Windows x64
aurelia-syncfusion-bridge 1.0.0
syncfusion-javascript 15.3.26
I would like to use just the grid component and its necessary and optional components but building traces all components.
Per install instructions the plugin is set to syncfusion.useAll() and I did not see any other documentation about changing this setting.
Thanks for your interest in Syncfusion components.
We can use required component by modifying couple of steps followed in the below user guide documentation.
https://help.syncfusion.com/aurelia/getting-started/aurelia-cli-integration
In aurelia_project/aurelia.json file, modify the following lines which was already configured in build.bundles.dependencies. here
{
"name": "aurelia-syncfusion-bridge",
"path": "../node_modules/aurelia-syncfusion-bridge/dist/amd",
"main": "index",
"resources": [
"grid/*.js", // <--- Required files --->
"common/template.js" // Remove this, if template rendering not required
]
}
Register the aurelia-syncfusion-bridge plugin with Aurelia in our main.js file which is in src folder. here.
.plugin('aurelia-syncfusion-bridge', (syncfusion) => syncfusion.ejGrid().ejTemplate());
// Remove ejTemplate(), if template rendering not required
For your convenience, we have prepared sample and attached below.
Sample
How to run.?
Run the below commands in the sample's root location.
npm install
au run --watch
Thanks,
Karthick T
Related
I seem to absolutely not grasp where to put root programmatic options for the babel.
If I have a monorepo and need to tell the different sub packages that they shall look upwards for my babel.config.js then I should put rootMode: "upwards" into the .babelrc of the sub packages, correct? This does not work, because of the resulting error
Error: .rootMode is only allowed in root programmatic options
Somehow I simply can't find any example of where to put/use root programmatic options... Can anyone point me to the right direction?
If you are using Webpack, you need to put it there.
module: {
[..]
rules: [
// Transpile ES6 Javascript into ES5 with babel loader
{
test: /\.jsx?$/,
exclude: [/node_modules/, /json/],
loader: 'babel-loader',
options: {
rootMode: 'upward'
},
},
[..]
],
[..]
},
Otherwise I had the same issue than you, I can't put it in the package.json file using the key babel.
Any API-related options are called programmatic options. Take a look at my discussion with the primary maintainer of Babel: https://github.com/babel/babel/discussions/14405.
It's when you specify them directly to Babel (babel.transformSync(code, programmaticOptions) or to the Babel integration you are using (e.g. babel-loader, which can pass them to its internal babel.transform call). In other words, not in presets or config files. [...]
by #nicolo-ribaudo - Babel core team.
I got this error using my (probably non-standard) monorepo setup where I have top-level subdirectories for each of my packages. No top-level package. When I upgraded to Babel 7, my Jest tests were no longer transforming packages that were yarn linked into the package where I was running Jest.
I added a top-level babel.config.js as part of Babel's monorepo instructions. I had rootMode: "upwards" in these three places:
ui-package/webpack.config.js for transforming the app.
ui-package/babel-jest.js for the tests, where it appeared like:
module.exports = require("babel-jest").createTransformer({
rootMode: "upward",
})
and was referenced from jest.config.js in that same dir like:
transform: {
"^.+\\.jsx?$": "./babel-jest.js",
},
And in /babel.config.js, the newly added top-level babel conf file.
Removing it from the last one removed the error.
I have built a custom element/web component to load and display Unity generated WebGL content. The web component imports the UnityLoader.js module - and works fine when used within an app served with 'polymer serve'.
However, when I build an app that uses my web component via the Polymer-CLI build process, no errors are given, but when I access a page using my component I always end up with an error from within UnityLoader.js:
"ReferenceError: BabelHelpers is not defined"
If I create the element directly within my app (in other words it is no longer managed by bower) then I can exclude the minification and compilation steps within the build section of my application's polymer.json file and the built version of the app works fine.
"builds": [
{
"preset": "es5-bundled",
"js": {
"compile": {"exclude": ["content/**/*","UnityLoader.js"]},
"minify": {"exclude": ["content/**/*","UnityLoader.js"]}
},
"html": {
"minify": {"exclude": ["content/**/*"]}
}
}
]
I've looked at my application's polymer.json file and I can see that the extraDependecies node contains some dependencies that other web components have placed there:
"extraDependencies": [
"bower_components/webcomponentsjs/*.js",
"!bower_components/webcomponentsjs/gulpfile.js",
"manifest.json",
"bower_components/plastic-image/intersection-observer.js",
"bower_components/ua-parser-js/dist/ua-parser.min.js"
],
I have UnityLoader.js within the extraDependencies of the element's polymer.json but that isn't getting cascaded up to an application that imports/consumes the element - which I guess must be possible as plastic-image and ua-parser-js have done it (I've looked at their bower_components folders and nothing seems obvious - other than the latter is installed as a dependency of the former).
Any ideas on how I can make sure that the UnityLoader.js that my web component uses is not compiled or minified during the build process of an application that consumes it?
I was having a similar issue with firebase-auth.js when making an ES5 build using polymer-cli 1.7.0. There might be a problem when compiling/minifying specific files. I had to roll back to 1.6.0 using npm install -g polymer-cli#1.6.0 to fix the problem.
I am trying to set up Jest on a React based project which uses ES6 modules. However I seem to be having issues with ES6 modules, I am using babel-jest and believe I have this set up properly (Jest detects it automatically).
Jest doesn't seem to have a problem using ES6 imports however as soon as it hits on an import statement within one of the imported modules it chokes. It's as if it is only transpiling the initial test script and not any of the imported modules. I have tried various configurations and tried searching Google with no luck. Running tests without any imports works fine.
Here is the error:
({"Object.<anonymous>":function(module,exports,require,__dirname,__filename,global,jest){import Predications from './predications';
^^^^^^
SyntaxError: Unexpected token import
Here are the relevant bits of config:
jest.conf.json
{
"testRegex": "\/test\/spec\/.*\\.js$",
}
.babelrc
{
"presets": ["es2015", "stage-0", "react"]
}
Test script
import React from 'react';
import { mount, shallow } from 'enzyme';
import Slider from 'react-slick';
import Carousel from '../../client/components/carousel/carousel.js'; // test chokes on when I include this module
describe('carousel component', () => {
it('is a test test case', () => {
expect(1 + 2).toEqual(3);
});
});
Update:
As suggested, I have tried running the test without jest.conf.js, however the testRegex is needed in order for Jest to find my tests, I tried moving tests to the default test directory and they still fail.
I would like to clarify that tests themselves are running fine, the issue seems to be where one of my imported modules uses ES6, in my example above, if I don't import my carousel component the test runs fine, as soon as I import that the test chokes on the import statement within that file. It seems as though the imported modules are not getting transpiled.
Update #2
After some investigation it appears the issue is that babel is not transpiling ES6 within node_modules. I have created an example repo to demonstrate this here: https://github.com/jamiedust/babel-jest-example
I understand that third party modules should be handling their own transpiling, however we have a number of modules which are hosted on our own npm registry and are re-used between projects, in these cases Webpack handles transpiling, for the Jest tests we need these node_modules to be transpiled by Babel, or a way of leveraging our webpack set up to do this for us.
Solution
Add the following config in package.json (or Jest config file).
"jest": {
"transformIgnorePatterns": [
"/node_modules/(?!test-component).+\\.js$"
]
}
By default any code in node_modules is ignored by babel-jest, see the Jest config option transformIgnorePatterns. I've also created a PR on your example repo, so you can see it working.
While this works, I've found it to be extremely slow in real applications that have a lot of dependencies containing ES modules. The Jest codebase has a slightly different approach to this as you can find in babel-jest transforming dependencies. This can also take much longer on Windows, see Taking 10 seconds on an empty repo.
If doing "unit" testing, mocking is probably the better way to go.
You could try adding the transform-es2015-modules-commonjs plugin to your babel config file for testing only. Here is an example config file which tells babel to transpile modules only when in a testing environment. You can put it underneath your presets:
{
"presets": [
"react",
["es2015", {"modules": false, "loose": true}]
],
"env": {
"test": {
"plugins": ["transform-es2015-modules-commonjs"]
}
}
}
You can read about the plugin here:
https://www.npmjs.com/package/babel-plugin-transform-es2015-modules-commonjs
Then, when running your Jest tests on the command line specify NODE_ENV=test (you may need to add the --no-cache flag to the command the first time after making the change to the babel config because Jest caches babel output, but after that you can leave it off:
NODE_ENV=test jest --no-cache
I learned about this issue in a React seminar by Brian Holt at Frontend Masters. https://frontendmasters.com/courses/
faced the same issue, followed the steps to resolve,
install babel-jest
in jest config add this configuration
transform: {
'^.+\\.js?$': require.resolve('babel-jest')
}
make sure you have babel.config.js present (your config might be different than provided below)
module.exports = {
"env": {
"test": {
presets: [
[
'#babel/preset-env',
{
targets: {
node: 'current',
},
},
],
]
}
}
};
I faced the same problem (node_module not transpiled by babel-jest), without being able to solve it.
Instead, I finally succeed by mocking the node_module, like described here https://facebook.github.io/jest/docs/manual-mocks.html
NB: setting mocks in __mocks__ subfolders did not work for me. So I passed the mock as the second parameter of the jest.mock() function. Something like :
jest.mock('your_node_module', () => {})
Another possible cause. Babel now ignores your .babelrc inside node_modules and uses the one provided by the dependency. If you have control of the dependency you would have to add a .babelrc to it and babel would use those settings for it.
this can cause problems though if your dependency and your project use different babel versions or modules.
For instance with bower I could do something like this to get only the scss files (excluding js):
{
"dependencies": {
"bootstrap-sass": "~3.3.5"
},
"overrides": {
"bootstrap-sass": {
"main": [
"assets/stylesheets/_bootstrap.scss"
]
}
}
}
I am having an hard time understanding how to do it with systemjs. in the config.js file I guess but even reading the docs I could not figure it out.
My use case is: while developing I am loading Material angular with systemjs but I want to load only the js files, not the css, which I want to manage indenpdently in my scss. Instead systemjs keep loading the file angular-material.css. I just started with systemjs and jspm, hope you can help.
nb: my problem is not related to the jspm build or bundle process but to the development time with these tools.
JSPM supports overrides as well. See https://github.com/jspm/registry/wiki/Configuring-Packages-for-jspm#testing-configuration for configuration options.
Using JSPM overrides you can easily override the main file and directories and files that you need from a module.
Upd. The css dependency is defined in the registry: https://github.com/jspm/registry/blob/974beb8b6520f4c1b3c6373db32ad05da5c82446/package-overrides/github/angular/bower-material%400.4.0.json It needs to be overwritten with the local override.
Using the gulp tasks from the yeoman generated Aurelia app I'm trying to bundle a custom application. When I run gulp bundle the following error is reported.
Where can I find a log to help track down this file or the reference to this file?
Double check your config.js
I've seen this from time to time, and it's usually an issue of the config.js. You'll want to make sure:
The github, npm, or wherever your text plugin is located is above your '*' line.
The text plugin is mapped.
The plugin files are located where (1) and (2) are pointing.
So, something like this:
config.js
paths: {
"github:*": "jspm_packages/github/*",
"npm:*": "jspm_packages/npm/*",
"*": "dist/*"
},
map: {
"text": "github:systemjs/plugin-text#0.0.4"
}
And jspm_packages/github/systemjs/plugin-text#0.0.4 exists.
If all else fails, try deleting your jspm_packages folder, and typing jspm install text.