needed:
type
TBrandNewComponent = class(...)
private
fJumbo: TJumboClass;
procedure SetJumbo(Value: TJumboClass);
published
property Jumbo: TJumboClass read fJumbo write SetJumbo;
end;
procedure TBrandNewComponent.SetJumbo(Value: TJumboClass);
begin
if fJumbo <> Value then
begin
fJumbo := Value;
// update JumboSelectedComponentType as needed...
end;
Your description of JumboClass.P really does not make sense. Assuming current is the component object currently assigned to the Jumbo property, then you are essentially setting Jumbo.P to the Self pointer of the component object, which is basically useless.
Since your other property is named JumboSelectedComponentType, it sounds like you want to store the class type of the selected component, not the object pointer. If that is the case, then a much more robust design is to give the JumboSelectedComponentType property a getter method (or just change it into a public function instead of a property) that queries the current Jumbo object for its ClassType:
type
TBrandNewComponent = class(...)
private
fJumbo: TJumboClass;
public
function JumboSelectedComponentType: TClass;
published
property Jumbo: TJumboClass read fJumbo write fJumbo;
end;
function TBrandNewComponent.JumboSelectedComponentType: TClass;
begin
if fJumbo <> nil then
Result := fJumbo.ClassType
else
Result := nil;
end;
Alternatively:
type
TJumboClassType = class of TJumboClass;
TBrandNewComponent = class(...)
private
fJumbo: TJumboClass;
public
function JumboSelectedComponentType: TJumboClassType;
published
property Jumbo: TJumboClass read fJumbo write fJumbo;
end;
function TBrandNewComponent.JumboSelectedComponentType: TJumboClassType;
begin
if fJumbo <> nil then
Result := TJumboClassType(fJumbo.ClassType)
else
Result := nil;
end;
If this is NOT what you are looking for, then you need to provide more details about what exactly you are really looking for, because your original description is just too vague.

Error When Editing Member Variable in Class

I'm trying to use a class in my program.
TStack = Class
Public
constructor Create; Overload;
Procedure Add(Frm:TForm);
Procedure Remove();
Procedure Do_Close;
Private
List : Array[1..Max_Forms] of Rec;
Count : Byte;
End;
Constructor:
constructor TStack.Create;
begin
Self.Count := 0;
end;
Procedure TStack.Add(Frm:TForm);
begin
Inc(Self.Count);
List[Count].Form := #Frm;
List[Count].Width := Frm.Width;
List[Count].Height := Frm.Height;
List[Count].left := Frm.Left;
List[Count].Top := Frm.Top;
end;
I can't change value of Count variable! It cause Run-Time error : Access violation....Write of address 000001E4
What's the problem?!
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
I'm trying to store a pointer to each form in a structure like this :
Rec = Record
Form : ^TForm;
Maximized : Boolean;
Width,
Height,
left,
Top : Integer;
End;
And then
Procedure TStack.Do_Close;
var
i : integer;
MyForm : TForm;
begin
i := .....some code here.......;
MyForm := #List[i].Form;
ShowMessage('I will close '+MyForm.Caption);
MyForm.Close;
end;
AND call constructor like this to initialize 'Count':
Stack.Create;
As described in comments you are attempting to create the object like this:
var
Stack: TStack;
....
Stack.Create;
This is a classic mistake, and one that we've all made. You are calling a method on an uninitialized instance variable.
In order to instantiate a class you need to write this:
Stack := TStack.Create;
On top of that I have the following comments:
Use zero-based indexing for arrays. That's the convention everywhere in Delphi apart from anachronistic strings. And even that is changing in newer versions.
Don't use static arrays for a stack unless you have a good reason for doing so. You'll just run the risk of running out of space. Or allocating more memory than you need. Use a dynamic array.
Rather than a dynamic array, you could use TList<T>.
Even so, one wonders why you are making your own stack class when there is the perfectly good TStack<T>.
You store the address of a local variable in your stack. In TStack.Add you add #Frm into the container. As soon as TStack.Add returns, #Frm is meaningless. That's because Frm is a local variable whose life ends when the function that owns it returns. I think you want to take a copy of Frm.
Picking up item 5 in more detail, your record is declared like this:
Rec = Record
Form : ^TForm;
Maximized : Boolean;
Width,
Height,
left,
Top : Integer;
End;
It is a mistake to use ^TForm. That is a pointer to a variable holding a pointer to an object. That's two levels of indirection, one too many. You must declare the Form field to be of type TForm. I suggest you revise the way Delphi object reference variables work. Delphi classes are what is known as reference types. A variable of type TMyClass where TMyClass is class(...) is already a pointer. The language automatically de-references the pointer when you use the . operator to access members.

Scan all classes for a given custom attribute

I'm looking for a way of scanning all loaded classes for classes which contain a custom attribute, if possible, without using RegisterClass().
at first you have to create TRttiContext, then get all loaded classes using getTypes. after that you can filter types by TypeKind = tkClass;
next step is to enumerate attributes and check if it has your attribute;
attribute and test-class delcaration:
unit Unit3;
interface
type
TMyAttribute = class(TCustomAttribute)
end;
[TMyAttribute]
TTest = class(TObject)
end;
implementation
initialization
TTest.Create().Free(); //if class is not actually used it will not be compiled
end.
and then find it:
program Project3;
{$APPTYPE CONSOLE}
uses
SysUtils, rtti, typinfo, unit3;
type TMyAttribute = class(TCustomAttribute)
end;
var ctx : TRttiContext;
t : TRttiType;
attr : TCustomAttribute;
begin
ctx := TRttiContext.Create();
try
for t in ctx.GetTypes() do begin
if t.TypeKind <> tkClass then continue;
for attr in t.GetAttributes() do begin
if attr is TMyAttribute then begin
writeln(t.QualifiedName);
break;
end;
end;
end;
finally
ctx.Free();
readln;
end;
end.
output is Unit3.TTest
Call RegisterClass to register a class with the streaming system.... Once classes are registered, they can be loaded or saved by the component streaming system.
so if you don't need component streaming (just find classes with some attribute), there is no need to RegisterClass
You can use the new RTTI functionality exposed by the Rtti unit.
var
context: TRttiContext;
typ: TRttiType;
attr: TCustomAttribute;
method: TRttiMethod;
prop: TRttiProperty;
field: TRttiField;
begin
for typ in context.GetTypes do begin
for attr in typ.GetAttributes do begin
Writeln(attr.ToString);
end;
for method in typ.GetMethods do begin
for attr in method.GetAttributes do begin
Writeln(attr.ToString);
end;
end;
for prop in typ.GetProperties do begin
for attr in prop.GetAttributes do begin
Writeln(attr.ToString);
end;
end;
for field in typ.GetFields do begin
for attr in field.GetAttributes do begin
Writeln(attr.ToString);
end;
end;
end;
end;
This code enumerates attributes associated with methods, properties and fields, as well as with types. Naturally you will want to do more than Writeln(attr.ToString), but this should give you an idea for how to proceed. You can test for your specific attribute in the normal way
if attr is TMyAttribute then
....

How to make in Object Pascal "class of interface" (or "interface of interface") type

Look at this sample:
//----------------------------------------------------------------------------
type
ISomeInterface = interface
procedure SomeMethod;
end;
// this is wrong, but illustrates that, what i need:
TSomeClassWhichImplementsSomeInterface = class of ISomeInterface;
var
gHardCodedPointer: Pointer; // no matter
procedure Dummy(ASomeClassToWorkWith: TSomeClassWhichImplementsSomeInterface);
begin
// actually, type of ASomeClassToWorkWith is unknown (at least TObject), but it
// must implement SomeMethod, so i can make something like this:
ASomeClassToWorkWith(gHardCodedPointer).SomeMethod;
end;
...
type
TMyClass = class(TInterfacedObject, ISomeInterface)
end;
...
// TMyClass implements ISomeInterface, so i can pass it into Dummy:
Dummy(TMyClass);
//----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course i can inherit TMyClass and use it childs, but I don't need this. I want to use another classes with their own hierarchy, just adding into them implementation of ISomeInterface (because there are no multiple-inheritance avaiable in Object Pascal, like in C++).
I know it may be looked crazy, don't ask me why I need this, just say - it is possibly to implement or not. Thanks a lot!
I think what you are looking for is this:
procedure Dummy;
var Intf : ISomeInterface;
begin
if Assigned(gHardCodedPointer) and Supports(gHardCodedPointer,ISomeInterface,Intf) then
Intf.SomeMethod
end;
If it's not, I have no clue about what you are trying to achieve there...
You can declare metaclasses, but you cannot define them in terms of what interfaces the base class implements. Interface implementation can only be checked at run time.
You can pass your Dummy function a metaclass, but you cannot use that metaclass to type-cast your plain pointer to a more specific type. Type-casting is a compile-time operation, but the actual value of the metaclass parameter isn't known until run time. The best you can do is type-cast it to the metaclass's base class. Then you can call all the methods that are defined in that base class.
But it seems you don't actually care what the base class is, as long as the class implements your interface. In that case, you can ignore the metaclass parameter. Type-cast your pointer to be a TObject (or, better yet, declare gHardCodedPointer to be a TObject in the first place), and then use the Supports function to get the interface reference.
var
SupportsInterface: Boolean;
Some: ISomeInterface;
begin
SupportsInterface := Supports(TObject(gHardCodedPointer), ISomeInterface, Some);
Assert(SupportsInterface, 'Programmer stored bad class instance in gHardCodedPointer');
Some.SomeMethod;
end;
If you really care about the metaclass parameter, you can add some enforcement for it, too. You can check whether the given class implements your interface, and you can check whether the object in gHardCodedPointer is an instance of that class:
Assert(ASomeClassToWorkWith.GetInterfaceEntry(ISomeInterface) <> nil);
Assert(TObject(gHardCodedPointer).InheritsFrom(ASomeClassToWorkWith));
But notice that you don't need to check either of those results to be able to call SomeMethod on gHardCodedPointer. They don't really matter.
By the way, the only hard-coded pointer value you can hope to have in Delphi is nil. All other pointer values are addresses that are very hard to predict at compile time because the compiler, the linker, and the loader all determine where everything really goes in memory. I suggest you come up with some other name for that variable that more accurately describes what it really holds.
Why can't you use the interface reference?
But, assuming there is a good reason for that, this might help.
As you have found out, you can't do class of on an interface.
What's more you can't use a variable value to cast anything to anything else. Casting is hardwired telling the compiler that you know the reference you are casting is of a specific type. Trying to do that with a var such as your ASomeClassToWorkWith parameter is going to produce errors as it goes against the very nature of casting.
Code below is not something I'd recommend, but it compiles and I think it does what you want. What it does is use a "dummy" ancestor and employs polymorfism to get the compiler to call the method on the correct type. If you do not mark SomeMethod as virtual, you will get the dummy ancestor's message on both button clicks.
The Instance function in the interface is there to show you a means of getting to the implementing instance of an interface without using RTTI. Just be aware of the caveat of this when using interface delegation: you may not get the instance you are expecting.
type
TForm1 = class(TForm)
TSomethingBtn: TButton;
TMyClassBtn: TButton;
procedure FormCreate(Sender: TObject);
procedure TSomethingBtnClick(Sender: TObject);
procedure TMyClassBtnClick(Sender: TObject);
private
{ Private declarations }
FSomething: TObject;
FMyClass: TObject;
public
{ Public declarations }
end;
var
Form1: TForm1;
implementation
{$R *.dfm}
type
TSomething = class; // forward;
TSomethingClass = class of TSomething;
ISomeInterface = interface
procedure SomeMethod;
function Instance: TSomething;
end;
TSomething = class(TInterfacedObject, ISomeInterface)
procedure SomeMethod; virtual;
function Instance: TSomething;
end;
var
gHardCodedPointer: Pointer; // no matter
procedure Dummy(aSomething: TSomething);
begin
// actually, type of ASomeClassToWorkWith is unknown (at least TObject), but it
// must implement SomeMethod, so i can make something like this:
aSomething.SomeMethod;
end;
type
TMyClass = class(TInterfacedObject, ISomeInterface)
procedure SomeMethod; virtual;
function Instance: TSomething;
end;
procedure TForm1.FormCreate(Sender: TObject);
begin
FSomething := TSomething.Create;
FMyClass := TMyClass.Create;
end;
{ TMyClass }
function TMyClass.Instance: TSomething;
begin
Result := TSomething(Self);
end;
procedure TMyClass.SomeMethod;
begin
ShowMessage('This comes from TMyClass');
end;
{ TSomething }
function TSomething.Instance: TSomething;
begin
Result := Self;
end;
procedure TSomething.SomeMethod;
begin
ShowMessage('This comes from the "dummy" ancestor TSomething');
end;
procedure TForm1.TMyClassBtnClick(Sender: TObject);
begin
// Presume this has been set elsewhere
gHardCodedPointer := FMyClass;
Dummy(TSomething(gHardCodedPointer));
end;
procedure TForm1.TSomethingBtnClick(Sender: TObject);
begin
// Presume this has been set elsewhere
gHardCodedPointer := FSomething;
Dummy(TSomething(gHardCodedPointer));
end;
It seems I see what you want to do. You just have to use what MS and partners implemented in the core of interfaces, use guids. Below is the example, but you should definitely use your own guid with CTRL+SHIFT+G in IDE
...
type
ITestInterface = interface
['{2EA2580F-E5E5-4F3D-AF90-2BBCD65B917B}']
procedure DoSomething;
end;
TTestObject = class(TInterfacedObject, ITestInterface)
procedure DoSomething;
end;
TTestObject2 = class(TInterfacedObject, ITestInterface)
procedure DoSomething;
end;
...
procedure TestMethod(Obj: TInterfacedObject);
var
Intf: ITestInterface;
begin
if (Obj as IUnknown).QueryInterface(ITestInterface, Intf) = S_OK then
Intf.DoSomething;
end;
{ TTestObject }
procedure TTestObject.DoSomething;
begin
MessageDlg('This is TTestObject showing something', mtInformation, [mbOk], 0)
end;
{ TTestObject2 }
procedure TTestObject2.DoSomething;
begin
MessageDlg('This is TTestObject2 showing something', mtInformation, [mbOk], 0)
end;
procedure TForm2.Button1Click(Sender: TObject);
var
Obj1, Obj2: TInterfacedObject;
begin
Obj1:=TTestObject.Create;
Obj2:=TTestObject2.Create;
TestMethod(Obj1);
TestMethod(Obj2);
end;
Even if you could, you couldn't typecast the interface with a interface-var anyway.
Same as with classes when you typecast a pointer to a metaclass, you'll get something of type metaclass (class of), not something of the type that is in metaclass.
With classes you solve this by typecast to the lowest common class in the hierachy. You can do the same with interfaces. ... If they inherit from eachother.
I think you have to use the interface, not the class:
procedure Dummy(ASomeClassToWorkWith: ISomeInterface);
begin
// actually, type of ASomeClassToWorkWith is unknown (at least TObject), but it
// must implement SomeMethod, so i can make something like this:
ASomeClassToWorkWith.SomeMethod;
end;
You just have to think amout reference counting
If you realy want the object instance you could change the interface like this:
type
ISomeInterface = interface
procedure SomeMethod;
function ImplementedInObject: TObject;
end;
procedure Dummy(ASomeInterfaceToWorkWith: ISomeInterface);
var
ASomeObjectToWorkWith: TObject;
begin
ASomeInterfaceToWorkWith.SomeMethod;
ASomeObjectToWorkWith := ASomeInterfaceToWorkWith.ImplementedInObject;
// Do what is needed with object
end;
...
type
TMyClass = class(TInterfacedObject, ISomeInterface)
function ImplementedInObject: TObject;
end;
function TMyClass.ImplementedInObject: TObject;
begin
Result := Self;
end;
The difference when calling code via interface variable or via variable pointing to an instance of a class that implements methods of the same interface is that different virtual method tables (VMT) are used, i.e. in a VMTs of an interface there will be only interface methods (plus AddRef, Release and QI, of course), in a VMT of a class there will be all virtual methods of that class.
That means that your code
ASomeClassToWorkWith(gHardCodedPointer).SomeMethod;
will be compiled to call TSomeClassWhichImplementsSomeInterface.SomeMethod directly instead of virtual method in VMT of ISomeInterface through interface pointer.
Even more, since interfaces cannot declare class methods and class attributes, an interface type is not a object (while class is an object), therefore "class of interface" does not make any sence.
You can add intermediate abstract class and declare you "class of interface" as class of the intermediate class:
type
TInterfacedObjectWithISomeInterface = class(TInterfacedObject, ISomeInterface)
procedure SomeMethod; virtual; abstract;
end;
TSomeClassWhichImplementsSomeInterface = class of TInterfacedObjectWithISomeInterface;
procedure Dummy(ASomeClassToWorkWith: TSomeClassWhichImplementsSomeInterface);
...
type
TMyClass = class(TInterfacedObjectWithISomeInterface)
procedure SomeMethod; override;
end;