I tried to update my table like below:
$query = "select *
FROM sites s, companies c, tests t
WHERE t.test_siteid = s.site_id
AND c.company_id = s.site_companyid
AND t.test_typeid = '20' AND s.site_id = '1337'";
$queryrow = $db->query($query);
$results = $queryrow->as_array();
foreach($results as $key=>$val){
$update = "update tests set test_typeid = ? , test_testtype = ? where test_siteid = ?";
$queryrow = $db->query($update,array('10','Meter Calibration Semi Annual',$val->site_id));
}
The above code is working good. But in update query , The column test_typeid is not updated with '10'. Column test_typeid is updating with empty value. Other columns are updating good. I dont know why this column test_typeid is not updating? And the column test_typeid type is integer only. I am using postgreSql
And My table definition is:
What i did wrong with the code. Kindly advice me on this.
Thanks in advance.
First, learn to use proper JOIN syntax. Never use commas in the FROM clause; always use proper explicit JOIN syntax.
You can write the query in one statement:
update tests t
set test_typeid = '10',
test_testtype = 'Meter Calibration Semi Annual'
from sites s join
companies c
on c.company_id = s.site_companyid
where t.test_siteid = s.site_id and
t.test_typeid = 20 and s.site_id = 1337;
I assume the ids are numbers, so there is no need to use single quotes for the comparisons.
Related
I have the following select statement in ABAP:
SELECT munic~mandt VREFER BIS AB ZZELECDATE ZZCERTDATE CONSYEAR ZDIMO ZZONE_M ZZONE_T USAGE_M USAGE_T M2MC M2MT M2RET EXEMPTMCMT EXEMPRET CHARGEMCMT
INTO corresponding fields of table GT_INSTMUNIC_F
FROM ZCI00_INSTMUNIC AS MUNIC
INNER JOIN EVER AS EV on
MUNIC~POD = EV~VREFER(9).
"where EV~BSTATUS = '14' or EV~BSTATUS = '32'.
My problem with the above statement is that does not recognize the substring/offset operation on the 'ON' clause. If i remove the '(9) then
it recognizes the field, otherwise it gives error:
Field ev~refer is unknown. It is neither in one of the specified tables
nor defined by a "DATA" statement. I have also tried doing something similar in the 'Where' clause, receiving a similar error:
LOOP AT gt_instmunic.
clear wa_gt_instmunic_f.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-mandt = gt_instmunic-mandt.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-bis = gt_instmunic-bis.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-ab = gt_instmunic-ab.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-zzelecdate = gt_instmunic-zzelecdate.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-ZZCERTDATE = gt_instmunic-ZZCERTDATE.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-CONSYEAR = gt_instmunic-CONSYEAR.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-ZDIMO = gt_instmunic-ZDIMO.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-ZZONE_M = gt_instmunic-ZZONE_M.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-ZZONE_T = gt_instmunic-ZZONE_T.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-USAGE_M = gt_instmunic-USAGE_M.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-USAGE_T = gt_instmunic-USAGE_T.
temp_pod = gt_instmunic-pod.
SELECT vrefer
FROM ever
INTO wa_gt_instmunic_f-vrefer
WHERE ( vrefer(9) LIKE temp_pod ). " PROBLEM WITH SUBSTRING
"AND ( BSTATUS = '14' OR BSTATUS = '32' ).
ENDSELECT.
WRITE: / sy-dbcnt.
WRITE: / 'wa is: ', wa_gt_instmunic_f.
WRITE: / 'wa-ever is: ', wa_gt_instmunic_f-vrefer.
APPEND wa_gt_instmunic_f TO gt_instmunic_f.
WRITE: / wa_gt_instmunic_f-vrefer.
ENDLOOP.
itab_size = lines( gt_instmunic_f ).
WRITE: / 'Internal table populated with', itab_size, ' lines'.
The basic task i want to implement is to modify a specific field on one table,
pulling values from another. They have a common field ( pod = vrefer(9) ). Thanks in advance for your time.
If you are on a late enough NetWeaver version, it works on 7.51, you can use the OpenSQL function LEFT or SUBSTRING. Your query would look something like:
SELECT munic~mandt VREFER BIS AB ZZELECDATE ZZCERTDATE CONSYEAR ZDIMO ZZONE_M ZZONE_T USAGE_M USAGE_T M2MC M2MT M2RET EXEMPTMCMT EXEMPRET CHARGEMCMT
FROM ZCI00_INSTMUNIC AS MUNIC
INNER JOIN ever AS ev
ON MUNIC~POD EQ LEFT( EV~VREFER, 9 )
INTO corresponding fields of table GT_INSTMUNIC_F.
Note that the INTO clause needs to move to the end of the command as well.
field(9) is a subset operation that is processed by the ABAP environment and can not be translated into a database-level SQL statement (at least not at the moment, but I'd be surprised if it ever will be). Your best bet is either to select the datasets separately and merge them manually (if both are approximately equally large) or pre-select one and use a FAE/IN clause.
They have a common field ( pod = vrefer(9) )
This is a wrong assumption, because they both are not fields, but a field an other thing.
If you really need to do that task through SQL, I'll suggest you to check native SQL sentences like SUBSTRING and check if you can manage to use them within an EXEC_SQL or (better) the CL_SQL* classes.
I am trying to update data in Table: local.import_payments from Table: local.payments based on update and Inner Join queries. The query I used:
Update local.import_payments
Set local.import_payments.client_id = local.payments.payment_for_client__record_id,
local.import_payments.client_name = local.payments.payment_for_client__company_name,
local.import_payments.customer_id = local.payments.customer__record_id,
local.import_payments.customer_name = local.payment_from_customer,
local.import_payments.payment_id = local.payments.payment_id
From local.import_payments
Inner Join local.payments
Where local.payments.copy_to_imported_payments = 'true'
The client_id, client_name, customer_id, customer_name in the local.import_payments need to get updated with the values from the table local.payments based on the condition that the field copy_to_imported_payments is checked.
I am getting a syntax error while executing the query. I tried a couple of things, but they did not work. Can anyone look over the queries and let me know where the issue is
Try the following
UPDATE local.import_payments
Set local.import_payments.client_id =
local.payments.payment_for_client__record_id,
local.import_payments.client_name =
local.payments.payment_for_client__company_name,
local.import_payments.customer_id = local.payments.customer__record_id,
local.import_payments.customer_name = local.payment_from_customer,
local.import_payments.payment_id = local.payments.payment_id
FROM local.payments as lpay
WHERE lpay.<<field>> = local.import_payments.<<field>>
AND local.payments.copy_to_imported_payments = 'true'
You shouldn't to specify the schema/table for updated columns, only column names:
Do not include the table's name in the specification of a target column — for example, UPDATE table_name SET table_name.col = 1 is invalid.
from the doc
You shouldn't to use the updating table in the from clause except of the case of self-join.
You can to make your query shorter using "column-list syntax".
update local.import_payments as target
set (
client_id,
client_name,
customer_id,
customer_name,
payment_id) = (
source.payment_for_client__record_id,
source.payment_for_client__company_name,
source.customer__record_id,
source.payment_from_customer,
source.payment_id)
from local.payments as source
where
<join condition> and
source.copy_to_imported_payments = 'true'
I create view in the postgresql that for write query but error message display table name used more than once. How to solve this problem?
Query
SELECT
tbcitizen.firstname || '-' || tbcitizen.middlename || '-' || tbcitizen.familyname as firstname,
tbcitizen.dateofbirth,
tbcity.cityname,
tbcontact.contactdetails,
tbcitizen.citizenidp
FROM
public.tbcitizen,
public.tbaddress,
public.tbcity,
public.tbcontact
INNER JOIN
tbcontact ON tbcitizen.citizenidp = tbcontact.referenceidf AND tbcontact.referencetypeidf = 1 AND
tbcontact.isprimery = 1 INNER JOIN
tbaddress ON tbcitizen.citizenidf = tbaddress.referenceidf AND tbaddress.referencetypeidf = 1 AND
tbaddress.isprimery = 1 INNER JOIN
tbcity ON tbaddress.cityidf = tbcity.cityidp
WHERE
tbaddress.referencetypeidf = tbcitizen.citizenidp AND
tbaddress.referenceidf = tbcitizen.citizenidp AND
tbaddress.cityidf = tbcity.cityidp
Error = table name "tbcontact" specified more than once
Thanks
As the error states that - your table tbcontact used 2 times as the source table. So it creates ambiguity for the postgres database engine. So to resolve this issue you have to use table alias with different name.
Hope it'll help you.
SELECT
nzy.NZPYYD
,nzy.NZZSYG
,nzy.NZJRYG
,acn.ANITCD
FROM
ACNTRA acn
LEFT OUTER JOIN NZYTFL nzy
ON (
nzy.NZCNO1 = acn.ANCNO1
AND nzy.NZCNO2 = acn.ANCNO2
AND nzy.NZCNO3 = acn.ANCNO3
AND nzy.NZCNO4 = acn.ANCNO4
AND nzy.NZCNO5 = acn.ANCNO5
AND nzy.NZSLKI = acn.ANSLKI
AND nzy.NZDLTM = ''
)
WHERE
acn.ANDLTM = ''
AND acn.ANTKCD = '1029'
AND nzy.NZTXKB = 1
The problem here is it gives 2 rows result.I want to get one unique row from the result of left outer join .Any help?
If both rows are identical, try
SELECT DISTINCT
nzy.NZPYYD
,nzy.NZZSYG
,nzy.NZJRYG
,acn.ANITCD
If not, you can try to SUM(), CONCAT(), MAX() or whatever the column with different values.
Difficult to be more precise without a sample output.
I'm trying to use fetchAll on a query that has 2 variables. I can't figure out the syntax.
I can manage with only 1 variable:
$sql = "SELECT * FROM mytable WHERE field1 = ?";
$this->_db->fetchAll($sql,$value1); # that works
However I'm having some issues when query has multiple variables
$sql = "SELECT * FROM mytable WHERE field1 = ? AND field2 = ?";
$this->_db->fetchAll($sql,$value1,$value2); # doesn't work
$this->_db->fetchAll($sql,array("field1"=>$value1,"field2"=>$value2)); # doesn't work either
The reason why I want to use ? instead of placing the variables directly into the query is that I've learned that using ? allows for the query to be compiled generically by the db engine and improves performances.
There are two types of parameter, named parameters and positional parameters. You're mixing the two types and that won't work.
Named parameters match a placeholder by name. Names are started with the : symbol. The parameter names are not the same as the names of the columns you happen to use them for. You supply parameter values in an associative array, using the parameter name (not the column name) as the array keys. For example:
$sql = "SELECT * FROM mytable WHERE field1 = :param1 AND field2 = :param2";
$this->_db->fetchAll($sql,array("param1"=>$value1,"param2"=>$value2));
Positional parameters use the ? symbol for the placeholder. You supply parameter values using a simple (non-associative) array, and the order of values in the array must match the order of parameter placeholders in your query. For example:
$sql = "SELECT * FROM mytable WHERE field1 = ? AND field2 = ?";
$this->_db->fetchAll($sql,array($value1,$value2));
Most brands of SQL database natively support only one style or the other, but PDO attempts to support both, by rewriting the SQL if necessary before preparing the query. Since Zend_Db is modeled after PDO, Zend_Db also supports both parameter styles.
This question is a bit old, but I thought I'd just add to it for reference sake.
I would recommend starting to use Zend_Db_Select with Zend_Db. I've been doing a lot with Zend_Db lately. More from Zend_Db_Select reference guide.
Lets assume you have a Zend_Db adapter: $this->_db
# this will get the Zend_Db_Select object
$select = $this->_db->select();
# now you build up your query with Zend_Db_Select functions
$select->from('mytable');
$select->where('field1 = ?', $field1);
$select->where('field2 = ?', $field2);
[...]
# echo to see the SQL (helps in debugging)
# SELECT * FROM mytable WHERE field1 = ? AND field2 = ? [...]
echo '<p>My SQL: ' . $select . '</p>';
# Execute the SQL / Fetch results
$results = $select->query()->fetchAll();
That's the basics from your given example, but the Zend Framework reference guide on the select object has a lot of good information on how to build even more complex queries with JOINS, UNIONS, GROUP BY, LIMIT, HAVING, etc.
If you wanted to use an alias name for a table or parameters, you use an associative array with the alias name being the index value:
# SELECT p.* FROM products AS p
$select->from('p' => 'products');
If you want to return only selected fields, you add an array of field names as a second parameter:
# SELECT model FROM products
$select->from(products, array(model));
Actually, the above could should produce fully qualified SQL as:
SELECT 'products'.model FROM 'products'
but I wrote the above for brevity and clarity in the example.
One thing I just came across is using AND and OR in the WHERE condition.
# WHERE a = $a
$select->where('a = ?', $a);
# WHERE a = $a AND b = $b
$select->where('a = ?', $a);
$select->where('b = ?', $b);
# WHERE a = $a OR b = $b
$select->where('a = ?', $a);
$select->orWhere('b = ?', $b);
# WHERE a = $a AND b = $b
$select->orWhere('a = ?', $a);
$select->where('b = ?', $b);
Notice, that whatever the following "where" function you use, will combine with the previous statement as that operand. Ok, that sounded confusing.
If the second "where" is an "OR" it will be an "OR" conditional. If the second "where" is a "AND" the statement will be "AND".
In other words, the first WHERE function is ignored in terms of what condition it will use.
In fact, I just asked a question on Stack Overflow yesterday regarding doing a complex WHERE using select.
Hope that helps!
Cheers!
Try this:
$sql = "SELECT * FROM mytable WHERE field1 = ? AND field2 = ?";
$statement = $this->_db->query($sql,array("field1"=>$value1,"field2"=>$value2));
$data = $statement->fetchAll();
$this->_db must be an instance of Db adapter.
Heres the actual Zend way to code for this.
$sql = "SELECT * FROM mytable WHERE field1 = :param1 AND field2 = :param2";
$this->_db->fetchAll($sql,array("param1"=>$value1,"param2"=>$value2));
$where = $this->_db->select()
->from('mytable')
->where('field1 = ?',$value1)
->where('field2 = ?',$value2);
$rowSet = $this->_db->fetchAll($where);
This works great for me