I am new to GitHub and ran into a strange problem. I have a GitHub Enterprise account, and am trying to add other GitHub account users as collaborators to a repo. When I searched for their user names, it errored with a message "XXX isn't a GitHub member". I am very sure that the users I am trying to add just created free public accounts on Github.com and I am searching with the right user names. Can anyone shine some light?
Thanks,
Annie
GitHub.com and your GitHub enterprise are two completely different different instances. They do not share any user data.
This means to add a collaborator to a project on your GitHub enterprise instance the user needs to create an account on this GitHub enterprise instance and not on GitHub.com
Related
I just signed up for GitLab, after learning about this cool feature where you can import your GitHub repositories and keep the two in sync. The import feature seems simple enough, but I paused when I got to the step where I authorize GitLab to my GitHub account. Why does it need so many permissions? Some make sense to me, others not so much. Specifically:
Personal user data
Full access
This application will be able to read and write all user data. This
includes the following:
Private email addresses
Private profile information
Followers
I understand why it needs to read and write to all public and private repository data. It's moving all that data to GitLab, and it needs to write to keep it in sync. What I don't understand is why it needs write permissions to my email and profile information?
I know that GitLab is a reputable company that didn't just pop up yesterday, but I am still wary when giving full access permissions to any service. If someone could help me understand, that would be appreciated.
You have two options when migrating a repository from GitHub to GitLab. You can migrate using only the url, in which case what you’ll have on GitLab is more similar to what you’d get if you simply added an additional remote in the repo - the full repo will be there, but everything specific to GitHub - the pull requests, comments, issues, etc, as well as all users tagged or participating - will be lost.
Alternatively, you can use the GitHub importer. This option fully migrates the GitHub repo to GitLab, setting up the GitLab equivalents of GitHub features (pull requests become merge requests, etc.). And part of this involves assigning users to each comment, mention, PR, etc.
From the gitlab docs:
When issues and pull requests are being imported, the importer attempts to find their GitHub authors and assignees in the database of the GitLab instance. Pull requests are called merge requests in GitLab.
For this association to succeed, each GitHub author and assignee in the repository must meet one of the following conditions prior to the import:
Have previously logged in to a GitLab account using the GitHub icon.
Have a GitHub account with a public-facing email address that matches their GitLab account’s email address.
GitLab content imports that use GitHub accounts require that the GitHub public-facing email address is populated. This means all comments and contributions are properly mapped to the same user in GitLab. GitHub Enterprise does not require this field to be populated so you may have to add it on existing accounts.
So yes, these are required if you want the full GitHub mirror or migration. If you just want the git repo contents, use the import from url tool, and the requirements will be much less extensive.
I read the documentation about the GitHub integration in AppVeyor and one thing is still not clear to me:
When I want to use GitHub teams, do I still need to invite people to be collaborators in AppVeyor?
If so, how does it work with permissions? If both GitHub teams and users/collaborators are assigned to roles, what does take precedence? Eg. user is directly assigned to an "Administrators" role and also a member of a GitHub team with a lower set of permissions. Are the two sets of permissions combined somehow?
In other words, is it possible to manage access to AppVeyor only through GitHub teams? (Without having to invite users to AppVeyor.) If not, what's the point of GitHub teams integration...?
I configured several GitHub teams from our organization (Kentico) with certain roles in AppVeyor. However, the users belonging to the GitHub teams didn't see the Kentico account in AppVeyor when they signed in with their GitHub account.
You do not have to invite GitHub team members (though you can). They should see your account in top left drop down when logged with GitHub button.
If you still invite them, GitHub team role takes over role you assigned in invitation.
Yes, you should be able just use GitHub teams. When GitHub team member login into AppVeyor with GitHub button, hidden Collaborator automatically created.
Let us troubleshoot your specific users over support ticket you created on our forum.
I tried to:
Revoke access and authorize again at https://ci.appveyor.com/account/kentico/authorizations - DIDN'T WORK
Remove and recreate the GitHub team at https://ci.appveyor.com/account/kentico/github-teams - DIDN'T WORK
Verify that both AppVeyor and AppVeyor CI are authorized OAuth apps at https://github.com/settings/applications - DIDN'T WORK
Reinstalled AppVeyor from GitHub marketplace: https://github.com/marketplace/appveyor - WORKED
I have a github account by my employer. I am working on a project single handedly. Now Is it possible that another employee uses the same account but different repository and does not have access to my repository?
On googling I found that this is possible if I convert my account into an organization account! So, yes this is possible.
https://help.github.com/articles/converting-a-user-into-an-organization/
I have a github account: https://github.com/remkohdev
and am a member of several github organizations
I have added all organizations to the Bluemix DevOps Third Party applications authorizations.
But I cannot change the default github organization to a different organization when I enable the Toolchain on Bluemix, so that I can create/edit the source code to the repo in a different than default Github organization?
Error:
The integration could not be set up. Check the settings and try again.
Reason: Unable to update the git integration. An error occurred while cloning the git repository. Error details: Unable to read the repository on: https://github.com/eventquarry/server.git. User is not authorized, or repository does not exist.
When you authorized with GitHub you probably did not explicitly grant access to the eventquarry organization.
To fix this, first you need to revoke your token by logging into Github.com, then click settings > Authorized applications > Revoke "IBM Bluemix Toolchains". Now go back to Bluemix, and when you click on the GitHub tool you will see an “Authorize” button. Upon clicking, you will be taken to GitHub, and here you need to click "Grant Access" next to eventquarry (and all orgs you would like to grant access to) before clicking "Authorize application".
Now you should be able to fork/clone/link with the private repositories in the eventquarry organization.
The devops git folks responded with this:
Right now, we don't support the ability to create new organization repositories through the toolchain UI. Any new repos are created under the personal account of the user. It is possible to link to existing organization repos by typing in the repo URL in the field. (Org repos won't show up in the dropdown, but the URL can be entered manually.) Note that the user needs admin privileges on the repo they're linking to in order to have a fully functioning integration though. It's possible to link to a repo without admin privileges, but we can't create a webhook on the repo, so there's no way for us to be notified of commit events. Pipelines will only run manually if the user doesn't have admin privileges on the repo.
Let me know if this is helpful...
I am setting up a private repository in GitHub and I want to invite people to my repo.
I found out that I can invite github users as my team members, but I want to know is it possible to invite non-github users to access my repo for checkin/checkout?
Thanks in advance.
You could add their ssh keys as Deployment Keys.
Deployment keys are ssh keys of users (usually, scripts) that are allowed to read the repository so they can build the code and deploy it somewhere.
This would allow your non-githubber coworkers to clone the repository.
Unfortunately, I don't think there's an equivalent system to allowing non-githubber to use the web interface.