We are using Algolia extension for Magento 2. We added 2-3 field in the products, so we want to show the value of those fields on instant search result page. As we checking the view/frontend/templates/instant/hit.phtml is in use, we want to add the custom attributes to the JSON data so we can fetch those attributes value and show in listing page.
First you have to add new fields to Algolia product index if not already added. You can use one of the custom backend events. e.g. algolia_after_create_product_object
Once your fields are indexed properly (verify from Algolia account console), you should be able to get those in hit.phtml
Related
I'm using the API query
GET https://dev.azure.com/{organization}/{project}/_apis/wit/workitemtypes/{type}/fields/{field}?api-version=5.1
with great success to get all of the allowed values for my fields. The issue is that the options to one of my dropdown menus is populated based on the selected value of another dropdown menu. Is it possible to pass a value to this GET query and then retrieve all of the allowedValues for this dynamically populated menu?
I'm afraid that this is currently impossible to pass a value to this GET query and then retrieve all of the allowedValues for this dynamically populated menu.
Work Item Types Field-Get rest api should only get the allowedValues of a specified field, cannot implement the logic of returning the allowedValues of this field based on the value of another field.
In addition, according to URI Parameters, you also cannot add the value of another field as optional parameters to the url for conditional filtering .
You could add your request for this feature on our UserVoice site , which is our main forum for product suggestions.After suggest raised, you can vote and add your comments for this feedback. The product team would provide the updates if they view it.
In my HTML page I have a group of five checkboxes. Their values are 1,2,3,4,5.
In the object to which those checkboxes belong I save them as an array. So if user selects options 2,4,5 I store it as [2,4,5].
I'm stuck at the spot when I try to validate that array in Firebase rules. Is there any way of doing validation like this?
I want to make sure an array like [5,6,7] does not go through the Firestore rules but something like [1,3,4,5] does.
Array type fields in Firestore documents show up as List type objects in security rules. You can use its hasOnly method to determine if the List contains only certain elements.
request.resource.data.arrayField.hasOnly([1,2,3,4,5)
When sending a GET query for matters, you can use the custom_field_ids[] key with a custom field id as the value to pull down the fields for a specific custom field assigned to a matter.
The documentation shows no similar functionality for the contact object. I'm having to pull all custom_field_values{field_name,value} and parse this result to find the specific custom field value I'm looking for, when I'm querying a contact.
Is there a better way to get the custom field value for a specific custom field id for contacts than what I'm doing above? If not, I'd love to see the custom_field_ids[] parameter applied to the contact object.
Software Platform - NetSuite
Goal - Run a weekly sales report. Use the data from that report to populate a custom item field on the item record (Kit item) in NetSuite.
Can this be done using a workflow or???
Before you try to write a Script or create a Workflow, I recommend you investigate NetSuite's ability to populate Custom Fields with Search Results.
Check out the Help page titled Creating Custom Fields with Values Derived from Summary Search Results for the details.
The basic process will involve creating a Saved Search that generates the data you need, then using the Validation and Defaulting tab on your Custom Item field to select the Search you created.
This should be done using SuiteScript. In your script, run a search, store the data as JSON, and submit the data to the item record. You could submit the data into a single text field on the item record, but it would be better to create a Custom Record Type "Sales Report" which has a list/record field sourced from the item and with the "Record Is Parent" checkbox checked. This will display your custom record on the item in a sublist. Using a Custom Record Type will allow you to store the data over multiple iterations. If you use a field on the item record it will be replaced each time you run the script.
I am using a data connection list to load desired views in an InfoPath form on SharePoint. I have a permission list with 2 columns: usernames and control group. My form on the main list loads a specific view based on what the username and group are of the permission list. You have to filter out the group based on the form's username() function to match the username column and set that as a condition to (on form load) change it to a specific view.
All this works, but the problem comes in when you have a user with multiple control groups. The filter only returns the first instance it finds. I can't think of a way to fix this. Maybe load the other list as a repeating table into the form, but then how would I reference that table in the conditions of a form load rule? Or is there a way to get a field filter to look past the first item it finds?
Update: I forgot to mention that I have to use a field to hold your filtered username:id:group aka group[title=username()] and then use that in the form load conditions. I think this is where the problem is, as this filter is what doesn't store all instances of the users id from the control list, but only the first.
SharePoint 2010 with forms created in InfoPath 2010
Are you querying the data in from info path or using visual studio, if you are querying in info path check the condition as Display name matches the username() and the query the data