Database from AlwaysOn availability group restored as normal database - database-restore

I have a problem with a normal SQL database restored from a DB set in AlwaysOn high availability group in SQL Server 2017.
I restored a copy of production db to a different server, to be used as QA test database, with a different name also - MyDB_demo
The problem is, the QA app copy (same code as production with new development enhancements) get an error at some point.
Even if my conn str points to MyDB_demo, I get the following error
[SqlException (0x80131904): The target database ('MyDB') is in an availability group and is currently accessible for connections when the application intent is set to read only. For more information about application intent, see SQL Server Books Online.]
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection, Action 1 wrapCloseInAction) +2444190
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection, Action 1 wrapCloseInAction) +5775712
System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject stateObj, Boolean callerHasConnectionLock, Boolean asyncClose) +285
System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.TryRun(RunBehavior runBehavior, SqlCommand cmdHandler, SqlDataReader dataStream, BulkCopySimpleResultSet bulkCopyHandler, TdsParserStateObject stateObj, Boolean& dataReady) +4169
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.TryConsumeMetaData() +58
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.get_MetaData() +89
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.FinishExecuteReader(SqlDataReader ds, RunBehavior runBehavior, String resetOptionsString, Boolean isInternal, Boolean forDescribeParameterEncryption) +409
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReaderTds(CommandBehavior cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, Boolean async, Int32 timeout, Task& task, Boolean asyncWrite, Boolean inRetry, SqlDataReader ds, Boolean describeParameterEncryptionRequest) +2127
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReader(CommandBehavior cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, String method, TaskCompletionSource`1 completion, Int32 timeout, Task& task, Boolean& usedCache, Boolean asyncWrite, Boolean inRetry) +911
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReader(CommandBehavior cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, String method) +64
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteReader(CommandBehavior behavior, String method) +240
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteDbDataReader(CommandBehavior behavior) +41
System.Data.Common.DbCommand.System.Data.IDbCommand.ExecuteReader(CommandBehavior behavior) +12
System.Data.Common.DbDataAdapter.FillInternal(DataSet dataset, DataTable[] datatables, Int32 startRecord, Int32 maxRecords, String srcTable, IDbCommand command, CommandBehavior behavior) +139
System.Data.Common.DbDataAdapter.Fill(DataSet dataSet, Int32 startRecord, Int32 maxRecords, String srcTable, IDbCommand command, CommandBehavior behavior) +136
System.Data.Common.DbDataAdapter.Fill(DataSet dataSet) +88
MyApp.SqlHelper.ExecuteDataset(SqlConnection connection, CommandType commandType, String commandText, SqlParameter[] commandParameters) +163
MyApp.PermitFunctions.GetSystemMessages(String sp, Int32 iPermitID, Int32 iAppID, SqlConnection cn) +219
MyApp.Municipality.LoadSystemMessage() +3869
MyApp.Municipality.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) +101
System.Web.UI.Control.OnLoad(EventArgs e) +95
System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() +59
System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() +131
System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +678
Is there any reference in the newly restored DB (named now MyDB_demo) that stores the original name of production DB and why is it trying to access it?
Any suggestion is appreciated.
EDIT
Actually, the server used to restore MyDB_demo is one of the secondary nodes for AlwasyOn availability group; it also contains a RO copy of production database, MyDB.
So the server has:
RO copy of production DB (MyDB)
normal, stand-alone db restored for QA - MyDB_demo
Hence, I understand the error message - it would makes sense if I tried to access directly the secondary, RO copy of production db from connection string.
But I do not: the connection string (which I double-checked) is trying to connect to QA db, MyDB_demo.
Here is some additional info:
the error is thrown in SQLHelper class, the helper class from MS to work with SQL Server, in the ExecuteDataset function
the error is thrown ONLY on one stored procedure - lot of other stored procedures and also direct SQL statements run just fine
I inspected the stored procedure, thinking it might contains accidentally a hardcoded reference to DB name - it doesn't
and the strange part - I run the stored procedure with the same parameters as called from the app in SSMS - and it run just fine - no error
So it looks somehow the connection string MIGHT be altered (!!!) is some way by the NET application itself, and only for this stored procedure?
Anyone ever encountered something like this?
Thank you

Due to the strange (read: stupid) situation that the culprit SP fails only when called from within app, but runs ok when tried in SSMS, I tried a "stupid" approach: I inspected its code, commented out two fields that were set with sub-selects like select top 1 from ..... where.... (actually I replaced theit values with dummy ones) and I changed an Order By field that was initially specified like "InspectionType" Desc, which I removed quotation marks from.
Doing this, the SP suddenly started to work ok even when called from the app.
Then I reverted all changes to original (added quoted back and put back the sub-selects) and the SP continued to work ok.
So ... problem solved.
Stupid approach for stupid problem (!?!?!)
In any case, if anyone has a better idea or explanation of what might have happened, I'd be glad to hear it
EDIT
I think I understand the fix.
By editing and saving the stored procedure, its query plan was recompiled.
So the original error might have been caused by the old query plan.
But why did it referenced the database name? Is the actual database name referenced in query plans? This looks a little odd to me.
And another question (open):
Does the SQL Server optimizer detect if a DB runs in high-availability mode, and when optimizing the queries, does it decide if a query is read-only mode and automatically redirects it toward a read-only node? Even if the ApplicationIntent readonly parameter is not present in connection string?
Because it was not in this case, even in production - we just implemented AlwaysOn functionality and are in the process of updating app to take advantage of R/O nodes.
Any comments are appreciated

Related

Entity Framework Generator For Postgres

I found a nice article in http://www.loresoft.com/Generate-ASP-NET-Web-API. I've read and test it with the SQL Server database with success. Now, I want to change the database engine into PostgreSQL, I've migrated the database from SQL Server into PostgreSQL.
But, When I am executing:
efg generate -c ""Host=localhost;Username=admin;Database=dbTest;Password=admin;Persist Security Info=True""
The console showing me:
17:18:04 W Option file not found: generation.yml
17:18:04 I Using default options
17:18:04 D Creating database model factory for: SqlServer
17:18:04 I Loading database model ...
17:18:04 F Host terminated unexpectedly
System.ArgumentException: Keyword not supported: 'host'.
at Microsoft.Data.Common.DbConnectionOptions.ParseInternal(Dictionary`2 parsetable, String connectionString, Boolean buildChain, Dictionary`2 synonyms, Boolean firstKey)
at Microsoft.Data.Common.DbConnectionOptions..ctor(String connectionString, Dictionary`2 synonyms)
at Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnectionString..ctor(String connectionString)
at Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnectionFactory.CreateConnectionOptions(String connectionString, DbConnectionOptions previous)
at Microsoft.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.GetConnectionPoolGroup(DbConnectionPoolKey key, DbConnectionPoolGroupOptions poolOptions, DbConnectionOptions& userConnectionOptions)
at Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.ConnectionString_Set(DbConnectionPoolKey key)
at Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.set_ConnectionString(String value)
at Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection..ctor(String connectionString)
at Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer.Scaffolding.Internal.SqlServerDatabaseModelFactory.Create(String connectionString, DatabaseModelFactoryOptions options)
at EntityFrameworkCore.Generator.CodeGenerator.GetDatabaseModel(IDatabaseModelFactory factory) in C:\projects\entityframeworkcore-generator\src\EntityFrameworkCore.Generator.Core\CodeGenerator.cs:line 371
at EntityFrameworkCore.Generator.CodeGenerator.Generate(GeneratorOptions options) in C:\projects\entityframeworkcore-generator\src\EntityFrameworkCore.Generator.Core\CodeGenerator.cs:line 40
at EntityFrameworkCore.Generator.GenerateCommand.OnExecute(CommandLineApplication application) in C:\projects\entityframeworkcore-generator\src\EntityFrameworkCore.Generator\GenerateCommand.cs:line 76
--- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown ---
at McMaster.Extensions.CommandLineUtils.Conventions.ExecuteMethodConvention.Invoke(MethodInfo method, Object instance, Object[] arguments)
at McMaster.Extensions.CommandLineUtils.Conventions.ExecuteMethodConvention.OnExecute(ConventionContext context, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
at McMaster.Extensions.CommandLineUtils.Conventions.ExecuteMethodConvention.<>c__DisplayClass0_0.<<Apply>b__0>d.MoveNext()
--- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown ---
at McMaster.Extensions.CommandLineUtils.CommandLineApplication.ExecuteAsync(String[] args, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
at McMaster.Extensions.CommandLineUtils.CommandLineApplication.Execute(String[] args)
at EntityFrameworkCore.Generator.Program.Main(String[] args) in C:\projects\entityframeworkcore-generator\src\EntityFrameworkCore.Generator\Program.cs:line 50
I think I was missing some dependencies package. But, I am not sure what is it.
Thank you very much
I've found the solution, and decide to post it here because It may help other people in the future.
Actually, efg command will use SqlServer provider if we not mentioning any "provider" parameter. So, I've revised my command into:
efg generate -c "Host=localhost;Username=admin;Database=dbTest;Password=admin;Persist Security Info=True" -p PostgreSQL

Azure SQL Database Operation Timeout

I have a shared hosting site "production" that works perfectly. It has users and thus far I have no issues.
I decided to created a test environment. I created another Azure app and copied the code from my "production" site to this test site. This happen today. It has no users. I created a DB and I agreed to pay five bucks a month. So this is not a free account. I uploaded my seed data which part of it was 40K rows of zip code. That went fine without issues.
However, when I use the site, I consistently get timeout error. I can assure you that this is NOT because of usage. I increased the timeout from 30 to 90 in the connection string but that didn't make a difference. There is no code difference between the production and test.
I have read many post about this but none helped. Here are some samples:
post1 post2 post3 post4 post5 post6
Any ideas?
> [Win32Exception (0x80004005): The wait operation timed out]
>
> [SqlException (0x80131904): Timeout expired. The timeout period
> elapsed prior to completion of the operation or the server is not
> responding. This failure occurred while attempting to connect to the
> routing destination. The duration spent while attempting to connect to
> the original server was - [Pre-Login] initialization=27; handshake=25;
> [Login] initialization=0; authentication=0; [Post-Login] complete=3;
> ] System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.OnError(SqlException
> exception, Boolean breakConnection, Action1 wrapCloseInAction)
> +2418094 System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnection.OnError(SqlException
> exception, Boolean breakConnection, Action1 wrapCloseInAction)
> +5694436 System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject
> stateObj, Boolean callerHasConnectionLock, Boolean asyncClose) +285
> System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.TryRun(RunBehavior runBehavior,
> SqlCommand cmdHandler, SqlDataReader dataStream,
> BulkCopySimpleResultSet bulkCopyHandler, TdsParserStateObject
> stateObj, Boolean& dataReady) +3731
> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.TryConsumeMetaData() +58
> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.get_MetaData() +89
> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.FinishExecuteReader(SqlDataReader ds,
> RunBehavior runBehavior, String resetOptionsString) +379
> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReaderTds(CommandBehavior
> cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, Boolean
> async, Int32 timeout, Task& task, Boolean asyncWrite, SqlDataReader
> ds, Boolean describeParameterEncryptionRequest) +2064
> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReader(CommandBehavior
> cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, String
> method, TaskCompletionSource`1 completion, Int32 timeout, Task& task,
> Boolean asyncWrite) +375
> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReader(CommandBehavior
> cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, String
> method) +53
> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteReader(CommandBehavior
> behavior, String method) +240
> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteDbDataReader(CommandBehavior
> behavior) +41
> System.Data.Common.DbCommand.ExecuteReader(CommandBehavior behavior)
> +12 System.Data.EntityClient.EntityCommandDefinition.ExecuteStoreCommands(EntityCommand
> entityCommand, CommandBehavior behavior) +435
It was the DTU issue. I had 5 DTU (S0) now I have 20 DTU (S1). If I have my physics right it's like a steam engine and BTU. Horsepower matters.
I was getting the same error but after looking a little deeper the issue I found was different and would like to share it if it helps someone else. I had an EntityFramework migration that ran fine on local development server and staging server but was taking too long on production. It was causing the timeout and since it was not a migration failed exception we did not think that would be the problem.
In this migration we were indexing a table that had millions of records hence indexing was taking longer and EF runs migration first time a connection is requested once deployed was causing issue.
Since my table had data that could be regenerated (nothing critical to keep just some summary data) I quickly empties the table and ran migrations. Everything was good after that.

Sql Sync causing source server to run out of memory causing error during sync to client server

I am synching my production SQL Server 2008 R2 db with my failover SQL Server 2008 R2 Express server using Microsoft Sync Framework 2.1 and it worked great for a while and then after a few days of syncs the source (production SQL Server) starts running out of memory (RAM) because of the syncs.
It didn't stop running or anything or cause website transactions to fail but the Sync Framework starts throwing the below error if there is low ram on production box.
Anyone seen this or have any idea why it is doing this and if there is a fix?
Here is the error ..
Microsoft.Synchronization.Data.DbSyncException: An unexpected exception occurred in a background thread that is enumerating
changes. See the inner exception for more details.
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: There is insufficient system
memory in resource pool 'internal' to run this query.
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection, Action1 wrapCloseInAction)
at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject
stateObj, Boolean callerHasConnectionLock, Boolean asyncClose)
at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.TryRun(RunBehavior runBehavior, SqlCommand cmdHandler, SqlDataReader dataStream,
BulkCopySimpleResultSet bulkCopyHandler, TdsParserStateObject
stateObj, Boolean& dataReady)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.TryConsumeMetaData()
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.get_MetaData()
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.FinishExecuteReader(SqlDataReader ds,
RunBehavior runBehavior, String resetOptionsString)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReaderTds(CommandBehavior
cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, Boolean
async, Int32 timeout, Task& task, Boolean asyncWrite)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReader(CommandBehavior
cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, String
method, TaskCompletionSource1 completion, Int32 timeout, Task& task,
Boolean asyncWrite)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReader(CommandBehavior
cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, String
method)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteReader(CommandBehavior
behavior, String method)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteReader()
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.DeriveParameters()
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommandBuilder.DeriveParameters(SqlCommand
command)
at Microsoft.Synchronization.Data.ManagementUtils.DeriveParameters(SqlCommand
command, IEnumerable`1 columns)
at Microsoft.Synchronization.Data.SqlServer.SqlSyncAdapter.SetCommandSessionParameters(IDbCommand
command, String commandName)
at Microsoft.Synchronization.Data.RelationalSyncProvider.EnumerateChangesInBatchesInternal(Object
batchProducer)
--- End of inner exception stack trace ---
at Microsoft.Synchronization.Data.DbSyncBatchProducer.DequeueBatch()
at Microsoft.Synchronization.Data.RelationalSyncProvider.ConsumeBatchFromProducer(DbSyncScopeMetadata
scopeMetadata)
at Microsoft.Synchronization.Data.RelationalSyncProvider.GetChanges(DbSyncScopeMetadata
scopeMetadata, DbSyncSession DbSyncSession, UInt32 memoryBatchSize)
at Microsoft.Synchronization.Data.RelationalSyncProvider.GetChangeBatch(UInt32
batchSize, SyncKnowledge destinationKnowledge, Object&
changeDataRetriever)
at Microsoft.Synchronization.KnowledgeProviderProxy.GetChangeBatch(UInt32
dwBatchSize, ISyncKnowledge pSyncKnowledge, ISyncChangeBatch&
ppChangeBatch, Object& ppUnkDataRetriever)
at Microsoft.Synchronization.CoreInterop.ISyncSession.Start(CONFLICT_RESOLUTION_POLICY
resolutionPolicy, _SYNC_SESSION_STATISTICS& pSyncSessionStatistics)
at Microsoft.Synchronization.KnowledgeSyncOrchestrator.DoOneWaySyncHelper(SyncIdFormatGroup
sourceIdFormats, SyncIdFormatGroup destinationIdFormats,
KnowledgeSyncProviderConfiguration destinationConfiguration,
SyncCallbacks DestinationCallbacks, ISyncProvider sourceProxy,
ISyncProvider destinationProxy, ChangeDataAdapter
callbackChangeDataAdapter, SyncDataConverter conflictDataConverter,
Int32& changesApplied, Int32& changesFailed)
at Microsoft.Synchronization.KnowledgeSyncOrchestrator.DoOneWayKnowledgeSync(SyncDataConverter
sourceConverter, SyncDataConverter destinationConverter, SyncProvider
sourceProvider, SyncProvider destinationProvider, Int32&
changesApplied, Int32& changesFailed)
at Microsoft.Synchronization.KnowledgeSyncOrchestrator.Synchronize()
at Microsoft.Synchronization.SyncOrchestrator.Synchronize()
try enabling batching by setting the MemoryDataCacheSize property.

MigrateDatabaseToLatestVersion and dbo.__MigrationHistory

I am trying to deploy an MVC4 application that is built using EF5 codefist and migrations.
I want the app to update the database when I in the future deploy new versions of the app with new migrations, so in Global.asax I do this:
Database.SetInitializer(new MigrateDatabaseToLatestVersion<GoDealMvc4Context, Configuration>());
using (var ctx = new GoDealMvc4Context()) {
ctx.Database.Initialize(false);
}
The initial database on the server is deployed by attaching an MDF file copied from my dev machine. This database contains the __MigrationsHistory system table. So this database should not need to execute any migrations, because it is up to date with latest migration.
When I try to start the app on the server, it I get this error:
There is already an object named 'UserProfile' in the database.
[SqlException (0x80131904): There is already an object named 'UserProfile' in the database.]
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection, Action`1 wrapCloseInAction) +388
System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject stateObj, Boolean callerHasConnectionLock, Boolean asyncClose) +688
System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.TryRun(RunBehavior runBehavior, SqlCommand cmdHandler, SqlDataReader dataStream, BulkCopySimpleResultSet bulkCopyHandler, TdsParserStateObject stateObj, Boolean& dataReady) +4403
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteNonQueryTds(String methodName, Boolean async, Int32 timeout) +2755286
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.InternalExecuteNonQuery(TaskCompletionSource`1 completion, String methodName, Boolean sendToPipe, Int32 timeout, Boolean asyncWrite) +527
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery() +290
System.Data.Entity.Migrations.DbMigrator.ExecuteSql(DbTransaction transaction, MigrationStatement migrationStatement) +247
System.Data.Entity.Migrations.DbMigrator.ExecuteStatements(IEnumerable`1 migrationStatements) +202
System.Data.Entity.Migrations.DbMigrator.ApplyMigration(DbMigration migration, DbMigration lastMigration) +472
System.Data.Entity.Migrations.DbMigrator.Upgrade(IEnumerable`1 pendingMigrations, String targetMigrationId, String lastMigrationId) +175
System.Data.Entity.MigrateDatabaseToLatestVersion`2.InitializeDatabase(TContext context) +150
System.Data.Entity.Internal.InternalContext.PerformInitializationAction(Action action) +66
System.Data.Entity.Internal.InternalContext.PerformDatabaseInitialization() +225
System.Data.Entity.Internal.RetryAction`1.PerformAction(TInput input) +208
System.Data.Entity.Internal.LazyInternalContext.InitializeDatabaseAction(Action`1 action) +235
GoDeal.Mvc4.MvcApplication.Application_Start() +342
So apparently the app thinks it needs to apply a migration even though the __MigrationHistory table is present in the database with this content:
MigrationId Model ProductVersion
201210161046508_initial 0x1F8... 5.0.0.net45
and the app contains a single migration class:
201210161046508_initial.cs:
public partial class initial : DbMigration
{
public override void Up()
{
CreateTable(
"dbo.UserProfile",
....
So my questions are:
1) why do my application think it needs to apply this migration when the contents of the __MigrationsHistory table is as described.
2) is this the recommended way of making an application that automatically applies new migrations wehn restarted on a new version.
There is also another NASTY gotcha here for anyone looking for answers. Check the content of the
[dbo].[__MigrationHistory] table column ContextKey
This table Tells how the DB was created (migration mode, Create mode etc...) was created. AND with what Migration Configuration Program. I got hurt with a change of MigrationsConfiguration Class name.
Changing the entry in table worked :-) Or renaming your code back.
1)
As your migration is called "initial" rather than "InitialCreate" this implies that you created this manually and when you enabled code first migrations the database didn't exist already. Or at least the context was not pointing to it. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/data/jj591621.aspx
I believe that MigrateDatabaseToLatestVersion will first trying the create the entity tables for entities that existed before migrations was enabled. As the InitialCreate migration does not exist in your database this first step will then clash with the tables that already exist. Sorry this is a bit vague but I don't fully understand it. To fix this I would remove the migrations by deleting them (first saving any custom changes) and then enable them again with the context pointing at the exiting DB. You should now have an "InitialCreate" migration. You should now be able to copy up the db and use MigrateDatabaseToLatestVersion in the production environment.
2)
Personally letting code first update a production DB worries me quite a bit. I have been using update-database -script -sourcemigration xx to generate the scripts to migrate the DB. This way you can see what is going to happen before you break anything. It also allows you to run in a transaction and roll back after a failure.
In my case this issue was caused by missing migration. I did some changes into model, but I forgot to create new migration file.
My solution is to run in Package Manager Console: Add-Migration MyMigrationName
Just in case someone else encounters SqlException with the message There is already an object named '<TABLE_NAME>' in the database. after changing the model while using automatic migrations. It seems the migrations' Configuration requires in some cases explicit naming of the context key:
internal sealed class Configuration : DbMigrationsConfiguration<MyDatabaseContext>
{
public Configuration ()
{
AutomaticMigrationsEnabled = true;
ContextKey = "MyNamespace.MyDatabaseContext"; // this line was missed
}
protected override void Seed(MyDatabaseContext context)
{
}
}
After adding the line above to the constructor of Configuration, the migration ran without any issues. You can check which ContextKey value is already in use in the __MigrationHistory database.

Unavailable XRMServices/2011/Organization.svc

I try to discover service endpoint .../XRMServices/2011/Organization.svc and I've this error:
An error has occurred.
Try this action again. If the problem continues, check the Microsoft Dynamics CRM Community for solutions or contact your organization's Microsoft Dynamics CRM Administrator. Finally, you can contact Microsoft Support.
System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object. at Microsoft.Crm.MainApplication.Application_Error(Object sender, EventArgs eventArguments)
Stack trace:
Error Description:
Generic SQL error.
Error Details:
Generic SQL error.
Full Stack:
[SqlException: Cannot open database "ASPState" requested by the login. The login failed.
Login failed for user 'NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE'.]
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection)
at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning()
at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.Run(RunBehavior runBehavior, SqlCommand cmdHandler, SqlDataReader dataStream, BulkCopySimpleResultSet bulkCopyHandler, TdsParserStateObject stateObj)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.CompleteLogin(Boolean enlistOK)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.LoginNoFailover(ServerInfo serverInfo, String newPassword, Boolean redirectedUserInstance, SqlConnection owningObject, SqlConnectionString connectionOptions, TimeoutTimer timeout)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.OpenLoginEnlist(SqlConnection owningObject, TimeoutTimer timeout, SqlConnectionString connectionOptions, String newPassword, Boolean redirectedUserInstance)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds..ctor(DbConnectionPoolIdentity identity, SqlConnectionString connectionOptions, Object providerInfo, String newPassword, SqlConnection owningObject, Boolean redirectedUserInstance)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnectionFactory.CreateConnection(DbConnectionOptions options, Object poolGroupProviderInfo, DbConnectionPool pool, DbConnection owningConnection)
at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.CreatePooledConnection(DbConnection owningConnection, DbConnectionPool pool, DbConnectionOptions options)
at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.CreateObject(DbConnection owningObject)
at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.UserCreateRequest(DbConnection owningObject)
at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.GetConnection(DbConnection owningObject)
at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.GetConnection(DbConnection owningConnection)
at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionClosed.OpenConnection(DbConnection outerConnection, DbConnectionFactory connectionFactory)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open()
at System.Web.SessionState.SqlSessionStateStore.SqlStateConnection..ctor(SqlPartitionInfo sqlPartitionInfo, TimeSpan retryInterval)
[HttpException: Unable to connect to SQL Server session database.]
at System.Web.SessionState.SqlSessionStateStore.ThrowSqlConnectionException(SqlConnection conn, Exception e)
at System.Web.SessionState.SqlSessionStateStore.SqlStateConnection..ctor(SqlPartitionInfo sqlPartitionInfo, TimeSpan retryInterval)
at System.Web.SessionState.SqlSessionStateStore.GetConnection(String id, Boolean& usePooling)
at System.Web.SessionState.SqlSessionStateStore.DoGet(HttpContext context, String id, Boolean getExclusive, Boolean& locked, TimeSpan& lockAge, Object& lockId, SessionStateActions& actionFlags)
at System.Web.SessionState.SqlSessionStateStore.GetItemExclusive(HttpContext context, String id, Boolean& locked, TimeSpan& lockAge, Object& lockId, SessionStateActions& actionFlags)
at System.Web.SessionState.SessionStateModule.GetSessionStateItem()
at System.Web.SessionState.SessionStateModule.BeginAcquireState(Object source, EventArgs e, AsyncCallback cb, Object extraData)
at System.Web.HttpApplication.AsyncEventExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute()
at System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously)
What may cause the problem, what is wrong with CRM?
Since you are using NETWORK SERVICE, you need to make sure the webserver's computer account is added to the SQLAccessGroup in Active Directory. Normally this is done for you during CRM setup, but if you want to change the account later you must remember to add the new account to this group manually. Here is a link that describes the different groups that CRM uses:
http://ayazahmad.wordpress.com/2007/01/26/active-directory-security-groups-for-mscrm/
I've seen a similar message when the user did not have a role assigned, but that occured in a test enviroment, still worth checking.
I completely re-installed development stack and the same happened again, I re-installed my virtual machine and it worked, seems like it some unknown issue. Now I'll try to reproduce the same errors on a new instances of a virtual machine.
Thanks to all)
I have seen also this message on my CRM server. What I've done is to just enable and disable anonymous authentication on IIS, and thing worked for me. Also I've played with web.config, service settings, but later I get that section back as it was on first install of CRM.
In my oppinion, IIS doesn't tell WCF how to auth, and couple of cold restarts, and enabling and disabling anonymous auth. wake up WCF.
Your AppPool needs to be a User that has access to the database.
With regards to the WCF Service,
Check your IIS Website Authentication settings, for WCF Services you need
Anonymous Authentication Enabled
ASP.NET Impersonation Enabled
Windows Authentication Enabled
for On-Premise installation running in an AD environment.
We also had the issue and it was resolved after restarting IIS.