In below code, I need to check if version string is not empty then append its value to the request variable.
if ([string]::IsNullOrEmpty($version))
{
$request += "/" + $version
}
How to check not in if condition?
if (-not ([string]::IsNullOrEmpty($version)))
{
$request += "/" + $version
}
You can also use ! as an alternative to -not.
You don't necessarily have to use the [string]:: prefix. This works in the same way:
if ($version)
{
$request += "/" + $version
}
A variable that is null or empty string evaluates to false.
As in many other programming and scripting languages you can do so by adding ! in front of the condition
if (![string]::IsNullOrEmpty($version))
{
$request += "/" + $version
}
If the variable is a parameter then you could use advanced function parameter binding like below to validate not null or empty:
[CmdletBinding()]
Param (
[parameter(mandatory=$true)]
[ValidateNotNullOrEmpty()]
[string]$Version
)
if (!$variablename)
{
Write-Host "variable is null"
}
I hope this simple answer will resolve the question.
Source
I would define $Version as a string to start with
[string]$Version
and if it's a param you can use the code posted by Samselvaprabu
or if you would rather not present your users with an error you can do something like
while (-not($version)){
$version = Read-Host "Enter the version ya fool!"
}
$request += "/" + $version
You can use the [string]::IsNullOrEmpty($version) method if it is a string.
But, I was looking for a universal way to check nulls (regardless of data type)
in Powershell. Checking for null (or not null) values in
PowerShell is tricky. Using ($value -eq $null) or ($value -ne
$null) does not always work. Neither does if($value). Using them
can even cause problems later on.
Just read this Microsoft article below (IN IT'S ENTIRETY) to get a grasp
of how tricky nulls can be in Powershell.
[https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/scripting/learn/deep-dives/everything-about-null?view=powershell-7.1][1]
I wrote these two functions below for checking for null (or not null) values
in PowerShell. I "believe" they should work for any and all values
and data types.
I hope someone finds them helpful.
I am not sure why MS hasn't put something like this into PowerShell natively to
make handling nulls easier (and less dangerous) in PowerShell.
I hope this helps someone.
If anyone knows of an unseen "pitfall" or problem with this method,
please post a comment here so we can know that.
Thanks!
<#
*********************
FUNCTION: ValueIsNull
*********************
Use this function ValueIsNull below for checking for null values
rather using -eq $null or if($value) methods. Those may not work as expected.
See reference below for more details on $null values in PowerShell.
[https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/scripting/learn/deep-dives/everything-about-null?view=powershell-7.1][1]
An if statement with a call to ValueIsNull can be written like this:
if (ValueIsNull($TheValue))
#>
function ValueIsNull {
param($valueToCheck)
# In Powershell when a parameter of a function does not have a data type defined,
# it will create the parameter as a PSObject. It will do this for
# an object, an array, and a base date type (int, string, DateTime, etc.)
# However if the value passed in is $null, then it will still be $null.
# So, using a function to check null gives us the ability to determine if the parameter
# is null or not by checking if the parameter is a PSObject or not.
# This function could be written more efficiently, but intentionally
# putting it in a more readable format.
# Special Note: This cannot tell the difference between a parameter
# that is a true $null and an undeclared variable passed in as the parameter.
# ie - If you type the variable name wrong and pass that in to this function it will see it as a null.
[bool]$returnValue = $True
[bool]$isItAnObject=$True
[string]$ObjectToString = ""
try { $ObjectToString = $valueToCheck.PSObject.ToString() } catch { $isItAnObject = $false }
if ($isItAnObject)
{
$returnValue=$False
}
return $returnValue
}
<#
************************
FUNCTION: ValueIsNotNull
************************
Use this function ValueIsNotNull below for checking values for
being "not-null" rather than using -ne $null or if($value) methods.
Both may not work as expected.
See notes on ValueIsNull function above for more info.
ValueIsNotNull just calls the ValueIsNull function and then reverses
the boolean result. However, having ValueIsNotNull available allows
you to avoid having to use -eq and\or -ne against ValueIsNull results.
You can disregard this function and just use !ValueIsNull($value).
But, it is my preference to have both for easier readability of code.
An if statement with a call to ValueIsNotNull can be written like this:
if (ValueIsNotNull($TheValue))
#>
function ValueIsNotNull {
param($valueToCheck)
[bool]$returnValue = !(ValueIsNull($valueToCheck))
return $returnValue
}
You can use the following list of calls to ValueIsNull to test it out.
$psObject = New-Object PSObject
Add-Member -InputObject $psObject -MemberType NoteProperty -Name customproperty -Value "TestObject"
$valIsNull = ValueIsNull($psObject)
$props = #{
Property1 = 'one'
Property2 = 'two'
Property3 = 'three'
}
$otherPSobject = new-object psobject -Property $props
$valIsNull = ValueIsNull($otherPSobject)
# Now null the object
$otherPSobject = $null
$valIsNull = ValueIsNull($otherPSobject)
# Now an explicit null
$testNullValue = $null
$valIsNull = ValueIsNull($testNullValue)
# Now a variable that is not defined (maybe a type error in variable name)
# This will return a true because the function can't tell the difference
# between a null and an undeclared variable.
$valIsNull = ValueIsNull($valueNotDefine)
[int32]$intValueTyped = 25
$valIsNull = ValueIsNull($intValueTyped)
$intValueLoose = 67
$valIsNull = ValueIsNull($intValueLoose)
$arrayOfIntLooseType = 4,2,6,9,1
$valIsNull = ValueIsNull($arrayOfIntLooseType)
[int32[]]$arrayOfIntStrongType = 1500,2230,3350,4000
$valIsNull = ValueIsNull($arrayOfIntStrongType)
#Now take the same int array variable and null it.
$arrayOfIntStrongType = $null
$valIsNull = ValueIsNull($arrayOfIntStrongType)
$stringValueLoose = "String Loose Type"
$valIsNull = ValueIsNull($stringValueLoose)
[string]$stringValueStrong = "String Strong Type"
$valIsNull = ValueIsNull($stringValueStrong)
$dateTimeArrayLooseValue = #("1/1/2017", "2/1/2017", "3/1/2017").ForEach([datetime])
$valIsNull = ValueIsNull($dateTimeArrayLooseValue)
# Note that this has a $null in the array values. Still returns false correctly.
$stringArrayLooseWithNull = #("String1", "String2", $null, "String3")
$valIsNull = ValueIsNull($stringArrayLooseWithNull)
Related
I am generating a ScriptBlock based on DB input which I invoke later in the script. I now want to ensure that a malicious user is not injecting any PS code in the DB varchar field that then gets executed.
First, I filtered the String Script Block for forbidden chars such as $ or ;. But I want to take it one step further and use AST to check if there is any executable code in the DB field.
When I use $Ast.FindAll for a specific element such as ForEachStatementAst it works fine.
However, I also want to be able to detect cmdlets etc in the String.
Examples that should be recognised as being ok:
abc
123
'a','b'
true
Examples that should be recognised as being not ok:
Write-host or Remove-Item or any other get-command cmdlet.
`$(MySubExpression)
When using AST visualisation, I get the same tree for both examples. ('abc', 'Write-Host')
ScriptBlockAst-> NamedBlockAst -> PipelineAst -> CommandAst -> StringConstantExpressionAst
Is there any way I can use AST to determine whether the DB field (or any string) contains only allowed entries such as non PS keywords / cmdlets, numbers etc but nothing that could be used as a PS command and that could be invoked?
The following code works for the test cases but I wonder if this can be achieved in a better way. If Res.count > 0, the input was not ok, if =0, it was ok.
$DebugPreference = 'Continue'
[System.Collections.Generic.List[System.String]]$InputStringList = New-Object -TypeName "System.Collections.Generic.List[System.String]"
$InputStringList.Add("foreach (`$x in #('a','b')){;}")
$InputStringList.Add("New-item -Path 'C:\Test.txt' -ItemType File")
$InputStringList.Add("Write-host 'as'")
$InputStringList.Add("abc")
$InputStringList.Add("a,b,c")
$InputStringList.Add("123")
$InputStringList.Add("true")
[System.Collections.Generic.List[System.Type]]$TypeList = New-Object -TypeName "System.Collections.Generic.List[System.Type]"
$TypeList.Add([System.Management.Automation.Language.StringLiteralToken])
$TypeList.Add([System.Management.Automation.Language.ScriptBlockAst])
$TypeList.Add([System.Management.Automation.Language.NamedBlockAst])
$TypeList.Add([System.Management.Automation.Language.StringConstantExpressionAst])
$TypeList.Add([System.Management.Automation.Language.ConstantExpressionAst])
$TypeList.Add([System.Management.Automation.Language.CommandExpressionAst])
$TypeList.Add([System.Management.Automation.Language.CommandAst])
$TypeList.Add([System.Management.Automation.Language.PipelineAst])
$TypeList.Add([System.Management.Automation.Language.ArrayLiteralAst])
[String[]]$CommandArray = (Get-Command | Select-Object -ExpandProperty 'Name')
[System.Management.Automation.ScriptBlock]$Predicate =
{
param([System.Management.Automation.Language.Ast]$AstObject)
Write-Debug -Message $AstObject.GetType().FullName
if($AstObject -is [System.Management.Automation.Language.StringConstantExpressionAst])
{
if($AstObject.Value -in $CommandArray)
{
return $true
}
else
{
return $false
}
}
else
{
return (-not($AstObject.GetType() -in $TypeList))
}
}
$InputStringList.GetEnumerator() | ForEach-Object -Process `
{
Write-Debug -Message ("Processing string: "+$PsItem.ToString())
$ast = [System.Management.Automation.Language.Parser]::ParseInput($PsItem, [ref]$null, [ref]$null)
$res=$ast.FindAll($Predicate, $true)
Write-Debug -Message $res.count.ToString()
}
As commented, what you trying to do is creating your own restricted languagemode. Meaning that it would probably be easier to invoke the concerned scriptblock in an restricted runspace.
Derived from #mklement0 great answer for Automatically retrieve Allowed Types for Constrained Language mode:
Function Invoke-Restricted {
[CmdletBinding()]param([String]$Expression)
$Restricted = [powershell]::Create()
$Restricted.Runspace.SessionStateProxy.LanguageMode = 'Restricted'
Try { $Restricted.AddScript($expression).Invoke() }
Catch { $PSCmdlet.ThrowTerminatingError($_) }
}
Restricted expression
Invoke-Restricted #'
#{
string = 'abc'
int = 123
array = 'a','b'
hashtable = #{ a = 1; b = 2 }
boolean = $true
}
'#
Yields
Name Value
---- -----
array {a, b}
int 123
boolean True
string abc
hashtable {b, a}
Invalid expression
Invoke-Restricted #'
#{
TimeSpan = [TimeSpan]'12:34:45'
}
'#
Throws an error:
Invoke-Restricted: Exception calling "Invoke" with "0" argument(s): "At line:1 char:1
+ [TimeSpan]"12:34:45"
+ ~~~~~~~~~~
The type TimeSpan is not allowed in restricted language mode or a Data section."
Yet, it has some limitations as it does not prevent e.g. the use of cmdlets.
For an easy and secure way to retrieve a (structured) configuration file I would depend on a serialized format as JSON using the ConvertFrom-Json cmdlet
Related: #12377 Running partly trusted PowerShell code in a restricted security environment.
Say I have JSON like:
{
"a" : {
"b" : 1,
"c" : 2
}
}
Now ConvertTo-Json will happily create PSObjects out of that. I want to access an item I could do $json.a.b and get 1 - nicely nested properties.
Now if I have the string "a.b" the question is how to use that string to access the same item in that structure? Seems like there should be some special syntax I'm missing like & for dynamic function calls because otherwise you have to interpret the string yourself using Get-Member repeatedly I expect.
No, there is no special syntax, but there is a simple workaround, using iex, the built-in alias[1] for the Invoke-Expression cmdlet:
$propertyPath = 'a.b'
# Note the ` (backtick) before $json, to prevent premature expansion.
iex "`$json.$propertyPath" # Same as: $json.a.b
# You can use the same approach for *setting* a property value:
$newValue = 'foo'
iex "`$json.$propertyPath = `$newValue" # Same as: $json.a.b = $newValue
Caveat: Do this only if you fully control or implicitly trust the value of $propertyPath.
Only in rare situation is Invoke-Expression truly needed, and it should generally be avoided, because it can be a security risk.
Note that if the target property contains an instance of a specific collection type and you want to preserve it as-is (which is not common) (e.g., if the property value is a strongly typed array such as [int[]], or an instance of a list type such as [System.Collections.Generic.List`1]), use the following:
# "," constructs an aux., transient array that is enumerated by
# Invoke-Expression and therefore returns the original property value as-is.
iex ", `$json.$propertyPath"
Without the , technique, Invoke-Expression enumerates the elements of a collection-valued property and you'll end up with a regular PowerShell array, which is of type [object[]] - typically, however, this distinction won't matter.
Note: If you were to send the result of the , technique directly through the pipeline, a collection-valued property value would be sent as a single object instead of getting enumerated, as usual. (By contrast, if you save the result in a variable first and the send it through the pipeline, the usual enumeration occurs). While you can force enumeration simply by enclosing the Invoke-Expression call in (...), there is no reason to use the , technique to begin with in this case, given that enumeration invariably entails loss of the information about the type of the collection whose elements are being enumerated.
Read on for packaged solutions.
Note:
The following packaged solutions originally used Invoke-Expression combined with sanitizing the specified property paths in order to prevent inadvertent/malicious injection of commands. However, the solutions now use a different approach, namely splitting the property path into individual property names and iteratively drilling down into the object, as shown in Gyula Kokas's helpful answer. This not only obviates the need for sanitizing, but turns out to be faster than use of Invoke-Expression (the latter is still worth considering for one-off use).
The no-frills, get-only, always-enumerate version of this technique would be the following function:
# Sample call: propByPath $json 'a.b'
function propByPath { param($obj, $propPath) foreach ($prop in $propPath.Split('.')) { $obj = $obj.$prop }; $obj }
What the more elaborate solutions below offer: parameter validation, the ability to also set a property value by path, and - in the case of the propByPath function - the option to prevent enumeration of property values that are collections (see next point).
The propByPath function offers a -NoEnumerate switch to optionally request preserving a property value's specific collection type.
By contrast, this feature is omitted from the .PropByPath() method, because there is no syntactically convenient way to request it (methods only support positional arguments). A possible solution is to create a second method, say .PropByPathNoEnumerate(), that applies the , technique discussed above.
Helper function propByPath:
function propByPath {
param(
[Parameter(Mandatory)] $Object,
[Parameter(Mandatory)] [string] $PropertyPath,
$Value, # optional value to SET
[switch] $NoEnumerate # only applies to GET
)
Set-StrictMode -Version 1
# Note: Iteratively drilling down into the object turns out to be *faster*
# than using Invoke-Expression; it also obviates the need to sanitize
# the property-path string.
$props = $PropertyPath.Split('.') # Split the path into an array of property names.
if ($PSBoundParameters.ContainsKey('Value')) { # SET
$parentObject = $Object
if ($props.Count -gt 1) {
foreach ($prop in $props[0..($props.Count-2)]) { $parentObject = $parentObject.$prop }
}
$parentObject.($props[-1]) = $Value
}
else { # GET
$value = $Object
foreach ($prop in $props) { $value = $value.$prop }
if ($NoEnumerate) {
, $value
} else {
$value
}
}
}
Instead of the Invoke-Expression call you would then use:
# GET
propByPath $obj $propertyPath
# GET, with preservation of the property value's specific collection type.
propByPath $obj $propertyPath -NoEnumerate
# SET
propByPath $obj $propertyPath 'new value'
You could even use PowerShell's ETS (extended type system) to attach a .PropByPath() method to all [pscustomobject] instances (PSv3+ syntax; in PSv2 you'd have to create a *.types.ps1xml file and load it with Update-TypeData -PrependPath):
'System.Management.Automation.PSCustomObject',
'Deserialized.System.Management.Automation.PSCustomObject' |
Update-TypeData -TypeName { $_ } `
-MemberType ScriptMethod -MemberName PropByPath -Value { #`
param(
[Parameter(Mandatory)] [string] $PropertyPath,
$Value
)
Set-StrictMode -Version 1
$props = $PropertyPath.Split('.') # Split the path into an array of property names.
if ($PSBoundParameters.ContainsKey('Value')) { # SET
$parentObject = $this
if ($props.Count -gt 1) {
foreach ($prop in $props[0..($props.Count-2)]) { $parentObject = $parentObject.$prop }
}
$parentObject.($props[-1]) = $Value
}
else { # GET
# Note: Iteratively drilling down into the object turns out to be *faster*
# than using Invoke-Expression; it also obviates the need to sanitize
# the property-path string.
$value = $this
foreach ($prop in $PropertyPath.Split('.')) { $value = $value.$prop }
$value
}
}
You could then call $obj.PropByPath('a.b') or $obj.PropByPath('a.b', 'new value')
Note: Type Deserialized.System.Management.Automation.PSCustomObject is targeted in addition to System.Management.Automation.PSCustomObject in order to also cover deserialized custom objects, which are returned in a number of scenarios, such as using Import-CliXml, receiving output from background jobs, and using remoting.
.PropByPath() will be available on any [pscustomobject] instance in the remainder of the session (even on instances created prior to the Update-TypeData call [2]); place the Update-TypeData call in your $PROFILE (profile file) to make the method available by default.
[1] Note: While it is generally advisable to limit aliases to interactive use and use full cmdlet names in scripts, use of iex to me is acceptable, because it is a built-in alias and enables a concise solution.
[2] Verify with (all on one line) $co = New-Object PSCustomObject; Update-TypeData -TypeName System.Management.Automation.PSCustomObject -MemberType ScriptMethod -MemberName GetFoo -Value { 'foo' }; $co.GetFoo(), which outputs foo even though $co was created before Update-TypeData was called.
This workaround is maybe useful to somebody.
The result goes always deeper, until it hits the right object.
$json=(Get-Content ./json.json | ConvertFrom-Json)
$result=$json
$search="a.c"
$search.split(".")|% {$result=$result.($_) }
$result
You can have 2 variables.
$json = '{
"a" : {
"b" : 1,
"c" : 2
}
}' | convertfrom-json
$a,$b = 'a','b'
$json.$a.$b
1
I have function that updates object in WMI. I want user to be able to specify in parameters only values that he wants to update. How can I do it?
function UpdateObject ([bool] $b1, [bool] $b2, [int] $n1, [string] $s1)
{
$myObject = GetObjectFromWmi #(...)
#(...)
#This is bad. As it overrides all the properties.
$myObject.b1 = $b1
$myObject.b2 = $b2
$myObject.n1 = $n1
$myObject.s1 = $s1
#This is what I was thinking but don't kwow how to do
if(IsSet($b1)) { $myObject.b1 = $b1 }
if(IsSet($b2)) { $myObject.b2 = $b2 }
if(IsSet($n1)) { $myObject.n1 = $n1 }
if(IsSet($s1)) { $myObject.s1 = $s1 }
#(...) Store myObject in WMI.
}
I tried passing $null as as parameter but it get's automaticly converted to $false for bool, 0 for int and empty string for string
What are your suggestions?
Check $PSBoundParameters to see if it contains a key with the name of your parameter:
if($PSBoundParameters.ContainsKey('b1')) { $myObject.b1 = $b1 }
if($PSBoundParameters.ContainsKey('b2')) { $myObject.b2 = $b2 }
if($PSBoundParameters.ContainsKey('n1')) { $myObject.n1 = $n1 }
if($PSBoundParameters.ContainsKey('s1')) { $myObject.s1 = $s1 }
$PSBoundParameters acts like a hashtable, where the keys are the parameter names, and the values are the parameters' values, but it only contains bound parameters, which means parameters that are explicitly passed. It does not contain parameters filled in with a default value (except for those passed with $PSDefaultParameterValues).
Building on briantist's answer, if you know that all the parameters exist as properties on the target object you can simply loop through the $PSBoundParameters hashtable and add them one by one:
foreach($ParameterName in $PSBoundParameters.Keys){
$myObject.$ParameterName = $PSBoundParameters[$ParameterName]
}
If only some of the input parameters are to be passed as property values, you can still specify the list just once, with:
$PropertyNames = 'b1','b2','n1','s1'
foreach($ParameterName in $PSBoundParameters.Keys |Where-Object {$PropertyNames -contains $_}){
$myObject.$ParameterName = $PSBoundParameters[$ParameterName]
}
To save yourself having to create a parameter for each property you may want to change, consider using a hashtable or other object to pass this information to your function.
For example:
function UpdateObject ([hashtable]$properties){
$myObject = GetObjectFromWmi
foreach($property in $properties.Keys){
# without checking
$myObject.$property = $properties.$property
# with checking (assuming members of the wmiobject have MemberType Property.
if($property -in (($myObject | Get-Member | Where-Object {$_.MemberType -eq "Property"}).Name)){
Write-Output "Updating $property to $($properties.$property)"
$myObject.$property = $properties.$property
}else{
Write-Output "Property $property not recognised"
}
}
}
UpdateObject -properties {"b1" = $true; "b2" = $false}
If you want a [Boolean] parameter that you want the user to specify explicitly or omit (rather than a [Switch] parameter which can be present or not), you can use [Nullable[Boolean]]. Example:
function Test-Boolean {
param(
[Nullable[Boolean]] $Test
)
if ( $Test -ne $null ) {
if ( $Test ) {
"You specified -Test `$true"
}
else {
"You specified -Test `$false"
}
}
else {
"You did not specify -Test"
}
}
In this sample function the $Test variable will be $null (user did not specify the parameter), $true (user specified -Test $true), or $false (user specified -Test $false). If user specifies -Test without a parameter argument, PowerShell will throw an error.
In other words: This gives you a tri-state [Boolean] parameter (missing, explicitly true, or explicitly false). [Switch] only gives you two states (present or explicitly true, and absent or explicitly false).
Curious about how to loop through a hash table where each value is an array. Example:
$test = #{
a = "a","1";
b = "b","2";
c = "c","3";
}
Then I would like to do something like:
foreach ($T in $test) {
write-output $T
}
Expected result would be something like:
name value
a a
b b
c c
a 1
b 2
c 3
That's not what currently happens and my use case is to basically pass a hash of parameters to a function in a loop. My approach might be all wrong, but figured I would ask and see if anyone's tried to do this?
Edit**
A bit more clarification. What I'm basically trying to do is pass a lot of array values into a function and loop through those in the hash table prior to passing to a nested function. Example:
First something like:
$parameters = import-csv .\NewComputers.csv
Then something like
$parameters | New-LabVM
Lab VM Code below:
function New-LabVM
{
[CmdletBinding()]
Param (
# Param1 help description
[Parameter(Mandatory=$true,
Position=0,
ValueFromPipeline=$true,
ValueFromPipelineByPropertyName=$true)]
[Alias("p1")]
[string[]]$ServerName,
# Param2 help description
[Parameter(Position = 1)]
[int[]]$RAM = 2GB,
# Param3 help description
[Parameter(Position=2)]
[int[]]$ServerHardDriveSize = 40gb,
# Parameter help description
[Parameter(Position=3)]
[int[]]$VMRootPath = "D:\VirtualMachines",
[Parameter(Position=4)]
[int[]]$NetworkSwitch = "VM Switch 1",
[Parameter(Position=4)]
[int[]]$ISO = "D:\ISO\Win2k12.ISO"
)
process
{
New-Item -Path $VMRootPath\$ServerName -ItemType Directory
$Arguments = #{
Name = $ServerName;
MemoryStartupBytes = $RAM;
NewVHDPath = "$VMRootPath\$ServerName\$ServerName.vhdx";
NewVHDSizeBytes = $ServerHardDriveSize
SwitchName = $NetworkSwitch;}
foreach ($Argument in $Arguments){
# Create Virtual Machines
New-VM #Arguments
# Configure Virtual Machines
Set-VMDvdDrive -VMName $ServerName -Path $ISO
Start-VM $ServerName
}
# Create Virtual Machines
New-VM #Arguments
}
}
What you're looking for is parameter splatting.
The most robust way to do that is via hashtables, so you must convert the custom-object instances output by Import-Csv to hashtables:
Import-Csv .\NewComputers.csv | ForEach-Object {
# Convert the custom object at hand to a hashtable.
$htParams = #{}
$_.psobject.properties | ForEach-Object { $htParams[$_.Name] = $_.Value }
# Pass the hashtable via splatting (#) to the target function.
New-LabVM #htParams
}
Note that since parameter binding via splatting is key-based (the hashtable keys are matched against the parameter names), it is fine to use a regular hashtable with its unpredictable key ordering (no need for an ordered hashtable ([ordered] #{ ... }) in this case).
Try this:
for($i=0;$i -lt $test.Count; $i++)
{$test.keys | %{write-host $test.$_[$i]}}
Weirdly, it outputs everything in the wrong order (because $test.keys outputs it backwards).
EDIT: Here's your solution.
Using the [System.Collections.Specialized.OrderedDictionary] type, you guarantee that the output will come out the same order as you entered it.
$test = [ordered] #{
a = "a","1";
b = "b","2";
c = "c","3";
}
After running the same solution code as before, you get exactly the output you wanted.
When I use another object in the .net-Framework in C# I can save a lot of typing by using the using directive.
using FooCompany.Bar.Qux.Assembly.With.Ridiculous.Long.Namespace.I.Really.Mean.It;
...
var blurb = new Thingamabob();
...
So is there a way in Powershell to do something similiar? I'm accessing a lot of .net objects and am not happy of having to type
$blurb = new-object FooCompany.Bar.Qux.Assembly.With.Ridiculous.Long.Namespace.I.Really.Mean.It.Thingamabob;
all the time.
There's really nothing at the namespace level like that. I often assign commonly used types to variables and then instantiate them:
$thingtype = [FooCompany.Bar.Qux.Assembly.With.Ridiculous.Long.Namespace.I.Really.Mean.It.Thingamabob];
$blurb = New-Object $thingtype.FullName
Probably not worth it if the type won't be used repeatedly, but I believe it's the best you can do.
PowerShell 5.0 (included in WMF5 or Windows 10 and up), adds the using namespace construct to the language. You can use it in your script like so:
#Require -Version 5.0
using namespace FooCompany.Bar.Qux.Assembly.With.Ridiculous.Long.Namespace.I.Really.Mean.It
$blurb = [Thingamabob]::new()
(The #Require statement on the first line is not necessary to use using namespace, but it will prevent the script from running in PS 4.0 and below where using namespace is a syntax error.)
Check out this blog post from a couple years ago: http://blogs.msdn.com/richardb/archive/2007/02/21/add-types-ps1-poor-man-s-using-for-powershell.aspx
Here is add-types.ps1, excerpted from that article:
param(
[string] $assemblyName = $(throw 'assemblyName is required'),
[object] $object
)
process {
if ($_) {
$object = $_
}
if (! $object) {
throw 'must pass an -object parameter or pipe one in'
}
# load the required dll
$assembly = [System.Reflection.Assembly]::LoadWithPartialName($assemblyName)
# add each type as a member property
$assembly.GetTypes() |
where {$_.ispublic -and !$_.IsSubclassOf( [Exception] ) -and $_.name -notmatch "event"} |
foreach {
# avoid error messages in case it already exists
if (! ($object | get-member $_.name)) {
add-member noteproperty $_.name $_ -inputobject $object
}
}
}
And, to use it:
RICBERG470> $tfs | add-types "Microsoft.TeamFoundation.VersionControl.Client"
RICBERG470> $itemSpec = new-object $tfs.itemspec("$/foo", $tfs.RecursionType::none)
Basically what I do is crawl the assembly for nontrivial types, then write a "constructor" that uses Add-Member add them (in a structured way) to the objects I care about.
See also this followup post: http://richardberg.net/blog/?p=38
this is just a joke, joke...
$fullnames = New-Object ( [System.Collections.Generic.List``1].MakeGenericType( [String]) );
function using ( $name ) {
foreach ( $type in [Reflection.Assembly]::LoadWithPartialName($name).GetTypes() )
{
$fullnames.Add($type.fullname);
}
}
function new ( $name ) {
$fullname = $fullnames -like "*.$name";
return , (New-Object $fullname[0]);
}
using System.Windows.Forms
using FooCompany.Bar.Qux.Assembly.With.Ridiculous.Long.Namespace.I.Really.Mean.It
$a = new button
$b = new Thingamabob
Here's some code that works in PowerShell 2.0 to add type aliases. But the problem is that it is not scoped. With some extra work you could "un-import" the namespaces, but this should get you off to a good start.
##############################################################################
#.SYNOPSIS
# Add a type accelerator to the current session.
#
#.DESCRIPTION
# The Add-TypeAccelerator function allows you to add a simple type accelerator
# (like [regex]) for a longer type (like [System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex]).
#
#.PARAMETER Name
# The short form accelerator should be just the name you want to use (without
# square brackets).
#
#.PARAMETER Type
# The type you want the accelerator to accelerate.
#
#.PARAMETER Force
# Overwrites any existing type alias.
#
#.EXAMPLE
# Add-TypeAccelerator List "System.Collections.Generic.List``1"
# $MyList = New-Object List[String]
##############################################################################
function Add-TypeAccelerator {
[CmdletBinding()]
param(
[Parameter(Position=1,Mandatory=$true,ValueFromPipelineByPropertyName=$true)]
[String[]]$Name,
[Parameter(Position=2,Mandatory=$true,ValueFromPipeline=$true)]
[Type]$Type,
[Parameter()]
[Switch]$Force
)
process {
$TypeAccelerators = [Type]::GetType('System.Management.Automation.TypeAccelerators')
foreach ($a in $Name) {
if ( $TypeAccelerators::Get.ContainsKey($a) ) {
if ( $Force ) {
$TypeAccelerators::Remove($a) | Out-Null
$TypeAccelerators::Add($a,$Type)
}
elseif ( $Type -ne $TypeAccelerators::Get[$a] ) {
Write-Error "$a is already mapped to $($TypeAccelerators::Get[$a])"
}
}
else {
$TypeAccelerators::Add($a, $Type)
}
}
}
}
If you just need to create an instance of your type, you can store the name of the long namespace in a string:
$st = "System.Text"
$sb = New-Object "$st.StringBuilder"
It's not as powerful as the using directive in C#, but at least it's very easy to use.
Thanks everybody for your input. I've marked Richard Berg's contribution as an answer, because it most closely resembles what I'm looking for.
All your answers brought me on the track that seems most promising: In his blog post Keith Dahlby proposes a Get-Type commandlet that allows easy consutruction of types for generic methods.
I think there is no reason against exetending this to also search through a predefined path of assemblies for a type.
Disclaimer: I haven't built that -- yet ...
Here is how one could use it:
$path = (System.Collections.Generic, FooCompany.Bar.Qux.Assembly.With.Ridiculous.Long.Namespace.I.Really.Mean.It)
$type = get-type -Path $path List Thingamabob
$obj = new-object $type
$obj.GetType()
This would result in a nice generic List of Thingamabob. Of course I'd wrap up everthing sans the path definition in just another utility function. The extended get-type would include a step to resolve any given type agains the path.
#Requires -Version 5
using namespace System.Management.Automation.Host
#using module
I realize this is an old post, but I was looking for the same thing and came across this: http://weblogs.asp.net/adweigert/powershell-adding-the-using-statement
Edit: I suppose I should specify that it allows you to use the familiar syntax of...
using ($x = $y) { ... }