I have 3 containers running on my docker, and I need to stop all of them using the following:
sudo docker stop $(docker ps -q)
When a run the command I got this message:
Got permission denied while trying to connect to the Docker daemon socket at unix:///var/run/docker.sock: Get http://%2Fvar%2Frun%2Fdocker.sock/v1.32/containers/json: dial unix /var/run/docker.sock: connect: permission denied
See 'docker stop --help'.
Usage: docker stop [OPTIONS] CONTAINER [CONTAINER...]
Stop one or more running containers
I made some search, and the cases that message show does not apply to my environment. I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 LTS with Docker version 17.09.0-ce, build afdb6d4
What does this message mean?
sudo usermod -a -G docker $USER
Reboot then run:
docker container run hello-world
it worked for me on ubuntu 18.2
If you are getting "permission denied" that probably means you haven't added yourself in users group which can operate upon docker. To fix that, go to your terminal and type:
sudo usermod -aG docker <name-of-user-to-grant-permission>
The 'docker' parameter is group created upon installing docker, and you can check that by typing:
getent group | grep docker
And the second parameter is the user you are adding to the group. The list of users you can check by typing:
getent passwd
For more information about command usermod you can find here.
UPDATED:
I installed docker again and just remembered that when you apply this command you need to restart your machine.
It seems your user cannot use docker command, so you need to run it via sudo in parentheses as well:
sudo docker stop $(sudo docker ps -q)
Related
I am trying to install a K8S cluster with Rancher, after installing docker successfully I ran the following command to install Rancher containers:
$ sudo docker run -d --restart=unless-stopped -p 8088:8088 rancher/server:stable
The console I got was:
As you can see I am not being able to download the Rancher containers, what could I do to make it work?
Well, starting with the point this Rancher installation is based on what is proposed in this link https://phoenixnap.com/kb/install-rancher-on-ubuntu. The Rancher version to be installed following the script in the link, according to Docker Hub, is 1.x.
So, I don't recommend the command proposed in the script:
sudo docker run -d --restart=unless-stopped -p 8080:8080 rancher/server:stable
See, the rancher/server must be replaced by: rancher/rancher:stable, then you will install latest Rancher version 2.x.
Also, to avoid the timeout problem you instead of using the command "docker run" go for "docker pull" first, then "docker run". In other words, after finishing the "pull" then you go with the "run" option. I recommend you run the following commands which will be faster and effective:
sudo docker pull rancher/rancher:latest
sudo docker run -d --restart=unless-stopped -p 8088:8088 -p 8443:8443 --privileged rancher/rancher:latest
After running that everything is in good shape, you can run your Rancher. I hope that can help someone, I lost one day to figure that out, since the download time takes hours each time you run to timeout and fail.
I want do use a docker container to simulate my production environment, so I installed the db and the server in the same container, and not each in his own.
This is my dockerfile:
FROM debian
RUN apt update
RUN apt install postgresql-9.6 tomcat8 tomcat8-admin -y
RUN service postgresql start
RUN service postgresql status # says postgres is down
RUN su - postgres ;
RUN createdb db_example # fails !!!
RUN psql -c "CREATE USER springuser WITH PASSWORD 'test123';"
RUN exit
RUN service tomcat8 start
COPY target/App-1.0.war /var/lib/tomcat8/webapps/
CMD ["/bin/bash"]
The problem is that the database is down so I am uable to create the user and the database.
If I start the a debian docker container and do this steps per hand everything works fine.
Thanks for your help
All the recommendations in the comments are correct, it's better to keep services in different containers.
Nevertheless and just to let you know, the problem in the Dockerfile is that starting services in RUN statements is useless. For every line in the Dockerfile, docker creates a new image. For example RUN service postgresql start, it may start postgresql during docker build, but it doesn't persist in the final image. Only the filesystem persist from one step to another, not the processes.
Every process need to be started in the entrypoint, this is the only command that's called when you exec docker run:
FROM debian
RUN apt update
RUN apt install postgresql-9.6 tomcat8 tomcat8-admin -y
COPY target/App-1.0.war /var/lib/tomcat8/webapps/
ENTRYPOINT["/bin/bash", "-c", "service postgresql start && service postgresql status && createdb db_example && psql -c \"CREATE USER springuser WITH PASSWORD 'test123';\" && service tomcat8 start && sleep infinity"]
(It may have problems with quotes on psql command)
I have the problem hat in the war file the localhost for the database war hard coded.
Thanks to Light.G, he suggested me to use --net=host for the container, so now there is one container with the database and one with the tomcat server.
This are the steps I followed.
Build the docker image
docker build -t $USER/App .
Start a postgres database
We are using the host namespace it is not possible to run another programm on the post 5432.
Start the postgres container like this:
docker run -it --rm --net=host -e POSTGRES_USER='springuser' -e POSTGRES_DB='db_example' -e POSTGRES_PASSWORD='test123' postgres
Start the tomcat
Start the App container, with this command:
docker run -it --net=host --rm $USER/App
I have installed Docker in my system with odoo:latest and postgres:latest as a container, and i can successfully start & stop my odoo service.
But the problem is i can only see the base odoo modules in it instead i want to run my own created modules along with the base modules in the dockerized odoo.
I have searched many links but but failed to understand.
What should i do to run my own modules ?
Please help me with all the steps to it.
Thanks in advance.
The solution to this problem has been resolved as-
Firstly i mounted my local folder which contains my extra-addons by the command-
$ docker run -v /path/to/your/local/folder:/mnt/extra-addons -p 8069:8069 --name odoo --link db:db -t odoo
Then check weather your local folder is mounted on the odoo container
or not by-
$ docker exec -u root -it odoo /bin/bash
After logging-
$ ls /mnt/extra-addons
You should see your files which were present in your local/folder.
Now, its done just restart your docker odoo server
To stop-
$ sudo docker stop db
$ sudo docker stop odoo
$ sudo service docker stop
To Start-
$ sudo service docker start
$ sudo docker start db
$ sudo docker start -a odoo
Now you can install your modules from the app.
You just need to mount a folder from your host machine to the docker... go to docker hub and in the odoo image you will find how to mount your custom modules
I have setup docker toolbox on windows 10. While building the project I encountered the following error :- Bind for 0.0.0.0:8081 failed: port is already allocated ? The sudo service docker restart command isn't working. Please provide me a solution for the same.
Generally speaking, you need to stop running the current container. For that you are going to know current CONTAINER ID:
$ docker container ls
You get something like:
CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES
97a32e8928ef friendlyhello "python app.py" 51 seconds ago Up 50 seconds 0.0.0.0:4000->80/tcp romantic_tesla
Then you stop the container by:
$ docker stop 97a32e8928ef
Finally, you try to do what you wanted to do, for example:
$ docker run -p 4000:80 friendlyhello
Commonly if this error happens, I restarting my winnat with commands:
$ net stop winnat
// build your project
$ net start winnat
If that doesnt help. I restart whole docker with commands:
wsl --unregister docker-desktop
wsl --unregister docker-desktop-data
Then docker offers to restart docker-service.
I'm starting to work with docker to automate envorinments, then I'm trying to build a simple LAMP so the Dockerfile is the following:
FROM centos:7
ENV container=docker
RUN yum -y swap -- remove systemd-container systemd-container-libs -- install systemd systemd-libs
RUN yum -y update; yum clean all; \
(cd /lib/systemd/system/sysinit.target.wants/; for i in *; do [ $i == systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service ] || rm -f $i; done); \
rm -f /lib/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/*;\
rm -f /etc/systemd/system/*.wants/*;\
rm -f /lib/systemd/system/local-fs.target.wants/*; \
rm -f /lib/systemd/system/sockets.target.wants/*udev*; \
rm -f /lib/systemd/system/sockets.target.wants/*initctl*; \
rm -f /lib/systemd/system/basic.target.wants/*;\
rm -f /lib/systemd/system/anaconda.target.wants/*;
VOLUME [ "/sys/fs/cgroup" ]
RUN yum -y update && yum clean all
RUN yum -y install firewalld httpd mariadb-server mariadb php php-mysql php-gd php-pear php-xml php-bcmath php-mbstring php-mcrypt php-php-gettext
#Enable services
RUN systemctl enable httpd.service
RUN systemctl enable mariadb.service
#start services
RUN systemctl start httpd.service
RUN systemctl start mariadb.service
#Open firewall ports
RUN firewall-cmd --permanent --add-service=http
RUN firewall-cmd --permanent --add-service=https
RUN firewall-cmd --reload
EXPOSE 80
CMD ["/usr/sbin/init"]
so when I build the image
docker build -t myimage .
Then when I run the code I get the following mistake:
The command '/bin/sh -c systemctl start httpd.service' returned a non-zero code: 1
When I enter to interactive mode(jumping the commands after RUN systemctl start httpd.service and rebuidling the image):
docker run -t -i myimage /bin/bash
And after try to start manually the service httpd I get the following mistake:
Failed to get D-Bus connection: No connection to service manager.
so, I don't know what am I doing wrong?
First of all, welcome to Docker! :-) Loads of Docker tutorials and docs are written around Ubuntu containers, but I like Centos too.
Ok, there are a couple of things to talk about here:
You're running up against a known issue with systemd-based Docker containers where they seem to need extra privileges to run, and even then lots of extra config is required to get them working. The Red Hat team are experimenting with some fixes (mentioned in comments) but not sure where that's at.
If you wish to try getting it working, these are the best instructions I've found, but I've played with this several times in the last couple of weeks and not got it working yet.
What people might say is "the real issue" here is that a Docker container should not be thought of as a "mini Virtual Machine". Docker is designed to run one "root" process per container, and the container system makes it easy to compose multiple containers together - they are small on disk, light on memory usage and easy to network together.
Here's a blog post from Docker which gives some background on this. There's also the "Docker Fundamentals" docs on Dockerizing applications and Working with containers.
So arguably the best way to proceed with the setup you're attempting to create here (though it might sound more complicated at the beginning) is to break your "stack" up into the services you need, and then use a tool like docker-compose (introduction, documentation) to create single-purpose Docker containers as required.
In your case above, you have two services, a web server and a database server. Therefore two Docker containers should work well, connected together by the database network connection. Here are some examples:
example with Symfony app, nginx and MariaDB
example with MariaDB + NodeJS
If you run one service per Docker container, you don't need to use systemd to manage them, as the Docker daemon manages each container sort of like it is a Unix process. When the process dies, the Docker container dies, and this is important because the Docker server monitors containers and can restart them automatically, or notify you.
This looks more like a perfect example where my docker-systemctl-replacement would fit into. It can easily interpret "systemctl start httpd.service" without an active SystemD around. I have done the same for some database services but not specifically the mariadb.service - may be you could give it a try.