I have been making a game with javascript for a while now, and I am doing the websocketing with node.js and socket.io.
So my question is: Once I get a server, how would setting it up work? Would I send the people who own the server my files, and then would they take care of setting it up? Would I be able to access the computer they loaned me and set things up from there? I'm confused about the whole process... first time doing anything like this.
Related
I am making a macos app in XCode, and I was wondering if there was a way to make it host a local server that is visible across the network.
I am trying to find a way so that it would host something on the devices's network with it's hostname/ip address, so if someone goes to http://hostname:5000 they would be able to see the response, and the app would be able to see the request, just like how hosting a local python server works. Is there any way to do this in XCode with Swift?
For example: the user presses 'start server' on their screen. The server is hosted across the network. Anytime a request is made to it, they get a notification.
Just to make you concern you may find some sample codes, including local web server inside the app.Few of them I found are:
https://github.com/ooper-shlab/MyWebViewApp-Swift
https://github.com/depoon/SwiftLocalhost
The main thing is it's just a public
, experimental code, so it's not simple, not easy to adopt, not all coding best-recommended, far from readable and may have severe bugs.But you can use it as a working example and take any parts of it into your app.
I have a lobby in which I want the users to be in sync. So when a user turns off his internet while the app is running, he should be removed. I know Firebase does not support server side coding, so the coding needs to be client side. The answers from How to delete firebase data after "n" days and Delete firebase data older than 2 hours do not answer this question since they expect that the user is online and they have an internet connection. So my question is if is possible to delete users when they got no internet? I thought maybe it is an idea to let the users update a value every 5 seconds, and when that update is not done, the other users in that lobby remove the player. This way is not good, since every player needs to retrieve and upload alot of data every 5 seconds. What is the best way to solve this?
Edit: to make it short, lets say each user has an image. The image should be green when the user is connected, and grey when disconnected.
Edit 2: after thinking it over, it is really hard to accurate present the connected users on a client-side server. That is why, if nobody has a different solution, I should add another server which can execute server-side codes. Because of the larges amount of servers, I would like to know which server I should use. The server should run a simple function which only checks if the users are connected or disconnected and can communicate with Firebase. If I am correct it should look like this:
But the server also needs to communicate with the users directly. I have absoluty no idea where to start.
If I'm not completely wrong, you should be able to use onDisconnect.
From the Firebase, documentation:
How onDisconnect:Works:
When an onDisconnect() operation is established, it lives on the Firebase Realtime Database server. The server checks security to make sure the user can perform the write event requested, and informs the client if it is invalid. The server then monitors the connection. If at any point it times out, or is actively closed by the client, the server checks security a second time (to make sure the operation is still valid) and then invokes the event.
In app in production I'm using onDisconnectRemoveValue, and when I close the app, the user removes himself from the lobby. Not sure how it works when you turn the device in airplane mode, but from the documentation it seems there should be no problem.
One thing: when you test it better do it on real device, the simulator have issues with turning it off and on, at least the on I have installed.
Edit: So i checked the onDisconnect when you put the device on airplane mode and it works! The question is, that it removes the user in about a 1:30 min, approximately, so if you read the documentation or ask the support, you may be (and only may be) able to find a way to set the time you want.
I am wanting to give back to a small gaming community. The idea is to make an app that acts like a chat client to connect to the game servers. I am trying to grasp the concepts on how connections work through examples I've found on the web, since I am self taught by seeing examples.
So far the examples I found are for connections on the same network. What I need is some kind of example that will allow me to connect from different networks or at least an explanation on what I need to do. Also I need to be able to get around a router without with setting port forwarding on the router.
In the end the app will be connecting to the game developer's server but I need a working app before I get his permission to connect to his servers.
Any help will be most appreciated. If any additional information is needed to help just ask and I'll do my best to fill in the gaps.
That is a very broad question, but I try to give you as much information as possible from by point of view. As I'm not yet sure if you want to have a P2P Connection (game-application to game-application) or a standard server model, I will just mentioned different approaches to this problem.
Adobe has support for P2P since a long time. Read some FAQ, esspecially "How does RTMFP differ from RTMP?" (I try to choose Sources with infographics, as that helped me to understand it).
What you really should start playing with and making first steps in, should be NetConnection. This is the very basic Function that will allow you to communicate to a Server running e.g. PHP or connecting to a Flash Media Server (FMS). FMS is inpartcular interresting for you, as it really boosts the ideas what you game could do, but setting up a FMS is not that easy,to host a own instance is even more complex. So if you come to the conclusion that you want to travel the road of using a FMS, I can suggest you Onyx Server. They mainly marketing theirself as a Streaming service, but in reality you will get access to a FMS for a ok'ish price (FMS instances on Amazon were way worst the last time I checked).
The FMS basicly only a Flash AS2 File with some extra Commands. Your FMS can handle real-time (!) persistent connections (!) with any client that connects to it. Everyone is able to connect to the server at first, and you can then choose in your FMS Script what a client have to bring to the table to stay on the server or is rejected. After that, you have a very string tool for a Game. For example, you could have a game instance connect to it, tell the server that an enemy was hit and the server near-instantly (the speed is really amazing, there is no feeled delay, it really is instant. Its called SharedObjects) pass this information down to the enemy game instance. I used FMS only for one project and it was a very long ride to understand it and work with it, but it was a really nice experience, as you code the Server in the "same" language like the game itself (AS2, AS3 = ECMA).
If you dont want to spend money at this stage, you can use the Adobe RTMFP Instance at p2p.rtmfp.net. It is, as far as I know, only for testing and you will be rejected if you misuse the service for a real project, but for starting and testing it will do. If you use the Cirrus Engine, you can even follow this Tutorial. You will find sample code in there:
// Cirrus connect info
private const SERVER:String = "rtmfp://p2p.rtmfp.net/";
private const DEVKEY:String = "{YOUR_DEVELOPER_KEY}";
// Used to connect to the Cirrus service
private var _netConnection:NetConnection;
_netConnection = new NetConnection();
// Listen for status info
_netConnection.addEventListener( NetStatusEvent.NET_STATUS, onNetStatus );
// Connect to Cirrus using our unique URI
_netConnection.connect( SERVER + DEVKEY );
My adive for you would be: Try getting comfortable with NetConnection. It is really straight forward. When I first started using it, I had a couple of days struggeling and reading a lot on the web, but I learned a lot doing so. You should too. Use NetConnection and try to create two simple AS3/FLA instances of your code that both connect to the same domain (use the adobe rtmfp domain for now) and try to exchange some simple String-Data between these instances.
To take some of the pain of your shoulders, add the minimum amount of listeners to your NetConnection like so:
//Main NetConnector
nc = new NetConnection();
//Troubleshooting Listener
nc.addEventListener(SecurityErrorEvent.SECURITY_ERROR, securityErrorHandler);
nc.addEventListener(NetStatusEvent.NET_STATUS, status_handler);
//nc.objectEncoding = ObjectEncoding.AMF0; //Default
nc.client = this;
nc.connect("https://some-domain");
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
/// CALL ERROR LISTENER
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
private function status_handler(e:NetStatusEvent):void {
//trace("NetStatusEvent");
dispatchEvent(new CallEvent(CallEvent.CALL_NATIVE_NET_STATUS, e, true ));
}
private function securityErrorHandler(e:SecurityErrorEvent):void {
//trace("SecurityErrorEvent");
dispatchEvent(new CallEvent(CallEvent.CALL_NATIVE_SECURITY_ERROR, e, true ));
}
You will get alot of errors and netStatus and NetSecuriy Events. Flash will often run into Sandbox-Violation errors when you now know what you are doing. That can be frustrating but if you keep it up, google every error and compare you implementations with the implementation of others, you will wrap your head around this and can do really neat stuff with it.
I recommend you google sources and tutorials for NetConnection and stick to one that is on your level of knowledge.
Good Luck.
I have a application built on Zend Framework I am trying to optimize.
I did some Xdebug profiling and although i cant say i understand every nitty gritty of the results i got, some things were quite obvious from the result.
For instance, the file Bootstrap.php seems to be the one gulping most of the time taking 4,553MS seconds which accounts for 92.49% of the total time.
And if i dig further, I could see that Zend_Application_Bootstrap_Boostrap->run takes the bulk of the time. Checking this out again, I found out that Zend_Controller_Front->Dispatch might actually be the function inside the Boostrap.php that takes time to execute.
Question is, from these indices that i have, how best can I go about Optimizing the application? If it caching, how do i go about applying Caching to this situation?
Thanks
From the look of the callgrinds, on the login page the app is spending most of it's time in curl_exec, which is to be expected if you're doing a remote login. But it is doing 10 separate curl_execs which seems excessive. I'm not familiar with the LinkedIn login auth, but is it possible your app is running the remote login code multiple times?
On the standard page request the app is spending most of its time connecting to MySQL, and it seems to be doing this twice. Are you using a remote DB server, and do you need two separate DB connections?
Assuming you are using a remote DB server and it is on the same network as your web server, there seems to be some networking issue there. I'd check the latency to that server if you can, and try connecting to the IP address instead of a hostname to see if that makes any difference (if doing this is much faster this would suggest an issue with the DNS setup on your web server).
For example, I have a website with various types of information. If that goes down I have a copy of the same website the users use on a local webserver, like Apache or IIS on the client. They use this local version until the Internet version returns. They can have no downtime, in other words.
The problem is that over time the Internet version will change while the client versions will remain the same unless I touch each client's machine to make the updates. I don't want to do that.
Is there a good way to keep my client up to date so that when I make a change on the server the client gets a copy so they can run it locally if needs be?
Thank you.
EDIT: do you think maybe using SVN and timely running of the update by the clients would work?
EDIT: they'll never ever submit anything. It's just so I don't have to update the client by hand, manually going to the machine. they're webpages that run in case the main server is down.
I will go for Git over SVN because of its distributed nature. Gives you multiple copies of code; use it along with this comment's solution:
Making git auto-commit
to autocommit.
Why not use something like HTTrack to make local copies of your actual internet site on each machine, rather then trying to do a separate deployment. That way you'll automatically stay in sync.
This has the advantage that if, at some point, part of your website is updated dynamically from a database, the user will still be able to have a static copy of the resulting site that is up-to-date.
There are tools like rsync which you can use periodically to sync the changes.