How do I know the exact name of the Groups in my VSTS workItems using Rest APIs.
I know the field names however As I do not know the group name or how to access the group. I am unable to add the field to the group
To get the group name(s), you can use the REST API to get process definition's Layout:
GET https://{accountName}.visualstudio.com/_apis/work/processdefinitions/{processId}/workItemTypes/{witRefName}/layout?api-version=4.1-preview
Such as
GET https://marinaliu.visualstudio.com/_apis/work/processdefinitions/c3c605d0-4ea8-492a-9d26-46612ccb51b1/workItemTypes/Microsoft.VSTS.WorkItemTypes.Bug/layout?api-version=4.1-preview
The response will look like:
{
"pages": [
{
"id": "Scrum.Bug.Bug",
"inherited": true,
"label": "Details",
"pageType": "custom",
"locked": false,
"visible": true,
"isContribution": false,
"sections": [
{
"id": "Section1",
"groups": [
...
{
"id": "2fe29062-685e-4e36-89ba-6415becaebd7",
"label": "Group1",
"isContribution": false,
"visible": true,
"controls": [
{
"id": "8c6bc312-cd08-44a7-a403-5bcbbe9baff1",
"label": "control",
"readOnly": false,
"visible": true,
"contribution": {
"contributionId": "ms-devlabs.vsts-extensions-multivalue-control.multivalue-form-control",
"inputs": {
"FieldName": "Microsoft.VSTS.Common.Activity",
"Values": "control value"
}
},
"isContribution": true
}
]
}
]
}
...
}
And you can get the group name from label parameter under sections and groups objects.
Related
My current data structure is something like this,
"customer": {
"_id": {
"$oid": "623a4b1bdb6d0a1210fd0234"
},
"customerName": "Andrew Jr"
},
I will need to create ACS (Azure Cognitive Search for the above data structure. So I was using something like this:
{
"name": "customer",
"type": "Edm.ComplexType",
"fields":
[
{
"name": "customerName",
"type": "Edm.String",
"searchable": true,
"filterable": true,
"sortable": true,
"facetable": true
}
]
},
But it will throw errors to me when I add the _id as a string data type, for example, below:
{
"name": "customer",
"type": "Edm.ComplexType",
"fields":
[
{
"name": "_id",
"type": "Edm.String",
"searchable": true,
"filterable": true,
"sortable": true,
"facetable": true
},
{
"name": "customerName",
"type": "Edm.String",
"searchable": true,
"filterable": true,
"sortable": true,
"facetable": true
}
]
},
Any ideas how to add the following format to the search?
"_id": {
"$oid": "623a4b1bdb6d0a1210fd0234"
},
Thanks,
Most likely you are getting the error is because of invalid name for the field (_id).
Based on the naming rules defined here, a field name can only contain letters, numbers, underscores ("_") however the first character of the field name must be a letter.
Since you are naming your field as _id, you will get an error.
I need to know if there is a way to delete a user from databricks using email only using SCIM api? As of now I can see it can only delete user by ID which means I need to first retrive the ID of the user and then use it to delete.
I am using this api from powershell to delete users by email.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/databricks/dev-tools/api/latest/scim/scim-users
If you look into the documentation for Get Users command of SCIM Users REST API, you can see that you can specify the filtering condition for it. For example, to find specific user, you can filter on the userName attribute, like this:
GET /api/2.0/preview/scim/v2/Users?filter=userName+eq+example#databricks.com HTTP/1.1
Host: <databricks-instance>
Accept: application/scim+json
Authorization: Bearer dapi48…a6138b
it will return a list of items in the Resources section, from which you can extract user ID that you can use for delete operation:
{
"totalResults": 1,
"startIndex": 1,
"itemsPerPage": 1,
"schemas": [
"urn:ietf:params:scim:api:messages:2.0:ListResponse"
],
"Resources": [
{
"id": "8679504224234906",
"userName": "example#databricks.com",
"emails": [
{
"type": "work",
"value": "example#databricks.com",
"primary": true
}
],
"entitlements": [
{
"value": "allow-cluster-create"
},
{
"value": "databricks-sql-access"
},
{
"value": "workspace-access"
}
],
"displayName": "User 1",
"name": {
"familyName": "User",
"givenName": "1"
},
"externalId": "12413",
"active": true,
"groups": [
{
"display": "123",
"type": "direct",
"value": "13223",
"$ref": "Groups/13223"
}
]
}
]
}
I'm trying to replicate an Azure DevOps process from one organization to another via the AZDO REST Api. I'm working on replicating the layout and am stuck because I can't discover the relationship between a custom field and a picklist when querying the source AZDO instance.
In my scenario I have a test work item type which I've called Issue. On the Issue interface I've created a custom field which is a picklist. While I can retrieve a list of lists via the Rest API and examine the field as well, I can't figure out how the two are related.
Here is a partial payload from the field:
{
"count": 39,
"value": [
...
{
"referenceName": "Custom.IssueSource",
"name": "Issue Source",
"type": "string",
"description": "Who is this attributed to",
"required": true,
"url": "https://dev.azure.com/MYORG/_apis/work/processes/f390103e-7097-4f19-b5b5-f9dbcf92bb6f/behaviors",
"customization": "custom"
},
... ]
}
and here is a partial payload from the lists get query which I used trial and error to determine was the picklist I've assigned:
{
"count": 10,
"value": [
...
{
"id": "2998d4e4-2bec-4935-98a1-b67a0b0b6d5d",
"name": "picklist_e854661e-8620-4ad9-be28-b974c5cb3a5d",
"type": "String",
"isSuggested": false,
"url": "https://dev.azure.com/MYORG/_apis/work/processes/lists/2998d4e4-2bec-4935-98a1-b67a0b0b6d5d"
},
...
]
}
Here is a partial layout response for the WIT:
{
"pages": [
{
"id": "d0171d51-ff84-4038-afc1-8800ab613160.System.WorkItemType.Details",
"inherited": true,
"label": "Details",
"pageType": "custom",
"visible": true,
"isContribution": false,
"sections": [
{
"id": "Section1",
"groups": [
...
{
"id": "bf03e049-5062-4d82-b91d-4396541fbed2",
"label": "Custom",
"isContribution": false,
"visible": true,
"controls": [
{
"id": "Custom.IssueSource",
"label": "Issue Source",
"controlType": "FieldControl",
"readOnly": false,
"visible": true,
"isContribution": false
}
]
}
]
},
... ]
}
Using fiddler against the AZDO web interface, the only time I see a reference to the picklist is from another non-AZDO API to https://dev.azure.com/MYORG/_apis/Contribution/dataProviders/query
Is there a way to discover the link via the AZDO Rest API? I saw this question which was similar but was about creating the link
Figured it out. Turns out you need to query from a different scope - work item tracking rather than work item tracking process:
https://dev.azure.com/MYORG/_apis/wit/fields/Custom.IssueSource?api-version=5.0-preview.2
returns
{
"name": "Issue Source",
"referenceName": "Custom.IssueSource",
"description": "Who is this attributed to",
"type": "string",
"usage": "workItem",
"readOnly": false,
"canSortBy": true,
"isQueryable": true,
...
"isIdentity": false,
--> "isPicklist": true,
"isPicklistSuggested": false,
--> "picklistId": "2998d4e4-2bec-4935-98a1-b67a0b0b6d5d",
"url": "https://dev.azure.com/MYORG/_apis/wit/fields/Custom.IssueSource"
}
I am working on a custom extension for Azure Devops which already contains a service endpoint:
"type": "ms.vss-endpoint.service-endpoint-type"
In addition, I would like to create a custom Release Artifact Source:
“type”: “ms.vss-releaseartifact.release-artifact-type”
Following this documentation, my current struggle is in filling the fields under the Artifact Source using an external API. I tried many patterns in the following ‘resultSelector’ and ‘resultTemplate’, but couldn’t hit one that worked for me.
In my example, I would like to take all the ‘uri’ values under ‘builds’ in the json response and present them in the ‘definition’ inputDescriptor of the Artifact Source. All my attempts resulted in an empty combo-box, even though I can see the request reaching the required API.
The json I would like to parse into the combo-box:
{
"builds": [
{
"uri": "/build1",
"lastStarted": "2018-11-07T13:12:42.547+0000"
},
{
"uri": "/build2",
"lastStarted": "2018-11-09T15:40:30.315+0000"
},
{
"uri": "/build3",
"lastStarted": "2018-11-12T17:46:24.805+0000"
}
],
"uri": "https://<server-address>/api/build"
}
Can you please help me create the Mustache pattern to retrieve the above "uri" values?
I tried:
$.builds[*].uri
which doesn't seem to work.
Here's some more information in case it helps.
Service endpoint's datasources:
"dataSources": [
{
"name": "TestConnection",
"endpointUrl": "{{endpoint.url}}/api/plugins",
"resourceUrl": "",
"resultSelector": "jsonpath:$.values[*]",
"headers": [],
"authenticationScheme": null
},
{
"name": "BuildNames",
"endpointUrl": "{{endpoint.url}}/api/build",
"resultSelector": "jsonpath:$.builds[*].uri"
},
{
"name": "BuildNumbers",
"endpointUrl": "{{endpoint.url}}/api/builds/{{definition}}",
"resultSelector": "jsonpath:$.buildsNumbers[*].uri"
}
]
Artifact source:
"inputDescriptors": [
{
"id": "connection",
"name": "Artifactory service",
"inputMode": "combo",
"isConfidential": false,
"hasDynamicValueInformation": true,
"validation": {
"isRequired": true,
"dataType": "string",
"maxLength": 300
}
},
{
"id": "definition",
"name": "definition",
"description": "Name of the build.",
"inputMode": "combo",
"isConfidential": false,
"dependencyInputIds": [
"connection"
],
"validation": {
"isRequired": true,
"dataType": "string",
"maxLength": 300
}
},
{
"id": "buildNumber",
"name": "Build Number",
"description": "Number of the build.",
"inputMode": "combo",
"isConfidential": false,
"dependencyInputIds": [
"connection"
],
"validation": {
"isRequired": true,
"dataType": "string",
"maxLength": 300
}
}
],
"dataSourceBindings": [
{
"target": "definition",
"dataSourceName": "BuildNames",
"resultTemplate": "{ Value : \"{{uri}}\", DisplayValue : \"{{uri}}\" }"
},
{
"target": "versions",
"dataSourceName": "BuildNumbers",
"resultTemplate": "{ Value : \"{{uri}}\", DisplayValue : \"{{uri}}\" }"
},
{
"target": "latestVersion",
"dataSourceName": "BuildNumbers",
"resultTemplate": "{ Value : \"{{uri}}\", DisplayValue : \"{{uri}}\" }"
},
{
"target": "artifactDetails",
"resultTemplate": "{ Name: \"{{version}}\", downloadUrl : \"{{endpoint.url}}\" }"
},
{
"target": "buildNumber",
"dataSourceName": "BuildNumbers",
"resultTemplate": "{ Value : \"{{uri}}\", DisplayValue : \"{{uri}}\" }"
}
]
}
Any help provided will be highly appreciated.
The working combination for this case is:
dataSources:
{
"name": "BuildNames",
"endpointUrl": "{{endpoint.url}}/api/build",
"resultSelector": "jsonpath:$.builds[*]"
}
dataSourceBindings:
{
"target": "definition",
"dataSourceName": "BuildNames",
"resultTemplate": "{ \"Value\" : \"{{{uri}}}\", \"DisplayValue\" : \"{{{uri}}}\" }"
}
I'm trying to implement a simple app for Google Assistant.
All works fine, but now I have a problem with the "permission" helper :
https://developers.google.com/actions/assistant/helpers#helper_intents
I have an intent connected with webhook to my java application. When an user types a sentence similar to "near to me", I want to ask to him his location and then use lat/lon to perform a search.
es: Brazilian restaurant near to me
my intent "searchRestaurant" is fired
I receive the webhook request and I parse it
if I find a parameter that is connected to a sentence like "near to me", so instead to response with a "Card" or a "List" I return a JSON that represent the helper request :
{
"conversationToken": "[]",
"expectUserResponse": true,
"expectedInputs": [
{
"inputPrompt": {
"initialPrompts": [
{
"textToSpeech": "PLACEHOLDER_FOR_PERMISSION"
}
],
"noInputPrompts": []
},
"possibileIntents": [
{
"intent": "actions.intent.PERMISSION",
"inputValueData": {
"#type": "type.googleapis.com/google.actions.v2.PermissionValueSpec",
"optContext": "Posso accedere alla tua posizione?",
"permission": [
"NAME",
"DEVICE_PRECISE_LOCATION"
]
}
}
]
}
]
}
but something seems to be wrong, and I receive an error:
"{\n \"responseMetadata\": {\n \"status\": {\n \"code\": 10,\n \"message\": \"Failed to parse Dialogflow response into AppResponse because of empty speech response\",\n \"details\": [{\n \"#type\": \"type.googleapis.com/google.protobuf.Value\",\n \"value\": \"{\\"id\\":\\"1cc45c5e-c398-4ea7-98a5-408f31ce142d\\",\\"timestamp\\":\\"2018-08-02T14:45:05.752Z\\",\\"lang\\":\\"it\\",\\"result\\":{},\\"alternateResult\\":{},\\"status\\":{\\"code\\":206,\\"errorType\\":\\"partial_content\\",\\"errorDetails\\":\\"Webhook call failed. Error: Failed to parse webhook JSON response: Cannot find field: conversationToken in message google.cloud.dialogflow.v2.WebhookResponse.\\"},\\"sessionId\\":\\"1533221100163\\"}\"\n }]\n }\n }\n}"
The "conversationToken" is filled, so I don't understand the error message.
Maybe I'm trying to perform the operation in a wrong way.
So, which is the correct way to call this helper?
--> I've created a second intent "askGeolocation" that have "actions_intent_PERMISSION" as "Event", and ... if I understand correctly the documentation, should be trigger if the request for helper is correct.
How can I get this working?
UPDATE :
I find some example of the json response for ask permission and seems that it should be different from the one above that i'm using :
https://github.com/dialogflow/fulfillment-webhook-json/blob/master/responses/v2/ActionsOnGoogle/AskForPermission.json
{
"payload": {
"google": {
"expectUserResponse": true,
"systemIntent": {
"intent": "actions.intent.PERMISSION",
"data": {
"#type": "type.googleapis.com/google.actions.v2.PermissionValueSpec",
"optContext": "To deliver your order",
"permissions": [
"NAME",
"DEVICE_PRECISE_LOCATION"
]
}
}
}
}
}
so, i've implemented it and now the response seems to be good (no more error on parsing it), but i still receive an error on it validation :
UnparseableJsonResponse
API Version 2: Failed to parse JSON response string with 'INVALID_ARGUMENT' error: "permission: Cannot find field."
so, a problem still persist.
Anyone know the cause?
Thanks
After some tests i found the problem.
I was returning a wrong json repsonse with "permission" instead of "permissions":
"permission**s**": [
"NAME",
"DEVICE_PRECISE_LOCATION"
]
So the steps to ask for location are correct. I report them here as a little tutorial in order to help who is facing on it for the first time:
1) In DialogFlow, add some logic to your Intent, in order to understand when is ok to ask to user his location. In my case, i've added a "parameter" that identify sentences like "nearby" and so on.
2) When my Intent is fired i receive to my java application a request like this :
...
"queryResult": {
"queryText": "ristorante argentino qui vicino",
"action": "bycategory",
"parameters": {
"askgeolocation": "qui vicino",
"TipoRistorante": ["ristorante", "argentino"]
},
...
3) If "askgeolocation" parameter is filled, instead to return a "simple message" o other type of message, i return a json for ask the permission to geolocation :
{
"payload": {
"google": {
"expectUserResponse": true,
"systemIntent": {
"intent": "actions.intent.PERMISSION",
"data": {
"#type": "type.googleapis.com/google.actions.v2.PermissionValueSpec",
"optContext": "To deliver your order",
"permissions": [
"NAME",
"DEVICE_PRECISE_LOCATION"
]
}
}
}
}
}
4) You MUST have a second Intent that is configured with "actions_intent_PERMISSION " event :
No training phrases
No Action and params
No Responses
But with Fulfillment active :
5) Once your response arrive to Google Assistant this is the message that appear :
6) Now, if user answer "ok" you receive this json on your webhook :
{
"responseId": "32cf46cf-80d8-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",
"queryResult": {
"queryText": "actions_intent_PERMISSION",
"action": "geoposition",
"parameters": {
},
"allRequiredParamsPresent": true,
"fulfillmentMessages": [{
"text": {
"text": [""]
}
}],
"outputContexts": [{
"name": "projects/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
}, {
"name": "projects/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",
"parameters": {
"PERMISSION": true
}
}, {
"name": "projects/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
}, {
"name": "projects/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
}, {
"name": "projects/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
}, {
"name": "projects/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
}],
"intent": {
"name": "projects/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",
"displayName": "geoposition"
},
"intentDetectionConfidence": 1.0,
"languageCode": "it"
},
"originalDetectIntentRequest": {
"source": "google",
"version": "2",
"payload": {
"isInSandbox": true,
"surface": {
"capabilities": [{
"name": "actions.capability.MEDIA_RESPONSE_AUDIO"
}, {
"name": "actions.capability.SCREEN_OUTPUT"
}, {
"name": "actions.capability.AUDIO_OUTPUT"
}, {
"name": "actions.capability.WEB_BROWSER"
}]
},
"requestType": "SIMULATOR",
"inputs": [{
"rawInputs": [{
"inputType": "KEYBOARD"
}],
"arguments": [{
"textValue": "true",
"name": "PERMISSION",
"boolValue": true
}],
"intent": "actions.intent.PERMISSION"
}],
"user": {
"lastSeen": "2018-08-03T08:55:20Z",
"permissions": ["NAME", "DEVICE_PRECISE_LOCATION"],
"profile": {
"displayName": ".... full name of the user ...",
"givenName": "... name ...",
"familyName": "... surname ..."
},
"locale": "it-IT",
"userId": "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
},
"device": {
"location": {
"coordinates": {
"latitude": 45.xxxxxx,
"longitude": 9.xxxxxx
}
}
},
"conversation": {
"conversationId": "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",
"type": "ACTIVE",
"conversationToken": "[]"
},
"availableSurfaces": [{
"capabilities": [{
"name": "actions.capability.SCREEN_OUTPUT"
}, {
"name": "actions.capability.AUDIO_OUTPUT"
}, {
"name": "actions.capability.WEB_BROWSER"
}]
}]
}
},
"session": "projects/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
}
that contains, name/surname and latitude/longitude. This information can be saved in your application, in order to not perform again this steps.
I hope this helps.
Davide
In your intent, you can ask for a parameter with a custom Entity. This you can do like this:
entity you can define as "near"
put all the synonyms for near for which you want to trigger location permission in this entity
do not mark this parameter as "required"
do not put any prompt
in the training phrases, add some phrases with this parameter
in your webhook, keep a check on the parameter, if present ask for permission if not continue.
add a permission event to another intent
do your post permission processing in that intent
Entity
Intent
I hope you get it.
There are samples on this topic specifically that guide you through exactly what's needed for requesting permissions in Node and Java.
Note: There are helper intents samples available in Node and Java as well.