Macro is working but keeps getting RESOLVEDATAMACRO errors - macros

We are getting tons of MACRORESOLVER error on one of our pages and I was able to pinpoint where it is coming from. We have a macro in a static html web part like the code below and I can't figure out what's wrong. It is working as expected too so I'm confused. Is the syntax wrong? Hoping someone can help me.
<div class="row">
<div class="col-sm-4 newsltr-two-btn">
{% if(!String.IsNullOrEmpty(Document)) { %}
<a target="_blank" href="~/getattachment/{% Document %}/attachment.aspx" download>{% DocumentText %}</a>
{% } else if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(ExternalDocumentUrl)) { %}
<a target="_blank" href="{% ExternalDocumentUrl %}">{% DocumentText %}</a>
{% } #%}
</div>
</div>
Event Log:
Error while evaluating expression: if(!string.IsNullOrEmpty(Document)) { print(ResolveMacros("\r\n {% DocumentText %} \r\n ")) } else if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(ExternalDocumentUrl)) { print(ResolveMacros("\r\n {% DocumentText %} \r\n ")) } |(user)paulo|(hash)7b864efc818f93934b7bfb4c7d92234dc8c506e841ed30c3b661f8bee604d86b
System.ArgumentOutOfRangeException: Index was out of range. Must be non-negative and less than the size of the collection.
Parameter name: index
at System.ThrowHelper.ThrowArgumentOutOfRangeException(ExceptionArgument argument, ExceptionResource resource)
at CMS.MacroEngine.ExpressionEvaluator.EvaluateCondition(Boolean& match, Boolean& securityPassed, DataRow drLogItem, DateTime evaluationStarted)

Looks like your syntax has an error in it. See notation below:
<div class="row">
<div class="col-sm-4 newsltr-two-btn">
{% if(!String.IsNullOrEmpty(Document)) { %}
<a target="_blank" href="~/getattachment/{% Document %}/attachment.aspx" download>{% DocumentText %</a> // your error is here, missing a closing curly brace after the percent sign for DocumentText
{% } else if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(ExternalDocumentUrl)) { %}
<a target="_blank" href="{% ExternalDocumentUrl %}">{% DocumentText %}</a>
{% } #%}
</div>
</div>
Also, if you're using a static HTML webpart, I'd suggest moving it to a static text webpart. Reason being the static text doesn't validate AND correct any of the HTML you input. This could also be the issue that the WYSIWYG editor is modifying your markup and causing problems.

Related

Flask-paginate + MongoDB full text search Error $search had wrong type when hitting page 2

Having an issue with flask-paginate & pyMongo/MongoDB full text search. Pagination works well for me until the user tries to search for a 'post' in the database. It will display the first 6 (as I've set it in my case) results that there are but once you want to navigate to page 2 it throws an error reading:
pymongo.errors.OperationFailure: "$search" had the wrong type. Expected string, found null, full error: {'operationTime': Timestamp(1600978481, 2), 'ok': 0.0, 'errmsg': '"$search" had the wrong type. Expected string, found null', 'code': 14, 'codeName': 'TypeMismatch', '$clusterTime': {'clusterTime': Timestamp(1600978481, 2), 'signature': {'hash': b'\xd6b\xe7\x8eI\xa5\xea[\xb2\x0e5Y\xa2\xf3\x93R\xc6\xc1\xc4\x06', 'keyId': 6862628668309504003}}}
The same issue arises if I try and filter the search results using .sort("param", 1) - I've removed this 'feature' since but this is the same error I've encountered.
Werkzeug notes that the issue arises on line 63 in my search() route ie. pagination = Pagination(...).
My routes.py:
#app.route('/search', methods=("GET", "POST"))
def search():
page = request.args.get(get_page_parameter(), type=int, default=1)
per_page = 6
search_request = request.form.get("search")
all_posts = mongo.db.posts.find({"$text": {"$search": search_request}}).skip((page-1) * per_page).limit(per_page)
pagination = Pagination(
page=page, per_page=per_page,
total=all_posts.count(), record_name='all_posts')
return render_template('search.html', all_posts=all_posts, pagination=pagination, search_request=search_request)
My search.html template:
<div class="row">
{% for post in all_posts %}
<div class="col s12 l4">
<div class="card card-panel hoverable">
<div class="card-image center-align">
<img src="{{post.image_url}}" class="card-img">
</div>
<div class="card-content">
<h4 class="card-title">{{post.title}}</h4>
<p>{{post.description}}</p>
<p class="read-time">{{post.read_time}} minute(s), {{post.views}} views</p>
</div>
<div class="card-action">
Read
</div>
</div>
</div>
{% endfor %}
{% if all_posts.count() == 0 %}
<div class="center-align">
<h3>No posts found</h3>
</div>
{% endif %}
</div>
<!-- Pagination -->
<div class="row center-align">
{% if all_posts.count() > 1 %}
{{ pagination.info }}
{% endif %}
{{ pagination.links }}
Thanks for your help.

Two For loops in one HTML page using Jinja (Not working)

I am trying to use one loop in my HTML File using Jinja template
First loop is for showing data on slider
Second is for list tag
The problem is that both are not showing data simultaneously
I have to remove one loop to make other loop working
For Slider
<ul class="rslides" id="slider">
{% for post in slider %}
<li>
<img src="{{post.Image}}" alt="">
<div class="caption">
{{post.Heading}}
</div>
</li>
{% endfor %}
for List Tag
{% for post in posts %}
<div class="article">
<div class="article-left">
<img src="{{post.Image}}" alt="" />
</div>
<div class="article-right">
<div class="article-title">
<p style="color:black">{{ post.Date }}<a class="span_link" href="#"><!-- <span class="glyphicon glyphicon-comment"></span>0 </a><a class="span_link" href="#"><span class="glyphicon glyphicon-eye-open"></span></a><a class="span_link" href="#"><span class="glyphicon glyphicon-thumbs-up"></span>89</a> --></p>
<a class="title" href="{{url_for('post',post_id=post._id)}}">{{ post.Heading }}</a>
</div>
<div class="article-text">
<p>{{ post.NewsType }}...</p>
<!-- <img src="{{ url_for('static', filename='images/more.png')}}" alt="" /> -->
<div class="clearfix"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="clearfix"></div>
</div>
{% endfor %}
Flask Code
allpost = posts.find( {"NewsType": {"$in": it}}).sort('Date',pymongo.DESCENDING).skip((page - 1) * per_page).limit(per_page)
pagination = Pagination(page=page,per_page=5,total=allpost.count(), search=search, record_name='allpost')
return render_template('index.html', posts=allpost,pagination=pagination,slider=allpost)
Both loops are getting values from mongodb collection .
Is there anyway to solve this problem?
A MongoDB query hands back an object that fetches results lazily. And once those results are fetched, that's it.
Your code is trying to consume allposts twice. What you're seeing is that the first loops through works, leaving nothing for the second loop.
One way to fix that is to consume the results once, turning them in to a list, before passing the list to your template. That is, add
allpost = list(allpost)
before passing that to the template.

How to put a html tag (span) inside a button in twig file symfony 2.8?

I have been trying to customize a form individual field, following the symfony documentation:
http://symfony.com/doc/master/form/form_customization.html#how-to-customize-an-individual-field
But I have not had success in my attempt.
This is my twig:
{% block _Formulario_personalizado_widget %}
<span class="icon-icon-buscar-libros fs1"></span>
{% endblock %}
{{ form_widget(Formulario.Buscar, {'id':"BuscarPorCriterio", 'attr':{'class':'btn btn-primary active'}}) }}
This is my form in the cotroller:
->add('Buscar',ButtonType::class, array('block_name'=> 'personalizado'))
And this controller returns a twig with next form name:
array("Formulario"=>$form->createView())
However, the output is like this:
<span class="icon-icon-buscar-libros fs1"></span>
<button type="button" id="BuscarPorCriterio" name="form[Buscar]" class="btn btn-primary active">Buscar</button>
And I actually need this output (with SPAN INSIDE Button):
<button type="button" id="BuscarPorCriterio" name="form[Buscar]" class="btn btn-primary active"><span class="icon-icon-buscar-libros fs1"></span> Buscar</button>
Thank you in advance for your help!
Usually, the submit buttons are not created inside the controller, nor the Type, but you can create them in the twig template directly. Like:
{% form_start(Formulario) %}
{% form_row(Formulario.field) %}
{# more fields here #}
<button type="button">
<span class="icon-icon-buscar-libros fs1"></span>
Buscar
</button>
{% form_end(Formulario) %}

Flask form routing

I'm struggling with a Flask App that gives me Bad Request on a form submission. I've been through the little bit of documentation from Flask and a number of SO pages. I'm sure there's something simple I'm missing.
In a nutshell, I've developed a template to receive the form called 'placeindex.html'. The form 'name' data all matches. If I change the name of 'placeindex.html' to 'index.html' it works fine, even though I'm pointing to the 'placeindex.html' file. Code below (view):
#app.route('/add_place', methods=['GET', 'POST'])
def add_place():
username = session['username']
placename = request.form['place']
address = request.form['address']
city = request.form['city']
state = request.form['state']
zipcode = request.form['zipcode']
alias = request.form['alias']
searchword = request.args.get('key', '')
print(searchword)
Place(session['username']).new_place(placename, address, city, state, zipcode, alias, username)
return render_template('placeindex.html')
placeindex.html:
{% extends "layout.html" %}
{% block place %}
<h2>Home</h2>
{% if session.username %}
<h3>Add new 'placeindex'</h3>
<form action="{{ url_for('add_place') }}" method="post">
<dl>
<dt>Name:</dt>
<dd><input type="text" size="30" name="place"></dd>
<dt>Address:</dt>
<dd><input type="text" size="30" name="address"></dd>
<dt>City:</dt>
<dd><input type="text" size="30" name="city"></dd>
<dt>State:</dt>
<dd><input type="text" size="2" name="state"></dd>
<dt>Zip Code:</dt>
<dd><input type="text" size="10" name="zipcode"></dd>
<dt>Nickname:</dt>
<dd><input type="text" size="30" name="alias"></dd>
</dl>
<input type="submit" value="Save">
</form>
{% endif %}
<br>
<h3>My Places</h3>
{% include "display_posts.html" %}
{% endblock %}
I've stripped out all the validation code to try to figure this out.
layout.html (in case it helps):
<!doctype html>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="{{ url_for('static', filename='style.css') }}">
<div class="page">
<div class="metanav">
{% if session.username %}
Logged in as {{ session.username }}
{% endif %}
Home
{% if not session.username %}
Register
Login
{% else %}
Profile
Logout
Places
Trips
Delegates
{% endif %}
</div>
{% for message in get_flashed_messages() %}
<div class="flash">{{ message }}</div>
{% endfor %}
{% block body %}{% endblock %}
{% block post %}{% endblock %}
{% block place %}{% endblock %}
{% block trip %}{% endblock %}
</div>
Once I open the 'index.html' version of the file and send form data, it refreshes to the correct file, but I can't go there directly without the BAD REQUEST page.
Thanks
The issue is that you are accessing request.form without checking if request.form is populated. form contains arguments in the body of the HTTP request ... and GET requests don't have a body.
As discussed in Form sending error, Flask - when Flask is asked for a form variable that doesn't exist it throws an error ... just like an ordinary Python dictionary does.
The solution in your case is to wrap all of your data-processing code inside of a conditional:
if request.method == "POST":
# code accessing request.form here
So the general structure is:
#app.route('/add_place', methods=['GET', 'POST'])
def add_place():
if request.method == "POST":
username = session['username']
placename = request.form['place']
# ... snip ...
# Note that this is not under the `if`
# so we'll *always* return this template's HTML.
return render_template('placeindex.html')

How to customize the data-prototype attribute in Symfony 2 forms

Since umpteens days, I block on a problem with Symfony 2 and forms.
I got a form of websites entities. "Websites" is a collection of website's entities and each website contains two attributes : "type" and "url".
If I want to add more of one website in my database, I can click on a "Add another website" link, which add another website row to my form. So when you click on the submit button, you can add one or X website(s) at the same time.
This process to add a row use the data-prototype attribute, which can generate the website sub-form.
The problem is that I customize my form to have a great graphic rendering... like that :
<div class="informations_widget">{{ form_widget(website.type.code) }}</div>
<div class="informations_error">{{ form_errors(website.type) }}</div>
<div class="informations_widget">{{ form_widget(website.url) }}</div>
<div class="informations_error">{{ form_errors(website.url) }}</div>
But the data-prototype doesn't care about this customization, with HTML and CSS tags & properties. I keep the Symfony rendering :
<div>
<label class=" required">$$name$$</label>
<div id="jobcast_profilebundle_websitestype_websites_$$name$$">
<div>
<label class=" required">Type</label>
<div id="jobcast_profilebundle_websitestype_websites_$$name$$_type">
<div>
<label for="jobcast_profilebundle_websitestype_websites_$$name$$_type_code" class=" required">label</label>
<select id="jobcast_profilebundle_websitestype_websites_$$name$$_type_code" name="jobcast_profilebundle_websitestype[websites][$$name$$][type][code]" required="required">
<option value="WEB-OTHER">Autre</option>
<option value="WEB-RSS">Flux RSS</option>
...
</select>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<label for="jobcast_profilebundle_websitestype_websites_$$name$$_url" class=" required">Adresse</label>
<input type="url" id="jobcast_profilebundle_websitestype_websites_$$name$$_url" name="jobcast_profilebundle_websitestype[websites][$$name$$][url]" required="required" value="" />
</div>
</div>
</div>
Does anyone have an idea to make that hack ?
A bit old, but here is a deadly simple solution.
The idea is simply to render the collection items through a Twig template, so you have full ability to customize the prototype that will be placed in your data-prototype="..." tag. Just as if it was a normal, usual form.
In yourMainForm.html.twig:
<div id="collectionContainer"
data-prototype="
{% filter escape %}
{{ include('MyBundle:MyViewsDirectory:prototype.html.twig', { 'form': form.myForm.vars.prototype }) }}
{% endfilter %}">
</div>
And in MyBundle:MyViewsDirectory:prototype.html.twig:
<div>
<!-- customize as you wish -->
{{ form_label(form.field1) }}
{{ form_widget(form.field1) }}
{{ form_label(form.field2) }}
{{ form_widget(form.field2) }}
</div>
Credit: adapted from https://gist.github.com/tobalgists/4032213
I know this question is quite old, but I had the same problem and this is how I soved it. I'm using a twig macro to accomplish this. Macros are like functions, you can render them with different arguments.
{% macro information_prototype(website) %}
<div class="informations_widget">{{ form_widget(website.type.code) }}</div>
<div class="informations_error">{{ form_errors(website.type) }}</div>
<div class="informations_widget">{{ form_widget(website.url) }}</div>
<div class="informations_error">{{ form_errors(website.url) }}</div>
{% endmacro %}
now you can render this macro wherever you want. Note that information_prototype() is just the name of the macro, you can name it whatever you want. If you want to use the macro to render the given items and the prototype the same way, do something like this:
<div class="collection" data-prototype="{{ _self.information_prototype(form.websites.vars.prototype)|e }}">
{% for website in form.websites %}
{{ _self.information_prototype(website) }}
{% endfor %}
<button class="add-collection">Add Information</button>
</div>
form.websites.vars.prototype holds the prototype data of the form with the prototype_name you specified. Use _self.+macroname if you want to use the macro in the same template.
You can find out more about macros in the Twig documentation
You probably have found out since but here is the solution for others.
Create a new template and copy/paste this code in it:
https://gist.github.com/1294186
Then in the template containing the form you want to customise, apply it to your form by doing this:
{% form_theme form 'YourBundle:Deal:Theme/_field-prototype.html.twig' %}
I've run into similar problem recently. Here's how you can override the collection prototype without having to explicitly set it in the html:
{% set customPrototype %}
{% filter escape %}
{% include 'AcmeBundle:Controller:customCollectionPrototype.html.twig' with { 'form': form.collection.vars.prototype } %}
{% endfilter %}
{% endset %}
{{ form_label(form.collection) }}
{{ form_widget(form.collection, { 'attr': { 'data-prototype': customPrototype } }) }}
You can do whatever you want then in your custom twig. For example:
<div data-form-collection="item" data-form-collection-index="__name__" class="collection-item">
<div class="collection-box col-sm-10 col-sm-offset-2 padding-top-20">
<div class="row form-horizontal form-group">
<div class="col-sm-4">
{{ form_label(form.field0) }}
{{ form_widget(form.field0) }}
</div>
<div class="col-sm-3">
{{ form_label(form.field1) }}
{{ form_widget(form.field1) }}
</div>
<label class="col-sm-3 control-label text-right">
<button data-form-collection="delete" class="btn btn-danger">
<i class="fa fa-times collection-button-remove"></i>{{ 'form.collection.delete'|trans }}
</button>
</label>
</div>
</div>
Useful when you only have to do it in specific places and don't need a global override that's applicable to all collections.
I know that answer is very late but it maybe useful for visitors.
on your theme file you can simply use one block for rendering every collection entry of websites widget as following:
{% block _jobcast_profilebundle_websitestype_websites_entry_widget %}
<div class="informations_widget">{{ form_widget(form.type.code) }}</div>
<div class="informations_error">{{ form_errors(form.type) }}</div>
<div class="informations_widget">{{ form_widget(form.url) }}</div>
<div class="informations_error">{{ form_errors(form.url) }}</div>
{% endblock %}
also create theme block for your collection widget row as following:
{% block _quiz_question_answers_row %}
{% if prototype is defined %}
{%- set attr = attr | merge({'data-prototype': form_row(prototype) }) -%}
{% endif %}
{{ form_errors(form) }}
{% for child in form %}
{{ form_row(child) }}
{% endfor %}
{% endblock %}
now the prototype and the rendered collection entry will be the same.
I had a somewhat similar issue. You might have to tweak this to work for your case, but someone may find it helpful.
Create a new template file to hold your custom form 'theme'
./src/Company/TestBundle/Resources/views/Forms/fields.html.twig
Normally, you can use the form_row function to display a field's label, error, and widget. But in my case I just wanted to display the widget. As you say, using the data-prototype feature would also display the label, so in our new fields.html.twig type your custom code for how you want the field to look:
{% block form_row %}
{% spaceless %}
{{ form_widget(form) }}
{% endspaceless %}
{% endblock form_row %}
I removed the container div, and the label and error, and just left the widget.
Now in the twig file that displays the form, simply add this after the {% extends ... %}
{% form_theme form 'CompanyTestBundle:Form:fields.html.twig' %}
And now the form_widget(form.yourVariable.var.prototype) will only render the field and nothing else.
Application wide form theming will be applied to the prototype.
See Making Application-wide Customizations
Here is sample code for custom data-prototype:
{{ form_widget(form.emails.get('prototype')) | e }}
where emails — your collection.
To customize differently existing collection items VS prototype, you can override collection_widget like this:
{%- block collection_widget -%}
{% if prototype is defined %}
{%- set attr = attr|merge({'data-prototype': form_row(prototype, {'inPrototype': true} ) }) -%}
{% endif %}
{{- block('form_widget') -}}
{%- endblock collection_widget -%}
And then in your custom entry:
{% block _myCollection_entry_row %}
{% if(inPrototype is defined) %}
{# Something special only for prototype here #}
{% endif %}
{% endblock %}
If you do not need to define a template system-wide, simply set a template in your twig template, and ask twig to use it.
{# using the profiler, you can find the block widget tested by twig #}
{% block my_block_widget %}
<div >
<p>My template for collection</p>
<div >
{{ form_row(form.field1)}}
</div>
<div>
{{ form_row(form.field2)}}
</div>
</div>
{% endblock %}
{% form_theme form.my_collection _self %}
<button data-form-prototype="{{ form_widget(form.my_collection.vars.prototype) )|e }}" >Add a new entry</button>
There are two blocks that you can possibly target to add a custom theme to a collection field:
_myCollection_row and _myCollection_entry_row
_myCollection_row - renders the whole collection.
_myCollection_entry_row - renders a single item.
The prototype relies on _myCollection_entry_row so if you theme _myCollection_row only your theme will appear in the form, but not the prototype. The prototype uses _myCollection_entry_row.
So it's best to theme _myCollection_entry_row first, and then theme _myCollection_row only if required. BUT - if you theme _myCollection_row make sure it calls _myCollection_entry_row to render each item in your collection.
This post focuses on using pre-existing conventions within the twig template.
Basing off "How to Embed a Collection of Forms" from the Symfony Cookbook (http://symfony.com/doc/master/cookbook/form/form_collections.html), you can just enter whatever html_escaped form data you wish in the data-prototype (maybe considered a hack, but works wonderfully) and only pages using that template will change.
In the example, they tell you to put:
<ul class="tags" data-prototype="{{ form_widget(form.tags.vars.prototype)|e }}">
...
</ul>
This can be successfully replaced with something such as:
<table class="tags" data-prototype="<tr> <td><div><input type="text" id="task_tags__name__tagId" name="task[tags][__name__][taskId]" disabled="disabled" required="required" size="10" value="" /></div></td> <td><div><input type="text" id="task_tags__name__tagName" name="task[tags[__name__][tagName]" required="required" value="" /></div></td></tr>">
<tr>
<th>Id</th>
<th>Name</th>
</tr>
<tr>
...pre existing data here...
</tr>
</table>
Where the data-type attribute of the table with the class "tags" above is the html-escaped version (and line breaks removed though spaces are ok and required) of:
<tr>
<td><div><input type="text" id="task_tags__name__tagId" name="task[tags][__name__][taskId]" disabled="disabled" required="required" size="10" value="" /></div></td>
<td><div><input type="text" id="task_tags__name__tagName" name="task[tags[__name__][tagName]" required="required" value="" /></div></td>
</tr>
...but you must also adjust the javascript in the example to add tr's instead of li elements:
function addTagForm(collectionHolder, $newLinkTr) {
...
// Display the form in the page in an tr, before the "Add a question" link tr
var $newFormTr = $('<tr></tr>').append(newForm);
...
};
...
// setup an "add a tag" link
var $addTagLink = $('Add a tag');
var $newLinkTr = $('<tr></tr>').append($addTagLink);
...
For me, the next step is figuring out how to define the prototype in an external file that I can somehow call in the twig template for the data-prototype that dynamically works with the form. Something like:
<table class="tags" data-prototype="{{somefunction('App\Bundle\Views\Entity\TagsPrototypeInTable')}}">
So if one of the other posts is describing this and I am too dense or if someone knows how to do such, say so!
There is a link to something from gitHub from Francois, but I didn't see any explanation so I think that is probably the more dynamic method I'll get to one of these near-future days.
Peace,
Steve
Update:
One can also use just parts of the prototype:
data-prototype="<tr> <td>{{ form_row(form.tags.vars.prototype.tagId) | e }}</td> <td>{{ form_row(form.tags.vars.prototype.tagName) | e }}</td></tr>"
Where the data-type attribute of the table with the class "tags" above is the html-escaped version (and line breaks removed though spaces are ok and required) of:
<td>{{ form_row(form.tags.vars.prototype.tagId) | e }}</td>
<td>{{ form_row(form.tags.vars.prototype.tagName) | e }}</td>
(I used http://www.htmlescape.net/htmlescape_tool.html.)
Symfony will replace the information between the {{}} with an html_escaped (because of the "|e") rendered field when the page is rendered. In this way, any customization at the field-level is not lost, but! you must manually add and remove fields to the prototype as you do so with the entity :)