I have a JMeter project with multiple GET and POST requests and assertions for these. I use Aggregate results and View results tree listeners, but none of these can store results on hourly basis. I tried JMeterPlugins-Standard and JMeterPlugins-Extras packages and jp#gc - Graphs Generator listener, but all of them use aggregated data instead of hourly data. So I would like to get number of successful and failed requests/assertions per hour, maybe a bar chart would be most suitable for this purpose.
I'm going to suggest a non-conventional design-level solution: name your samplers dynamically with hour (or date and hour), so that each hour the name will change, and thus they will appear in different category, i.e.:
The code for such name is:
${__time(dd:hh,)} the rest of sampler name
Such sampler will appear in the following way in Aggregate Report (here I simulated it with minutes/seconds, but same will happen with days/hours, just on larger scale):
Pros and cons of such approach:
Simple, you can aggregate anything by hour, minute, or any other time slice while test is running, and not by analysis after execution.
Not listener-dependant, can be used with pretty much any listener or visualizer
If you want to also have overall stats, it will require to sum up every sub-category. So it alters data, but in the way that it can still can be added back to original relatively easy.
Calculating __time before every sampler will not be unnoticed completely from performance perspective, but I don't think it will add visible overhead to a script.
You could get the same data by properly aggregating JTL or CSV (whichever you use) after execution, so it doesn't provide you with anything that is not possible to achieve using standard methods
Script needs altering to make this happen. if you have 100s of samplers, it's going to take a while. And if you want to change back...
You might want to use Filter Results Tool which has --start-offset and --end-offset parameters, you can "cut" your results file into "interesting" pieces and plot them according to your requirements.
You can install Filter Results Tool using JMeter Plugins Manager
Also be aware that according to JMeter Best Practices you should
Use as few Listeners as possible; if using the -l flag as above they can all be deleted or disabled.
Don't use "View Results Tree" or "View Results in Table" listeners during the load test, use them only during scripting phase to debug your scripts.
You can get whatever information you need from the .jtl results file, you can specify test results location via -l command-line argument
To get summarized results per hour add to your test plan Generate Summary Results:
Generates a summary of the test run so far to the log file and/or standard output
Update interval in jmeter.properties to your needs ,1 hour, 3600 seconds:
summariser.interval=3600
You will get summary per hour of your requests.
You can try with Jmeter backend Listener. It has integration with graphite and Influxdb. After storing the results in these time series database you can display the result in Grafana dashboard. Grafana has its own filtering of showing the results in hourly, monthly, daily basis and so on.
Related
I'm using Graphite + Grafana to monitor (by sampling) queue lengths in a test system at work. The data that gets uploaded to Graphite is grouped into different series/metrics by properties of the payloads in the queue. These properties can be somewhat arbitrary, at least to the point where they are not all known at the time when the data collection script is run.
For example, a property could be the project that the payload belongs to and this could be uploaded as a separate series/metric so that we can monitor the queues broken down by the different projects.
This has the consequence that Graphite sends a lot of null values for certain metrics if the queues in the test system did not contain any payloads with properties that would group it into that specific series/metric.
For example, if a certain project did not have any payloads in queue at the time when the data collection was ran.
In Grafana this is not so nice as the line graphs don't show up as connected lines and gauges will show either null or the last non-null value.
For line graphs I can just chose to connect null values in Grafana but for gauges thats not possible.
I know about the keepLastValue function in Graphite but that includes a limit for how long to keep the value which I like very much as I would like to keep the last value until the next time data collection is ran. Data collection is run periodically at known intervals.
The problem with keepLastValue is it expects a number of points as this limit. I would rather give it a time period instead. In Grafana the relationship between time and data points is very dynamic so its not easy to hard-code a good limit for keepLastValue.
Thus, my question is: Is there a way to tell Graphite to keep the last value for a given time instead of a given number of points?
When I create a ParametersVariation simulation, the main model does not run. All I see is the default UI with iterations completed and replication. My end goal (as with most people) is to have a model go through a certain number of replications, but nothing is even running. There is limited documentation available on this. Please advise.
This is how Parameters Variation is intended to work. If you're running 1000 runs and multiple replications with parallel runs, how can you see what's happening in Main in each?
Typically, the best way to benefit from such an experiment is to track the results of each run using elements from the Analysis palette or even better to export results to Excel or similar.
To be able to collect data, you need to write your code in Java actions fields with root. to access elements in main (or top-level agent).
Check the example below, where after each run a variable from main is added to a dataset in the Parameters Variation experiment. At the end of 100 runs for example, the dataset will have 100 values of the main variable, with 1 value for each run.
I am working with this metadata table REP_WFLOW_RUN currently from Infra DB, to get status about workflows. The column run_status_code shows whether this wf is running, succeeded, stopped, aborted etc..
But for my Business use case I also need to report to Business, the estimated time of completion of this particular work flow.
Example: If suppose the workflow generally started at 6:15, then along with this info that work flow has started I want to convey it is also estimated to complete at so and so time.
Could you please guide me if you have any details on how to get this info from Informatica database.
Many thanks in advance.
This is a very good question but no one can answer correctly :)
Now, you can get some logic like other scheduling tool does.
First calculate average time the workflow takes to complete for a successful run. And output should be a decimal value.
select avg(end_time - start_time )*24 avg_time_in_hr, workflow_name
From REP_WFLOW_RUN
Where run_status_code='succeeded'
Group by workflow_name
You can use above value as estimated time to completion for that workflow. Output should be a datetime.
Select sysdate + avg_time_in_hr/24 est_time_to_complete from dual
Now, this value is an estimated figure and not correct value. So on a bad day, if this takes hours, average value will be bad but we cant do much here.
I assumed, your infa metadata is on oracle.
I have a report on PowerBI that has many pages/tabs and each one also has alot of data being displayed. As I didn't design this, I'm going through the report to eliminate as much as I can and possibly splitting the report as alot of the data only requries refreshing once a week.
This is where my query comes in, I have information on one page that requires a refresh every two hours over a 12 hour duration, one field of data that requires a daily refresh and two more fields only require refreshing when required.
Is it possible to segment scheduled refreshes throughout a single part of the report, or does scheduled refresh only allow the entire report to be refreshed? (I.E. Sales status is hourly, Outbound status is daily, and sales summary is weekly)
I'd rather avoid having to split reports, as it is very handy to have them on one page; rather than having to open two and view them on multiple monitors.
I am just starting out on PowerBI reports, having been shown enough to get what I need done; but plan to delve further in, this being my first port of call if it is possible.
Thanks for any reponses in advance.
Brian.
No. It's Not Possible.
PowerBI Internal working like Tabular Model.
In Import mode we can not do incremental refresh also.
So other option is you can create Reporting layer and define denormilized with calucaluated columns Reporting tables.( Sales ,summary )
and use Direct query or Refresh and Do ETL for This table.
So you can schedule ETL for specific Tables i.e.Sales or summary.
My atomist client exposes metrics on commands that are run. Each command is a metric with a username element as well a status element.
I've been scraping this data for months without resetting the counts.
My requirement is to show the number of active users over a time period. i.e 1h, 1d, 7d and 30d in Grafana.
The original query was:
count(count({Username=~".+"}) by (Username))
this is an issue because I dont clear the metrics so its always a count since inception.
I then tried this:
count(max_over_time(help_command{job=“Application
Name”,Username=~“.+“}[1w]) -
max_over_time(help_command{job=“Application name”,Username=~“.+“}[1w]
offset 1w) > 0)
which works but only for one command I have about 50 other commands that need to be added to that count.
I tried the:
"{__name__=~".+_command",job="app name"}[1w] offset 1w"
but this is obviously very expensive (timeout in browser) and has issues with integrating max_over_time which doesn't support it.
Any help, am I using the metric in the wrong way. Is there a better way to query... my only option at the moment is the count (format working above for each command)
Thanks in advance.
To start, I will point out a number of issues with your approach.
First, the Prometheus documentation recommends against using arbitrarily large sets of values for labels (as your usernames are). As you can see (based on your experience with the query timing out) they're not entirely wrong to advise against it.
Second, Prometheus may not be the right tool for analytics (such as active users). Partly due to the above, partly because it is inherently limited by the fact that it samples the metrics (which does not appear to be an issue in your case, but may turn out to be).
Third, you collect separate metrics per command (i.e. help_command, foo_command) instead of a single metric with the command name as label (i.e. command_usage{commmand="help"}, command_usage{commmand="foo"})
To get back to your question though, you don't need the max_over_time, you can simply write your query as:
count by(__name__)(
(
{__name__=~".+_command",job=“Application Name”}
-
{__name__=~".+_command",job=“Application name”} offset 1w
) > 0
)
This only works though because you say that whatever exports the counts never resets them. If this is simply because that exporter never restarted and when it will the counts will drop to zero, then you'd need to use increase instead of minus and you'd run into the exact same performance issues as with max_over_time.
count by(__name__)(
increase({__name__=~".+_command",job=“Application Name”}[1w]) > 0
)