The request to
POST v1.0/groups
with the body:
{
"description": "hello",
"displayName": "group_for_restore",
"groupTypes": [
"Unified"
],
"mailEnabled": true,
"mailNickname": "group_for_restore",
"securityEnabled": false,
"visibility": "Public"
}
returns the id of the created group. But on the web interface this group does not appear.
That is why the request to
POST v1.0/planner/plans
with the body:
{
"owner": "{group-id}", // from the request above
"title": "group_for_restore"
}
returns such JSON:
{
"error": {
"code": "",
"message": "You do not have the required permissions to access this item, or the item may not exist.",
"innerError": {
"request-id": "d6d74776-e4cc-4cb2-bf87-20e3510b6f8c",
"date": "2018-03-27T14:39:00"
}
}
} (status code 403)
So it seems to me that it failed to create whole group (with all necessary content). I was trying to wait (2-5 min ... when the group will appear on the web interface), after that I could easily create a plan.
How can I properly guess the time when a group will be created or which request should be sent to check that it has been created successfully?
You shouldn't "guess", instead use periodic polling.
After creating the group, try polling groups/{id}/drive in 2-5 minute intervals. Once the Drive is available the Group has been provisioned.
Related
I followed the guide here: https://developers.facebook.com/docs/marketing-api/offline-conversions
Unlike "regular" Event Sets, which includes a "Test Events" tab in its dashboard, offline event sets don't seem to have this feature. You must either upload a CSV or call the API.
However, the offline event set shows no data coming from the API at all; the history tab only shows the CSV uploads, which were "last received 10 days ago". It doesn't even include the test upload I made today.
Is this a bug? How long should I wait for the data to appear in the events manager for my offline event?
Sample call
POST https://graph.facebook.com/v15.0/<offline_event_set_id>/events?access_token=<system_user_access_token>
{
"upload_tag": "store_data",
"data": [
{
"match_keys": {
"em": "<hashed>",
"ph": "<hashed>"
},
"currency": "PHP",
"value": 100,
"event_id": "test",
"event_name": "Purchase",
"event_time": "1669633380",
"custom_data": {
"event_source": "in_store"
},
"action_source": "physical_store",
"order_id": "test",
"data_processing_options": []
}
]
}
The response is as follows:
{"id":"<offline_event_set_id>","num_processed_entries":1}
Which seems to indicate that the event was uploaded successfully. But that event never shows up in the Overview tab of that offline event set.
Would appreciate any insights/guides elsewhere/answers, I've spent a few days on this with no success.
The "error": I was encoding the event_time as a string, whereas Facebook expects this value to be an integer. After updating my POST body to correct that, the events started showing up within minutes in the Overview tab.
{
"upload_tag": "store_data",
"data": [
{
"match_keys": {
"em": "<hashed>",
"ph": "<hashed>"
},
"currency": "PHP",
"value": 100,
"event_id": "test",
"event_name": "Purchase",
"event_time": 1669633380, // <-- The only change was removing the quotes
"custom_data": {
"event_source": "in_store"
},
"action_source": "physical_store",
"order_id": "test",
"data_processing_options": []
}
]
}
I really wish Facebook had returned some kind of error or warning, but at least I found the issue. Be careful with your data types, people!
I'm having a hard time trying to figure out how to properly use the Marketo REST API using Postman for testing purpose.
So far I can Authenticate and get my access_token,
but when I try to create a folder... (properly authenticated)
endpoint: [POST] /rest/asset/v1/folders.json
body:
{
"description": "Test Folder",
"name": "Test",
"parent": {
"id": 1,
"type": "Folder"
}
}
I get:
{
"success": false,
"errors": [
{
"message": "name cannot be null.",
"code": "701"
},
{
"message": "parent cannot be null",
"code": "701"
}
],
"requestId": "408a#1720c00a893",
"warnings": []
}
I don't know what I'm doing wrong.
See an example in the Marketo API documentation
Create/Update folder request should be an application/x-www-form-urlencoded not application/json
So in Postman, you have to post a form with three parameters:
parent={"id":416,"type":"Folder"}
name=Test 10 - deverly
description=This is a test
For the parent parameter you should specify a specific json-like text, which is a usual format for folderId
For generic folders (not programs) you can provide just integer id, without JSON structure, this is not recommended but can be used for manual API tests
I have a requirement to dynamically add/remove or enable disable approval and checks at azure DevOps pipeline environment.
Is there a rest api for this?
Is there a rest api for this?
Yes, it has. BUT, as what the #Krysztof said, we haven't provide such api documents to public as of today. This is because what you are looking for is one feature (configure Check and approval from environments ) that only support for YAML pipeline, and until now, we are developing but does not publish the corresponding rest api (for YAML) docs.
But, as work around, you can catch these apis from F12. Just do action from UI, then capture and analyze corresponds api records to found out what you are expecting.
Here I make the summary to you.
The api that used to add/delete approval and check to environment is:
https://dev.azure.com/{org name}/{project name}/_apis/pipelines/checks/configurations
The corresponding api method for add or delete is Post and DELETE.
Firstly, share you the request body samples which for approval and check added.
1) Add approval to this environment:
{
"type": {
"id": "8C6F20A7-A545-4486-9777-F762FAFE0D4D", // The fixed value for Approval
"name": "Approval"
},
"settings": {
"approvers": [
{
"id": "f3c88b9a-b49f-4126-a4fe-3c99ecbf6303" // User Id
}
],
"executionOrder": 1,
"instructions": "",
"blockedApprovers": [],
"minRequiredApprovers": 0,
"requesterCannotBeApprover": false // The pipeline requester allow to approve it.
},
"resource": {
"type": "environment",
"id": "1", // Environment id
"name": "Deployment" //Environment name
},
"timeout": 43200 // Set the available time(30d) of this approval pending. The measure unit is seconds.
}
2) Add task check, Azure function, Invoke rest api task and etc:
{
"type": {
"id": "fe1de3ee-a436-41b4-bb20-f6eb4cb879a7", // Fixed value if you want to add task check
"name": "Task Check" //Fixed value
},
"settings": {
"definitionRef": {
"id": "537fdb7a-a601-4537-aa70-92645a2b5ce4", //task Id
"name": "AzureFunction", //task name
"version": "1.0.10" //task version
},
"displayName": "Invoke Azure Function", //task display name configured
"inputs": {
"method": "POST",
"waitForCompletion": "false",
"function": "csdgsdgsa",
"key": "436467543756" // These are all task inputs
},
"retryInterval": 5, // The re-try time specified.
"linkedVariableGroup": "AzKeyGroup"// The variable group name this task linked with
},
"resource": {
"type": "environment",
"id": "2",
"name": "Development"
},
"timeout": 43200
}
In this request body, you can find the corresponding task id from our public source code. Just check the task.json file of corresponding task.
3) Add template check:
{
"type": {
"id": "4020E66E-B0F3-47E1-BC88-48F3CC59B5F3", // Fixed value for template check added.
"name": "ExtendsCheck" //Fixed value
},
"settings": {
"extendsChecks": [
{
"repositoryType": "git", // github for Github source, bitbucket for Bitbucket source
"repositoryName": "MonnoPro",
"repositoryRef": "refs/heads/master",
"templatePath": "tem.yml"
}
]
},
"resource": {
"type": "environment",
"id": "6",
"name": "development"
}
}
In this body, if the template source is coming from github or bitbucket, the value of repositoryName should like {org name}/{repos name}.
Hope these are helps.
This is an older question but we had a similar need. There does not appear to be a direct API To query this, but this GitHub Project pointed us in the right direction:
# GET ENVIRONMENT CHECKS (stored under .fps.dataProviders.data['ms.vss-pipelinechecks.checks-data-provider'].checkConfigurationDataList)
GET https://dev.azure.com/{{organization}}/{{project}}/_environments/{{environment_id}}/checks?__rt=fps&__ver=2
As mentioned above under .fps.dataProviders.data['ms.vss-pipelinechecks.checks-data-provider'].checkConfigurationDataList the list of who is authorized is provided.
The officially documented APIs can tell you that there are checks in place; for example:
GET https://dev.azure.com/{organization}/{project}/_apis/pipelines/checks/configurations?resourceType=environment&resourceId={id}
Can tell you that you have checks enabled (including an Approval check) but this isn't super useful as it does not give a list of who can Approve.
Note that you can get the list of environments (to get their resource ID) using this documented API:
GET https://dev.azure.com/{organization}/{project}/_apis/distributedtask/environments?api-version=7.1-preview.1
This is not supported at the moment. You can upvote feature request to show your interest here.
I'm testing Google Calendar API with service account and JWT authentication server to server.
All runs fine except when I try to create an event inside a calendar I receive the error
"code": 403,
"message": "Calendar usage limits exceeded."
The problem appears only when I add an attendee to the event.
If I try to create the same event in the same calendar without any attendee, al works fine.
I receive the same error if I try to add the attendee in a second moment after event creation.
So, at this time, I cannot invite any person to any event programmatically.
For me this is a very big problem.
Can you help me?
Thanks!
EDIT:
I'm using ApiRest with ServiceAccount and JWT token.
This is a sample running fine:
POST https://www.googleapis.com/calendar/v3/calendars/{{calendarId}}/events?access_token={{access_token}}
{
"end": {
"dateTime": "2020-01-17T14:50:05Z"
},
"start": {
"dateTime": "2020-01-17T13:50:05Z"
},
"summary": "prova",
}
while this one returns error
POST https://www.googleapis.com/calendar/v3/calendars/{{calendarId}}/events?access_token={{access_token}}
{
"end": {
"dateTime": "2020-01-17T14:50:05Z"
},
"start": {
"dateTime": "2020-01-17T13:50:05Z"
},
"attendees":[{"email":"xxxxxxxxxxxxx#gmail.com"}],
"summary": "prova",
}
returns
{
"error": {
"errors": [
{
"domain": "usageLimits",
"reason": "quotaExceeded",
"message": "Calendar usage limits exceeded."
}
],
"code": 403,
"message": "Calendar usage limits exceeded."
}
}
There is no difference between POST and PUT method that implements respectively event creation and event update.
When I add any attendee, the result is always error.
Searching about your issue I found out it's been a well-known problem for a while and it's been reported on Issue Tracker in these threads:
Service account is unable to invite calendar groups to calendar events
Unable to set reminders via API request
Can't send notification through service account calendar
I'm trying to create a report definition using the GoodData REST API. I use the following endpoint to invoke the rest call.
"/gdc/md/{project-id}/obj"
When i try to invoke the API call with the following dataset in which the projectId and the userId are valid, it gives me the error with the response code 500.
{
"reportDefinition": {
"content": {
"filters": [],
"format": "grid",
"grid": {
"rows": [],
"columns": [
"metricGroup"
],
"sort": {
"columns": [],
"rows": []
},
"columnWidths": [],
"metrics": [
{
"uri": "/gdc/md/qy48iv4flikdlcwpwioizuip74wt8nb5/obj/63f3cecd2a8d3ce2ec9378381c8f39e3",
"alias": ""
}
]
}
},
"meta": {
"title": "Sample report definition",
"summary": "This is a sample report",
"tags": "",
"deprecated": 0,
"category": "samplecategory"
}
}
}
{
"error": {
"message": "Internal server error. Please fill in bug report with request_id='lp78FL5S1IPMqB2n'"
}
}
I'm certain that the user project_id and the user_id are valid. Is this an error in the API?
Thank you in advance.
Apart from the metrics URI that looks weird (hash instead of numeric ID), I was able to dig in our logs an error that says: "Category is not equal to tag structure".
In your example you have its value set to "samplecategory". "category" property defines what type of object are you creating. If you are creating a report definition it should have value of "reportDefinition".
Last time I worked with GoodData API, metrics had numeric IDs. That seems most likely to be the culprit. Where did you get "/gdc/md/qy48iv4flikdlcwpwioizuip74wt8nb5/obj/63f3cecd2a8d3ce2ec9378381c8f39e3" from, especially the "63f3cecd2a8d3ce2ec9378381c8f39e3" part?