When changing to Twitter4J 4.0.6 my code, that I inherited, uses PropertyConfiguration static fields. pre 4.0.6 the static fields were public. so twitter4j.conf.PropertyConfiguration.OAUTH_CONSUMER_KEY was a valid thing to do. in 4.0.6 these fields are now private. So my [inherited] code no longer compiles.
what is the protocol now for getting the values of these fields in 4.0.6?
I have researched this and found nothing on the change. I did find a lot of examples for pre 4.0.6 where the static fields were used just like my code does. Is there documentation, or are there examples, for these fields in twitter4j 4.0.6?
Related
I am new to Doxygen but I want to use it for a technical documentation for our team.
The background: We have several services in .NET which are going to be called from a JAVA backend through RPC.
Therefore it is quite useful to have those services documented for the JAVA guys.
Using the Doxywizard did help in the first place, but it created a huge overflow of data, which I want to filter, but have no clue how to.
What I want to achieve is, that Doxygen ONLY will use methods, which does have a specific attribute.
For example:
[RpcMethod(id: "GetNumDemo", description: "A demo method")]
public async Task<int> GetNumDemo(JavaDTO dtoObject, int randNum)
I want to have the method within the documentation found by Doxygen since it has the RpcMethod attribute and also cause it have a JavaDTO object, I want to have this class documented as well.
But I am overwhelmed with it ... do you guys can help me? ... at least with a hint within the Doxygen documentation.
Read through the documentation and goodled
We are using several vocabularies along with schema.org and struggle with the structured data testing tool from Google. Is is even possible to completely pacify it when mixing vocabularies?
Some of the classes and properties we use are specializations of classes and properties of schema.org.
I have read the page about the extension mechanism. It is completely unclear to me what external extensions actually are. It is completely unclear to me if and how it is possible to communicate to Google that a class/property is a specialization of a schema.org class/property (so that Google uses RDFS reasoning to get statements involving the schema.org namespace).
The example I am using is http://www.netestate.de/imgtag_schema_example/lio.html
The RDFa in that page describes the image shown. The <img> tag in the source has a typeof attribute.
If I use typeof="lio:Image", I get 1 error about lio:Image not being known to Google. Makes sense. Validation URL: http://www.netestate.de/imgtag_schema_example/lio.html
If I use typeof="lio:Image schema:ImageObject", I get exactly the same error. Validation URL: http://www.netestate.de/imgtag_schema_example/lioschema.html
If I use typeof="schema:ImageObject", I get 19 errors about properties not recognized as compatible with ImageObject. Validation URL: http://www.netestate.de/imgtag_schema_example/schema.html
If I use typeof="schema:ImageObject lio:Image", I get 1 error about a class that is not known to Google (the class is not named but "ImageObject" is red!). Validation URL: http://www.netestate.de/imgtag_schema_example/schemalio.html
If I use typeof="lio:Image" and add the statement lio:Image rdfs:subClassOf schema:ImageObject to the RDFa, the validator separates the triples about http://purl.org/net/lio#Image ("class not defined, no errors") and the image (unknown class #__sid=rd0, 1 error). Validation URL: http://www.netestate.de/imgtag_schema_example/liosubclass.html
Where does the relative URI #__sid=rd0 come from?
Why is the error about #__sid=rd0 missing in this simpler example?
http://www.netestate.de/imgtag_schema_example/minimal.html
Don't let any Google Structured Data Testing Tool complaints about unknown vocabulary bother you. Its main purpose it to help publishers understand when they are using structures which Google products/features expect and use. Generally it will only understand the schema.org parts (and won't exploit subtypes to other vocabularies). You might find using the additionalType property helps make some errors go away. The __sid=rd0 ID is just a generated URI for what RDF would consider a 'blank node' in the graph.
I'am testing the new Core Sportlight API feature in iOS 9. The indexing process works well but is there a way to define that the indexed Item should only get searched by the "title" Attribute instead of "title" and "description"?
Maybe you already have some more informations than me.
I have tried doing this using Objective C, and it works perfectly.
It depends on what implementation of "CSSearchableAttributeSet" is used.
In obj C, there are many implementations of CSSearchableAttributeSet like
CSSearchableItemAttributeSet_General
CSSearchableItemAttributeSet_Document
CSSearchableItemAttributeSet_Image
and others.
I have used CSSearchableItemAttributeSet_General in my code and I'm able to search by the title attribute only. In fact, that particular implementation of CSSearchableItemAttributeSet doesn't even have a "description" attribute.
So depending on what type of object you want to search for, you can use the particular implementation.
I believe it would be the same equivalent class in swift as well.
-Tejas
I am developing a plugin for NetBeans 8.0 and I created a LookupProvider which is registered like that:
#LookupProvider.Registration(projectType = {
"org-netbeans-modules-ant-freeform",
"org-netbeans-modules-j2ee-archiveproject",
"org-netbeans-modules-j2ee-clientproject",
"org-netbeans-modules-j2ee-earproject",
"org-netbeans-modules-j2ee-ejbjarproject",
"org-netbeans-modules-java-j2seproject",
"org-netbeans-modules-maven",
"org-netbeans-modules-web-clientproject",
"org-netbeans-modules-web-project"
})
I would like to know if there is the possibility to reference the project types from a constant (which is already defined by the NetBeans platform) or do I really have to declare them as strings (like org-netbeans-modules-web-clientproject)?
I believe there are constants for these but the question is if you really want to depend on them. Oftentimes the constants are hidden in the project type's own module that doesn't provider API packages or provides them only to friends. And typically your own primary dependency is on the interface that you implement and put into the lookup. There could be some sort of master list in a public package somewhere but that could always just list the subset of project types. Also please note that for maven you can actually have an unlimited number of constants as we support only registering your LP to a given maven packaging type.
I've got a List of classes I want to send down to a Scala Template in Play! Framework 2.2.3
however I ran into some issues while trying to do so.
The class I want the list to contain is an arbitrary class type that comes from a package outside of my workspace, but not natively from Java. See the picture below.
Note: I do not have a project/Build.scala file.
The above image represents the first line in my scala template, I have tried to use #import as well (#import com.***.***.type._, com.***.***.type.Version, etc) but to no avail.
This is the error message given to me by Play! Framework.
Is there an issue with the namespacing? Everything works fine when using classes located in my workspace.
The Paths are correct, I've double checked that. For reasons I cannot disclose more code in this region, if more information is required please ask for it and I'll edit the post.
The problem is related to package named type. This word is reserved in Scala as language keyword. You need to escape it like this:
#import List[com.your.package.`type`.Version]