Suppose I have data formatted in the following way (FYI, total row count is over 30K):
customer_id order_date order_rank
A 2017-02-19 1
A 2017-02-24 2
A 2017-03-31 3
A 2017-07-03 4
A 2017-08-10 5
B 2016-04-24 1
B 2016-04-30 2
C 2016-07-18 1
C 2016-09-01 2
C 2016-09-13 3
I need a 4th column, let's call it days_since_last_order which, in the case where order_rank = 1 then 0 else calculate the number of days since the previous order (with rank n-1).
So, the above would return:
customer_id order_date order_rank days_since_last_order
A 2017-02-19 1 0
A 2017-02-24 2 5
A 2017-03-31 3 35
A 2017-07-03 4 94
A 2017-08-10 5 38
B 2016-04-24 1 0
B 2016-04-30 2 6
C 2016-07-18 1 79
C 2016-09-01 2 45
C 2016-09-13 3 12
Is there an easier way to calculate the above with a window function (or similar) rather than join the entire dataset against itself (eg. on A.order_rank = B.order_rank - 1) and doing the calc?
Thanks!
use the lag window function
SELECT
customer_id
, order_date
, order_rank
, COALESCE(
DATE(order_date)
- DATE(LAG(order_date) OVER (PARTITION BY customer_id ORDER BY order_date))
, 0)
FROM <table_name>
Related
I've a table data as below, now I need to fetch the record with in same code, where (Value2-Value1)*2 of one row >= (Value2-Value1) of consequtive date row. (all dates are uniform with in all codes)
---------------------------------------
code Date Value1 Value2
---------------------------------------
1 1-1-2018 13 14
1 2-1-2018 14 16
1 4-1-2018 15 18
2 1-1-2019 1 3
2 2-1-2018 2 3
2 4-1-2018 3 7
ex: output needs to be
1 1-1-2018 13 14
as I am begginer to SQL coding, tried my best, but cannot get through with compare only on consequtive dates.
Use a self join.
You can specify all the conditions you've listed in the ON clause:
SELECT T0.code, T0.Date, T0.Value1, T0.Value2
FROM Table As T0
JOIN Table As T1
ON T0.code = T1.code
AND T0.Date = DateAdd(Day, 1, T1.Date)
AND (T0.Value2 - T0.Value1) * 2 >= T1.Value2 - T1.Value1
I have a table like this:
type code desc store Sales/Day Stock
-----------------------------------------------
1 AA1 abc 101 3 6
1 AA2 abd 101 4 0
1 AA3 abf 101 4 3
2 BA1 bba 101 5 1
2 BA2 bbc 101 2 1
1 AA1 abc 102 1 4
1 AA2 abd 102 2 0
2 BA1 bba 102 4 2
2 BA2 bbc 102 5 5
etc.
How I can show the result table like this:
type code desc Store 101 Store 102
Sales/Day | Stock Sales/Day | Stock
--------------------------------------------------------------
1 AA1 abc 3 6 1 4
1 AA2 abd 4 0 2 0
1 AA3 abf 4 3 0 0
2 BA1 bba 5 1 4 2
2 BA2 bbc 2 1 5 5
etc.
Note:
Colspan is only display.
demo:db<>fiddle
First way: FILTER
SELECT
type,
code,
"desc",
COALESCE(SUM(sales_day) FILTER (WHERE store = 101)) as sales_day_101,
COALESCE(SUM(stock) FILTER (WHERE store = 101), 0) as stock_101,
COALESCE(SUM(sales_day) FILTER (WHERE store = 102), 0) as sales_day_102,
COALESCE(SUM(stock) FILTER (WHERE store = 102), 0) as stock_102
FROM mytable
GROUP BY type, code, "desc"
ORDER BY type, code
Aggregating your values. I took SUM but in your case with distinct rows many other aggregate functions would do it. FILTER allows you to aggregate only one store.
The COALESCE is to avoid NULL values if no values are present for one aggregation (like AA3 in store 102).
Second way, CASE WHEN
SELECT
type,
code,
"desc",
SUM(CASE WHEN store = 101 THEN sales_day ELSE 0 END) as sales_day_101,
SUM(CASE WHEN store = 101 THEN stock ELSE 0 END) as stock_101,
SUM(CASE WHEN store = 102 THEN sales_day ELSE 0 END) as sales_day_102,
SUM(CASE WHEN store = 102 THEN stock ELSE 0 END) as stock_102
FROM mytable
GROUP BY type, code, "desc"
ORDER BY type, code
The idea is the same, but the newer FILTER function is replace by the more common CASE clause.
Notice that "desc" is a reserved word in Postgres. So I strictly recommend to rename your column.
I have my data that looks like this:
user_id touchpoint_number days_difference
1 1 5
1 2 20
1 3 25
1 4 10
2 1 2
2 2 30
2 3 4
I would like to create one more column that would create a cumulative sum of the days_difference, partitioned by user_id, but would reset whenever the value reaches 30 and starts counting from 0. I have been trying to do it, but I couldn't figure it out how to do it in PostgreSQL, because it has to be recursive.
The outcome I would like to have would be something like:
user_id touchpoint_number days_difference cum_sum_upto30
1 1 5 5
1 2 20 25
1 3 25 0 --- new count all over again
1 4 10 10
2 1 2 2
2 2 30 0 --- new count all over again
2 3 4 4
Do you have any cool ideas how this could be done?
This should do what you want:
with cte as (
select t.a, t.b, t.c, t.c as sumc
from t
where b = 1
union all
select t.a, t.b, t.c,
(case when t.c + cte.sumc > 30 then 0 else t.c + cte.sumc end)
from t join
cte
on t.b = cte.b + 1 and t.a = cte.a
)
select *
from cte
order by a, b;
Here is a rextester.
I have one system that read from two client databases. For the two clients, both of them have different format of cut off date:
1) Client A: Every month at 15th. Example: 15-12-2016.
2) Client B: Every first day of the month. Example: 1-1-2017.
The cut off date are stored in the table as below:
Now I need a single query to retrieve the current month's cut off date of the client. For instance, today is 15-2-2017, so the expected cut off date for both clients should be as below:
1) Client A: 15-1-2017
2) Client B: 1-2-2017
How can I accomplish this in a single Stored Procedure? For client B, I can always get the first day of the month. But this can't apply to client A since their cut off is last month's date.
Might be something like this you are looking for:
DECLARE #DummyClient TABLE(ID INT IDENTITY,ClientName VARCHAR(100));
DECLARE #DummyDates TABLE(ClientID INT,YourDate DATE);
INSERT INTO #DummyClient VALUES
('A'),('B');
INSERT INTO #DummyDates VALUES
(1,{d'2016-12-15'}),(2,{d'2017-01-01'});
WITH Numbers AS
( SELECT 0 AS Nr
UNION ALL SELECT 1
UNION ALL SELECT 2
UNION ALL SELECT 3
UNION ALL SELECT 4
UNION ALL SELECT 5
UNION ALL SELECT 6
UNION ALL SELECT 7
UNION ALL SELECT 9
UNION ALL SELECT 10
UNION ALL SELECT 11
UNION ALL SELECT 12
UNION ALL SELECT 13
UNION ALL SELECT 14
UNION ALL SELECT 15
UNION ALL SELECT 16
UNION ALL SELECT 17
UNION ALL SELECT 18
UNION ALL SELECT 19
UNION ALL SELECT 20
UNION ALL SELECT 21
UNION ALL SELECT 22
UNION ALL SELECT 23
UNION ALL SELECT 24
)
,ClientExt AS
(
SELECT c.*
,MIN(d.YourDate) AS MinDate
FROM #DummyClient AS c
INNER JOIN #DummyDates AS d ON c.ID=d.ClientID
GROUP BY c.ID,c.ClientName
)
SELECT ID,ClientName,D
FROM ClientExt
CROSS APPLY(SELECT DATEADD(MONTH,Numbers.Nr,MinDate)
FROM Numbers) AS RunningDate(D);
The result
ID Cl Date
1 A 2016-12-15
1 A 2017-01-15
1 A 2017-02-15
1 A 2017-03-15
1 A 2017-04-15
1 A 2017-05-15
1 A 2017-06-15
1 A 2017-07-15
1 A 2017-09-15
1 A 2017-10-15
1 A 2017-11-15
1 A 2017-12-15
1 A 2018-01-15
1 A 2018-02-15
1 A 2018-03-15
1 A 2018-04-15
1 A 2018-05-15
1 A 2018-06-15
1 A 2018-07-15
1 A 2018-08-15
1 A 2018-09-15
1 A 2018-10-15
1 A 2018-11-15
1 A 2018-12-15
2 B 2017-01-01
2 B 2017-02-01
2 B 2017-03-01
2 B 2017-04-01
2 B 2017-05-01
2 B 2017-06-01
2 B 2017-07-01
2 B 2017-08-01
2 B 2017-10-01
2 B 2017-11-01
2 B 2017-12-01
2 B 2018-01-01
2 B 2018-02-01
2 B 2018-03-01
2 B 2018-04-01
2 B 2018-05-01
2 B 2018-06-01
2 B 2018-07-01
2 B 2018-08-01
2 B 2018-09-01
2 B 2018-10-01
2 B 2018-11-01
2 B 2018-12-01
2 B 2019-01-01
I use Oracle 10g and I have a table that stores a snapshot of data on a person for a given day. Every night an outside process adds new rows to the table for any person whose had any changes to their core data (stored elsewhere). This allows a query to be written using a date to find out what a person 'looked' like on some past day. A new row is added to the table even if only a single aspect of the person has changed--the implication being that many columns have duplicate values from slice to slice since not every detail changed in each snapshot.
Below is a data sample:
SliceID PersonID StartDt Detail1 Detail2 Detail3 Detail4 ...
1 101 08/20/09 Red Vanilla N 23
2 101 08/31/09 Orange Chocolate N 23
3 101 09/15/09 Yellow Chocolate Y 24
4 101 09/16/09 Green Chocolate N 24
5 102 01/10/09 Blue Lemon N 36
6 102 01/11/09 Indigo Lemon N 36
7 102 02/02/09 Violet Lemon Y 36
8 103 07/07/09 Red Orange N 12
9 104 01/31/09 Orange Orange N 12
10 104 10/20/09 Yellow Orange N 13
I need to write a query that pulls out time slices records where some pertinent bits, not the whole record, have changed. So, referring to the above, if I only want to know the slices in which Detail3 has changed from its previous value, then I would expect to only get rows having SliceID 1, 3 and 4 for PersonID 101 and SliceID 5 and 7 for PersonID 102 and SliceID 8 for PersonID 103 and SliceID 9 for PersonID 104.
I'm thinking I should be able to use some sort of Oracle Hierarchical Query (using CONNECT BY [PRIOR]) to get what I want, but I have not figured out how to write it yet. Perhaps YOU can help.
Thanks you for your time and consideration.
Here is my take on the LAG() solution, which is basically the same as that of egorius, but I show my workings ;)
SQL> select * from
2 (
3 select sliceid
4 , personid
5 , startdt
6 , detail3 as new_detail3
7 , lag(detail3) over (partition by personid
8 order by startdt) prev_detail3
9 from some_table
10 )
11 where prev_detail3 is null
12 or ( prev_detail3 != new_detail3 )
13 /
SLICEID PERSONID STARTDT N P
---------- ---------- --------- - -
1 101 20-AUG-09 N
3 101 15-SEP-09 Y N
4 101 16-SEP-09 N Y
5 102 10-JAN-09 N
7 102 02-FEB-09 Y N
8 103 07-JUL-09 N
9 104 31-JAN-09 N
7 rows selected.
SQL>
The point about this solution is that it hauls in results for 103 and 104, who don't have slice records where detail3 has changed. If that is a problem we can apply an additional filtration, to return only rows with changes:
SQL> with subq as (
2 select t.*
3 , row_number () over (partition by personid
4 order by sliceid ) rn
5 from
6 (
7 select sliceid
8 , personid
9 , startdt
10 , detail3 as new_detail3
11 , lag(detail3) over (partition by personid
12 order by startdt) prev_detail3
13 from some_table
14 ) t
15 where t.prev_detail3 is null
16 or ( t.prev_detail3 != t.new_detail3 )
17 )
18 select sliceid
19 , personid
20 , startdt
21 , new_detail3
22 , prev_detail3
23 from subq sq
24 where exists ( select null from subq x
25 where x.personid = sq.personid
26 and x.rn > 1 )
27 order by sliceid
28 /
SLICEID PERSONID STARTDT N P
---------- ---------- --------- - -
1 101 20-AUG-09 N
3 101 15-SEP-09 Y N
4 101 16-SEP-09 N Y
5 102 10-JAN-09 N
7 102 02-FEB-09 Y N
SQL>
edit
As egorius points out in the comments, the OP does want hits for all users, even if they haven't changed, so the first version of the query is the correct solution.
In addition to OMG Ponies' answer: if you need to query slices for all persons, you'll need partition by:
SELECT s.sliceid
, s.personid
FROM (SELECT t.sliceid,
t.personid,
t.detail3,
LAG(t.detail3) OVER (
PARTITION BY t.personid ORDER BY t.startdt
) prev_val
FROM t) s
WHERE (s.prev_val IS NULL OR s.prev_val != s.detail3)
I think you'll have better luck with the LAG function:
SELECT s.sliceid
FROM (SELECT t.sliceid,
t.personid,
t.detail3,
LAG(t.detail3) OVER (PARTITION BY t.personid ORDER BY t.startdt) 'prev_val'
FROM TABLE t) s
WHERE s.personid = 101
AND (s.prev_val IS NULL OR s.prev_val != s.detail3)
Subquery Factoring alternative:
WITH slices AS (
SELECT t.sliceid,
t.personid,
t.detail3,
LAG(t.detail3) OVER (PARTITION BY t.personid ORDER BY t.startdt) 'prev_val'
FROM TABLE t)
SELECT s.sliceid
FROM slices s
WHERE s.personid = 101
AND (s.prev_val IS NULL OR s.prev_val != s.detail3)