This does not work:
scala> """one\r\ntwo\r\nthree\r\nfour""".replace("\r\n", "\n")
res1: String = one\r\ntwo\r\nthree\r\nfour
How to do that in Scala?
Is there a more idiomatic way of doing that, instead of using replace?
The problem is that """ quotes does not expand escape sequences. Three different approaches:
Use single " quotes in order to treat escape sequences correctly: "one\r\ntwo";
Use the s string interpolator, be careful following this approach cause this could lead to unexpected replacements: s"""one\r\ntwo""";
Call treatEscapes directly to expands escape sequences in your string: StringContext.treatEscapes("""one\r\ntwo""").
Refer also to this earlier question.
try this
"""one\r\ntwo\r\nthree\r\nfour""".replace("\\r\\n", "\n")
\ is treated as escape charater within string, so you need to tell the compiler that its not a escape character but a string.
Related
In the example above, I have a String? value of dictionary key containing unescaped backslashes. The assertion fails because the literal string I defined for comparison is escaped.
How do I define the string literal so it is unescaped in the comparison?
Or should I be escaping the dictionary value?
For example, in Perl I would define the string using single quotes or q().
I saw that there is some sort of RFC for a similar Swift solution, but what is the workaround?
Your comparison will work if you use only one method, not both of them: either escape the characters (but do not use #...#). OR if you use #...#, don't escape the characters.
I.e. for a string X4\\7, both of the following will pass the comparison correctly:
"X4\\\\7"
#"X4\\7"#
I have tried to print it but it just by passes because it's an escaped character.
e.g output should be as follows.
\correct
For that and also future reference:
\0 – Null character (that is a zero after the slash)
\\ – Backslash itself. Since the backslash is used to escape other characters, it needs a special escape to actually print itself.
\t – Horizontal tab
\n – Line Feed
\r – Carriage Return
\” – Double quote. Since the quotes denote a String literal, this is necessary if you actually want to print one.
\’ – Single Quote. Similar reason to above.
Use the following code for Swift 5, Xcode 10.2
let myText = #"This is a Backslash: \"#
print(myText)
Output:
This is a Backslash: \
Now not required to add a double slash to use a single slash in swift 5, even now required slash before some character, for example, single quote, double quote etc.
See this post for latest update about swift 5
https://www.hackingwithswift.com/articles/126/whats-new-in-swift-5-0
var s1: String = "I love my "
let s2: String = "country"
s1 += "\"\(s2)\""
print(s1)
It will print I love my "country"
The backslash character \ acts as an escape character when used in a string. This means you can use, for example, double quotes, in a string by pre-pending them with \. The same also applies for the backslash character itself, which is to say that println("\\") will result in just \ being printed.
The following example prints "SAME":
if (q/\\a/ eq q/\a/) {
print "SAME\n";
}
else {
print "DIFFERENT\n";
}
I understand this is consistent with the documentation. But I think this behavior is undesirable. Is there a need to escape a backlash lilteral in single-quoted string? If I wanted 2 backlashes, I'd need to specify 4; this does not seem convenient.
Shouldn't Perl detect whether a backslash serves as an escape character or not? For instance, when a backslash does not precede a delimiter, it should be treated as a literal; and if that were the case, I wouldn't need 3 backslashes to express two, e.g.,
q<a\\b>
instead of
q<a\\\b>.
Is there a need to escape a backlash in single-quoted string?
Yes, if the backslash is followed by another backslash, or is the last character in the string:
$ perl -e'print q/C:\/'
Can't find string terminator "/" anywhere before EOF at -e line 1.
$ perl -e'print q/C:\\/'
C:\
This makes it possible to include any character in a single-quoted string, including the delimiter and the escape character.
If I wanted 2 backlashes, I'd need to specify 4; this does not seem convenient.
Actually, you only need three (because the second backslash isn't followed by another backslash). But as an alternative, if your string contains a lot of backslashes you can use a single-quoted heredoc, which requires no escaping:
my $path = <<'END';
C:\a\very\long\path
END
chomp $path;
print $path; # C:\a\very\long\path
Note that the heredoc adds a newline to the end, which you can remove with chomp.
In single-quoted string literals,
A backslash represents a backslash unless followed by the delimiter or another backslash, in which case the delimiter or backslash is interpolated.
In other words,
You must escape delimiters.
You must escape \ that are followed by \ or the delimiter.
You may escape \ that aren't followed by \ or the delimiter.
So,
q/\// ⇒ /
q/\\\\a/ ⇒ \\a
q/\\\a/ ⇒ \\a
q/\\a/ ⇒ \a
q/\a/ ⇒ \a
Is there a need to escape a backlash in single-quoted string?
Yes, if it's followed by another backslash or the delimiter.
If I wanted 2 backlashes, I'd need to specify 4
Three would suffice.
this does not seem convenient.
It's more convenient than double-quoted strings, where backslashes must always be escaped. Single-quoted string require the minimum amount of escaping possible without losing the ability to produce the delimiter.
Is it possible to pass a single trailing \ character to a string macro?
macro test_str(s)
s
end
test"\\" # results in \\, that is two backslashes
test"\" # does not parse ... the " is treated as escaped
It is a work around, but you could invoke the macro directly -- as a macro rather than as a string macro
#test_str("\\") works fine.
One way would be to implement the functionality as part of the string macro itself. Ignoring performance, an easy way to do that is just replace(s, "\\\\", "\\").
macro test_str(s)
replace(s, "\\\\", "\\")
end
Then
julia> test"\\"
"\\"
is indeed a single backslash.
I want to replace something with a path like C:\foo, so I:
s/hello/c:\foo
But that is invalid.
Do I need to escape some chars?
Two problems that I can see.
Your first problem is that your s/// replacement is not terminated:
s/hello/c:\foo # fatal syntax error: "Substitution replacement not terminated"
s/hello/c:\foo/ # syntactically okay
s!hello!c:\foo! # also okay, and more readable with backslashes (IMHO)
Your second problem, the one you asked about, is that the \f is taken as a form feed escape sequence (ASCII 0x0C), just as it would be in double quotes, which is not what you want.
You may either escape the backslash, or let variable interpolation "hide" the problem:
s!hello!c:\\foo! # This will do what you want. Note double backslash.
my $replacement = 'c:\foo' # N.B.: Using single quotes here, not double quotes
s!hello!$replacement!; # This also works
Take a look at the treatment of Quote and Quote-like Operators in perlop for more information.
If I understand what you're asking, then this might be something like what you're after:
$path = "hello/there";
$path =~ s/hello/c:\\foo/;
print "$path\n";
To answer your question, yes you do need to double the backslash because \f is an escape sequence for "form feed" in a Perl string.
The problem is that you are not escaping special characters:
s/hello/c:\\foo/;
would solve your problem. \ is a special character so you need to escape it. {}[]()^$.|*+?\ are meta (special) characterss which you need to escape.
Additional reference: http://perldoc.perl.org/perlretut.html