I am struggling to overcome to issue I have. I am trying to delete a parent node/key given I find the correct child value.
My database is structure liked this
I am querying my database by a certain value, objectID, as it will match the postID which is passed through the parameters. The objectID value is removed. However, I am struggling to remove the key in which it falls under.
I have had mixed results so far:
I can either remove the objectID value using this code:
refSnap?.ref.child("objectID").child(postID).removeValue()
Of I can remove the whole notifications node/directory, using this:
refSnap?.ref.child("objectID").queryEqual(toValue: postID).ref.removeValue()
refSnap?.key gives me all the keys/nodes under the notifications node.
I cannot access the key which the objectID and all other information is stored under as it is .childByAutoId. Can anyone possibly help me as to how I can sort this issue?
While the other answer provides some insight with an alternate and workable structure, the ability to delete a node based on a child is fairly straightforward and directly addresses the question without changing the structure.
(note that the structure may need to be changed anyway but for this exercise, we'll use it as is.)
Given a structure suggested in the question:
notification
"rtupy..." //childByAutoId
"-LFEMjAcny..." // childByAutoId
"-LFEzrrq..." // childByAutoId
from: "aw,sdasdad"
objectID: "-LFEMjAcn...."
timestamp: 15292
type: "comment"
Suppose you want to delete the node "-LFEzrrq..." as shown in your screenshot. That node contains the child objectID: "-LFEMjAcn...."
To delete the node you need query for the node that contains the objectID you want which, according to the question, is working and returning the correct child.
Use the returned snapshot to obtain it's parent key, and get the path to that node and delete it. Note that we don't know what process or code the OP used to obtain the node they want to delete - perhaps it was from another query and the node reference was passed in or some other means.
let queryRef = //unknown how, but build the query for objectID = "-LFEMjAcny...."
queryRef.observeSingleEvent(of: .value, with: { snapshot in
let key = snapshot.key //this is the parent key of the objectID node i.e. -LFEMzrrq..."
let parentRef = snapshot.ref.parent! //this is the path to that parent
let refToDelete = parentRef.child(key) //add the parent key to the path: -LFEzrrq
refToDelete.removeValue() //delete it
})
As you can see, regardless of the parent nodes' key, or how deep it is, this code will delete the node found in the query.
The key names do not matter so using .childByAutoId as references to tie your nodes together is safe and generally best practice as disassociating node keys from the data they contain makes your structure highly expandable.
Your issue is that you are using childByAutoId and you can't "tie" these random alphanumerics to something(in this case the post).
The structure that i would set is this:
-notifications
--uid //notifications for user
--- userAid+userBid //follow notification, if they unfollow you already now which one it is and you can go and delete it
---commentNotificationID // you give this notification the same Id that the comment has, so if the user deletes the comment you use that id to delete the notification as well.
Related
Hello, I have a problem I created a Registration form and im trying to check if there is any user which have a certain username inside the Firebase Db. I tried to get the reference of all the users.
var users = Database.database().reference("users")
But I don't know how I could check if there is any user with a specified username.
You'll want to use a query for that. Something like:
let query = users.queryOrdered(byChild: "username").equalTo("two")
Then execute the query and check whether the result snapshot exists.
Note though that you won't be able to guarantee uniqueness in this way. If multiple users perform the check at the same time, they may both end up claiming the same user name.
To guarantee a unique user name, you will need to store the user names as the key - as keys are by definition unique within their parent node. For more on this, see some of these top search results and possibly also from here.
I am struggling to figure out how to delete/look for a certain key/id under any given node in a particular directory.
Here is how my database looks:
The userID and postID is generated through the use of .childByAutoId(). So as you can infer, searching by a particular string .e.g. a username, is not possible. However, I do have the postID passed through the parameters, when calling the function. I have tried several methods, but no luck. In essence this is what I wish to do (pseudo code):
Go to the "feed" directory
The postID is passed already, so look through every node under feed
If the postID exists under a particular node, remove the node, if not, move onto the next node
Continue until the node does not exist in this particular directory
I do have a reference to my feed directory - API.Feed.REF_FEED. I have tried to use .parent , .queryOrdered, .queryEqualTo etc.
This will work:
let query = feedRef.queryOrdered(byChild: "-L....VJ").equalTo(true)
query.observe(.childAdded, with: { (snapshot) -> Void in
snapshot.ref.removeValue()
})
The problem with this approach though it that it requires that you have an index on -L....VJ, and thus on every post ID that you might want to delete. This rapidly becomes unmanageable.
For this reason consider adding an inverted lookup map to your database: one that maps each post ID to the users that have that post in their feed:
userposts
$postid
userid1: true
userid2: true
Now you can quickly find all the users that have a specific post, and then delete the post from those users' feed.
I have the following Firebase structure
There is a node that keeps a list of albums by user. In certain circumstances I do not have the user id (E7Bv..), I only have the album id (-L0uG...). If I had both then I could easily access the specific album node.
Since I do not have the userid, i need a way to query the node where the albumin is equal to the value I have in hand. I do not see how to structure such a query.
As one approach I also tried to add the albumid (-L0uG...) to the sub node as the value of _key. I'd prefer not to have to duplicate that value and just query for where the sub-node for albumid equals the value I have in hand for albumid.
Or, if that can not be done then can anyone tell me how to query where the sub-node has a value for _key that matches the value i have in hand - Without knowing the userid node value?
I would like to do something like this ... (where albumRef is the top node for byUser_albums)
albumRef.queryOrdered(byChild: "_key").queryEqual(toValue: albumID).observeSingleEvent(of: .value, with: { snapshot in
of course this fails because _key is not on the userid node, it is on the albumid node. I need to either query by the subnode id, or go deeper to query by _key
UPDATE
From Frank Below. I tried this ...
albumRef.queryOrdered(byChild: albumID).queryStarting(atValue: nil).observeSingleEvent(of: .value, with: { snapshot in
This works and finds the right data. It returns the key of the scoping autoid. The only downside is that Firebase says (in debug log) ....
"**Using an unspecified index. Your data will be downloaded and filtered on the client. Consider adding ".indexOn": "-L0vTQtLwBe_hilTOGid" at /byUser_albums to your security rules for better performance**"
If I were doing a typical read then I could just add the rule to the database, but I can't add this rule because the value that it wants the .indexOn is not a static value - it's an auto. I don't see a way to index on the autoid. I think I will have to restructure the albums node to have user as an attribute instead of defining a scoping node by user. I do not see a way to read without downloading all data and filter on the client.
I am trying to make a money related app which shows the user their spendings as a project to get used to Firebase. So I stumbled upon this issue; I can't seem to figure out how to add more than one expense assigned to a user. Whenever I add a new expense, the existing value in Firebase gets reset to the new value but I want it to store both the new and the old value. How can I do this?
There's something called "autoID" if that helps. I'll link that in a few moments.
Edit: It's used here.
childByAutoId() is what you want for swift. See Updating Or Deleting specific data section in the Read and Write Data on iOS
let thisUserRef = ref.child("users").child(users uid)
let expenseRef = thisUserRef.child("expenses").childByAutoId()
let dict = ["expense_type": "travel", "expense_amt": "1.99"]
expenseRef.setValue(dict)
will results in
users
uid_0
-Y88jn90skda //<- the node key created with childByAutoId
expense_type: "travel"
expense_amt: "1.99"
the childByAutoId is super powerful and allows 'random' node keys to be generated that contain your child data.
See the answer to this question and this other question for some tips on data modeling and queries.
I am pretty new to both Swift and Firebase, and I am attempting to make a simple app using Firebase as the backend. As far as I know, there is no memory-efficient way to use the numChildren() function without loading every single child into memory for counting, so I am implementing my own simple counter for the number of "Events" that have been created in my app.
The documentation for Firebase states that the childByAutoID() method should be used for updating lists in multi-user applications. I am assuming it adds a timestamp to the requested update and does them in order.
My question is whether it is necessary to use childByAutoID() when only updating a SINGLE field in a multi-user application. That is, will there be conflicts on my numEvents field if I do:
dbRef = FIRDatabase.database().reference()
dbRef.child("numEvents").setValue(num)
Or must I do:
dbRef = FIRDatabase.database().reference()
dbRef.child("numEvents").childByAutoId().setValue(num)
In order to avoid write conflicts? My only real confusion is that the documentation for childByAutoID stresses that it is useful when the children are a list of items, but mine is only a single item.
If you are only updating a single field you should not be using childByAutoId. To update a child value for an object, you need to obtain a reference to that object somehow, perhaps by a query of some sort (in many cases you will naturally already have a reference to the object if it needs to be changed) and you can change the value like this:
dbRef.child("events").child(objectToUpdateId).child(fieldToUpdateKey).setValue(newValue)
childByAutoId in this context would be used to create a new field like:
dbRef.child("events").childByAutoId().setValue(newObject)
I'm not exactly sure how this applies to your situation, but those are some descriptions of how to update a field, and use childByAutoId.
What childByAutoId does is create a unique key for a node, to avoid using the same key multiple times and then creating data conflicts like inconsistency (not write conflicts) to avoid write conflicts you use the transaction blocks.
The best way to learn is to try it out
If num == 1 , in the first example the result will be
dbRef:{
numEvents:1
}
While the second will be
dbRef:{
numEvents:{
//The auto-generated key
KLBHJBjhbjJBJHB:1
}
}
The childByAutoId would be useful if you want to save in a node multiple children of the same type, that way each children will have its own unique identifier
For example
pet:{
KJHBJJHB:{
name:fluffy,
owner:John Smith,
},
KhBHJBJjJ:{
name:fluffy,
owner:Jane Foster,
}
}
This way you have a unique identifier for cases where there is no clear way with the item data to guarantee it will be unique (in this case the pet's name)
Few things here:
childByAutoId is not a timestamp. But is used to create unique nodes in any given node.
Use case of childByAutoId :
You have messages node which stores messages from multiple user who are involved in a group chat. So each user can add messages in the group chat so you would do something like this each time user sends message:
dbRef = FIRDatabase.database().reference()
dbRef.child("messages").childByAutoId().setValue(messageText)
So this will create a unique message id for each message from different users. This will kind of act like primary key of message in normal databases.
The structure of database will be something like this:
messages: {
"randomIdGenerated-12asd12" : "hello",
"randomIdGenerated-12323D123" : "Hi, HOw are you",
}
So in your case your first approach is good enough! Since you dont need unique node for counting number of events added.