I am currently using the built in citation style 'Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association' as it is the closest to the style that I need. However, the one issue I am having is when it comes to documents with the same first author and year, but different subsequent authors, shown below:
I have a paper by (Elphick, Davies, et al. 2011) and (Elphick, Bergh, et
al. 2011).
What I want is a paper by (Elphick et al. 2011a) and (Elphick et al.
2011b).
I have a very rudimentary knowledge of computer programming, and have been able to work out some small issues I was having using the CSL editor. However, I have not been able to figure out how to resolve this issue. Is anyone able to help me with this? Thanks!
There are multiple ways in CSL 1.0.1 to disambiguate in-text cites that otherwise would look the same. Adding the year-suffixes is the measure of last resort (assuming it's turned on with the "disambiguate-add-year-suffix" attribute on the <citation> tag). In your case, you will want to disable the disambiguation method of adding names of additional persons. You can do this by removing the "disambiguate-add-names" from the same tag. "disambiguate-add-year-suffix" needs to be set to "true".
See http://docs.citationstyles.org/en/1.0.1/specification.html#disambiguation for documentation.
If you share your entire <citation> tag (with all the attributes and their values) here I can tell you whether you'd need to remove any other disambiguation attributes (the only other one is "disambiguate-add-givenname", but it doesn't look like that's active in your style)
Related
I have googled (well, DuckDuckGo'ed, actually) till I'm blue in the face, but cannot find a list of language codes of the type en-GB or fr-CA anywhere.
There are excellent resources about the components, in particular the W3C I18n page, but I was hoping for a simple alphabetical listing, fairly canonical if possible (something like this one). Cannot find.
Can anyone point me in the right direction? Many thanks!
There are several language code systems and several region code systems, as well as their combinations. As you refer to a W3C page, I presume that you are referring to the system defined in BCP 47. That system is orthogonal in the sense that codes like en-GB and fr-CA simply combine a language code and a region code. This means a very large number of possible combinations, most of which make little sense, like ab-AX, which means Abkhaz as spoken in Åland (I don’t think anyone, still less any community, speaks Abkhaz there, though it is theoretically possible of course).
So any list of language-region combinations would be just a pragmatic list of combinations that are important in some sense, or supported by some software in some special sense.
The specifications that you have found define the general principles and also the authoritative sources on different “subtags” (like primary language code and region code). For the most important parts, the official registration authority maintains the three- and two-letter ISO 639 codes for languages, and the ISO site contains the two-letter ISO 3166 codes for regions. The lists are quite readable, and I see no reason to consider using other than these primary resources, especially regarding possible changes.
There are 2 components in play here :
The language tag which is generally defined by ISO 639-1 alpha-2
The region tag which is generally defined by ISO 3166-1 alpha-2
You can mix and match languages and regions in whichever combination makes sense to you so there is no list of all possibilities.
BTW, you're effectively using a BCP47 tag, which defines the standards for each locale segment.
Unicode maintains such a list :
http://unicode.org/repos/cldr-tmp/trunk/diff/supplemental/index.html
Even better, you can have it in an XML format (ideal to parse the list) and with also the usual writing systems used by each language :
http://unicode.org/repos/cldr/trunk/common/supplemental/supplementalData.xml
(look in /LanguageData)
One solution would be to parse this list, it would give you all of the keys needed to create the list you are looking for.
http://www.iana.org/assignments/language-subtag-registry/language-subtag-registry
I think you can take it from here http://www.unicode.org/cldr/charts/latest/supplemental/territory_language_information.html
This can be found at Unicode's Common Locale Data Repository. Specifically, a JSON file of this information is available in their cldr-json repo
We have a working list that we work off of for language code/language name referencing for Localizejs. Hope that helps
List of Language Codes in YAML or JSON?
List of primary language subtags, with common region subtags for each language (based on population of language speakers in each region):
https://www.unicode.org/cldr/charts/latest/supplemental/language_territory_information.html
For example, for English:
en-US (320,000,000)
en-IN (250,000,000)
en-NG (110,000,000)
en-PK (100,000,000)
en-PH (68,000,000)
en-GB (64,000,000)
(Jukka K. Korpela and tigrish give good explanations for why any combination of language + region code is valid, but it might be helpful to have a list of codes most likely to be in actual use. s-f's link has such useful information sorted by region, so it might also be helpful to have this information sorted by language.)
I search for an timeline graph for version control systems (like git, svn, cvs, ...) with its creation dates, ancestors and versions. I've found nothing like that.
If there is no such graph, what tool can I use to create such graphs like this or this?
Edit: I've made one for myself: https://aaron-fischer.net/zed
I'd recommend that you look into:
graphviz, for visualizing graphs, and which has a variety of incarnations. First choice, very flexible language that should let you do what you want with a little programming to automate generating the graphs. (Including things like the dotted lines from your first example.
igraph, which is a library for R, Python, etc for working with
(and visualizing) graphs.
cytoscape, network (in the graph theory) analysis.
gephi, which is similar to cytoscape.
Also consider mind-mapping software like Freemind, Xmind, etc.
In all cases, these tools can display the hierarchical network that describes your data, though adding dates/times might be difficult. (Graphviz lets you place nodes exactly where you want, so you might add the time scale in another program. In any case, you'd need to do some programming to munge the actual VCS data into something graphable.)
A suitable graph for your requirement is called Sankey chart.
It is usually used to describe flow and transitions. It can be adapted to show source control revisions. You can use the width of the line to present the number of line codes changed, and colors to present different release version etc.
Another nice implementation for this is evolines.
Another option that is a bit simpler is using a SpaceTree like the one InfoViz (http://thejit.org/). Check their demo below:
http://thejit.org/static/v20/Jit/Examples/Spacetree/example1.html
I'm struggling with the size of output files for large Modelica models. Off course, I can protect some objects in order to remove them completely from the result file. However, that gives rise to two problems:
it's not possible to redeclare protected objects
if i want to test my model in detail (eg for a short time period), i need to declare those objects publicly again in order to see their variables
I wonder if there's a trick to set the 'verbosity' of a Modelica model. Maybe what I would like is a third keyword next to public, protected, eg. transparent. Then, when setting up a simulation, I want be able to set the verbosity level to 1, or 2 with the following effect:
1--> consider all transparentelements as protected
2--> consider all transparentelements as public
This effect would propagate to all models and submodels.
I don't think this already exists. But is there an easy workaround?
Thanks,
Roel
As Michael Tiller wrote above, this is not handled the same way in all Modelica tools and there is no definite answer. To give an OpenModelica-specific answer, it's possible to use simulate(ModelName,outputFilter="regex"), to store only the variables that fully match the given regex (default is .*, matching any variable).
Roel,
I know several people wrestling with this issue. At the moment, all of this depends on the tool being used. I don't know how other tools handle filtering of results, but in Dymola you control it (as you point out) by giving the signals special qualifiers (e.g. protected).
One thing I've done in the past is to extend from a model and then add a bunch of output signals for things I'm interested in. Then you can select "Outputs" in Dymola to make sure those get in the results file. This is far from perfect because a) listing everything you want can get tedious and b) referencing protected variables is not strictly allowed (although Dymola lets you get away with it but issues a warning).
At Dassault, we are actively discussing this idea and hope to provide some better functionality along these lines. It isn't clear whether such functionality will be strictly tool specific or whether it will involve the language somehow. But if it is language related, we will (of course) work with the design group to formulate a specification that other tool vendors can support as well.
In SystemModeler, you go to the Settings tab in the Experiment Browswer in Simulation Center. Click on Output on the bottom and select which variables to store.
(The options are state variables, derivatives, algebraic variables, parameters, protected variables and if you mark the Store simulation log-option, you'll get some interesting statistics on events over time and function evaluations, opening another possibility to track down parts of the simulation and model that creates more evaluations)
I am not sure if this helps you, but in Dymola you can go to Simulation->Setup->Output and mark a checkbox saying "Store Protected variables". That way it is possible to declare most variables as protected: during normal simulation they are not stored, but when debugging your model, you just mark that checkbox and they are stored.
Of course that is not the same as your suggested keyword transparent, but maybe it helps a little...
A bit late, but in Dymola 2013 FD01 and later you can select which variables to store based on names (and model names) using the annotation __Dymola_selections, and even filter on user-defined tags - so you could create a tag name "transparent" in the model. See "Matching and variable selections" in the manual.
I'm curious if anyone understands, knows or can point me to comprehensive literature or source code on how Google created their popular passage blocks feature. However, if you know of any other application that can do the same please post your answer too.
If you do not know what I am writing about here is a link to an example of Popular Passages. When you look at the overview of the book Modelling the legal decision process for information technology applications ... By Georgios N. Yannopoulos you can see something like:
Popular passages
... direction, indeterminate. We have
not settled, because we have not
anticipated, the question which will
be raised by the unenvisaged case when
it occurs; whether some degree of
peace in the park is to be sacrificed
to, or defended against, those
children whose pleasure or interest it
is to use these things. When the
unenvisaged case does arise, we
confront the issues at stake and can
then settle the question by choosing
between the competing interests in the
way which best satisfies us. In
doing... Page 86
Appears in 15 books from 1968-2003
This would be a world fit for
"mechanical" jurisprudence. Plainly
this world is not our world; human
legislators can have no such knowledge
of all the possible combinations of
circumstances which the future may
bring. This inability to anticipate
brings with it a relative
indeterminacy of aim. When we are bold
enough to frame some general rule of
conduct (eg, a rule that no vehicle
may be taken into the park), the
language used in this context fixes
necessary conditions which anything
must satisfy... Page 86
Appears in 8 books from 1968-2000
more
It must be an intensive pattern matching process. I can only think of n-gram models, text corpus, automatic plagisrism detection. But, sometimes n-grams are probabilistic models for predicting the next item in a sequence and text corpus (to my knowledge) are manually created. And, in this particular case, popular passages, there can be a great deal of words.
I am really lost. If I wanted to create such a feature, how or where should I start? Also, include in your response what programming languages are best suited for this stuff: F# or any other functional lang, PERL, Python, Java... (I am becoming a F# fan myself)
PS: can someone include the tag automatic-plagiarism-detection, because i can't
Read this ACM paper by Kolak and Schilit, the Google researchers who developed Popular Passages. There are also a few relevant slides from this MapReduce course taught by Baldridge and Lease at The University of Texas at Austin.
In the small sample I looked over, it looks like all the passages picked were inline or block quotes. Just a guess, but perhaps Google Books looks for quote marks/differences in formatting and a citation, then uses a parsed version of the bibliography to associate the quote with the source. Hooray for style manuals.
This approach is obviously of no help to detect plagiarism, and is of little help if the corpus isn't in a format that preserves text formatting.
If you know which books are citing or referencing other books you don't need to look at all possible books only the books that are citing each other. If is is scientific reference often line and page numbers are included with the quote or can be found in the bibliography at the end of the book, so maybe google parses only this informations?
Google scholar certainly has the information about citing from paper to paper maybe from book to book too.
I have taken over a large code base and would like to get an overview how and where certain classes and their methods are used.
Is there any good tool that can somehow visualize the dependencies and draw a nice call tree or something similar?
The code is in C++ in Visual Studio if that helps narrow down any selection.
Here are a few options:
CodeDrawer
CC-RIDER
Doxygen
The last one, doxygen, is more of an automatic documentation tool, but it is capable of generating dependency graphs and inheritance diagrams. It's also licensed under the GPL, unlike the first two which are not free.
When I have used Doxygen it has produced a full list of callers and callees. I think you have to turn it on.
David, thanks for the suggestions. I spent the weekend trialing the programs.
Doxygen seems to be the most comprehensive of the 3, but it still leaves some things to be desired in regard to callers of methods.
All 3 seem to have problems with C++ templates to varying degrees. CC-Rider simply crashed in the middle of the analysis and CodeDrawer does not show many of the relationships. Doxygen worked pretty well, but it too did not find and show all relations and instead overwhelmed me with lots of macro references until I filtered them out.
So, maybe I should clarify "large codebase" a bit for eventual other suggestions: >100k lines of code overall spread out over more than 100 template files plus several actual class files pulling it all together.
Any other tools out there, that might be up to the task and could do better (more thoroughly)? Oh and specifically: anything that understands IDL and COM interfaces?
When I have used Doxygen it has produced a full list of callers and callees. I think you have to turn it on.
I did that of course, but like I mentioned, doxygen does not consider interfaces between objects as they are defined in the IDL. It "only" shows direct C++ calls.
Don't get me wrong, it is already amazing what it does, but it is still not complete from my high level view trying to get a good understanding of how everything fits together.
In Java I would start with JDepend. In .NET, with NDepend. Don't know about C++.