I am trying to delete all report_details before bulkCreate/insert the new ones. The problem is when there is an error in bulkCreate it does not rollback. It should bring the destroyed report_details back but it is not working.
The way i am testing this transaction code is I insert the report_details and then manually change one column name so that when inserting again it gives column error. and transaction should rollback but in actual report_details are destroyed and on bulkCreate error it does not bring back destroyed report_details
can some one please take a look on my code. I have search on google my syntax is correct.
and how do i test transactions on my machine ? instead of changing the column name is there any other way to produce error?
function saveReportsDetails(results) {
db.report_detail.bulkCreate(results.report.objAllReportsDetail);
return db.snpreq.transaction(t => {
// transaction block
return db.report_detail.destroy({
where: {
profile_id: results.profile.data[0].id
}
}, {
transaction: t
}).then(deleted => {
console.log('*******TRANSACTION DELETED*********');
return db.twenreport_detail.bulkCreate(results.report.objAllReportsDetail, {
transaction: t
}).then(reports_created => {
console.log('*******TRANSACTION bulk created*********');
});
});
}).then(transaction => {
console.log('********All Transaction********');
}).catch(err => {
console.log('*******ROLL BACK*********');
});
}
There was error in m code syntax. In delete transaction it takes transaction: t in single argument
like this
return db.twentythree_and_me_report_detail.destroy({
where: {
profile_id: results.profile.data[0].id
},
transaction: t
})
I was not receiving any kind of syntax error or any other error. so, i just kept search and found answer
Related
I need to add a column to my table of riders, allowing us to store the name of the image that will display on that rider's card. I then need to update all of the records with the auto-generated image names.
I've done a bunch of searching, and all roads seem to lead back to this thread or this one. I've tried the code from both of these threads, swapping in my own table and column names, but I still can't get it to work.
This is the latest version of the code:
export async function up(knex, Promise) {
return knex.transaction(trx => {
const riders = [
{
name: 'Fabio Quartararo',
card: 'rider_card_FabioQuartararo'
},
...24 other riders here...
{
name: 'Garrett Gerloff',
card: 'rider_card_GarrettGerloff'
},
];
return knex.schema.table('riders', (table) => table.string('card')).transacting(trx)
.then(() =>{
const queries = [];
riders.forEach(rider => {
const query = knex('riders')
.update({
card: rider.card
})
.where('name', rider.name)
.transacting(trx); // This makes every update be in the same transaction
queries.push(query);
});
Promise.all(queries) // Once every query is written
.then(() => trx.commit) // We try to execute all of them
.catch(() => trx.rollback); // And rollback in case any of them goes wrong
});
});
}
When I run the migration, however, it fails with the following error:
migration file "20211202225332_update_rider_card_imgs.js" failed
migration failed with error: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'all')
Error running migrations: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'all')
at D:\Users\seona\Documents\_Blowfish\repos\MotoGP\dist\database\migrations\20211202225332_update_rider_card_imgs.js:134:25
at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:96:5)
So it's clearly having some sort of problem with Promise.all(), but I can't for the life of me figure out what. Searching has not turned up any useful results.
Does anyone have any ideas about how I can get this working? Thanks in advance.
I think you might be following some older documentation and/or examples (at least that's what I was doing).
The Promise argument is no longer passed into the migration up and down functions.
So, the signature should be something like this:
function up(knex) {
// Use the built in Promise class
Promise.all(<ARRAY_OF_QUERY_PROMISES>);
...
}
I have an onSnapshot keeping track of the documents in a collection:
db.collection('/.../').onSnapshot(querySnapshot=> mylocalvariable = querySnapshot.docs)
Now, I want to select the first (in some order) element of this collection of documents that my user has not yet handled. When a user is done handling a document, I use a transaction to update the document according to the user's needs (transaction is better for me than .update() because I might have multiple users changing different parts of the document).
The problem is that unlike a .update (which would update mylocalvariable immediately), it seems like the transaction finishes without updating mylocalvariable. So, when I go to grab the "next" document, it just grabs the same document, because the function runs before the variable gets updated.
Code sample:
db.collection('/mycollection').onSnapshot(querySnapshot=> mylocalvariable = querySnapshot.docs)
function selectnextrecord(){
nextrecord = mylocalvariable.find(x=>!x.data().done)
console.log(nextrecord)
//expected: Get something different than the current record
//observed: This is being run with old data, so it returns the same record that I currently have with the old data.
}
let nextrecord;
selectnextrecord();
function submitchanges(){
let sfDocRef = db.collection('/mycollection').doc(nextrecord.id);
return db.runTransaction(function(transaction) {
return transaction.get(sfDocRef).then(function(sfDoc) {
if (!sfDoc.exists) {
throw "Document does not exist!";
}
transaction.update(sfDocRef, {done:true});
});
}).then(function() {
selectnextrecord();
}).catch(function(error) {
console.log("Transaction failed: ", error);
});
}```
After going through the documentation, I think this is expected behavior.
Do not modify application state inside of your transaction functions. Doing so will introduce concurrency issues, because transaction functions can run multiple times and are not guaranteed to run on the UI thread. Instead, pass information you need out of your transaction functions
In any case, you could filter the documents that are not done with .where() and then place your transaction inside a foreach:
db.collection('cities')
.where("done", "==", true)
.get()
.then(snapshot => {
snapshot.forEach(doc => {
return db.runTransaction(function(transaction) {
return transaction.get(sfDocRef).then(function(sfDoc) {
if (!sfDoc.exists) {
throw "Document does not exist!";
}
transaction.update(sfDocRef, {done:true});
});
}).catch(function(error) {
console.log("Transaction failed: ", error);
});
})
})
I use PosgreSQL. Now I have an INSERT raw query. I want to know ask 2 questions:
I want to know if it is success or failure when executing it
If success, I want to get the new data I inserted
var querydb = INSERT INTO chat_message VALUES (DEFAULT, '${text}',
'${created_at}', '${room_id}', '${user_id}');
sequelize.query(querydb, { type: sequelize.QueryTypes.INSERT})
.then(insertID => {
resolve(insertID)
})
.catch(err => {
reject(err)
})
First of all you shouldn't be using raw queries until unless you are not able to do anything with sequelize.js , or else there is no use of using this library.
Use sequelize.js as much as possible , so that you can use default functionality very easily.
So this is how you can do the same thing in sequelize.js way :
ChatMessage.create({
text: text,
room_id: room_id,
user_id: user_id
created_at: new Date() // Not required , it will be auto managed by sequlize
}).then(message => {
console.log(message);
// you can now access the newly ChatMessage task via the variable message
}).catch(err => {
// catch error if anything goes wrong
})
I have requirement where in need to create the record from SAPui5 application,
For that we have Form and enterthe all details and submit to the data base.
Now i need to validate the first field value, if that value exist in the system/DB need to populate the error, like this record already exist during livechange.
For E.g., Input fields are as follows.
Empld : 121
EmpName : tom
On Change of Empid value need to check 121 record exist in the database or not.
Following are the blogs refereed for the solution but didn't get the solution for the same.
https://blogs.sap.com/2015/10/19/how-to-sapui5-user-input-validations/
https://blogs.sap.com/2015/11/01/generic-sapui5-form-validator/
As i"m new to SAPUI5.Please help me with the coding.
Thanks in advance.
I don't know how much you are aware of Requests to the Backend but maybe you could make a Read Operation and check if there is any data returned:
First solution could be like this (with Entity key):
this.getOwnerComponent().getModel().read("/EntityPath", {
success: function(oData, response) {
if(oData.results.length === 0) {
console.log("Nothing found for this key");
}
},
error: function(oError) {
//Error Handling here
}
});
Or you could build a Filter, pass it to the read operation and check if there is any data returned:
var aFilter = new sap.m.Filter(new Filter("EmpId", sap.m.FilterOperator.EQ, "value"));
this.getOwnerComponent().getModel().read("/EntitySet", {
filters: aFilter,
success: function(oData, response) {
if(oData.results.length === 0) {
console.log("User is not available");
}
},
error: function(oError) {
//Error Handling here
}
});
However, this isn't the best way to check if there is already an entry in your database. You should do this in your Business Logic with Error Messages which get passed to the Frontend.
Hope this helps :-)
I'm trying to do something seemingly simple, update a views counter in MongoDB every time the value is fetched.
For example I've tried it with this method.
Meteor.methods({
'messages.get'(messageId) {
check(messageId, String);
if (Meteor.isServer) {
var message = Messages.findOne(
{_id: messageId}
);
var views = message.views;
// Increment views value
Messages.update(
messageId,
{ $set: { views: views++ }}
);
}
return Messages.findOne(
{_id: messageId}
);
},
});
But I can't get it to work the way I intend. For example the if(Meteor.isServer) code is useless because it's not actually executed on the server.
Also the value doesn't seem to be available after findOne is called, so it's likely async but findOne has no callback feature.
I don't want clients to control this part, which is why I'm trying to do it server side, but it needs to execute everytime the client fetches the value. Which sounds hard since the client has subscribed to the data already.
Edit: This is the updated method after reading the answers here.
'messages.get'(messageId) {
check(messageId, String);
Messages.update(
messageId,
{ $inc: { views: 1 }}
);
return Messages.findOne(
{_id: messageId}
);
},
For example the if(Meteor.isServer) code is useless because it's not
actually executed on the server.
Meteor methods are always executed on the server. You can call them from the client (with callback) but the execution happens server side.
Also the value doesn't seem to be available after findOne is called,
so it's likely async but findOne has no callback feature.
You don't need to call it twice. See the code below:
Meteor.methods({
'messages.get'(messageId) {
check(messageId, String);
var message = Messages.findOne({_id:messageId});
if (message) {
// Increment views value on current doc
message.views++;
// Update by current doc
Messages.update(messageId,{ $set: { views: message.views }});
}
// return current doc or null if not found
return message;
},
});
You can call that by your client like:
Meteor.call('messages.get', 'myMessageId01234', function(err, res) {
if (err || !res) {
// handle err, if res is empty, there is no message found
}
console.log(res); // your message
});
Two additions here:
You may split messages and views into separate collections for sake of scalability and encapsulation of data. If your publication method does not restrict to public fields, then the client, who asks for messages also receives the view count. This may work for now but may violate on a larger scale some (future upcoming) access rules.
views++ means:
Use the current value of views, i.e. build the modifier with the current (unmodified) value.
Increment the value of views, which is no longer useful in your case because you do not use that variable for anything else.
Avoid these increment operator if you are not clear how they exactly work.
Why not just using a mongo $inc operator that could avoid having to retrieve the previous value?