In watson conversation dialog I have created a condition; something like
if $stored_state == #states:(Florida) AND $preferred_joint == #joint:(KFC)
then some response
where $stored_state is a context variable, which was stored at a previous node from user input. Same goes for $preferred_joint. #states and #joint are just two entities with fuzzy matching.
But condition like this never works. I also tried to use #states:(Florida) entity after converting it to a context variable. But still doesn't work.
Now, what do I do wrong there? Is there any way to compare context variable with entity?
Just to confirm, you want to check if the entity that the user just said at the last input matches what you had stored in your context?
You can use an AND condition for this right?
#states: 'Florida' && $stored_state == 'Florida'
This is declaring that the user just said the state florida, and the stored context variable is also florida.
Related
I try to display a message that contains the number inserted in the question, for example when user inserts a number of 12 digits I want to display that 12 digits and a text.
Until now:
I created an Entity with pattern (/d{12}) named #ticket_number
An Intent named #myTicket that has as example #ticket_number
Dialog that triggers when #myTicket | #ticket_number and has on context TicketNumer "<?#ticket_number.literal?>" and display a message as follows "Do you want to get info for ticket $ticketnumber ?".
The problem is that when I try it the Intent result is irrelevant, the message looks ok but I need to match the Intent. What could I do?
Can you share a picture of your node? There is no need that you match the intent; as indicating the ticket number alone, should not be an intent itself, but the entity. I'd remove the #myTicket | part of the node. And the condition should not include an OR; otherwise, if #myTicket triggers the node, and there is no ticket number, the response would fail.
As mentioned in the IBM documentation
it is not yet possible to use pattern entity in Intents.
Currently, you can only directly reference synonym entities that you
define (pattern values are ignored). You cannot use system entities.
I need to check whether the Property contains one of the or all following strings
"C-I", "C-II", "C-III", "C-IV", "C-V"
if not it Errormessage must be
"Invalid Property. Must be blank or C-I, C-II, C-III, C-IV, or C-V.",
i don know which "DataAnnotation Attribute" to use and How? if possible please provide sample.
You could use the Regular Expression data annotation. However, I would recommend implementing IValidatableObject on your data class. You can then write your custom logic within the Validate method. This way, if/when those valid options change, you would just be modifying a collection, rather then trying to figure out a new valid regex statement.
It can be done using anyone of the follwing Attributes
**
1.EnumDataTypeAttribute
2.CustomValidationAttribute
3. Creating New Custom Attribute.
**
I'm using a plugin and want to perform an action based on the records statuscode value. I've seen online that you can use entity.FormattedValues["statuscode"] to get values from option sets but when try it I get an error saying "The given key was not present in the dictionary".
I know this can happen when the plugin cant find the change for the field you're looking for, but i've already checked that this does exist using entity.Contains("statuscode") and it passes by that fine but still hits this error.
Can anyone help me figure out why its failing?
Thanks
I've not seen the entity.FormattedValues before.
I usually use the entity.Attributes, e.g. entity.Attributes["statuscode"].
MSDN
Edit
Crm wraps many of the values in objects which hold additional information, in this case statuscode uses the OptionSetValue, so to get the value you need to:
((OptionSetValue)entity.Attributes["statuscode"]).Value
This will return a number, as this is the underlying value in Crm.
If you open up the customisation options in Crm, you will usually (some system fields are locked down) be able to see the label and value for each option.
If you need the label, you could either do some hardcoding based on the information in Crm.
Or you could retrieve it from the metadata services as described here.
To avoid your error, you need to check the collection you wish to use (rather than the Attributes collection):
if (entity.FormattedValues.Contains("statuscode")){
var myStatusCode = entity.FormattedValues["statuscode"];
}
However although the SDK fails to confirm this, I suspect that FormattedValues are only ever present for numeric or currency attributes. (Part-speculation on my part though).
entity.FormattedValues work only for string display value.
For example you have an optionset with display names as 1, 2, 3,
The above statement do not recognize these values because those are integers. If You have seen the exact defintion of formatted values in the below link
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-in/library/microsoft.xrm.sdk.formattedvaluecollection.aspx
you will find this statement is valid for only string display values. If you try to use this statement with Integer values it will throw key not found in dictionary exception.
So try to avoid this statement for retrieving integer display name optionset in your code.
Try this
string Title = (bool)entity.Attributes.Contains("title") ? entity.FormattedValues["title"].ToString() : "";
When you are talking about Option set, you have value and label. What this will give you is the label. '?' will make sure that the null value is never passed.
I'm trying to sync a dataview (explorer window) with a tree (directory tree).
When I click on an element on my dataview, I'd like the same node gets selected on the tree
The problem is that using the
tree.getSelectionModel().select(index)
doesn't allow me to select the node by its internal id (the id I provided in my treestore), but only by the record index...
So I just can't sync both views...
There would be the solution of the expandPath(), but my treestore is fed by a relational database (id,name,parent_id etc..), so finding the full path is(or could be) a heavy load for the server (I'd like to avoid to have to provide any path...).
Basically I would like to be able to say "expand the node where the "id= " (or any other key/value of the treestore).
Is it possible ? Is there any workaround ?
Thank you for reading me !
The tree.getSelectionModel().select(record) function can accept a record instance instead of an index. I would do something like this:
var record = tree.getRootNode().findChild('id_name','record_id',true);
tree.getSelectionModel().select(record);
for more info on the findChild function, check out the NodeInterface docs here:
http://docs.sencha.com/ext-js/4-0/#/api/Ext.data.NodeInterface-method-findChild
you can also use selecteditemtree.data.id for this.
I have a very small entity framework setup containing only a few related classes/tables and a view. I need to be able to pull a specific record from this view, namely, I need to be able to grab the record that meets two criteria, it has a specific ProfileID and a specific QuoteID.
This line is what's causing the problem:
TWProfileUpchargeTotal upchargeTotals = _context.TWProfileUpchargeTotals.Where(p => p.Profileid == profile.id && p.quoteid == _quote.quoteid).First();
I'm looping through the profiles I know about and getting their information from the view, so profile.id changes each time.
The first time this code executes it gets the correct record from the view.
The second and third (and presumably beyond that) time it executes, it retrieves the exact same record.
Any idea why or what I'm doing wrong here?
Thanks, in advance.
You've been bitten by the LINQ "gotcha" called closure. The following post (and many others) on SO detail this:
closure
What you need to do is declare a variable WITHIN the foreach you've ommited from the above code and assign the profile.id to this and use this in the Where clause.
foreach(Profile profile in ListOfProfiles)
{
var localProfile = profile;
TWProfileUpchargeTotal upchargeTotals = _context.TWProfileUpchargeTotals.Where(p => p.Profileid == localProfile.id && p.quoteid == _quote.quoteid).First();
}