Arquillian #BeforeClass injected EntityManager null - jpa

I'd like to persist some data using an instance of an EntityManager using Arquillian. To do so I'd like it to be done once before all the tests, so I tried using #BeforeClass like so
#RunWith(Arquillian.class)
public class MyTest {
#Deployment
public static WebArchive createDeployment() {
// create deployment
}
#PersistenceContext
static EntityManager em;
#BeforeClass
public static void setup() {
em.persist(someObject);
}
}
Using this approach however the EntityManager is null. I can get this to work with #Before but obviously this runs before every test method which I don't want.

Related

How not to rollback #DataJpaTest?

In the following code
#DataJpaTest
#Transactional(propagation = Propagation.NOT_SUPPORTED)
#AutoConfigureTestDatabase(replace= AutoConfigureTestDatabase.Replace.NONE)
public class GenreDaoJpaTest{
#Autowired
private TestEntityManager entityManager;
#Autowired
private GenreRepository dao;
....
}
when I'm adding #Transactional(propagation = Propagation.NOT_SUPPORTED) with the purpose to cancel a roolback after each test I'm getting an exception:
ava.lang.IllegalStateException: No transactional EntityManager found
at org.springframework.util.Assert.state(Assert.java:73)
at org.springframework.boot.test.autoconfigure.orm.jpa.TestEntityManager.getEntityManager(TestEntityManager.java:237)
at org.springframework.boot.test.autoconfigure.orm.jpa.TestEntityManager.persist(TestEntityManager.java:92)
at ru.otus.ea.dao.GenreDaoJpaTest.init(GenreDaoJpaTest.java:38)
It there a way to autowire TestEntityManager and not to roolback transactions in tests?
Your TestEntityManager is autowired but you are executing the persist call outside of a transaction.
You can autowire TransactionTemplate:
#Autowired
private TransactionTemplate transactionTemplate;
And execute your DB interactions using its execute method:
User savedUser = transactionTemplate.execute((conn) -> {
return testEntityManager.persist(new User("foo"));
});
Also you should be aware that now you are responsible for cleanup of test DB after tests execute (which might be hard to maintain as logic grows):
#BeforeEach // just to be sure
#AfterEach
public void cleanup() {
userRepository.deleteAll();
}

Spring Boot Hibernate Postgresql #Transactional does not rollback [duplicate]

I want to read text data fixtures (CSV files) at the start on my application and put it in my database.
For that, I have created a PopulationService with an initialization method (#PostConstruct annotation).
I also want them to be executed in a single transaction, and hence I added #Transactional on the same method.
However, the #Transactional seems to be ignored :
The transaction is started / stopped at my low level DAO methods.
Do I need to manage the transaction manually then ?
Quote from legacy (closed) Spring forum:
In the #PostConstruct (as with the afterPropertiesSet from the InitializingBean interface) there is no way to ensure that all the post processing is already done, so (indeed) there can be no Transactions. The only way to ensure that that is working is by using a TransactionTemplate.
So if you would like something in your #PostConstruct to be executed within transaction you have to do something like this:
#Service("something")
public class Something {
#Autowired
#Qualifier("transactionManager")
protected PlatformTransactionManager txManager;
#PostConstruct
private void init(){
TransactionTemplate tmpl = new TransactionTemplate(txManager);
tmpl.execute(new TransactionCallbackWithoutResult() {
#Override
protected void doInTransactionWithoutResult(TransactionStatus status) {
//PUT YOUR CALL TO SERVICE HERE
}
});
}
}
I think #PostConstruct only ensures the preprocessing/injection of your current class is finished. It does not mean that the initialization of the whole application context is finished.
However you can use the spring event system to receive an event when the initialization of the application context is finished:
public class MyApplicationListener implements ApplicationListener<ContextRefreshedEvent> {
public void onApplicationEvent(ContextRefreshedEvent event) {
// do startup code ..
}
}
See the documentation section Standard and Custom Events for more details.
As an update, from Spring 4.2 the #EventListener annotation allows a cleaner implementation:
#Service
public class InitService {
#Autowired
MyDAO myDAO;
#EventListener(ContextRefreshedEvent.class)
public void onApplicationEvent(ContextRefreshedEvent event) {
event.getApplicationContext().getBean(InitService.class).initialize();
}
#Transactional
public void initialize() {
// use the DAO
}
}
Inject self and call through it the #Transactional method
public class AccountService {
#Autowired
private AccountService self;
#Transactional
public void resetAllAccounts(){
//...
}
#PostConstruct
private void init(){
self.resetAllAccounts();
}
}
For older Spring versions which do not support self-injection, inject BeanFactory and get self as beanFactory.getBean(AccountService.class)
EDIT
It looks like that since this solution has been posted 1.5 years ago developers are still under impression that if a method,
annotated with #Transactional, is called from a #PostContruct-annotated method invoked upon the Bean initialization, it won't be actually executed inside of Spring Transaction, and awkward (obsolete?) solutions get discussed and accepted instead of this very simple and straightforward one and the latter even gets downvoted.
The Doubting Thomases :) are welcome to check out an example Spring Boot application at GitHub which implements the described above solution.
What actually causes, IMHO, the confusion: the call to #Transactional method should be done through a proxied version of a Bean where such method is defined.
When a #Transactional method is called from another Bean, that another Bean usually injects this one and invokes its proxied (e.g. through #Autowired) version of it, and everything is fine.
When a #Transactional method is called from the same Bean directly, through usual Java call, the Spring AOP/Proxy machinery is not involved and the method is not executed inside of Transaction.
When, as in the suggested solution, a #Transactional method is called from the same Bean through self-injected proxy (self field), the situation is basically equivalent to a case 1.
#Platon Serbin's answer didn't work for me. So I kept searching and found the following answer that saved my life. :D
The answer is here No Session Hibernate in #PostConstruct, which I took the liberty to transcribe:
#Service("myService")
#Transactional(readOnly = true)
public class MyServiceImpl implements MyService {
#Autowired
private MyDao myDao;
private CacheList cacheList;
#Autowired
public void MyServiceImpl(PlatformTransactionManager transactionManager) {
this.cacheList = (CacheList) new TransactionTemplate(transactionManager).execute(new TransactionCallback(){
#Override
public Object doInTransaction(TransactionStatus transactionStatus) {
CacheList cacheList = new CacheList();
cacheList.reloadCache(MyServiceImpl.this.myDao.getAllFromServer());
return cacheList;
}
});
}
The transaction part of spring might not be initialized completely at #PostConstruct.
Use a listener to the ContextRefreshedEvent event to ensure, that transactions are available:
#Component
public class YourService
implements ApplicationListener<ContextRefreshedEvent> // <= ensure correct timing!
{
private final YourRepo repo;
public YourService (YourRepo repo) {this.repo = repo;}
#Transactional // <= ensure transaction!
#Override
public void onApplicationEvent(ContextRefreshedEvent event) {
repo.doSomethingWithinTransaction();
}
}
Using transactionOperations.execute() in #PostConstruct or in #NoTransaction method both works
#Service
public class ConfigurationService implements ApplicationContextAware {
private static final Logger LOG = LoggerFactory.getLogger(ConfigurationService.class);
private ConfigDAO dao;
private TransactionOperations transactionOperations;
#Autowired
public void setTransactionOperations(TransactionOperations transactionOperations) {
this.transactionOperations = transactionOperations;
}
#Autowired
public void setConfigurationDAO(ConfigDAO dao) {
this.dao = dao;
}
#PostConstruct
public void postConstruct() {
try { transactionOperations.execute(new TransactionCallbackWithoutResult() {
#Override
protected void doInTransactionWithoutResult(final TransactionStatus status) {
ResultSet<Config> configs = dao.queryAll();
}
});
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
LOG.trace(ex.getMessage(), ex);
}
}
#NoTransaction
public void saveConfiguration(final Configuration configuration, final boolean applicationSpecific) {
String name = configuration.getName();
Configuration original = transactionOperations.execute((TransactionCallback<Configuration>) status ->
getConfiguration(configuration.getName(), applicationSpecific, null));
}
#Override
public void setApplicationContext(ApplicationContext applicationContext) throws BeansException {
}
}

Is it possible to pass EntityManager as a parameter through multiple beans?

I know i can do the following :
public class MyDao{
private EntityManager em;
public void setEm(EntityManager em){
this.em = em;
}
...
and then, using #PostConstuct to pass the EntityManager
public class MyBean{
private EntityManager em;
#Inject
private MyDao myDao;
#PostConstruct
private void init(){
myDao.setEm(em);
}
...
But due to my application's architecture restriction i cannot directly inject MyDao into MyBean, i should pass by MyBusinessDao Class, so i tried the following but i'm getting a nullPointerExeception on the value of EntityManager in MyDao :
public class MyBean{
private EntityManager em;
public MyBean(){
em = createEntityManager();
}
private EntityManager createEntityManager(){
//dynamically create the EntityManager
}
#Inject
private MyBusinessDao myBusinessDao;
#PostConstruct
private void init(){
myBusinessDao.setEm(em);
}
...
and in MyBusinessDao i inject MyDao:
public class MyBusinessDao {
private EntityManager em;
#Inject
private MyDao myDao;
#PostConstruct
private void init(){
myDao.setEm(em);
}
...
I should mention that i'm not using a J2EE container
You can implement an CDI Producer Method for providing the EntityManager via CDI injection.
#ApplicationScoped
class EntityManagerProducer {
#PersistenceContext(...)
private EntityManager em;
#Produces
#RequestScoped
public EntityManager produceEm() {
return em;
}
}
You can also inject the EntityManagerFactory and call emf.createEntityManager() in the producer method and implement an CDI-Disposer method, which closes the EntityManager before the scope is finished.
public void dispose(#Disposes EntityManager em) { ... }
If you have multiple persistence contexts, then implement a producer method for each persistence context and qualify them with a CDI-Qualifier.
I resolved it this way :
public class MyBusinessDao {
private EntityManager em;
#Inject
private MyDao myDao;
private void setEm(EntityManager em){
this.em = em;
//and here i call the setEm method of myDao also
myDao.setEm(em);
}
...

CDI with EntityListener and timing issue?

I'm trying to do this.
public class MyEntityListener {
#PrePersist
private void onPrePersist(final Object object) {
// set object with value fetched via onPostConstruct
}
#PostConstruct
private void onPostConstruct() {
// fetch some value using entityManager
}
#PersistenceContext
private EntityManager entityManager;
}
When I persist and instance via EJB, the entityManager is different instance from that of the EJB.
onPrePersist is executed (before or) regardless of postConstruct.
Is this normal?

Injection of #PersistenceContext in CDI-Unit

Here is the unit testing code. When we run unit test code (SampleServiceTest2); EntityManager injected in AbstractDao is always null! How can we inject em during unit test.
*** SampleServiceTest2.java
import javax.inject.Inject;
import org.jglue.cdiunit.CdiRunner;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
#RunWith(CdiRunner.class)
public class SampleServiceTest2 {
#Inject SampleService greeter;
#Test
public void testGreeter() throws Exception {
System.out.println("before2");
greeter.addSampleData(new SampleDataDto(), new KullaniciDto());
System.out.println("after2");
}
}
*** SampleService.java
import javax.ejb.Stateless;
import javax.inject.Inject;
....
#Stateless
#SecuredBean
public class SampleService {
#Inject
SampleLogic sampleLogic;
#Yetki(tag="perm_add_sample_data")
public void addSampleData(SampleDataDto data, KullaniciDto aktifKullaniciDto){
SampleDataHelper sampleDataHelper = new SampleDataHelper();
SampleData sampleData = sampleDataHelper.getEntity(data);
KullaniciHelper kullaniciHelper = new KullaniciHelper();
Kullanici kullanici = kullaniciHelper.getEntity(aktifKullaniciDto);
sampleLogic.addData(sampleData, kullanici);
}
}
**** SampleLogic.java
import javax.inject.Inject;
....
public class SampleLogic {
#Inject
SampleDataDao sampleDataDao;
public void addData(SampleData data, Kullanici kullanici) {
addData1(data,kullanici);
System.out.println("SampleLogic : addData() called!");
}
public void addData1(SampleData data, Kullanici kullanici) {
sampleDataDao.create(data, kullanici);
}
}
**** SampleDataDao.java
public class SampleDataDao extends AbstractDao<SampleData> {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
}
**** AbstractDao.java
public abstract class AbstractDao<T extends BaseEntity> implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
#PersistenceContext(unitName="meopdb")
private EntityManager em;
protected EntityManager getEm() {
return em;
}
#SuppressWarnings("rawtypes")
private Class entityClass;
#SuppressWarnings("rawtypes")
private Class getEntityClass() {
if (entityClass == null) {
entityClass = (Class) ((ParameterizedType) getClass().getGenericSuperclass()).getActualTypeArguments()[0];
}
return entityClass;
}
public T create(T t, Kullanici kullanici) {
if (t.getId() != null) {
throw new IllegalStateException("Create Operation: Oid should be null");
}
t.setId(getSeqNextValue(t));
t.setEklemeZamani(new Timestamp(Calendar.getInstance().getTimeInMillis()));
t.setEkleyenKullaniciId(kullanici.getId());
t.setDurumId(EnumDurum.AKTIF.getValue());
t = em.merge(t);
em.flush();
return t;
}
}
If you test with CDIUnit, the only thing you get is CDI injections, not the full power of Java EE. Injecting entityManager using #PersistenceContext into AbstractDAO is not part of standalone CDI, it is only supported when application is running within a Java EE application server.
The solution is to inject EntityManager using CDI mechanism and create a producer. The producer could be then switched for an alternative in unit tests to provide test entityManager. However, setting up JPA in a standalone unit test is not so straightforward, as you need to specify connection properties directly in persistence.xml file. Also, do not forget to add dependencies on a JPA implementation (hibernate, eclipselink) into your test dependencies.
However, if you do not want to adapt your application's code or you need more than CDI in your tests, you should have a look at Arquillian Java EE test framework.
Here is an example for CDIUnit:
public abstract class AbstractDao<T extends BaseEntity> implements Serializable {
...
#Inject
#Named("meopdb")
private EntityManager em;
...
}
// producer in application - just a wraper over `#PersisteneContext`
public class EntityManagerProducer {
#Produces
#PersistenceContext(unitName="meopdb")
#Named("meopdb")
private EntityManager em;
}
/* producer in your test sources - it creates entityManager via API calls instead of injecting via `#PersistenceContext`. Also, a different persistence unit is used so that it does not clash with main persistence unit, which requires datasource from app server
*/
public TestEntityManagerProducer {
#Produces
#ProducesAlternative // CDIUnit annotation to turn this on as an alternative automatically
#Named("meopdb")
public EntityManager getEm() {
return Persistence
.createEntityManagerFactory("meopdb-test")
.createEntityManager();
}
}
And it is not yet enough. You need to create a new persistence.xml in your test resources with the test persistence unit named "meopdb-test". For this unit you need to specify RESOURCE_LOCAL transaction-type, and specify connection information. And last thing not to forget - you need to list all your entities in the persistence.xml, or in external orm file. This is because your tests run outside of application server. Inside app server, JPA can find entities automatically.
As #OndroMih said, in CDI-Unit, the only thing you get is CDI injections. So you have to cheat a little.
You can use extension do add javax.inject.Inject annnotation to all #PersistenceContext injections
import java.util.Set;
import javax.enterprise.event.Observes;
import javax.enterprise.inject.spi.*;
import javax.inject.Inject;
import javax.persistence.PersistenceContext;
import org.apache.deltaspike.core.util.metadata.AnnotationInstanceProvider;
import org.apache.deltaspike.core.util.metadata.builder.AnnotatedTypeBuilder;
public class AddInjectToPersistenceContextInjectionsCdiExtension implements Extension {
<T> void processAnnotatedType(#Observes ProcessAnnotatedType<T> pat) {
Set<AnnotatedField<? super T>> fields = pat.getAnnotatedType().getFields();
for (AnnotatedField<? super T> field : fields) {
if (shouldInjectionAnnotationBeAddedToField(field)) {
AnnotatedType<T> at = pat.getAnnotatedType();
AnnotatedTypeBuilder<T> builder = new AnnotatedTypeBuilder<T>().readFromType(at);
Inject injectAnnotation = AnnotationInstanceProvider.of(Inject.class);
builder.addToField(field, injectAnnotation);
pat.setAnnotatedType(builder.create());
}
}
}
private <X> boolean shouldInjectionAnnotationBeAddedToField(AnnotatedField<? super X> field) {
return !field.isAnnotationPresent(Inject.class) &&
field.isAnnotationPresent(PersistenceContext.class);
}
}
and produce suitable EntityManager in test class
#RunWith(CdiRunner.class)
#AdditionalClasses(AddInjectToPersistenceContextInjectionsCdiExtension.class)
public class SampleServiceTest2 {
#Inject SampleService greeter;
EntityManagerFactory emf;
#PostConstruct
void init() {
emf = Persistence.createEntityManagerFactory("integration");
}
#Produces
EntityManager createEntityManager() {
return emf.createEntityManager();
}
#Test
public void testGreeter() throws Exception {
}
}
It's not exactly equivalent of what Java EE container does, but it's close enough more often than not.