Drools - Accumulate logic - drools

I need help in writing the accumulate logic for below requirement:
Requirement: Certain rules will provide the percentage to be applied for global value. Another set of rules should use the aggregate total percentage in determining the result.
For example: 0.75 is the global value passed as input(threshold).
Rule 1 might apply -10% of the fixed value ie. 0.75 - (0.75 * 0.10) = 0.675
Rule2 will apply + 20% off updated value. ie., 0.675 + (0.675 * 0.20) = 0.81
My global value is 0.75 (Threshold)
Using the below rules I am trying to applied the percentage applicable for a fixed value :
//class imports
global Double FIXED_THRESHOLD;
//Rules
rule "Prediction Rule_2"
lock-on-active true
no-loop true
salience (2)
when
LossInput (airBagDeployed == 'Y' , driveable == 'N')
result : RuleResult(predictedTotalsThreshold == 0)
then
insert(new ControlFact( -10.0 ) ); //Reduce -10% to global value 0.75 - 0.75* 0.10 = 0.675
System.err.println("New control fact added to working memory....");
end
rule "Prediction Rule_1"
lock-on-active true
no-loop true
salience (1)
when
LossInput (airBagDeployed == 'Y' , driveable == 'N', make == 'Honda' )
result : RuleResult(predictedTotalsThreshold == 0)
then
insert(new ControlFact( 20.0 ) ); // Add 20% to the updated aggregate (0.20 % of 0.675).
System.err.println("New control fact added to working memory....");
end
I tried the below accumulate logic but obviously it is wrong. It is applying only to fixed value always instead of the updated value.
rule "Aggregate All Threshold"
no-loop true
when
$aggregateTotalsThresholdPercentage : Number() from accumulate(
ControlFact( $totalsThreshold : totalsThresholdPercentage ),
sum( ( FIXED_THRESHOLD + ( FIXED_THRESHOLD * $totalsThreshold ) / 100 ) ) )
ruleResult: RuleResult(predictedTotalsThreshold == 0)
then
ruleResult.setPredictedTotalsThreshold($aggregateTotalsThresholdPercentage.doubleValue());
update(ruleResult);
end
POJO:
public class LossInput{
private String airBagDeployed;
private String driveable;
private String make;
}
public class ControlFact {
public double totalsThresholdPercentage;
}
public class RuleResult {
private double predictedTotalsThreshold;
}
//insert facts in working memory
kieSession.insert(lossInput);
kieSession.insert(ruleResult);
kieSession.setGlobal("FIXED_THRESHOLD", new Double(0.75));
kieSession.fireAllRules();
Please help on the accumulate logic to apply the updated value everytime when percentage threshold to be applied.

You cannot use accumulate/sum this way because you add the FIXED_THRESHOLD for each ControlFact.
Insert ControlFacts as you have in the "Prediction..." rules (without all the rule attributes). Use each ControlFact to update RuleResult's predictedTotalsThreshold. The "Aggregate" rule will fire repeatedly, and therefore you need to make sure to retract the used ControlFact.
rule "Aggregate All Threshold"
when
ControlFact( $ttp: totalsThresholdPercentage );
$res: RuleResult( $ptt: predictedTotalsThreshold)
then
double nt = $ptt + $ptt*$ttp/100;
modify( $res ){ setPredictedTotalsThreshold( $nt ) }
retract( $res );
end

Related

drools how to fire specified group dynamically

i am using drools 7.x.
my logic looks like following:
if(variableA == 1) {
if(variableA1 == 2) {
....
} else if(variableA1 == 3) {
....
}
}else {
if(variableB1 == 1) {
....
}else if(variableB1 == 2) {
if(variableN == 1) {
}else if(variableN == 2) {
}
}
}
by the way, these variables not in the same class, i intend to insert them as fact in drl.
how can i define the rules? or how can i define rules like :
rule 1
when
then
end
rule 2
when
then
end
rule 1-1
when
then
end
rule 1-2
when
then
end
rule 2-1
when
then
end
rule 2-2
when
then
end
wherein, only one of rules will be fired in rule 1 and rule 2, rule 1-1 and rule 1-2 is group1, rule 2-1 and rule 2-2 is group2.
if rule 1 is fired, then only one of rules is fired in group1, there is no need to test group2. While if rule 2 is fired, then only one of rules is fired in group2, there is no need to test group1.
salience for rules priority
logical insertions to depend on other rule
activation-group for xor logic
rule "1"
salience 1
activation-group "group 0"
when
$model : Model(a == 1)
then
insertLogical(new GroupActivation("group 1", $model));
System.out.println("rule 1");
end
rule "2"
salience 1
activation-group "group 0"
when
$model : Model(b == 1)
then
insertLogical(new GroupActivation("group 2", $model));
System.out.println("rule 2");
end
rule "1-1"
activation-group "group 1"
when
GroupActivation(name == "group 1", $model : model)
Model(this == $model, a1 == 1)
then
System.out.println("rule 1-1");
end
rule "1-2"
activation-group "group 1"
when
GroupActivation(name == "group 1", $model : model)
Model(this == $model, a2 == 1)
then
System.out.println("rule 1-2");
end
rule "2-1"
activation-group "group 2"
when
GroupActivation(name == "group 2", $model : model)
Model(this == $model, b1 == 1)
then
System.out.println("rule 2-1");
end
rule "2-2"
activation-group "group 2"
when
GroupActivation(name == "group 2", $model : model)
Model(this == $model, b2 == 1)
then
System.out.println("rule 2-2");
end
Model.java
public class Model {
private int a;
private int a1;
private int a2;
private int b;
private int b1;
private int b2;
...
GroupActivation.java
public class GroupActivation {
private String name;
private Model model;
...
I'm going to assume all of these variables exist inside of an class which I'm going to call Inputs. You'd call these rules by passing an instance of Inputs into the rules.
I'm also going to assume that the last 'else if' in your example was a type and you're actually checking that variableN == 2.
rule "A1-2"
when
Inputs( variableA == 1,
variableA1 == 2 )
then
// ...
end
rule "A1-3"
when
Inputs( variableA == 1,
variableA1 == 3 )
then
// ...
end
rule "B1"
when
Inputs( variableA != 1,
variableB1 == 1 )
then
// ...
end
rule "B2-N1"
when
Inputs( variableA != 1,
variableB1 == 2,
variableN == 1 )
then
// ...
end
rule "B2-N2"
when
Inputs( variableA != 1,
variableB1 == 2,
variableN == 2 )
then
// ...
end
Rather straight forward. The key is that you need to check that the condition for variableA ==1 is not true for the rules that deal with B. Basically when you're converting an if/elsif/else into rules, you need to negate the conditions from the previous if-clauses on your left-hand-side.
There's no "specified groups" involved. Mostly because there's no explanation about what you mean by these words.
Drools also has inheritance. There's no real reason to use it here, but you could if you wanted to:
rule "A1"
when
$i: Inputs(variableA == 1)
then // notice empty "then"
end
rule "A1 = 2" extends "A1"
when
Inputs( variableA1 == 2 ) from $i
then
//
end

Drools variable binding: reassignment not allowed

Assume that MyObject is a Java Object with an integer property called integerProperty.
I would like to write a Drools rule like the following (syntactically incorrect):
rule "myRule"
when
MyObject( $integerProperty : integerProperty )
accumulate(
$o : MyObject(
integerProperty == $integerProperty + 1,
$integerProperty : this.integerProperty
);
$total : count($o);
$total > 10
)
then
[BLABLABLA]
end
I want to fire my rule when there is a set of more than 10 elements of type MyObject whose integerProperty values form an arithmetic sequence, e.g. 1, 2, 3, … In this case, I will assign a negative value to an HardMediumSoftLongScore object (hoping that information this helps).
I am sure that an MyObject having a given integerProperty is unique (eg. there is just one MyObject having integerProperty equal to, say, 2). The problem is that I'm not allowed to re-assign the variable binding $integerProperty. Is there a way around this?
Try implementing the below example and check whether you are getting your desired output. Before firing the rule insert the previous object as a global variable (prev in the example below) in the drool session.
global MyObject prev;
rule "myRule"
when
$total : Number(doubleValue > 10) from accumulate(
$o : MyObject( prev.getIntegerProperty() != null && $i : integerProperty == prev.getIntegerProperty() + 1),
init( double total = 0;),
action( total += 1; ),
reverse( total -= 1; ),
result( new Double( total ) ) )
then
[BLABLABLA]
end
In your java code before firing the rule set the previous object as a global object. Follow the code below :
kieSession.setGlobal("prev",myprevobject)
kieSession.insert(myobject)
kieSession.fireAllRules()

Drools rules execution hangs

The following rule hangs drools:
rule "Sound the alarm in case temperature rises above threshold"
when
$m1 : TempReading( temp >= 35 )
Number( doubleValue >= 2 ) from accumulate(
TempReading( temp >= 35, this after[0s, 1m] $m1 ),
init( double total = 0; ),
action( total += 1; ),
reverse( total -= 1; ),
result( total ) )
then
System.out.println("Temp over max")
end
I have log statements in ObjectXXXEvents which are all logged tight away.
It looks like this:
Object inserted
com.sample.DroolsTest$TempReading#6bab2585
Object inserted
com.sample.DroolsTest$TempReading#a486d78
Object inserted
com.sample.DroolsTest$TempReading#cdc3aae
Object inserted
com.sample.DroolsTest$TempReading#7ef2d7a6
Object inserted
com.sample.DroolsTest$TempReading#5dcbb60
I have log statements for matchCreated, matchCancelled, beforeMatchFired and afterMatchFired and NONE of them are logged.
If I change the clockType to psuedo it exits but the rule does not fire.
What gives?

Drools: how to use abbreviated condition notation together with further conditions?

Using Drools 6.5.0.Final
I want to use abbreviated combined relation condition (e.g. Person( age > 30 && < 40 )) in combination with additional conditions.
I tried it, but the resulting rules are executed more than once.
I have a small example, where temperature deviation from a setpoint is checked and the allowed deviations depend on the setpoint. The allowed deviations are configured with Param facts, see below.
If I execute the example (fire-all-rules):
rule 1 fires two times (bug?)
rule 2 fires once as expected (without abbreviated notation).
Is my usage of the abbreviated notation wrong or is this a bug?
Example rules:
declare Param
from : float
to : float
low : float
high : float
end
declare TemperatureEvent
#role( event )
id : String
setpoint : float
t : float
end
rule "Init abbreviated conditions test"
when
then
insert(new Param(0, 10, 1, 1));
insert(new Param(10,20, 2, 3));
insert(new TemperatureEvent("id1", 13.7f,11.5f));
// rule 1 and rule 2 should fire exactly once
end
rule "rule 1"
when
$p: Param()
$x : TemperatureEvent($p.from <= setpoint && < $p.to, (t < setpoint+$p.low || t > setpoint+$p.high))
then
System.out.println("rule 1: "+$x.getId()+" "+$x.getSetpoint()+" "+$x.getT());
end
rule "rule 2"
when
$p: Param()
$x : TemperatureEvent($p.from <= setpoint, setpoint < $p.to, (t < setpoint+$p.low || t > setpoint+$p.high))
then
System.out.println("rule 2: "+$x.getId()+" "+$x.getSetpoint()+" "+$x.getT());
end
The abbreviated restriction
$p.from <= setpoint && < $p.to
is equivalent to
$p.from <= setpoint && $p.from < $p.to
What you want is
setpoint >= $p.from && < $p.to

Check whether the sum in a list is greater than 100

I have to write a drool function on a list which has to do the following thing
create a summation
check whether the summation is greater than 100.
below is the drool rule I have created
rule "001"
when
$charge : MainClass(subList.size() > 0)
$item : SubListClass(number < 0) from $charge.subOrderROList
$total : Number() from accumulate(SubListClass( $p : number ),sum( $p )
then
int index = $charge.SubListClass.indexOf($item)+1;
violations.error(kcontext, "ad", "ad.message", new String[]{String.valueOf(index),$item.getNumber().toString()},index);
end`
I am not able to check whether the $total is greater than 100
thanks
This would be correct if it were possible to obtain a sum > 100 by adding negative numbers. I have kept the constraints as they were in the Q, so change this as appropriate. Maybe number > 0?
rule "001"
when
$charge: MainClass(subList.size() > 0)
$total: Number( intValue > 100 )
from accumulate( SubListClass($p: number < 0)
from $charge.subOrderROList,
sum( $p ) )
then