Which values allowed for -a option? Documentation hasn't enough info. It says only:
-a MODE, --analysis-mode MODE (default: 4)
MODE defines the type of warnings. 4 - General Analysis.
I tried to look up on pvs site. But found nothing.
MODE defines the type of warnings:
1 - 64-bit errors;
2 - reserved;
4 - General Analysis (default);
8 - Micro-optimizations;
16 - Customers Specific Requests.
Modes can be combined by adding the values.
Related
In processing a stream of logs (via UDP) in a raku (v2022.07) app, I'm
hitting what appears to be a memory leak using IO::Socket::Async.
I pulled the code out into a simpler program which I've included below
(~ identical to code at https://docs.raku.org/type/IO::Socket::Async):
#!/usr/bin/env raku
#
my $socket = IO::Socket::Async.bind-udp('localhost', 24225);
react {
whenever $socket.Supply -> $v {
print $v if $v.chars > 0;
};
};
It leaks substantial ram - I let it run about 12 hours and
when I checked -- still running (on a 1T ram machine) -- with
ps auwwx [pid]
it showed 314974456 and 20739784 for VSZ and RSS (so, roughly 300G v size and 20G resident).
[btw, the UDP traffic is fairly light - average of 350 (~100 byte) packets/sec (spikes to ~1000/sec)]
So .. I rewrote above in perl5 (after similar leaky results w/
a couple of raku variants) which stabilizes quickly at about 8M resident - that's fine/stable/etc. -
but I'd prefer this process to feed a raku channel (without separate perl process/file
tailing, etc.).
My environment: FreeBSD 13.1-RELEASE-p2 GENERIC amd64 and raku:
v2022.07 built on MoarVM 2022.07 (installed with rakubrew).
I'm guessing this is unique to raku on freebsd but not sure.
I did attempt to upgrade (rakubrew) to v2022.12 to see if problem resolved there -
but in rebuilding modules (zef), too many failed (some issue with
Digest/Digest::HMAC) - so I had to revert to 2022.07.
I'll sure be grateful for any suggestions for addressing the leak or alternative
methods to address reading from a UDP port.
Not exactly a solution to your problem, but you can monitor memory usage from within your Raku code using built-in feature:
use Telemetry;
say T{"max-rss"};
Also remember that Supply by default decodes unicode chars. If your protocol is binary you may add :bin to Socket params to avoid treating binary data as text.
I followed this article to enable FTRACE
https://lwn.net/Articles/365835/
to test a realtime system, my system uses arm cortexa15 (Description: https://mp.renesas.com/en-us/rzg/marketplace/board/RZGB000003.html)
CONFIG_FTRACE=y
CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER=y
CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER=y
CONFIG_STACK_TRACER=y
CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE=y
But, it didn't work, caused the system hang-up when starting kernel.
Even referred How to Enable or configure ftrace module
I would like to test latency in the realtime system with cyclictest (option -b to trigger FTRACER)
cyclictest -a -t -n -p99 -f -b100
It generated dump message:
INFO: debugfs mountpoint: /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/
WARN: tracing_enabled or tracing_on not found
debug fs not mounted, TRACERs not configured?
could not set ftrace_enabled to 0
FATAL: Can't open /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/available_tracers for reading
I repeated a next step to enable a group of tracer configs:
CONFIG_FTRACE=y
CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE=y
CONFIG_HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE=y
CONFIG_HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACER=y
CONFIG_HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER=y
CONFIG_HAVE_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD=y
CONFIG_HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS=y
CONFIG_HAVE_C_RECORDMCOUNT=y
CONFIG_TRACING_SUPPORT=y
CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER=y
CONFIG_IRQSOFF_TRACER=y
CONFIG_FUNCTION_PROFILER=y
CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER=y
CONFIG_SCHED_TRACER=y
CONFIG_ENABLE_DEFAULT_TRACERS=y
CONFIG_FTRACE_SYSCALLS=y
CONFIG_TRACER_SNAPSHOT=y
CONFIG_STACK_TRACER=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IO_TRACE=y
CONFIG_TRACEPOINT_BENCHMARK=y
CONFIG_BACKTRACE_SELF_TEST=y
CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_LL=y
The result still was the same. Kernel hung and didn't show anything.
Anyone who deal with realtime system and Ftrace can help ? Thanks.
I resolve my problem. Below is a part of my defconfig file.
CONFIG_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT=y
CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT=y
CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS=y
CONFIG_STACKTRACE=y
CONFIG_NOP_TRACER=y
CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE=y
CONFIG_TRACE_CLOCK=y
CONFIG_CONTEXT_SWITCH_TRACER=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_TRACER=y
CONFIG_FTRACE=y
CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER=y
CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER=y
CONFIG_SCHED_TRACER=y
CONFIG_FTRACE_SYSCALLS=y
CONFIG_TRACER_SNAPSHOT=y
CONFIG_STACK_TRACER=y
CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE=y
CONFIG_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD=y
After enabling Ftrace tool, the culprit can then be found in the trace output at /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace. The kernel function that was executed just before a latency of more than 100 microseconds was detected is marked with an exclamation mark.
I got a haproxy 1.8 vanilla alpine docker image running with maxconn = 2000
curl -s http://host:port/stats| grep maxsock
<b>maxsock = </b> 4017; <b>maxconn = </b> 2000; <b>maxpipes = </b> 0<br>
Sometimes I get the following Warning in my logs:
[WARNING] 0/0 (0) : [/usr/local/sbin/haproxy.main()] FD limit (4015) too low for maxconn=2000/maxsock=4016. Please raise 'ulimit-n' to 4016 or more to avoid any trouble.
I find it very odd since I read this in haproxy doc:
ulimit-n
Sets the maximum number of per-process file-descriptors to . By
default, it is automatically computed, so it is recommended not to use this
option.
Not sure if it's a bug on haproxy or something I am doing wrong.
What do you think of that?
edit: haproxy is running as root
It depends on the open file descriptor limit(hard and soft), you can check that by ulimit -Hn and ulimit -Sn.
It is automatically computed, but it depends on the user you run haproxy, if you run haproxy using root then even if the computed value is greater than hard limit, you can set that value without warning.
But if you run as a normal user, then the max value is hard limit, if the computed value is greater than that, you got the warning.
I need to be connect to 2 STM32s over 2 ST-Links at the same time. I found this issue described here.
However, solution doesn't work for me.
ST-Link ID1: 55FF6B067087534923182367
ST-Link ID2: 49FF6C064983574951291787
OpenOCD cfg file:
source [find interface/stlink-v2.cfg]
hla_serial "55FF6B067087534923182367"
source [find target/stm32f4x.cfg]
# use hardware reset, connect under reset
reset_config srst_only srst_nogate
I get:
$ openocd.exe -f stm32f4_fmboard.cfg
Open On-Chip Debugger 0.10.0
Licensed under GNU GPL v2
For bug reports, read
http://openocd.org/doc/doxygen/bugs.html
Info : auto-selecting first available session transport "hla_swd". To override use 'transport select <transport>'.
Info : The selected transport took over low-level target control. The results might differ compared to plain JTAG/SWD
adapter speed: 2000 kHz
adapter_nsrst_delay: 100
none separate
srst_only separate srst_nogate srst_open_drain connect_deassert_srst
Info : Unable to match requested speed 2000 kHz, using 1800 kHz
Info : Unable to match requested speed 2000 kHz, using 1800 kHz
Info : clock speed 1800 kHz
Error: open failed
in procedure 'init'
in procedure 'ocd_bouncer'
I do not know if solved but:
pi#raspberrypi:~/prog/bootloader $ st-info --probe
Found 1 stlink programmers
serial: 363f65064b46323613500643
openocd: "\x36\x3f\x65\x06\x4b\x46\x32\x36\x13\x50\x06\x43"
flash: 0 (pagesize: 0)
sram: 0
chipid: 0x0000
descr: unknown device
this tool shows serial of st-links and there is option called openocd. When I put hla_serial "\x36\x3f\x65\x06\x4b\x46\x32\x36\x13\x50\x06\x43" in file then it works for me. Your way does not. It also does not work in command line given as argument. It works only as I described in cfg file
The format of the configuration file seems to have changed recently. The following applies for Open On-Chip Debugger 0.10.0+dev-00634-gdb070eb8 (2018-12-30-23:05).
Find out the serial number with lsusb, st-link, or with ls -l /dev/serial/by-id. The latter yields (with two STLink/V2.1 connected):
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Nov 30 14:31 usb-STMicroelectronics_STM32_STLink_066CFF323535474B43125623-if02 -> ../../ttyACM0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Dec 30 23:55 usb-STMicroelectronics_STM32_STLink_0672FF485457725187052924-if02 -> ../../ttyACM1
The specification on the .cfg-file is now plain hex. Do not use the C string syntax any longer. For selecting the latter device, simply write:
#hla_serial "066CFF323535474B43125623"
hla_serial "0672FF485457725187052924"
I recently bought a Lenovo 500-15ACZ notebook and installed Ubuntu 16.04 on it. After the installation I found I couldn't connect to Wifi. When I googled the issue, this seemed to be a common problem for Broadcom wifi cards. I found this question on askubuntu and followed the steps of the answer by Luis Alvarado.
The command lspci -nn -d 14e4: showed me that the pci.id of my device is 14e4:43ae rev 02, which is not yet supported in Linux.
However, there is a script (link to project) on git that tries to solve this via backport:
#!/bin/bash
cd /tmp
git clone https://github.com/kvalo/ath10k-firmware.git
cd ath10k-firmware/QCA9377/hw1.0
sudo mkdir -p /lib/firmware/ath10k/QCA9377/hw1.0
sudo cp board.bin /lib/firmware/ath10k/QCA9377/hw1.0
sudo cp firmware-5.bin_WLAN.TF.1.0-00267-1 /lib/firmware/ath10k/QCA9377/hw1.0/firmware-5.bin
sudo modprobe -r ath10k_pci
cd /tmp
wget https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/backports/2015/11/20/backports-20151120.tar.gz
tar -xf backports-20151120.tar.gz
cd backports-20151120
make defconfig-ath10k
make
sudo make install
But when I tried to run this, make threw the following error:
Building backport-include/backport/autoconf.h ... done.
CC [M] /tmp/backports-20151120/compat/main.o
In file included from /tmp/backports-20151120/backport-include/backport/backport.h:7:0,
from :0:
./include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h: In function ‘__qrwlock_write_byte’:
/tmp/backports-20151120/backport-include/linux/kconfig.h:25:28: error: implicit declaration of function ‘config_enabled’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
#define IS_BUILTIN(option) config_enabled(option)
^
./include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h:156:26: note: in expansion of macro ‘IS_BUILTIN’
return (u8 *)lock + 3 * IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN);
^
./include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h:156:37: error: ‘CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN’ undeclared (first use in this function)
return (u8 *)lock + 3 * IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN);
^
/tmp/backports-20151120/backport-include/linux/kconfig.h:25:43: note: in definition of macro ‘IS_BUILTIN’
#define IS_BUILTIN(option) config_enabled(option)
^
./include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h:156:37: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
return (u8 *)lock + 3 * IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN);
^
/tmp/backports-20151120/backport-include/linux/kconfig.h:25:43: note: in definition of macro ‘IS_BUILTIN’
#define IS_BUILTIN(option) config_enabled(option)
^
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
scripts/Makefile.build:294: recipe for target '/tmp/backports-20151120/compat/main.o' failed
make[6]: *** [/tmp/backports-20151120/compat/main.o] Error 1
scripts/Makefile.build:567: recipe for target '/tmp/backports-20151120/compat' failed
make[5]: *** [/tmp/backports-20151120/compat] Error 2
Makefile:1524: recipe for target '_module_/tmp/backports-20151120' failed
make[4]: *** [_module_/tmp/backports-20151120] Error 2
Makefile.build:6: recipe for target 'modules' failed
make[3]: *** [modules] Error 2
Makefile.real:88: recipe for target 'modules' failed
make[2]: *** [modules] Error 2
Makefile:40: recipe for target 'modules' failed
make[1]: *** [modules] Error 2
Makefile:30: recipe for target 'default' failed
make: *** [default] Error 2
CC [M] /tmp/backports-20151120/compat/main.o
In file included from /tmp/backports-20151120/backport-include/backport/backport.h:7:0,
from :0:
./include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h: In function ‘__qrwlock_write_byte’:
/tmp/backports-20151120/backport-include/linux/kconfig.h:25:28: error: implicit declaration of function ‘config_enabled’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
#define IS_BUILTIN(option) config_enabled(option)
^
./include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h:156:26: note: in expansion of macro ‘IS_BUILTIN’
return (u8 *)lock + 3 * IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN);
^
./include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h:156:37: error: ‘CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN’ undeclared (first use in this function)
return (u8 *)lock + 3 * IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN);
^
/tmp/backports-20151120/backport-include/linux/kconfig.h:25:43: note: in definition of macro ‘IS_BUILTIN’
#define IS_BUILTIN(option) config_enabled(option)
^
./include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h:156:37: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
return (u8 *)lock + 3 * IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN);
^
/tmp/backports-20151120/backport-include/linux/kconfig.h:25:43: note: in definition of macro ‘IS_BUILTIN’
#define IS_BUILTIN(option) config_enabled(option)
^
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
scripts/Makefile.build:294: recipe for target '/tmp/backports-20151120/compat/main.o' failed
make[5]: *** [/tmp/backports-20151120/compat/main.o] Error 1
scripts/Makefile.build:567: recipe for target '/tmp/backports-20151120/compat' failed
make[4]: *** [/tmp/backports-20151120/compat] Error 2
Makefile:1524: recipe for target '_module_/tmp/backports-20151120' failed
make[3]: *** [_module_/tmp/backports-20151120] Error 2
Makefile.build:6: recipe for target 'modules' failed
make[2]: *** [modules] Error 2
Makefile.real:88: recipe for target 'modules' failed
make[1]: *** [modules] Error 2
Makefile:40: recipe for target 'install' failed
make: *** [install] Error 2
**Does anyone know how to fix this?**
Please let me know if you need any other info.
Thanks in advance!
Update:
I installed the broadcom-sta-dkms package as you suggested. Unfortunately, you were right; this didn't work.
When I tried the wl driver, dmesg | grep -i wl returned [
12.459884] wl: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel.
[ 12.459890] wl: module license 'MIXED/Proprietary' taints kernel.
[ 12.468203] wl: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel
[ 12.487603] wl driver 6.30.223.271 (r587334) failed with code 1001
[ 12.487606] ERROR #wl_cfg80211_detach :
[ 12.487607] NULL ndev->ieee80211ptr, unable to deref wl
However, I'm afraid I am not sure what this means. For the other drivers, dmesg returned nothing.
Well, I'd suggest to be consistent. You have a Wi-Fi device and you know its PCI vendor ID (which stands before the colon) and device ID - 14e4:43ae. In your question you don't provide a complete excerpt from your lspci, so it's not clear whether your device is indeed identified as Broadcom. However, if we assume it's true, we can search for it.
Here is what WikiDevi page says:
802.11a/b/g/n/ac WLAN + Bluetooth 4.0 NGFF 2230 Mini Card
WI1 chip1: Broadcom BCM43162
Probable Linux driver unknown
PCI ID not yet observed in any mainline kernel / this list
So, as you might see, this page sheds light on such important things like chip naming and current observation of kernel code awareness of such PCI ID. The latter means that, according to their research, no one driver in the main kernel tree has such an ID in the corresponding PCI ID table by means of which the kernel makes a decision to probe a specific driver for a given device. Nothing known about the PCI ID.
But now we know for sure that this one is indeed a Broadcom device.
Looking at your excerpt from the script (which you are trying to make use of) baffles me a lot since it's for Qualcomm Atheros, not for Broadcom. It tries to grab QCA firmware from (possibly) untrusted repository and compile ath10k backported driver. So, at this point we know that the question merely about the compilation errors is unhelpful from the very beginning. But, of course, one may suppose that either Linux kernel headers package is not installed or the version of backported ath10k is not compatible with your current kernel. That's it.
So, it's clear that we shall look for Broadcom drivers (and, possibly, for Broadcom firmware) instead. From this perspective I can tell you that three types of drivers are available for Broadcom devices: b43 (mostly legacy), vendor-licensed broadcom-sta (wl) and in-tree brcm80211. The latter one is a common name for brcmsmac and brcmfmac.
Here are the authoritative pages with up-to-date info:
b43 - http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers/b43/
brcm80211 - https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/users/drivers/brcm80211
Also, a more or less descriptive page for the vendor-licensed wl:
https://wiki.debian.org/wl
I can't find your PCI ID on either of the pages. This indeed confirms that corresponding support has not been added yet. However, we can confirm this further by just trying the drivers on hands. It's obvious that in-kernel b43 and brcm80211 don't work for you, but it might be useful to take a look at dmesg - perhaps, brcm80211 is loaded but can't find FW.
If nothing useful is found, then it would be nice to try wl. This driver is distributed by means of broadcom-sta package (Debian, Ubuntu), and I can mention the corresponding description on Ubuntu website.
So, to try wl you need to make sure that you have proper Linux headers and then just install broadcom-sta-dkms package.
apt-get update
apt-get install linux-headers-$(uname -r)
apt-get install broadcom-sta-dkms
Hopefully, it will compile and install it. Then you should do a reboot and take a look at what happens with your Wi-Fi. Most likely, this won't help (since I suppose that your device is really not supported yet), but if it works, you will be able to use it. Even if you see for sure that your device doesn't work with wl, again, like in the case of brcm80211, it's worth taking a look at dmesg output. However, in example, seeking for a valid FW image (if dmesg complains about it) is a separate question and should be discussed accordingly.
Also, I can expand on this topic and mention that in certain mailing lists on the net some folks have already asked about plans to add support for this device. Here is one of the links. So, if neither brcm80211 nor wl (broadcom-sta-dkms) help you, you may consider sending an email to one of brcm80211 supporters. Their names and email addresses are listed on the page. There are Broadcom employees among them. If you ask them for a good piece of advice, you will also help other people.
UPDATE
So, you say that b43 (also b43_legacy) and brcm80211 keep silence in dmesg. This could mean that your PCI ID is not supported by these drivers.
What's for wl output, I can share my output for comparison:
wl: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel.
wl: module license 'MIXED/Proprietary' taints kernel.
Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
wlan0: Broadcom BCM43a0 802.11 Hybrid Wireless Controller 6.30.223.271 (r587334)
This obviously means that your output minus this one gives some sort of silence again. However, it's too murky to say for sure whether your device is unsupported or there is some FW issue.
So, it seems like no options remain here.
However, you still may consider ndiswrapper solution. In two words, it's a special tool/driver which enables you to install a proper inf and sys files from the Windows driver (i.e. you should obtain it for your card somewhere, eg. extract from the CD or download from Broadcom webside) in such a way that the driver would operate in Linux as it was in Windows environment. This type of solution has its drawbacks and limitations. First of all, only Windows XP versions of wireless drivers are supported, so if you've got, say, a ZIP package from the vendor's website, you need to extract inf and sys files from the directory named after Windows XP (not Vista/7/10), and you need to pay attention to CPU architecture choice (32 bit / 64 bit). Here is an article from Debian which could fit Ubuntu as well. But this kind of solution overall may face some extra drawbacks and suddenly bad operation (it's a topic for a separate talk) and also in general it is considered as bad solution for missing driver. So, many people in such a situation just prefer to swap their unsupported card with some other one or just wait until the missing support is added to one of the native drivers. It's up to you.