I have a pyspark DataFrame
a = [
('Bob', 562),
('Bob',880),
('Bob',380),
('Sue',85),
('Sue',963)
]
df = spark.createDataFrame(a, ["Person", "Amount"])
I need to create a column that hashes the Amount and returns the amount. The problem is I can't use a UDF so I have used a mapping function.
df.rdd.map(lambda x: hash(x["Amount"]))
If you can't use udf you can use the map function, but as you've currently written it, there will only be one column. To keep all the columns, do the following:
df = df.rdd\
.map(lambda x: (x["Person"], x["Amount"], hash(str(x["Amount"]))))\
.toDF(["Person", "Amount", "Hash"])
df.show()
#+------+------+--------------------+
#|Person|Amount| Hash|
#+------+------+--------------------+
#| Bob| 562|-4340709941618811062|
#| Bob| 880|-7718876479167384701|
#| Bob| 380|-2088598916611095344|
#| Sue| 85| 7168043064064671|
#| Sue| 963|-8844931991662242457|
#+------+------+--------------------+
Note: In this case, hash(x["Amount"]) is not very interesting so I changed it to hash Amount converted to a string.
Essentially you have to map the row to a tuple containing all of the existing columns and add in the new column(s).
If your columns are too many to enumerate, you could also just add a tuple to the existing row.
df = df.rdd\
.map(lambda x: x + (hash(str(x["Amount"])),))\
.toDF(df.columns + ["Hash"])\
I should also point out that if hashing the values is your end goal, there is also a pyspark function pyspark.sql.functions.hash that can be used to avoid the serialization to rdd:
import pyspark.sql.functions as f
df.withColumn("Hash", f.hash("Amount")).show()
#+------+------+----------+
#|Person|Amount| Hash|
#+------+------+----------+
#| Bob| 562| 51343841|
#| Bob| 880|1241753636|
#| Bob| 380| 514174926|
#| Sue| 85|1944150283|
#| Sue| 963|1665082423|
#+------+------+----------+
This appears to use a different hashing algorithm than the python builtin.
Related
In short
I have cartesian-product (cross-join) of two dataframes and function which gives some score for given element of this product. I want now to get few "best matched" elements of the second DF for every member of the first DF.
In details
What follows is a simplified example as my real code is somewhat bloated with additional fields and filters.
Given two sets of data, each having some id and value:
// simple rdds of tuples
val rdd1 = sc.parallelize(Seq(("a", 31),("b", 41),("c", 59),("d", 26),("e",53),("f",58)))
val rdd2 = sc.parallelize(Seq(("z", 16),("y", 18),("x",3),("w",39),("v",98), ("u", 88)))
// convert them to dataframes:
val df1 = spark.createDataFrame(rdd1).toDF("id1", "val1")
val df2 = spark.createDataFrame(rdd2).toDF("id2", "val2")
and some function which for pair of the elements from the first and second dataset gives their "matching score":
def f(a:Int, b:Int):Int = (a * a + b * b * b) % 17
// convert it to udf
val fu = udf((a:Int, b:Int) => f(a, b))
we can create the product of two sets and calculate score for every pair:
val dfc = df1.crossJoin(df2)
val r = dfc.withColumn("rez", fu(col("val1"), col("val2")))
r.show
+---+----+---+----+---+
|id1|val1|id2|val2|rez|
+---+----+---+----+---+
| a| 31| z| 16| 8|
| a| 31| y| 18| 10|
| a| 31| x| 3| 2|
| a| 31| w| 39| 15|
| a| 31| v| 98| 13|
| a| 31| u| 88| 2|
| b| 41| z| 16| 14|
| c| 59| z| 16| 12|
...
And now we want to have this result grouped by id1:
r.groupBy("id1").agg(collect_set(struct("id2", "rez")).as("matches")).show
+---+--------------------+
|id1| matches|
+---+--------------------+
| f|[[v,2], [u,8], [y...|
| e|[[y,5], [z,3], [x...|
| d|[[w,2], [x,6], [v...|
| c|[[w,2], [x,6], [v...|
| b|[[v,2], [u,8], [y...|
| a|[[x,2], [y,10], [...|
+---+--------------------+
But really we want only to retain only few (say 3) of "matches", those having the best score (say, least score).
The question is
How to get the "matches" sorted and reduced to top-N elements? Probably it is something about collect_list and sort_array, though I don't know how to sort by inner field.
Is there a way to ensure optimization in case of large input DFs - e.g. choosing minimums directly while aggregating. I know it could be done easily if I wrote the code without spark - keeping small array or priority queue for every id1 and adding element where it should be, possibly dropping out some previously added.
E.g. it's ok that cross-join is costly operation, but I want to avoid wasting memory on the results most of which I'm going to drop in the next step. My real use case deals with DFs with less than 1 mln entries so cross-join is yet viable but as we want to select only 10-20 top matches for each id1 it seems to be quite desirable not to keep unnecessary data between steps.
For start we need to take only the first n rows. To do this we are partitioning the DF by 'id1' and sorting the groups by the res. We use it to add row number column to the DF, like that we can use where function to take the first n rows. Than you can continue doing the same code your wrote. Grouping by 'id1' and collecting the list. Only now you already have the highest rows.
import org.apache.spark.sql.expressions.Window
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
val n = 3
val w = Window.partitionBy($"id1").orderBy($"res".desc)
val res = r.withColumn("rn", row_number.over(w)).where($"rn" <= n).groupBy("id1").agg(collect_set(struct("id2", "res")).as("matches"))
A second option that might be better because you won't need to group the DF twice:
val sortTakeUDF = udf{(xs: Seq[Row], n: Int)} => xs.sortBy(_.getAs[Int]("res")).reverse.take(n).map{case Row(x: String, y:Int)}}
r.groupBy("id1").agg(sortTakeUDF(collect_set(struct("id2", "res")), lit(n)).as("matches"))
In here we create a udf that take the array column and an integer value n. The udf sorts the array by your 'res' and returns only the first n elements.
pyspark dataframe which have a range of numerical variables.
for eg
my dataframe have a column value from 1 to 100.
1-10 - group1<== the column value for 1 to 10 should contain group1 as value
11-20 - group2
.
.
.
91-100 group10
how can i achieve this using pyspark dataframe
# Creating an arbitrary DataFrame
df = spark.createDataFrame([(1,54),(2,7),(3,72),(4,99)], ['ID','Var'])
df.show()
+---+---+
| ID|Var|
+---+---+
| 1| 54|
| 2| 7|
| 3| 72|
| 4| 99|
+---+---+
Once the DataFrame has been created, we use floor() function to find the integral part of a number. For eg; floor(15.5) will be 15. We need to find the integral part of the Var/10 and add 1 to it, because the indexing starts from 1, as opposed to 0. Finally, we have need to prepend group to the value. Concatenation can be achieved with concat() function, but keep in mind that since the prepended word group is not a column, so we need to put it inside lit() which creates a column of a literal value.
# Requisite packages needed
from pyspark.sql.functions import col, floor, lit, concat
df = df.withColumn('Var',concat(lit('group'),(1+floor(col('Var')/10))))
df.show()
+---+-------+
| ID| Var|
+---+-------+
| 1| group6|
| 2| group1|
| 3| group8|
| 4|group10|
+---+-------+
I have a spark dataframe with multiple columns in it. I want to find out and remove rows which have duplicated values in a column (the other columns can be different).
I tried using dropDuplicates(col_name) but it will only drop duplicate entries but still keep one record in the dataframe. What I need is to remove all entries which were initially containing duplicate entries.
I am using Spark 1.6 and Scala 2.10.
I would use window-functions for this. Lets say you want to remove duplicate id rows :
import org.apache.spark.sql.expressions.Window
df
.withColumn("cnt", count("*").over(Window.partitionBy($"id")))
.where($"cnt"===1).drop($"cnt")
.show()
This can be done by grouping by the column (or columns) to look for duplicates in and then aggregate and filter the results.
Example dataframe df:
+---+---+
| id|num|
+---+---+
| 1| 1|
| 2| 2|
| 3| 3|
| 4| 4|
| 4| 5|
+---+---+
Grouping by the id column to remove its duplicates (the last two rows):
val df2 = df.groupBy("id")
.agg(first($"num").as("num"), count($"id").as("count"))
.filter($"count" === 1)
.select("id", "num")
This will give you:
+---+---+
| id|num|
+---+---+
| 1| 1|
| 2| 2|
| 3| 3|
+---+---+
Alternativly, it can be done by using a join. It will be slower, but if there is a lot of columns there is no need to use first($"num").as("num") for each one to keep them.
val df2 = df.groupBy("id").agg(count($"id").as("count")).filter($"count" === 1).select("id")
val df3 = df.join(df2, Seq("id"), "inner")
I added a killDuplicates() method to the open source spark-daria library that uses #Raphael Roth's solution. Here's how to use the code:
import com.github.mrpowers.spark.daria.sql.DataFrameExt._
df.killDuplicates(col("id"))
// you can also supply multiple Column arguments
df.killDuplicates(col("id"), col("another_column"))
Here's the code implementation:
object DataFrameExt {
implicit class DataFrameMethods(df: DataFrame) {
def killDuplicates(cols: Column*): DataFrame = {
df
.withColumn(
"my_super_secret_count",
count("*").over(Window.partitionBy(cols: _*))
)
.where(col("my_super_secret_count") === 1)
.drop(col("my_super_secret_count"))
}
}
}
You might want to leverage the spark-daria library to keep this logic out of your codebase.
I'm trying to add a new column to a DataFrame. The value of this column is the value of another column whose name depends on other columns from the same DataFrame.
For instance, given this:
+---+---+----+----+
| A| B| A_1| B_2|
+---+---+----+----+
| A| 1| 0.1| 0.3|
| B| 2| 0.2| 0.4|
+---+---+----+----+
I'd like to obtain this:
+---+---+----+----+----+
| A| B| A_1| B_2| C|
+---+---+----+----+----+
| A| 1| 0.1| 0.3| 0.1|
| B| 2| 0.2| 0.4| 0.4|
+---+---+----+----+----+
That is, I added column C whose value came from either column A_1 or B_2. The name of the source column A_1 comes from concatenating the value of columns A and B.
I know that I can add a new column based on another and a constant like this:
df.withColumn("C", $"B" + 1)
I also know that the name of the column can come from a variable like this:
val name = "A_1"
df.withColumn("C", col(name) + 1)
However, what I'd like to do is something like this:
df.withColumn("C", col(s"${col("A")}_${col("B")}"))
Which doesn't work.
NOTE: I'm coding in Scala 2.11 and Spark 2.2.
You can achieve your requirement by writing a udf function. I am suggesting udf, as your requirement is to process dataframe row by row contradicting to inbuilt functions which functions column by column.
But before that you would need array of column names
val columns = df.columns
Then write a udf function as
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
def getValue = udf((A: String, B: String, array: mutable.WrappedArray[String]) => array(columns.indexOf(A+"_"+B)))
where
A is the first column value
B is the second column value
array is the Array of all the columns values
Now just call the udf function using withColumn api
df.withColumn("C", getValue($"A", $"B", array(columns.map(col): _*))).show(false)
You should get your desired output dataframe.
You can select from a map. Define map which translates name to column value:
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions.{col, concat_ws, lit, map}
val dataMap = map(
df.columns.diff(Seq("A", "B")).flatMap(c => lit(c) :: col(c) :: Nil): _*
)
df.select(dataMap).show(false)
+---------------------------+
|map(A_1, A_1, B_2, B_2) |
+---------------------------+
|Map(A_1 -> 0.1, B_2 -> 0.3)|
|Map(A_1 -> 0.2, B_2 -> 0.4)|
+---------------------------+
and select from it with apply:
df.withColumn("C", dataMap(concat_ws("_", $"A", $"B"))).show
+---+---+---+---+---+
| A| B|A_1|B_2| C|
+---+---+---+---+---+
| A| 1|0.1|0.3|0.1|
| B| 2|0.2|0.4|0.4|
+---+---+---+---+---+
You can also try mapping, but I suspect it won't perform well with very wide data:
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.encoders.RowEncoder
import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
import org.apache.spark.sql.Row
val outputEncoder = RowEncoder(df.schema.add(StructField("C", DoubleType)))
df.map(row => {
val a = row.getAs[String]("A")
val b = row.getAs[String]("B")
val key = s"${a}_${b}"
Row.fromSeq(row.toSeq :+ row.getAs[Double](key))
})(outputEncoder).show
+---+---+---+---+---+
| A| B|A_1|B_2| C|
+---+---+---+---+---+
| A| 1|0.1|0.3|0.1|
| B| 2|0.2|0.4|0.4|
+---+---+---+---+---+
and in general I wouldn't recommend this approach.
If data comes from csv you might consider skipping default csv reader and use custom logic to push column selection directly into parsing process. With pseudocode:
spark.read.text(...).map { line => {
val a = ??? // parse A
val b = ??? // parse B
val c = ??? // find c, based on a and b
(a, b, c)
}}
I find it hard to understand the difference between these two methods from pyspark.sql.functions as the documentation on PySpark official website is not very informative. For example the following code:
import pyspark.sql.functions as F
print(F.col('col_name'))
print(F.lit('col_name'))
The results are:
Column<b'col_name'>
Column<b'col_name'>
so what are the difference between the two and when should I use one and not the other?
The doc says:
col:
Returns a Column based on the given column name.
lit:
Creates a Column of literal value
Say if we have a data frame as below:
>>> import pyspark.sql.functions as F
>>> from pyspark.sql.types import *
>>> schema = StructType([StructField('A', StringType(), True)])
>>> df = spark.createDataFrame([("a",), ("b",), ("c",)], schema)
>>> df.show()
+---+
| A|
+---+
| a|
| b|
| c|
+---+
If using col to create a new column from A:
>>> df.withColumn("new", F.col("A")).show()
+---+---+
| A|new|
+---+---+
| a| a|
| b| b|
| c| c|
+---+---+
So col grabs an existing column with the given name, F.col("A") is equivalent to df.A or df["A"] here.
If using F.lit("A") to create the column:
>>> df.withColumn("new", F.lit("A")).show()
+---+---+
| A|new|
+---+---+
| a| A|
| b| A|
| c| A|
+---+---+
While lit will create a constant column with the given string as the values.
Both of them return a Column object but the content and meaning are different.
To explain in a very succinct manner, col is typically used to refer to an existing column in a DataFrame, as opposed to lit which is typically used to set the value of a column to a literal
To illustrate with an example:
Assume i have a DataFrame df containing two columns of IntegerType, col_a and col_b
If i wanted a column total which were the sum of the two columns:
df.withColumn('total', col('col_a') + col('col_b'))
Instead of i wanted a column fixed_val having the value "Hello" for all rows of the DataFrame df:
df.withColumn('fixed_val', lit('Hello'))