I'm creating a medicine reminder web app, that will require the user to enter the data related to medicine and the time at which the reminder will be shown.
So is there any way to store the user input time in the mongodb, there is a type to store date, but couldn't find anything to store time.
This is the mongoose schema
const mongoose = require('mongoose')
const Schema = mongoose.Schema
const medicineSchema = new Schema({
title: {
type: String,
required: true
},
count: {
type: Number,
required: true
},
about: {
type: String
},
time: {
type: TimeRanges,
required: true
}
}, { timestamps: true })
module.exports = mongoose.model('Medicine', medicineSchema)
I tried timeranges but it shows timeranges is not defined, and I don't think timeranges will store time input.
Taking user input through the form
I am using String SchemaType with Date() object.
// Set current date TimeStamp, eg: '1666512804163'
TimeStamp: new Date().getTime().toString()
// Display saved TimeStamp, eg: '23/10/2022'
new Date(parseInt(TimeStamp)).toLocaleDateString()
I am new to mongoose and I was strugling whole day trying to understand populate. I managed to do simple examples but now I created two schemas:
First which is UserSchema with some user details:
const UserSchema: mongoose.Schema = new mongoose.Schema ({
name: String,
email: String
});
And second which is MatchSchema witch I want to be populated with user details but I am not sure if something like this will work:
const MatchSchema: mongoose.Schema = new mongoose.Schema ({
player_one: {
id: String,
score: Number,
player_details: {
type: mongoose.Schema.Types.ObjectId,
ref: 'User'
}
},
player_two: {
id: String,
score: Number,
player_details: {
type: mongoose.Schema.Types.ObjectId,
ref: 'User'
}
},
winner: String
},{timestamps: true});
Probably I used something which wont work and any help will be appriciated.
You need to create a Mongoose model using the UserSchema and name it 'User'. You can then create a Match model using the MatchSchema. Assuming the UserSchema and MatchSchema are in the same file, you can add the following:
const User = mongoose.model('User', UserSchema)
const Match = mongoose.model('Match', MatchSchema)
Then when you want to populate the Match model with User data:
let data = Match.find({})
.populate('player_one.player_details')
.populate('player_two.player_details')
I am new to mongodb and wanted to populate two ids using lookup
Eg:
{
"sampleId1": "5kjksds8nkjfhsjfi8kl",
"sampleId2": "7jhjshfi9jsfkjsdfkkk"
}
I am using aggregate framework to query the data and wanted to popualte both ids.
I want $loopup to populate both ids which is similar to
Model.find().populate('sampleId1').populate('sampleId2')
For your case, I want to suggest you mongoose-autopopulate like this
const autopopulate = require('mongoose-autopopulate')'
const sampleSchema = new Schema({
sampleId1: {type: Schema.ObjectId, ref: 'ColleactionName', autopopulate: {select: 'firstName, lastName'}},
sampleId2: {type: Schema.ObjectId, ref: 'ColleactionName', autopopulate: {select: 'firstName, lastName'}}
})
sampleSchema.plugin(autopopulate)
module.exports = mongoose.model('sampleSchema', sampleSchema)
now whenever you request for find it automatically populates all field
who have Schema.ObjectId
let criteria = {},
projection = {},
options = {lean: true}
Model.find(criteria, projection, options, (err, result) => {
console.log(result); // See out-put
})
The second thing you need to check in your schema that sampleId1 and sampleId2 both have type type: Schema.ObjectId with reference of collection name ref: 'ColleactionName'
the second way to this thing which you already have done you question
sampleSchema.
find(...).
populate('sampleId1').
populate('sampleId2').
exec();
so I've been at it for like 4 hours, read the documentation several times, and still couldn't figure out my problem. I'm trying to do a simple populate() to my model.
I have a User model and Store model. The User has a favoriteStores array which contains the _id of stores. What I'm looking for is that this array will be populated with the Store details.
user.model
var mongoose = require('mongoose'),
Schema = mongoose.Schema;
var UserSchema = new Schema({
username: String,
name: {first: String, last: String},
favoriteStores: [{type: Schema.Types.ObjectId, ref: 'Store'}],
modifiedOn: {type: Date, default: Date.now},
createdOn: Date,
lastLogin: Date
});
UserSchema.statics.getFavoriteStores = function (userId, callback) {
this
.findById(userId)
.populate('favoriteStores')
.exec(function (err, stores) {
callback(err, stores);
});
}
And another file:
store.model
var mongoose = require('mongoose'),
Schema = mongoose.Schema;
var StoreSchema = new Schema({
name: String,
route: String,
tagline: String,
logo: String
});
module.exports = mongoose.model('Store', StoreSchema);
After running this what I get is:
{
"_id": "556dc40b44f14c0c252c5604",
"username": "adiv.rulez",
"__v": 0,
"modifiedOn": "2015-06-02T14:56:11.074Z",
"favoriteStores": [],
"name": {
"first": "Adiv",
"last": "Ohayon"
}
}
The favoriteStores is empty, even though when I just do a get of the stores without the populate it does display the _id of the store.
Any help is greatly appreciated! Thanks ;)
UPDATE
After using the deepPopulate plugin it magically fixed it. I guess the problem was with the nesting of the userSchema. Still not sure what the problem was exactly, but at least it's fixed.
I think this issue happens when schemas are defined across multiple files. To solve this, try call populate this way:
.populate({path: 'favoriteStores', model: 'Store'})
I'm using MongoDB as a log keeper for my app to then sync mobile clients. I have this models set up in NodeJS:
var UserArticle = new Schema({
date: { type: Number, default: Math.round((new Date()).getTime() / 1000) }, //Timestamp!
user: [{type: Schema.ObjectId, ref: "User"}],
article: [{type: Schema.ObjectId, ref: "Article"}],
place: Number,
read: Number,
starred: Number,
source: String
});
mongoose.model("UserArticle",UserArticle);
var Log = new Schema({
user: [{type: Schema.ObjectId, ref: "User"}],
action: Number, // O => Insert, 1 => Update, 2 => Delete
uarticle: [{type: Schema.ObjectId, ref: "UserArticle"}],
timestamp: { type: Number, default: Math.round((new Date()).getTime() / 1000) }
});
mongoose.model("Log",Log);
When I want to retrive the log I use the follwing code:
var log = mongoose.model('Log');
log
.where("user", req.session.user)
.desc("timestamp")
.populate("uarticle")
.populate("uarticle.article")
.run(function (err, articles) {
if (err) {
console.log(err);
res.send(500);
return;
}
res.json(articles);
As you can see, I want mongoose to populate the "uarticle" field from the Log collection and, then, I want to populate the "article" field of the UserArticle ("uarticle").
But, using this code, Mongoose only populates "uarticle" using the UserArticle Model, but not the article field inside of uarticle.
Is it possible to accomplish it using Mongoose and populate() or I should do something else?
Thank you,
From what I've checked in the documentation and from what I hear from you, this cannot be achieved, but you can populate the "uarticle.article" documents yourself in the callback function.
However I want to point out another aspect which I consider more important. You have documents in collection A which reference collection B, and in collection B's documents you have another reference to documents in collection C.
You are either doing this wrong (I'm referring to the database structure), or you should be using a relational database such as MySQL here. MongoDB's power relies in the fact you can embed more information in documents, thus having to make lesser queries (having your data in a single collection). While referencing something is ok, having a reference and then another reference doesn't seem like you're taking the full advantage of MongoDB here.
Perhaps you would like to share your situation and the database structure so we could help you out more.
You can use the mongoose-deep-populate plugin to do this. Usage:
User.find({}, function (err, users) {
User.deepPopulate(users, 'uarticle.article', function (err, users) {
// now each user document includes uarticle and each uarticle includes article
})
})
Disclaimer: I'm the author of the plugin.
I faced the same problem,but after hours of efforts i find the solution.It can be without using any external plugin:)
applicantListToExport: function (query, callback) {
this
.find(query).select({'advtId': 0})
.populate({
path: 'influId',
model: 'influencer',
select: { '_id': 1,'user':1},
populate: {
path: 'userid',
model: 'User'
}
})
.populate('campaignId',{'campaignTitle':1})
.exec(callback);
}
Mongoose v5.5.5 seems to allow populate on a populated document.
You can even provide an array of multiple fields to populate on the populated document
var batch = await mstsBatchModel.findOne({_id: req.body.batchId})
.populate({path: 'loggedInUser', select: 'fname lname', model: 'userModel'})
.populate({path: 'invoiceIdArray', model: 'invoiceModel',
populate: [
{path: 'updatedBy', select: 'fname lname', model: 'userModel'},
{path: 'createdBy', select: 'fname lname', model: 'userModel'},
{path: 'aircraftId', select: 'tailNum', model: 'aircraftModel'}
]});
how about something like:
populate_deep = function(type, instance, complete, seen)
{
if (!seen)
seen = {};
if (seen[instance._id])
{
complete();
return;
}
seen[instance._id] = true;
// use meta util to get all "references" from the schema
var refs = meta.get_references(meta.schema(type));
if (!refs)
{
complete();
return;
}
var opts = [];
for (var i=0; i<refs.length; i++)
opts.push({path: refs[i].name, model: refs[i].ref});
mongoose.model(type).populate(instance, opts, function(err,o){
utils.forEach(refs, function (ref, next) {
if (ref.is_array)
utils.forEach(o[ref.name], function (v, lnext) {
populate_deep(ref.ref_type, v, lnext, seen);
}, next);
else
populate_deep(ref.ref_type, o[ref.name], next, seen);
}, complete);
});
}
meta utils is rough... want the src?
or you can simply pass an obj to the populate as:
const myFilterObj = {};
const populateObj = {
path: "parentFileds",
populate: {
path: "childFileds",
select: "childFiledsToSelect"
},
select: "parentFiledsToSelect"
};
Model.find(myFilterObj)
.populate(populateObj).exec((err, data) => console.log(data) );