Four categories in category table.
id | name
--------------
1 | 'wine'
2 | 'chocolate'
3 | 'autos'
4 | 'real estate'
Two of the many (thousands of) forecasters in forecaster table.
id | name
--------------
1 | 'sothebys'
2 | 'cramer'
Relevant forecasts by the forecasters for the categories in the forecast table.
| id | forecaster_id | category_id | forecast |
|----+---------------+-------------+--------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 'bad weather, prices rise short-term' |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 'cocoa bean surplus, prices drop' |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 'we dont deal with autos - no idea' |
| 4 | 2 | 2 | 'sell, sell, sell' |
| 5 | 2 | 3 | 'demand for cocoa will skyrocket - prices up - buy, buy buy' |
I want prioritized mapping of (forecaster, category, forecast) such that, if a forecast exists for some primary forecaster (e.g. 'cramer') use it because I trust him more. If a forecast exists for some secondary forecaster (e.g. 'sothebys') use that. If no forecast exists for a category, return a row with that category and null for forecast.
I have something that almost works and after I get the logic down I hope to turn into parameterized query.
select
case when F1.category is not null
then (F1.forecaster, F1.category, F1.forecast)
when F2.category is not null
then (F2.forecaster, F2.category, F2.forecast)
else (null, C.category, null)
end
from
(
select
FR.name as forecaster,
C.id as cid,
C.category as category,
F.forecast
from
forecast F
inner join forecaster FR on (F.forecaster_id = FR.id)
inner join category C on (C.id = F.category_id)
where FR.name = 'cramer'
) F1
right join (
select
FR.name as forecaster,
C.id as cid,
C.category as category,
F.forecast
from
forecast F
inner join forecaster FR on (F.forecaster_id = FR.id)
inner join category C on (C.id = F.category_id)
where FR.name = 'sothebys'
) F2 on (F1.cid = F2.cid)
full outer join category C on (C.id = F2.cid);
This gives:
'(sothebys,wine,"bad weather, prices rise short-term")'
'(cramer,chocolate,"sell, sell, sell")'
'(cramer,autos,"demand for cocoa will skyrocket - prices up - buy, buy buy")'
'(,"real estate",)'
While that is the desired data it is a record of one column instead of three. The case was the only way I could find to achieve the ordering of cramer first sothebys next and there is lots of duplication. Is there a better way and how can the tuple like results be pulled back apart into columns?
Any suggestions, especially related to removal of duplication or general simplification appreciated.
This sounds like a case for DISTINCT ON (untested):
SELECT DISTINCT ON (c.id)
fr.name AS forecaster,
c.name AS category,
f.forecast
FROM forecast f
JOIN forecaster fr ON f.forecaster_id = fr.id
RIGHT JOIN category c ON f.category_id = c.id
ORDER BY
c.id,
CASE WHEN fr.name = 'cramer' THEN 0
WHEN fr.name = 'sothebys' THEN 1
ELSE 2
END;
For each category, the first row in the ordering will be picked. Since Cramer has a higher id than Sotheby's, it will be given preference.
Adapt the ORDER BY clause if you need a more complicated ranking.
Related
In my Postgresql 9.3 database I have a table stock_rotation:
+----+-----------------+---------------------+------------+---------------------+
| id | quantity_change | stock_rotation_type | article_id | date |
+----+-----------------+---------------------+------------+---------------------+
| 1 | 10 | PURCHASE | 1 | 2010-01-01 15:35:01 |
| 2 | -4 | SALE | 1 | 2010-05-06 08:46:02 |
| 3 | 5 | INVENTORY | 1 | 2010-12-20 08:20:35 |
| 4 | 2 | PURCHASE | 1 | 2011-02-05 16:45:50 |
| 5 | -1 | SALE | 1 | 2011-03-01 16:42:53 |
+----+-----------------+---------------------+------------+---------------------+
Types:
SALE has negative quantity_change
PURCHASE has positive quantity_change
INVENTORY resets the actual number in stock to the given value
In this implementation, to get the current value that an article has in stock, you need to sum up all quantity changes since the latest INVENTORY for the specific article (including the inventory value). I do not know why it is implemented this way and unfortunately it would be quite hard to change this now.
My question now is how to do this for more than a single article at once.
My latest attempt was this:
WITH latest_inventory_of_article as (
SELECT MAX(date)
FROM stock_rotation
WHERE stock_rotation_type = 'INVENTORY'
)
SELECT a.id, sum(quantity_change)
FROM stock_rotation sr
INNER JOIN article a ON a.id = sr.article_id
WHERE sr.date >= (COALESCE(
(SELECT date FROM latest_inventory_of_article),
'1970-01-01'
))
GROUP BY a.id
But the date for the latest stock_rotation of type INVENTORY can be different for every article.
I was trying to avoid looping over multiple article ids to find this date.
In this case I would use a different internal query to get the max inventory per article. You are effectively using stock_rotation twice but it should work. If it's too big of a table you can try something else:
SELECT sr.article_id, sum(quantity_change)
FROM stock_rotation sr
LEFT JOIN (
SELECT article_id, MAX(date) AS date
FROM stock_rotation
WHERE stock_rotation_type = 'INVENTORY'
GROUP BY article_id) AS latest_inventory
ON latest_inventory.article_id = sr.article_id
WHERE sr.date >= COALESCE(latest_inventory.date, '1970-01-01')
GROUP BY sr.article_id
You can use DISTINCT ON together with ORDER BY to get the latest INVENTORY row for each article_id in the WITH clause.
Then you can join that with the original table to get all later rows and add the values:
WITH latest_inventory as (
SELECT DISTINCT ON (article_id) id, article_id, date
FROM stock_rotation
WHERE stock_rotation_type = 'INVENTORY'
ORDER BY article_id, date DESC
)
SELECT article_id, sum(sr.quantity_change)
FROM stock_rotation sr
JOIN latest_inventory li USING (article_id)
WHERE sr.date >= li.date
GROUP BY article_id;
Here is my take on it: First, build the list of products at their last inventory state, using a window function. Then, join it back to the entire list, filtering on operations later than the inventory date for the item.
with initial_inventory as
(
select article_id, date, quantity_change from
(select article_id, date, quantity_change, rank() over (partition by article_id order by date desc)
from stockRotation
where type = 'INVENTORY'
) a
where rank = 1
)
select ii.article_id, ii.quantity_change + sum(sr.quantity_change)
from initial_inventory ii
join stockRotation sr on ii.article_id = sr.article_id and sr.date > ii.date
group by ii.article_id, ii.quantity_change
I have no control over the data or the database structure. I have this EAV type of data where a consultant can speak one or many languages and he can travel to 1 or many countries in Europe and he has many skills indeed.
FYI there are 10 different main categories in my data.
Some consultants speak 10 languages while other speak only one.
The data looks a bit like this
____________________________________________
| ConsultantID | Category | Value |
--------------------------------------------
| 1 | Language | English |
| 1 | Language | French (fluent) |
| 1 | Language | Spanish (working)|
| 1 | Country | Ireland |
| 1 | Country | Italy |
| 1 | Country | Germany |
| 1 | Country | Belgium |
| 456 | Language | French (working) |
| 456 | Country | Belgium |
| 847 | Language | English |
| 847 | Country | Belgium |
--------------------------------------------
I want to list all consultants willing to travel to Belgium and who speak French (working or fluent). Based on my current example that would be #1 and #456
I wrote the query below which list all values matching a category for a consultant (note this is not dynamic as the number of value in my example is set to 5 max - so already a poor design).
SELECT
ID, category,
MAX(CASE seq WHEN 1 THEN value ELSE '' END ) +
MAX(CASE seq WHEN 2 THEN ',' + value ELSE '' END ) +
MAX(CASE seq WHEN 3 THEN ',' + value ELSE '' END ) +
MAX(CASE seq WHEN 4 THEN ',' + value ELSE '' END ) +
MAX(CASE seq WHEN 5 THEN ',' + value ELSE '' END )
FROM
(SELECT
p1.ID, p1.category, p1.value,
(SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM tblWebPracticeInfo p2
WHERE p2.category = p1.category
AND p2.ID = P1.ID
AND p2.value <= p1.value)
FROM
tblWebPracticeInfo p1) D (ID, category, value, seq )
GROUP BY
ID, category
ORDER BY
ID;
I would then need to query this table...
But without even a where clause it takes already 2 seconds to execute
I have something else more basic (but similarly not efficient)
select *
from tblWebMemberInfo m
where
m.ID in (select p.id from tblWebPracticeInfo p
where p.category = 'Language' and p.value like 'French%')
and m.ID in (select p.id from tblWebPracticeInfo p
where p.category = 'Country' and p.value = 'Belgium')
order by m.ID
That's basically where I am. As you can see nothing genius and nothing which is really working.
Can you point me to the right track.
I'm using SQL Server 2005 - v9.00.1
Many thanks in advance for your time & help
If you just need to list the consultants then you can use exists():
select p.Id ...
from Person p /* Assuming you have a regular table for people,
if not, use distinct or group by */
where exists (
select 1
from tblWebPracticeInfo l
where l.Id = p.Id
and l.Category = 'Language'
and l.Value = 'French'
)
and exists (
select 1
from tblWebPracticeInfo c
where c.Id = p.Id
and c.Category = 'Country'
and c.Value = 'Belgium'
)
You could also use aggregation and having like so:
select ConsultantID
from tblWebMemberInfo m
where (p.category = 'Language' and p.value like 'French%')
or (p.category = 'Country' and p.value = 'Belgium')
group by ConsultantID
having count(*) = 2 /* number of conditions to match is 2 */
Let's say I have this 3 tables
Countries ProvOrStates MajorCities
-----+------------- -----+----------- -----+-------------
Id | CountryName Id | CId | Name Id | POSId | Name
-----+------------- -----+----------- -----+-------------
1 | USA 1 | 1 | NY 1 | 1 | NYC
How do you get something like
---------------------------------------------
CountryName | ProvinceOrState | MajorCities
| (Count) | (Count)
---------------------------------------------
USA | 50 | 200
---------------------------------------------
Canada | 10 | 57
So far, the way I see it:
Run the first SELECT COUNT (GROUP BY Countries.Id) on Countries JOIN ProvOrStates,
store the result in a table variable,
Run the second SELECT COUNT (GROUP BY Countries.Id) on ProvOrStates JOIN MajorCities,
Update the table variable based on the Countries.Id
Join the table variable with Countries table ON Countries.Id = Id of the table variable.
Is there a possibility to run just one query instead of multiple intermediary queries? I don't know if it's even feasible as I've tried with no luck.
Thanks for helping
Use sub query or derived tables and views
Basically If You You Have 3 Tables
select * from [TableOne] as T1
join
(
select T2.Column, T3.Column
from [TableTwo] as T2
join [TableThree] as T3
on T2.CondtionColumn = T3.CondtionColumn
) AS DerivedTable
on T1.DepName = DerivedTable.DepName
And when you are 100% percent sure it's working you can create a view that contains your three tables join and call it when ever you want
PS: in case of any identical column names or when you get this message
"The column 'ColumnName' was specified multiple times for 'Table'. "
You can use alias to solve this problem
This answer comes from #lotzInSpace.
SELECT ct.[CountryName], COUNT(DISTINCT p.[Id]), COUNT(DISTINCT c.[Id])
FROM dbo.[Countries] ct
LEFT JOIN dbo.[Provinces] p
ON ct.[Id] = p.[CountryId]
LEFT JOIN dbo.[Cities] c
ON p.[Id] = c.[ProvinceId]
GROUP BY ct.[CountryName]
It's working. I'm using LEFT JOIN instead of INNER JOIN because, if a country doesn't have provinces, or a province doesn't have cities, then that country or province doesn't display.
Thanks again #lotzInSpace.
I've got two Tables Called Manu and Cars
Manufacturer | Employees | id
Toyota | 102346 | 1
Subaru | 284608 | 2
Kia | 268244 | 3
Suzuki | 228624 | 4
The second table Cars
Car | id
Corolla | 1
camry | 1
alto | 4
vitara | 4
forester | 2
impreza | 2
xv | 2
cerato | 3
celica | 1
Now the table Cars references back to table Manu through Id
Im trying to return manufacturers that have produced 2 or more models of cars.
So far what I have tried is
Select m.id, m.manufacturer
from Manu m
inner join Cars n on m.id = n.id
group by m.id having count(n.id) >= 2;
it tells me that column m.id must appear in group by clause or be used in an aggregate function. Very confused.
Thanks
First we'll get the number of cars by manufacturer:
SELECT id,COUNT(id) FROM cars GROUP BY id;
Next, we'll use that data to get the manufacturers that make more than two models:
SELECT s.id,s.count,m.manufacturer FROM
(SELECT id,COUNT(id) FROM cars GROUP BY id) s
JOIN manu m USING (id) WHERE s.count >= 2;
Actually you have already give the answer. just you didnt group by m.manufactorer;
Select m.id, m.manufactorer
from Manu m
inner join Cars n using(id)
group by m.id,m.manufactorer
having count(*) >= 2;
I have some tables which are related to each others.
A short demonstration:
Sites:
id | clip_id | article_id | unit_id
--------------+------------+--------
1 | 123 | 12 | 7
Clips:
id | title | desc |
------------+--------
1 | foo2 | abc1
Articles:
id | title | desc | slug
------------+---------------------
1 | foo2 | abc1 | article.html
Units:
id | vertical_id | title |
------------------+-------+
1 | 123 | abc |
Verticals:
id | name |
-----------+
1 | vfoo |
Now I want to do something like below:
SELECT ALL VERTICAL, UNIT, SITE, CLIP, ARTICLE attributes
from VERTICAL, UNIT, SITE, CLIP, ARTICLE TABLES
WHERE vertical_id = 2
Can some one help me how can I use joins for this?
Here is a running example of possibly what you want: http://sqlfiddle.com/#!15/af63b/2
select * from
sites
inner join units on sites.unit_id=units.id
inner join clips on clips.id=sites.clip_id
inner join articles on articles.id=sites.article_id
inner join verticals on verticals.id=units.vertical_id
where units.vertical_id=123
The problem is, that the description you gave us did not clearly specify which columns to join:
(answered) Why does units have a link to site via site_id and sites a link back to units via unit_id?
(answered) Why does units have a link to verticals via vertical_id and verticals a link back to units via unit_id?
I am guessing that your data does not giva a consistent example to get rows using the join. For vertical_id=123 there is no corresponding entry in verticals.
Edit:
I corrected the SQL due to corrections within the question. With this the two questions are answered.
select s.id, s.clip_id, s.article_id, u.title, u.vertical_id, c.title, v.unit_id, c.desc, a.slug
from sites s
join units u on s.id = u.id
join clips c on u.id = c.id
join verticals v on c.id = v.id
join articles a on v.id = a.id
where v.vertical_id = 'any id'