I see an example explains KATP for Kotlin JVM, which is working.
I wonder if it supports Kotlin JS? Is there any example?
No, kapt does not support Kotlin/JS. kapt integrates into the Java compiler and uses its annotation processing API, and none of this exists in the Kotlin/JS compilation pipeline.
I found a library that does it https://github.com/Foso/MpApt
From README:
I wrote an annotation processing libary that can detect annotations in Kotlin Native/JS and Jvm projects, because Kapt is only working with KotlinJvm. The library can be used in Kotlin Compiler plugins. Tested with Kotlin 1.3.41, 1.3.50, 1.3.71
Related
I would like to cross-build some of my Bazel targets to Scala 2.12 and 2.13. As a further point of complexity, I need to be able to express cross-target dependencies (eg. some 2.13 target may have a Bazel dependency on a 2.12 target).
Note: this isn't a regular library dependency (eg. with the dependency 2.12-built JAR showing up on the class path when compiling the 2.13 JAR), as that would almost surely result in issues due to having two incompatible versions of the Scala standard library on the class path. Rather, this is just a case where I need the dependency JAR built so I can use it in some integration tests in the 2.13 target.
What I've found online so far...
This issue from rules_scala seems it doesn't support baking the Scala version into the target and instead you have to pick the Scala version globally.
This Databricks post has a cross-building section that is exactly what I think I would like (eg. one target generated per library per supported Scala version), but the snippets in that post don't seem to be backed by any runnable Bazel code.
This later post by Databricks also hints at a cross_scala_lib rule, but also doesn't have any accompanying code.
I had been using Scalariform in a project I upgraded to Scala 2.11. In doing so, I discovered that Scalariform does not appear to have an artifact published for 2.11 in any of the usual places. This makes the usual sbt cross-version dependency unhappy.
As 2.11 has been out for a while already, this has me questioning if the usage of Scalariform as an embedded library should be considered abandoned? Has the community moved on to an alternative I just don't know about?
Scalafmt is an alternative code formatter that does compile to 2.11 and can be used as an embedded library. An up-to-date usage example is here https://olafurpg.github.io/scalafmt/#Standalonelibrary
I've got a Scala project that is built with Gradle. The Scala code is source compatible with scala 2.9 and 2.10 and I'd like to cross build it to both major Scala versions. Does Gradle support this?
For example, my gradle project will have a single module:
build.gradle
src/main/scala/foo.scala
and I'd like the resulting published jars to be:
org-foo_2.9-0.1.jar (with dependency on scala-library 2.9)
org-foo_2.10-0.1.jar (with dependency on scala-library 2.10)
Gradle's Scala plugin doesn't currently support cross-building. It's possible to implement it yourself, though. In my Polyglot Gradle talk, I presented a proof-of-concept.
I am searching for a good example of this. The Gradle manual doesn't mention how to specify Scala version but looking at the source code for the Scala plugin it seems to infer it from the Scala library jar that you specify.
The best example I could find is the Apache Kafka build system. It specifies the Scala version and then uses some additional logic to resolve the correct version of the Scala libraries. It also uses some logic to attach the correct label to the jars its builds to correspond to the correct Scala version.
This feels like a lot of work and something that the build system should do for you like in SBT.
When i go through the com.google.gwt.dev package i found that there are two compilers available in com.google.gwt.dev.
My need is to compile a GWT project programatically from my Java Application. Which one is suited?
GWTCompiler is the old entry point. The class has been deprecated for years, and has finally been removed starting with GWT 2.5.1-rc1.
Both the classes are the main executable entry point
for the GWT Java to JavaScript compiler.
But com.google.gwt.dev.GWTCompiler is deprecated
Use com.google.gwt.dev.Compiler (latest compiler from 2.5)
Here you can find the both classes api:
GWTCompiler // here you can find that its deprecated
Compiler
I've created Java annotations (since I need run time retention) under $PROJECT/src/main/java and my scala codewhich uses these java annotations us under $PROJECT/src/main/scala. The Java annotation thus created also makes use of a Java ENUM as it's value.
If I compile the project then sbt doesn't seem to compile the Java annotations first and errors out on each usage of the enum in annotations. If I comment out all usages of the Java enum in annotations in scala code and do a compile, uncomment enum usage and compile again it all works fine.
How do I ensure that sbt compiles my java annotations and enum (i.e. $PROJECT/src/main/java) before attempting to compile scala code when doing a clean build?
EDIT: I have a bare bones build.sbt and am using sbt 0.11.2
Some good news: This is a known issue and has been resolved.
Some bad news: It's resolved in 2.10 and the fix may not be backported to 2.9.3 (quoting Paul Phillips in the issue thread):
I've tagged this for backporting, which is not a guarantee; I don't
have time to do it right now but I expect to in the near future.
Some good news: If you're stuck on pre-2.10 and your Java sources don't depend on your Scala sources, you can just add the following to your build.sbt and all is well:
compileOrder := CompileOrder.JavaThenScala
Some bad news: If you're stuck on pre-2.10 and your Java sources do depend on your Scala sources, I'm pretty sure you're out of luck, and the comment-compile-uncomment trick is probably your best bet.
I'll bet you're facing SI-2764. This has been fixed in Scala 2.10.
In the meantime, create a separate sub-project for your Java annotations, and depend on this from the project containing the Scala code.. Then the Scala compiler will only process the .class files, rather the .java files.