Actions on Google Smart Home - actions-on-google

i wrote a smart home skill for Alexa, which interacts with a bunch of REST apis i created. It integrated with my OAUTH2 server, all good.
I've tried reading the limited Actions on Google documentation, and looked at the example Node app on github, and i'm stumped.
The action.json seems to take a single URL - i'm unclear on what that should be, the example takes the easy route of passing a single url, then deciding on sync/execute etc as url param in the index.js, which I don't want to do.
Can someone please explain how this works for them? I see a bunch of other people struggling on here, so i take some comfort that i may be thick, but i'm not alone!

Since you developed an Alexa smart home skill, you should know the skill adapter hosted as a Lambda function.
The example Node.js program works just like the skill adapter.
When Google Home invokes your smart home app, it sends the request to the url in the action.json. You can use the example Node.js app for this url, then write your function to handle sync/execute requests. This part should be very similar to the REST APIs you created for Alexa.

Related

Dynamically create skills for Actions on Google via an exposed API?

Is there an API exposed for Actions on Google, similar to what Dialogflow offers with their API? The only API-like flow I have found through my research is this webhook flow API, but that only deals with conversation requests, prompts, and responses, which I have already handled.
Ideally I'd like to be able to dynamically create "agents" and their conversation flows without having to use the AoG console, similar to what Amazon offers with Alexa SMAPI.
There's not a full API to do everything that you want end-to-end. Some parts, like Dialogflow and fulfillment, can be automated, but it will still require some manual work in the Actions Console.
I had a conversation with another developer on this subject once. As a workaround, which is admittedly hacky, they decided to use the Puppeteer library to programmatically control a browser instance to fill in fields and click buttons.
That may not necessarily work when the console changes, and isn't a good substitute for an API, but it may work for you.
Yes you can do it using Google Dialogflow REST API
Here are APIs for the agent :
There are many more APIs available for different operations.

How to secure/protect usage of Algolia's front end api key?

From the official tutorials on https://community.algolia.com/instantsearch.js/, Algolia requires you to code the key into your application and used with each api request. If someone were to dig this up, what's to prevent them from spamming search requests with your api key?
If someone were to dig this up, what's to prevent them from spamming search requests with your api key?
Do you want the cruel truth? Nothing...
Unfortunately in a web app does not exist anyway of securing secrets, be they api-keys, tokens or any other name convention that may be used.
In a web app all is needed is to use F12 or view the page source and search for them in the raw html and JavaScript.
You can try to use JavaScript obfuscation to make it hard to find but will still be easy to reverse engineer. Even in a mobile app that have their code obfuscated and released as a binary is easy to extract this secrets.
If you want to understand a little more about Mobile Api Security Techinques please read this series of articles to find how api-keys, access tokens, HMAC and other techniques can be used and bypassed. While the article was wrote in the context of a mobile API is still valid in a web app context for the security techniques used to protect the API.
Possible Solution
The best approach is to always delegate your web app access to third part API's to a backend you can control.
In this backend you can then use a User Behaviour Analytics(UBA) solution to monitor bad use of this third part access.
Once UBA can be complex and expensive to deploy you could start by using the new Google reCaptcha V3 across all pages of your web app. ReCaptcha V3 does not require direct user interaction once it works on the background to differentiate humans from bots.
So I would have the web app requesting the Agolia search to my backend that would use reCaptcha V3 protection to differentiate abuse in the search functionality by bots or attackers.
Remember that this approach has the huge benefit of never reveal your Agolia API Key, thus attackers can never directly use it.

User management and Commenting system for website

I am working on a news media website, and I am looking to add feature to allow users to register, login and make comments.
For example (New York Times login/register screen)
May I know what options are available, what are the common approaches publishers would choose ?
So far I have been looking at:
AWS Cognito: Allows to create own user directory, and authenticate.
Disquss SSO: also implemented commenting.
In house development: Code a new microservice to manage user directory and store/serve comments, alternatively using AWS Lambda. I am very keen to go down that path, example, but this might costs a lot to develop + maintain.
User data security is my top consideration, I would prefer to use a separate system to store user data. Either a robust third party service or complete in house development of a new system.
Any suggestions?
Thank you.
These are web-standards for single sign on:
OpenID
OpenID Connect
Companies like Google and Facebook provide authentication using Google-/Facebook-accounts. As far as I know, Google uses OpenID Connect which is based on OAuth. However, I don't know if you don't have to store user data any more at all when using this.
I believe it's worth checking again if authentication and commenting should be combined, especially when using a third-party-solution. It makes it harder to change one of the two.
This could give you some more ideas: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_single_sign-on_implementations.

Host my own user authentication service on my own server?

I have tried Google with queries similar to the title of this question, but haven't found anything useful.
Background: I am building a web app and would like to add a user authentication level to it. I cannot imagine anything worse than building a user authentication system from the ground up, so I want a quick solution.
I'm looking for open source software I can host on my server that provides an auth layer I can connect to, with multiple user accounts
Criteria:
I want to host the software on my own server
Provide a log in screen that works with multiple sign in strategies - twitter, facebook, vanilla email, etc.
Persists users to a database (preferably postgres) and persists session data
Preferably lets me store a minimal amount of data per user, like key value store
Has a client-side (Javascript) API, like Facebook's JS, so I can use this auth service on multiple sites. Namely, I want to use it on localhost or my own file system (when allowing file cookies). Client side JS API exposes methods like log in / log out
Has a server side API (such as exposes local RESTful endpoints) so that when I do build out my server side app for other data storage outside of the user, my app can query the auth service for log in status.
I want to run this stack completely independently of my own app - in fact I want to run this auth service and purely communicate to it from my local dev environment without building any server side app of my own.
I have used Firebase and they do many of the things that I want, including log in strategies and the client / server side APIs, but I want to be able to host my own version of this.
I can't imagine anyone takes pleasure out of building user authentication of any kind, so I'm surprised I haven't found anything in research.
I also know this is an open-ended question, but as far as I can tell I haven't found anything satisfying my requirements.
I like Devise (https://github.com/plataformatec/devise), which is for Rails. It has an active community with a boatloads of plugins available that can fulfill many of your requirements.
I didn't see a language specified; most languages and frameworks have their own implementations. Can you provide more information?
Example: I use the Flask framework on python. In addition, I use the Authomatic library which provides Oauth access for twitter, google, facebook, etc.
What I was looking for is something called a Single Sign On solution. According to this list there is nothing currently that meets my criteria.
Instead I have chosen to just run a local webserver and implement a regular auth flow.

DotnetNuke redirect

our client needs to shortcuts to particular pages
We need to redirect non existent urls like
http://site.com/promotion1
to the actual URL similar to
http://site.com/promotions/promotion1/tabid/799/language/en-AU/Default.aspx
...
I've sent a list of appropriate DNN modules to our client but it may take them forever to get back to me.
In the mean time they still submitting requests to us to create redirects for them.
if there's no cost involved then i wont have to wait for them to get back to me.
so I'm looking for a Quick and free way to enable the clients to set these up on this own.
I've looked at:
MAS.ActionRedirect
Ventrian Friendly URL Provider
DotNetNuke URL Rewriting HTTP Module
But haven't had much luck in the small amount of time i have available.
Has anyone got some suggestions on how to achieve our goal with either the above resources or maybe some additional resource i haven't found yet?
(DNN v4.9)
You should be able to use the built-in friendly URL functionality within DNN, or use a URL rewriter module within IIS.
You can read my answer about using the DNN Friendly URL functionality for more details, or look into the IIS URL Rewrite module.