I am using Jersey Rest implementation. There are one Rest Services Called HelloWorld. See the below code.
Please consider this code as reference not as compiled code.
#Path("helloWorld")
public class HelloWorld{
#Path("test")
#Produces(...)
#Consum(...)
#GET
public Response test(Person person){
System.out.println(person);
}
}
I am using Jersey client to sent the request.
Here My question is apart from POST method is there any way to send the object to GET method directly. Instead of QueryString.
Please let me if there is any way to do so.
Thanks
So the problem shouldn't be with the server. I did a few tests on different servers (not weblogic as I don't use it) and all of them seem to have no problems accepting a body in the GET request. The problem seem to be with the client. To test I used the following code
ClientBuilder.newClient()
.target("http://localhost:8080/api/get-body")
.property(ClientProperties.SUPPRESS_HTTP_COMPLIANCE_VALIDATION, true)
.request()
.method(HttpMethod.GET, Entity.text("Hello World"));
The SUPPRESS_HTTP_COMPLIANCE_VALIDATION allows us to pass a body to the request. If we didn't use this, then we would get an error.
The problem with this code, is that even though we set this override property, the client completely overrides the GET method and automatically makes it a POST method, so I would get back a 405 Method Not Allowed.
The solution I came up with is to just allow the client to set a header, e.g. X-GET-BODY-OVERRIDE, and then use a #PreMatching filter on the server side to check for this header. If the header is present, then just change the method to a GET
#Provider
#PreMatching
public class GetWithBodyFilter implements ContainerRequestFilter {
#Override
public void filter(ContainerRequestContext request) throws IOException {
String getOverride = request.getHeaderString("X-GET-BODY-OVERRIDE");
if (getOverride != null && "true".equalsIgnoreCase(getOverride)) {
request.setMethod(HttpMethod.GET);
}
}
}
Then just register the filter with the server side. On the client, you would simply need to add the header
ClientBuilder.newClient()
.target("http://localhost:8080/api/get-body")
.property(ClientProperties.SUPPRESS_HTTP_COMPLIANCE_VALIDATION, true)
.request()
.header("X-GET-BODY-OVERRIDE", "True")
.method(HttpMethod.GET, Entity.text("Hello World"));
This solution is good because it takes into account more than just the Jersey client, in regards with being able to send a body in the GET request.
Related
It seems like Sling expects every form POST to modify the JCR. So the expected/standard behavior would be a POST-redirect-GET, which is fine for most things. However, I need to be able to POST to AEM and then use the data in that POST to create a rendered result. Our use of AEM is stateless and so I don't want to carry the POST'd data in Session in order to utilize it in a subsequent GET.
Some have recommended putting the POST'd data in Browser sessionStorage, but that doesn't have broad enough support to be sufficient.
As far as I can tell there is no way for Sling in AEM to take a POST and produce a rendered result.
Here is a screenshot of what a POST produces in the page/resourceType component and in any Sling included jsp's that happen to be involved in the rendering.
I have tried things like using the "nop" operation.
<input type="hidden" name=":operation" value="nop" />
But either way all servlets think a POST is happening and don't render properly.
There is the option of creating a custom servlet, to handle the POST, but then how do you render the templated output and change the request so that all the components think they are serving a GET?
UPDATED:
Here is a screenshot of the "nop" POST.jsp result.
What you can do is create a POST.jsp file in the appropiate resourceType.
If your POST request go to /content/yourapp/something, which has a resourceType: your/app/example. Then you can create a file /apps/your/app/example/POST.jsp with whatever render you wish. You can even include your default rendering script in the POST.jsp file if you need it to be rendered the same as the GET requests.
The other option is to use a servlet registered for POST requests and internally use the SlingRequestProcessor service. That service allow you to programmatically process a request through Sling. You can use a SlingRequestWrapper to wrap your request and override getMethod() to return "GET". That should process the request as if it was a GET request.
This sounds like a somewhat funky use case, IIUC you are using a large request parameter P to drive the rendering?
Using a custom POST servlet should work, if you use something like
slingRequest.getRequestDispatcher(resource).forward(request, response) where request is a wrapper around the actual request, where request.getMethod() returns GET. You can then store your P data in request attributes.
The SlingHttpServletRequestWrapper class can be used to create such wrappers.
Creating a custom servlet to handle a post could be an idea. After successfull write you could redirect to the modified resource - simple 302.
The other solution that comes to my mind is a custom Filter that would do the same. However, since AEM expects to get 200 instead of 302, it would be good to tell by atrribute or parameter that this POST needs to be redirected. Otherwise some of the AEM UI functionalities could brake. This is a quick example of an idea. You would probably need to write something more sophisticated.
#Component(immediate = true)
#Service
#Properties({
#Property(name = Constants.SERVICE_DESCRIPTION, value = "Desc"),
#Property(name = Constants.SERVICE_VENDOR, value = "Company name"),
#Property(name = Constants.SERVICE_RANKING, intValue = RedirectFilter.RANKING),
#Property(name = "filter.scope", value = "request") })
public class RedirectFilter implements Filter {
public static final int RANKING = -1000; // low ranking
#Override
public void init(final FilterConfig filterConfig) throws ServletException {
}
#Override
public void destroy() {
}
#Override
public void doFilter(final ServletRequest request, final ServletResponse response, final FilterChain chain)
throws IOException, ServletException {
if (request.getParameter("redirect").equals("true")) {
((SlingHttpServletResponse) response).sendRedirect(((SlingHttpServletRequest)request).getRequestURI());
}
}
}
I'm having trouble setting something up that I'm pretty sure /should/ be easy, so I thought I'd throw it to the crowd. I can't seem to find what I'm looking for elsewhere on the web or on SE.
I am simplifying my project of course, but basically I have a JAX-WS annontated Jersey resource class that looks something like this:
#Path("myresource")
public class MyResource {
#Autowired
MyComplexObjectDAO daoInstance;
#Path("findObject/{id}")
#GET
public MyComplexObject findObject( #PathParam(value="id") String id ) {
return daoInstance.findObject( id );
}
#Path("saveObject")
#PUT
public MyComplexObject saveObject( MyComplexObject objectToSave ) {
MyComplexObject savedObject = daoInstance.saveObject( objectToSave );
return savedObject;
}
}
So you can see I'm autowiring a DAO object using spring, and then I use the DAO methods in the REST handlers.
The 'findObject' call seems to work fine - so far it works exactly as I expect it to.
The 'saveObject' call is not working the way I want and that's what I need some advice on.
You can see that I'm trying to directly take an instance of my complex object as a parameter to the REST method. Additionally I would like to return an instance of the complex object after it's been saved.
I put together some 'client' code for testing this out.
#Test
public void saveTest() {
WebResource wsClient = createWebServiceClient();
MyComplexObject unsavedInstance = createMyComplexObject();
MyComplexObject savedInstance =
wsClient
.path("saveObject")
.accept(MediaType.APPLICATION_XML)
.put(MyComplexObject.class, unsavedInstance);
assertNotNull(savedIntent);
}
Which is returning the following error:
com.sun.jersey.api.client.UniformInterfaceException: PUT http://localhost:8081/rest/myresource/save returned a response status of 400 Bad Request
I don't see why this isn't working and I think I've tried just about everything I can think of. Any help or direction would be very much appreciated.
Thanks so much!
I see that you call the accept() method in your test client (which means that a "Accept:" header is added to the request, indicating the server what type of representation you would like). However, you don't call the type() method to add a "Content-type:" header and inform the server that you are sending XML data. See http://jersey.java.net/nonav/documentation/latest/client-api.html#d4e644 for examples.
Side remark: your URLs are not RESTful - you should avoid verbs in your path:
So, instead of:
/api/findObject/{id}
/api/saveObject
You should use:
/api/objects/{id}
/api/objects
Last note: to create an object on calling /api/objects, you should do a POST and not a PUT to adhere to REST best practices and widely adopted patterns.
switching to the 'concrete class' solution I alluded to in my earlier comment is what fixed things up for me.
In Java, there is ThreadLocal, which can be used to carry some data from one object to another without explicit passing as method argument.
I need to intercept GWT request and extract custom HTTP header from it, then I need to store the header value somehow to be processed later.
The problem is that the place to extract the header belongs to RequestBuilder, and there is no way (?) to pass the variable from within RequestBuilder to the custom code actually handling the request/response from server. And it is not possible to pass some variable from client code to that request builder.
ThreadLocal could be the solution, however it is not available in GWT. Is there something I can use?
You can use RequestBuilder.setHeader to set header values for your HTTP request.
On the backend you can use HttpServletRequest of your servlet to retrieve the header values from your HTTP request.
Update:
Some class with a static instance variable:
public class SomeClass {
public static String myVar;
}
And in the RequestBuilder code you can do following:
RequestBuilder request = new RequestBuilder(url);
request.setCallback(new RequestCallback() {
#Override
public void onResponseReceived(Request request, Response response) {
SomeClass.myVar = response.getHeader("someheader");
}
});
I have to consume a service provided by one of our partners. I was given little direction, but was told the security was to be PasswordDigest. I looked it up and immediatly saw lots of references to WSE, so off I went. It was very easy to implement and in no time I had a standard WSE user token using PasswordDigest sitting in the SOAP headers of my messages.
When we started testing today I was immediatly told (by the error message) that things weren't right. Turns out, out partner doesn't look in the SOAP header, but rather wants the security info in the http header.
I have seen lots of articles on how to add custom http headers to a proxy class, but my proxy inherits from SoapHttpClientProtocol which doesn't have a headers collection to add to. I was looking at making a raw httpWebRequest, but I have a specific method to access that has some complex parameters to deal with (and besides it feels like going backwords).
What is the best way to add custom http headers to a service proxy class that doesn't have a GetWebRequest method?
For reference:
Proxy class decleration:
[System.CodeDom.Compiler.GeneratedCodeAttribute("System.Web.Services", "2.0.50727.3053")]
[System.Diagnostics.DebuggerStepThroughAttribute()]
[System.ComponentModel.DesignerCategoryAttribute("code")]
[System.Web.Services.WebServiceBindingAttribute(Name="MtomServiceSoap11", namespace="http://ws.xxxxxxx.com/")]
public partial class MtomServiceService : System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapHttpClientProtocol {
Target method I need to call:
[System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapDocumentMethodAttribute("", Use=System.Web.Services.Description.SoapBindingUse.Literal, ParameterStyle=System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapParameterStyle.Bare)]
[return: System.Xml.Serialization.XmlElementAttribute("uploadDocumentResponse", Namespace="http://ws.edsmtom.citizensfla.com/")]
public uploadDocumentResponse uploadDocument([System.Xml.Serialization.XmlElementAttribute(Namespace="http://ws.xxxxxxx.com/")] uploadDocumentRequest uploadDocumentRequest) {
object[] results = this.Invoke("uploadDocument", new object[] {
uploadDocumentRequest});
return ((uploadDocumentResponse)(results[0]));
}
}
The actual call to the Service is simple. The objects being pass in are not:
request.criteria = docCriteria;
request.document = document;
var result = service.uploadDocument(request);
Thanks.
It figures that 30 minutes after posting I would stumble across the answer. While the proxy class decelaration does not create a GetWebRequest method, its base class System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapHttpClientProtocol has it and it can be overridden.
protected override System.Net.WebRequest GetWebRequest(Uri uri)
{
var request = base.GetWebRequest(uri);
request.Headers.Add("blah", "blah"); // <----
return request;
}
I'm building a very simple REST API using Jersey, and I've got a warning in my log files that I'm not sure about.
WARNING: A servlet POST request, to
the URI
http://myserver/mycontext/myapi/users/12345?action=delete,
contains form parameters in the
request body but the request body has
been consumed by the servlet or a
servlet filter accessing the request
parameters. Only resource methods
using #FormParam will work as
expected. Resource methods consuming
the request body by other means will
not work as expected.
My webapp only has the Jersey servlet defined, mapped to /myapi/*
How can I stop these warnings?
For me the warning was showing for POST application/x-www-form-urlencoded. And I am using Spring Boot which has an HiddenHttpMethodFilter that does a getParameter before anything else... So I ended up doing this nasty override:
#Bean
public HiddenHttpMethodFilter hiddenHttpMethodFilter() {
return new HiddenHttpMethodFilter() {
#Override
protected void doFilterInternal(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response,
FilterChain filterChain) throws ServletException, IOException {
if ("POST".equals(request.getMethod())
&& request.getContentType().equals(MediaType.APPLICATION_FORM_URLENCODED_VALUE)) {
filterChain.doFilter(request, response);
} else {
super.doFilterInternal(request, response, filterChain);
}
}
};
}
This message is meant to warn developers about the fact that the request entity body has been consumed, thus any other attempts to read the message body will fail.
It is safe to ignore the message or filter it out from the logs:
java.util.logging.Logger jerseyLogger =
java.util.logging.Logger.getLogger(WebComponent.class.getName());
jerseyLogger.setFilter(new Filter() {
#Override
public boolean isLoggable(LogRecord record) {
boolean isLoggable = true;
if (record.getMessage().contains("Only resource methods using #FormParam")) {
isLoggable = false;
}
return isLoggable;
}
});
The following thread describes the warning you are receiving. It sounds as though you might have a filter defined in your web.xml that is processing the request before Jersey does.
Finally got rid of this by making sure I had Content-Type: application/json in my request headers (obviously, on the client side)
I just had my ajax-function in JQuery set to contentType: "application/x-www-form-urlencoded; charset=UTF-8" because with a prior solution (without Jersey) I had some encoding problems. When I removed that the message was gone and everything worked fine.
This warning is the only thing the WebComponent logs, so just turn logging up to ERROR level or turn off logging for this component in your logback.xml or wherever you have logging configured. You don't need to write a custom filter to ignore this specific message since there are no other messages logged from this component.
Source code snippet from org.glassfish.jersey.servlet.WebComponent version 2.14:
if(!form.asMap().isEmpty()) {
containerRequest.setProperty("jersey.config.server.representation.decoded.form", form);
if(LOGGER.isLoggable(Level.WARNING)) {
LOGGER.log(Level.WARNING, LocalizationMessages.FORM_PARAM_CONSUMED(containerRequest.getRequestUri()));
}
}
The localized message that is used for this warning message is:
form.param.consumed=A servlet request to the URI {0} contains form parameters in the request body but the request body has been consumed by the servlet or a servlet filter accessing the request parameters. Only resource methods using #FormParam will work as expected. Resource methods consuming the request body by other means will not work as expected.
Turn logging off for the WebComponent in your logback.xml like so:
<logger name="org.glassfish.jersey.servlet.WebComponent" level="OFF" additivity="false"/>
Right.
So I've been suffering this issue, and I've been trying to solve it on different ways, but I did't want to change my web.xml settings, just because if I was testing my application with Postman it worked perfect, but when it was being integrated with the webapp it fails with the mentioned issue (A servlet request to the URI {MY_URI} contains form parameters in the request body but the request body has been consumed by the servlet or a servlet filter accessing the request parameters. Only resource methods using #FormParam will work as expected. Resource methods consuming the request body by other means will not work as expected.)
So as #clijk mentioned, you only have to set your headers as:
"Content-Type":"application/json"
"charset":"UTF-8"
and voilá, the warning it's gone.
Thanks
In my case I've fixed this error when I've changed the Object Date to String in the method.
Error:
#POST
#Path("/myPath")
#Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
public List<MyObject> myMethod(#FormParam("StartDate") Date date) throws Exception {
Fixed
#POST
#Path("/myPath")
#Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
public List<MyObject> myMethod(#FormParam("StartDate") String date) throws Exception {
Put this to your resource signature. Or find this string in your project someone already use this if #PUT or #POST is used. This should help
import javax.ws.rs.Consumes;
#Consumes(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)