Let say we have the vector v=[1,2,3] and we want to build the matrix of all the combinations of the numbers contained in v, i.e.
1 2 3
1 3 2
2 1 3
2 3 1
3 1 2
3 2 1
Since I'm not good in recursion, firstly I tried to write the code to build such a matrix by using for loops
makeLoop([1,2,3])
function A = makeLoop(v)
loops=length(v);
for i = 1:loops
dummy=v;
m=factorial(loops)/loops;
A((1+m*(i-1)):m*i,1)=v(i);
v(i)=[];
loops2=length(v);
for j = 1:loops2
dummy2=v;
m2=factorial(loops2)/loops2;
A(((1+m2*(j-1))+m*(i-1)):(m2*j+m*(i-1)),2)=v(j);
v(j)=[];
loops3=length(v);
for k = 1:loops3
m3=factorial(loops3)/loops3;
A(((1+m2*(j-1))+m*(i-1)):(m2*j+m*(i-1)),3)=v(k);
end
v=dummy2;
end
v=dummy;
end
end
it seems like it work, but obviously write it all for a bigger v would be like hell. Anyway I don't understand how to properly write the recursion, I think the recursive structure will be something like this
function A = makeLoop(v)
if length(v)==1
"do the last for loop"
else
"do a regular loop and call makeLoop(v) (v shrink at each loop)"
end
but I don't get which parts should I remove from the original code, and which to keep.
You were very close! The overall structure that you proposed is sound and your loopy-code can be inserted into it with practically no changes:
function A = makeLoop(v)
% number of (remaining) elements in the vector
loops = length(v);
if loops==1 %"do the last for loop"
A = v; %Obviously, if you input only a single number, the output has to be that number
else %"do a regular loop and call makeLoop(v) (v shrink at each loop)"
%preallocate matrix to store results
A = zeros(factorial(loops),loops);
%number of results per vector element
m = factorial(loops)/loops;
for i = 1:loops
%For each element of the vector, call the function again with that element missing.
dummy = v;
dummy(i) = [];
AOut = makeLoop(dummy);
%Then add that element back to the beginning of the output and store it.
A((1+m*(i-1)):m*i,:) = [bsxfun(#times,v(i),ones(m,1)) AOut];
end
end
Explanation bsxfun() line:
First, read the bsxfun documentation, it explains how it works way better than I could. But long story short, with bsxfun() we can replicate a scalar easily by multiplying it with a column vector of ones. E.g. bsxfun(#times,5,[1;1;1]) will result in the vector [5;5;5]. Note that since Matlab 2016b, bsxfun(#times,5,[1;1;1]) can written shorter as 5.*[1;1;1]
To the task at hand, we want to add v(i) in front (as the first column) of all permutations that may occur after it. Therefore we need to replicate the v(i) into the 1. dimension to match the number of rows of AOut, which is done with bsxfun(#times,v(i),ones(m,1)). Then we just horizontally concatenate this with AOut.
You can simply use the perms function to achieve this:
v = [1 2 3];
perms(v)
ans =
3 2 1
3 1 2
2 3 1
2 1 3
1 3 2
1 2 3
If you want them sorted using the same criterion you applied in the desired output, use the following code (refer to this page for an official documentation of the sortrows functon):
v = [1 2 3];
p = perms(v);
p = sortrows(p)
p =
1 2 3
1 3 2
2 1 3
2 3 1
3 1 2
3 2 1
Related
I'm attempting the following as a hobby, not as homework. In Computer Programming with MATLAB: J. Michael Fitpatrick and Akos Ledeczi, there is a practice problem that asks this:
Write a function called alternate that takes two positive integers, n and m, as input arguments (the function does not have to check the format of the input) and returns one matrix as an output argument. Each element of the n-by-m output matrix for which the sum of its indices is even is 1.
All other elements are zero.
A previous problem was similar, and I wrote a very simple function that does what it asks:
function A = alternate(n,m)
A(1:n,1:m)=0;
A(2:2:n,2:2:m)=1;
A(1:2:n,1:2:m)=1;
end
Now my question is, is that good enough? It outputs exactly what it asks for, but it's not checking for the sum. So far we haven't discussed nested if statements or anything of that sort, we just started going over very basic functions. I feel like giving it more functionality would allow it to be recycled better for future use.
Great to see you're learning, step 1 in learning any programming language should be to ensure you always add relevant comments! This helps you, and anyone reading your code. So the first improvement would be this:
function A = alternate(n,m)
% Function to return an n*m matrix, which is 1 when the sum of the indices is even
A(1:n,1:m)=0; % Create the n*m array of zeros
A(2:2:n,2:2:m)=1; % All elements with even row and col indices: even+even=even
A(1:2:n,1:2:m)=1; % All elements with odd row and col indicies: odd+odd=even
end
You can, however, make this more concise (discounting comments), and perhaps more clearly relate to the brief:
function A = alternate(n,m)
% Function to return an n*m matrix, which is 1 when the sum of the indices is even
% Sum of row and col indices. Uses implicit expansion (R2016b+) to form
% a matrix from a row and column array
idx = (1:n).' + (1:m);
% We want 1 when x is even, 0 when odd. mod(x,2) is the opposite, so 1-mod(x,2) works:
A = 1 - mod( idx, 2 );
end
Both functions do the same thing, and it's personal preference (and performance related for large problems) which you should use.
I'd argue that, even without comments, the alternative I've written more clearly does what it says on the tin. You don't have to know the brief to understand you're looking for the even index sums, since I've done the sum and tested if even. Your code requires interpretation.
It can also be written as a one-liner, whereas the indexing approach can't be (as you've done it).
A = 1 - mod( (1:n).' + (1:m), 2 ); % 1 when row + column index is even
Your function works fine and output the desired result, let me propose you an alternative:
function A = alternate(n,m)
A = zeros( n , m ) ; % pre-allocate result (all elements at 0)
[x,y] = meshgrid(1:m,1:n) ; % define a grid of indices
A(mod(x+y,2)==0) = 1 ; % modify elements of "A" whose indices verify the condition
end
Which returns:
>> alternate(4,5)
ans =
1 0 1 0 1
0 1 0 1 0
1 0 1 0 1
0 1 0 1 0
initialisation:
The first line is the equivalent to your first line, but it is the cannonical MATLAB way of creating a new matrix.
It uses the function zeros(n,m).
Note that MATLAB has similar functions to create and preallocate matrices for different types, for examples:
ones(n,m) Create
a matrix of double, size [n,m] with all elements set to 1
nan(n,m) Create a
matrix of double, size [n,m] with all elements set to NaN
false(n,m) Create a
matrix of boolean size [n,m] with all elements set to false
There are several other matrix construction predefined function, some more specialised (like eye), so before trying hard to generate your initial matrix, you can look in the documentation if a specialised function exist for your case.
indices
The second line generate 2 matrices x and y which will be the indices of A. It uses the function meshgrid. For example in the case shown above, x and y look like:
| x = | y = |
| 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 1 1 1 1 |
| 1 2 3 4 5 | 2 2 2 2 2 |
| 1 2 3 4 5 | 3 3 3 3 3 |
| 1 2 3 4 5 | 4 4 4 4 4 |
odd/even indices
To calculate the sum of the indices, it is now trivial in MATLAB, as easy as:
>> x+y
ans =
2 3 4 5 6
3 4 5 6 7
4 5 6 7 8
5 6 7 8 9
Now we just need to know which ones are even. For this we'll use the modulo operator (mod) on this summed matrix:
>> mod(x+y,2)==0
ans =
1 0 1 0 1
0 1 0 1 0
1 0 1 0 1
0 1 0 1 0
This result logical matrix is the same size as A and contain 1 where the sum of the indices is even, and 0 otherwise. We can use this logical matrix to modify only the elements of A which satisfied the condition:
>> A(mod(x+y,2)==0) = 1
A =
1 0 1 0 1
0 1 0 1 0
1 0 1 0 1
0 1 0 1 0
Note that in this case the logical matrix found in the previous step would have been ok since the value to assign to the special indices is 1, which is the same as the numeric representation of true for MATLAB. In case you wanted to assign a different value, but the same indices condition, simply replace the last assignment:
A(mod(x+y,2)==0) = your_target_value ;
I don't like spoiling the learning. So let me just give you some hints.
Matlab is very efficient if you do operations on vectors, not on individual elements. So, why not creating two matrices (e.g. N, M) that holds all the indices? Have a look at the meshgrid() function.
Than you might be able find all positions with an even sum of indices in one line.
Second hint is that the outputs of a logic operation, e.g. B = A==4, yields a logic matrix. You can convert this to a matrix of zeros by using B = double(B).
Have fun!
Suppose that I have a Q vector which is defined as Q = [1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 15]; and I would like to find a way to extract different vectors of consecutive numbers and also a vector for the rest of the elements. So my result would be like:
q1 = [1 2 3 4 5];
q2 = [8 9 10 ];
q3 = [15];
You can do this using diff, cumsum and accumarray:
q = accumarray(cumsum([1, diff(Q)~=1])', Q', [], #(x){x})
which returns:
{[1,2,3,4,5];
[8,9,10];
[15]}
i.e. q{1} gives you [1,2,3,4,5] etc which is a far cleaner solution to having separately named vectors. But if you really really wanted to have them, and you know exactly how many groups you will get out, you can do it as follows:
[q1,q2,q3] = q{:};
Explanation:
accumarray will apply an aggregation function (4th input) to elements of a vector (2nd input) based on groupings specified in another vector (1st input).
To use the notation in the docs:
sub = cumsum([1, diff(Q)~=1])';
val = Q';
fun = #(x){x};
Note that sub needs to start from 1. The idea is to use diff to find elements that are consecutive (i.e. where Q(i+1) - Q(i) == 1) which is vectorized using the diff function. By specifying diff(Q)~=1 we can find the breaks between groups of consecutive numbers (concatenating the 1 at the beginning to force a break at the start). cumsum then just converts these breaks into vector of in the right form for sub i.e.
sub = [1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3]
The aggregation function we specify is just cell concatenation.
I need to find all possible combinations of numbers 1:8 such that sum of all elements is equal to 8
The combinations need to be arranged in an ascending order.
Eg
1 7
2 2 4
1 3 5
1 2 2 3
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
A number can repeat itself. But a combination must not..
i.e 1 2 2 3 and 2 1 2 3
I need the the solution in ascending order So there will be only one possibility of every combination
I tried a few codes online suggested on Find vector elements that sum up to specific number in MATLAB
VEC = [1:8];
NUM = 8;
n = length(VEC);
finans = zeros(2^n-1,NUM);
for i = 1:(2^n - 1)
ndx = dec2bin(i,n) == '1';
if sum(VEC(ndx)) == NUM
l = length(VEC(ndx));
VEC(ndx)
end
end
but they dont include the possibilities where the numbers repeat.
I found a better approach through recursion and it's more elegant (I like elegant) and faster than my previous attempt (0.00399705213 seconds on my computer).
EDIT: You will need my custom function stretchmat.m that stretches a vector to fit the size of another matrix. Kinda like repmat but stretching the first parameter (see help for details). Very useful!
script.m
% Define funciton to prepend a cell x with a variable i
cellprepend = #(x,i) {[i x]};
% Execute and time function
tic;
a = allcomb(cellprepend,1,8); % Solution in a
toc;
allcomb.m
function a = allcomb( cellprepend, m, n )
% Add entire block as a combination
a{1} = n;
% Exit recursion if block size 1
if n == 1
return;
end
% Recurse cutting blocks at different segments
for i = m:n/2
b = allcomb(cellprepend,i,n-i);
a = [a cellfun( cellprepend, b, num2cell( stretchmat( i, b ) ) )];
end
end
So the idea is simple, for solutions that add to 8 is exhaustive. If you look for only valid answers, you can do a depth first search by breaking up the problem into 2 blocks. This can be written recursively as I did above and is kinda similar to Merge Sort. The allcomb call takes the block size (n) and finds all the ways of breaking it up into smaller pieces.
We want non-zero pieces so we loop it from 1:n-1. It then prepends the first block to all the combinations of the second block. By only doing all comb on one of the blocks, we can ensure that all solutions are unique.
As for the sorting, I'm not quite sure what you mean by ascending. From what I see, you appear to be sorting from the last number in ascending order. Can you confirm? Any sort can be appended to the end of script.m.
EDIT 2/3 Notes
For the permutatively unique case, the code can be found here
Thanks to #Simon for helping me QA the code multiple times
EDIT: Look at my second more efficient answer!
The Naive approach! Where the cartprod.m function can be found here.
% Create all permutations
p(1:8) = {0:8};
M = fliplr( cartprod( p{:} ) );
% Check sums
r = sum( M, 2 ) == 8;
M = M(sum( M, 2 ) == 8,:); % Solution here
There are definitely more efficient solutions than this but if you just need a quick and dirty solution for small permutations, this will work. Please note that this made Matlab take 3.5 GB of RAM to temporarily store the permutations.
First save all combinations with repetitions in a cell array. In order to do that, just use nmultichoosek.
v = 1 : 8;
combs = cell(length(v),0);
for i = v
combs{i} = nmultichoosek(v,i);
end
In this way, each element of combs contains a matrix where each row is a combination. For instance, the i-th row of combs{4} is a combination of four numbers.
Now you need to check the sum. In order to do that to all the combinations, use cellfun
sums = cellfun(#(x)sum(x,2),combs,'UniformOutput',false);
sums contains the vectors with the sum of all combinations. For
instance, sums{4} has the sum of the number in combination combs{4}.
The next step is check for the fixed sum.
fixed_sum = 10;
indices = cellfun(#(x)x==fixed_sum,sums,'UniformOutput',false);
indices contains arrays of logical values, telling if the combination satisfies the fixed sum. For instance, indices{4}(1) tells you if the first combination with 4 numbers sums to fixed_sum.
Finally, retrieve all valid combinations in a new cell array, sorting them at the same time.
valid_combs = cell(length(v),0);
for i = v
idx = indices{i};
c = combs{i};
valid_combs{i} = sortrows(c(idx,:));
end
valid_combs is a cell similar to combs, but with only combinations that sum up to your desired value, and sorted by the number of numbers used: valid_combs{1} has all valid combinations with 1 number, valid_combs{2} with 2 numbers, and so on. Also, thanks to sortrows, combinations with the same amount of numbers are also sorted. For instance, if fixed_sum = 10 then valid_combs{8} is
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3
1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2
This code is quite efficient, on my very old laptop I am able to run it in 0.016947 seconds.
How can I construct a scrambled matrix with 128 rows and 32 columns in vb.net or Matlab?
Entries of the matrix are numbers between 1 and 32 with the condition that each row mustn't contain duplicate elements and rows mustn't be duplicates.
This is similar to #thewaywewalk's answer, but makes sure that the matrix has no repeated rows by testing if it does and in that case generating a new matrix:
done = 0;
while ~done
[~, matrix] = sort(rand(128,32),2);
%// generate each row as a random permutation, independently of other rows.
%// This line was inspired by randperm code
done = size(unique(matrix,'rows'),1) == 128;
%// in the event that there are repeated rows: generate matrix again
end
If my computations are correct, the probability that the matrix has repteated rows (and thus has to be generated again) is less than
>> 128*127/factorial(32)
ans =
6.1779e-032
Hey, it's more likely that a cosmic ray will spoil a given run of the program! So I guess you can safely remove the while loop :-)
With randperm you can generate one row:
row = randperm(32)
if this vector wouldn't be that long you could just use perms to find all permutations:
B = perms(randperm(32))
but it's memory-wise too much! ( 32! = 2.6313e+35 rows )
so you can use a little loop:
N = 200;
A = zeros(N,32);
for ii = 1:N
A(ii,:) = randperm(32);
end
B = unique(A, 'rows');
B = B(1:128,:);
For my tests it was sufficient to use N = 128 directly and skip the last two lines, because with 2.6313e+35 possibly permutations the probability that you get a correct matrix with the first try is very high. But to be sure that there are no row-duplicates choose a higher number and select the first 128 rows finally. In case the input vector is relatively short and the number of desired rows close to the total number of possible permutations use the proposed perms(randperm( n )).
small example for intergers from 1 to 4 and a selection of 10 out of 24 possible permutations:
N = 20;
A = zeros(N,4);
for ii = 1:N
A(ii,:) = randperm(4);
end
B = unique(A, 'rows');
B = B(1:10,:);
returns:
B =
1 2 3 4
1 2 4 3
1 3 4 2
2 3 1 4
2 3 4 1
2 4 1 3
2 4 3 1
3 1 2 4
3 1 4 2
3 2 1 4
some additional remarks for the choice of N:
I made some test runs, where I used the loop above to find all permutations like perms does. For vector lengths of n=4 to n=7 and in each case N = factorial(n): 60-80% of the rows are unique.
So for small n I would recommend to choose N as follows to be absolutely on the safe side:
N = min( [Q factorial(n)] )*2;
where Q is the number of permutations you want. For bigger n you either run out of memory while searching for all permutations, or the desired subset is so small compared to the number of all possible permutations that repetition is very unlikely! (Cosmic Ray theory linked by Luis Mendo)
Your requirements are very loose and allow many different possibilities. The most efficient solution I can think off that meets these requirements is as follows:
p = perms(1:6);
[p(1:128,:) repmat(7:32,128,1)]
How in matlab I can interactively append matrix with rows?
For example lets say I have empty matrix:
m = [];
and when I run the for loop, I get rows that I need to insert into matrix.
For example:
for i=1:5
row = v - x; % for example getting 1 2 3
% m.append(row)?
end
so after inserting it should look something like:
m = [
1 2 3
3 2 1
1 2 3
4 3 2
1 1 1
]
In most programming languages you can simply append rows into array/matrix. But I find it hard to do it in matlab.
m = [m ; new_row]; in your loop. If you know the total row number already, define m=zeros(row_num,column_num);, then in your loop m(i,:) = new_row;
Just use
m = [m; row];
Take into account that extending a matrix is slow, as it involves memory reallocation. It's better to preallocate the matrix to its full size,
m = NaN(numRows,numCols);
and then fill the row values at each iteration:
m(ii,:) = row;
Also, it's better not to use i as a variable name, because by default it represents the imaginary unit (that's why I'm using ii here as iteration index).
To create and add a value into the matrix you can do this and can make a complete matrix like yours.
Here row = 5 and then column = 3 and for hence two for loop.
Put the value in M(i, j) location and it will insert the value in the matrix
for i=1:5
for j=1:3
M(i, j) = input('Enter a value = ')
end
fprintf('Row %d inserted successfully\n', i)
end
disp('Full Matrix is = ')
disp(M)
Provably if you enter the same values given, the output will be like yours,
Full Matrix is =
1 2 3
3 2 1
1 2 3
4 3 2
1 1 1