I understood Ingress can be used when we want to expose multiple service/routes with a single Load Balancer / public IP.
Now I want to expose my Nginx server to public. I have two choices
Set service type as LoadBalancer voila I got public IP
Use Nginx Ingress Controller
Now I can get my job done with Option 1 when or why would I choose Option 2 whats the advantage of having nginx with Ingress without Ingress ?
There is a difference between ingress rule (ingress) and ingress controller. So, technically, nginx ingress controller and LoadBalancer type service are not comparable. You can compare ingress resource and LoadBalancer type service, which is below.
Generally speaking:
LoadBalancer type service is a L4(TCP) load balancer. You would use it to expose single app or service to outside world. It would balance the load based on destination IP address and port.
Ingress type resource would create a L7(HTTP/S) load balancer. You would use this to expose several services at the same time, as L7 LB is application aware, so it can determine where to send traffic depending on the application state.
ingress and ingress controller relation:
Ingress, or ingress rules are the rules that ingress controller follows to distribute the load. Ingress controller get the packet, checks ingress rules and determines to which service to deliver the packet.
Nginx Ingress Controller
Nginx ingress controller uses LoadBalancer type service actually as entrypoint to the cluster. Then is checks ingress rules and distributes the load. This can be very confusing. You create an ingress resource, it creates the HTTP/S load balancer. It also gives you an external IP address (on GKE, for example), but when you try hitting that IP address, the connection is refused.
Conclusions:
You would use Loadbalancer type service if you would have a single app, say myapp.com that you want to be mapped to an IP address.
You would use ingress resource if you would have several apps, say myapp1.com, myapp1.com/mypath, myapp2.com, .., myappn.com to be mapped to one IP address.
As the ingress is L7 it is able to distinguish between myapp1.com and myapp1.com/mypath, it is able to route the traffic to the right service.
Accepted answer covered a lots of stuff already. All of the reasons are valid, apart from that the reason I am using ingress controller in aws is to minimize cost. I have multiple web applications which are running in kubernetes cluster aws. To access those applications instead of exposing individual application as LoadBalancer and creating individual ELB (each ELB cost money), I expose ingress controller service as LoadBalancer and created ingress rule for each.
Steps involve:
Ingress service, exposed as loadbalancer which created ELB in aws lets say elb1.aws.com
Ingress rule for each web applications, eg example.com, awesome.com, helloworld.com
Route53 mapping all mapped to same ELB, eg:
example.com -> elb1.aws.com
awesome.com -> elb1.aws.com
helloworld.com -> elb1.aws.com
Related
Exposing Service from a BareMetal(Kubeadm) Build Kubernetes Cluster to the outside world. I am trying to access my Nginx as a service outside of the cluster to get NGINX output in the web browser.
For that, I have created a deployment and service for NGINX as shown below,
As per my search, found that we have below to expose to outside world
MetalLb
Ingress NGINX
Some HELM resources
I would like to know all these 3 or any more approaches in such way it help me to learn new things.
GOAL
Exposing Service from a BareMetal(Kubeadm) Built Kubernetes Cluster to the outside world.
How Can I make my service has its own public IP to access from the outside cluster?
You need to set up MetalLB to get an external IP address for the LoadBalancer type services. It will give a local network IP address to the service.
Then you can do port mapping (configuration in the router) of incoming traffic of port 80 and port 443 to your external service IP address.
I have done a similar setup you can check it here in detail:
https://developerdiary.me/lets-build-low-budget-aws-at-home/
You need to deploy an ingress controller in your cluster so that it gives you an entrypoint where your applications can be accessed. Traditionally, in a cloud native environment it would automatically provision a LoadBalancer for you that will read the rules you define inside your Ingress object and route your request to the appropriate service.
One of the most commonly used ingress controller is the Nginx Ingress Controller. There are multiple ways you can use to deploy it (mainfests, helm, operators). In case of bare metal clusters, there are multiple considerations which you can read here.
MetalLB is still in beta stage so its your choice if you want to use. If you don't have a hard requirement to expose the ingress controller as a LoadBalancer, you can expose it as a NodePort Service that will accessible across all your nodes in the cluster. You can then map that NodePort Service in your DNS so that the ingress rules are evaluated.
Question is straightforward, but I've not been able to quite figure out which steps a request follows when it reaches kubernetes system.
Who first handle a received request? Ingress Controller, LoadBalancer, ClusterIP...
So, I know there are several ways to make pods externally accessible:
Creating a NodePort service.
Creating an LoadBalancer service.
Creating an Ingress rule.
Some questions here related with best-practices or mandatory facts?
Ingress is in front of a ClusterIP Service mandatory?
1.1 Could or shouldn't I create an Ingress in front of a NodePort or a LoadBalancer service?
Ingress Controllers are LoadBalancer Services? I mean, traefik or other Ingress Controllers are all of them deployed as LoadBalancer services?
Misunderstanding arises from several texts I've found over there:
image here: Seems LoadBalancer is placed first of Ingress Controllers.
image here: Seems Ingress is in front of a LoadBalancer.
Above questions arises from an attempt of expose externally a mongodb replicatset.
I've created a LoadBalancer for each node. Is this correct?
I'd like to create a domain using my Ingress Controller for those LoadBalancer. Can this be possible?
Is there point to create an Ingress in front of a headless service?
Ingress is in front of a ClusterIP Service mandatory?
If you want the service accessible externally, then you will need an externally accessible service. This can be a LoadBalancer service or an Ingress. A ClusterIP service is not accessible outside the cluster.
Could or shouldn't I create an Ingress in front of a NodePort or a LoadBalancer service?
You can create an Ingress in front of a NodePort or LoadBalancer, but there's no point in creating an Ingress in front of a LoadBalancer unless you want two different endpoints for accessing the same service (the LoadBalancer will get one IP and the Ingress Controller's own LoadBalancer will get another IP). However, using an Ingress will allow you to have additional functionality, such as SSL Certificates, which the standard LoadBalancer service resource does not (normally) provide
Ingress Controllers are LoadBalancer Services? I mean, traefik or other Ingress Controllers are all of them deployed as LoadBalancer services?
Correct. An Ingress controller opens an endpoint for traffic into the cluster, and then uses the ingress resources you create in the cluster to determine how and where to route the traffic.
The endpoint is a publicly accessible endpoint (unless you configure it to be an internal loadbalancer, in which case only machines within your corporate network will be able to access it).
The controller will normally update the Ingress resource in your cluster so you will see the IP of the loadbalancer belonging to the ingress
I used to work with Openshift/OKD cluster deployed in AWS and there it was possible to connect cluster to some domain name from Route53. Then as soon as I was deploying ingress with some hosts mappings (and the hosts defined in ingres were subdomains of the basis domain) all necessary lb rules (Routes in Openshift) and subdomain itself were created by Openshift and were directly available. For example: Openshift is connected to domain "somedomain.com" which is registered in Route53. In ingress I have the host mapping like:
hosts:
- host: sub1.somedomain.com
paths:
- path
After deployment I can reach sub1.somedomain.com. Is this kind of functionality available in GKE?
So far I have seen only mapping to static IP.
Also I red here https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/ingress-http2 that if I need to connect service with ingress, the service have to be of type NodePort. Is it realy so? In Openshift it was not required any normal ClusterIP service could be connected to ingress.
Thanks in advance!
I think you should consider the other Ingress Controllers for your use cases.
I'm not an expert of the GKE, but as I can see Best practices for enterprise multi-tenancy as follows,
you need to consider how to route the multiple Ingress hostnames through wildcard subdomain like the OpenShift additionally.
Set up HTTP(S) Load Balancing with Ingress
:
You can create and configure an HTTP(S) load balancer by creating a Kubernetes Ingress resource,
which defines how traffic reaches your Services and how the traffic is routed to your tenant's application.
By registering Services with the Ingress resource, the Services' naming convention becomes consistent,
showing a single ingress, such as tenanta.example.com and tenantb.example.com.
The routing feature depends on the Ingress Controllers basically.
In my finding, the default Ingress Controllers of the GKE just creates a Google Cloud HTTP(S) Load Balancer, but it does not consider multi-tenancy by default like the OpenShift.
In contrast, in the OpenShift, the Ingress Controller was implemented using HAProxy with dynamic configuration feature as follows.
LB -tenanta.example.com--> HAProxy(directly forward the tenanta.example.com traffic to the target pod IPs) ---> Target Pods
The type of service exposition depends on the K8S implementation on each cloud provider.
If the ingress controller is a component inside your cluster, a ClusterIP is enough to have your service reachable (internally from inside the cluster itself)
If the ingress definition configure an external element (in case of GKE, a load balancer), this element isn't a part of the cluster and can't know the ClusterIP (because it is only accessible internally). A node port is required in this case.
So, in your case, either you expose your service in NodePort, or you configure GKE with another Ingress controller, locally installed in the cluster, instead of using this one by default.
So far GKE does not provide the possibility to dynamically create subdomains. The wished situation would be if GKE cluster can be set some DNS zone managed in GCP and there is a mimik of OpenShift Routes using for example ingress annotations.
But the reality tight now - you have to create subdomain or domain youself as well as IP address wich you connect this domain to. And this particular GCP IP address (using name) can be connected to ingress using annotations. Or it can be used in loadbalancer service.
I don't know if I missed something, but I can't seem to find any posts/doc that is related to my question. Maybe I misunderstand the type ingress in kubernetes, but is it possible to define multiple ingresses that use the same LoadBlancer? Having to start one LoadBalancer for every ingress is costly.
One of the benefit of using ingress it helps to avoid creating an external LoadBalancer for each LoadBalancer type service. On many cloud providers some of the ingress controllers will create the corresponding external Load Balancer resource for each ingress resource. But using Nginx Ingress controller you need one loadBalancer to expose the Nginx Ingress controller itself. Then create multiple ingress resource and have multiple backends. All the backends are served by same external Load Balancer.
From the docs of Nginx Ingress
In this section you can find a common usage scenario where a single
load balancer powered by ingress-nginx will route traffic to 2
different HTTP backend services based on the host name
For a sample microservice based architecture deployed on Google kubernetes engine, I need help to validate my understanding :
We know services are supposed to load balance traffic for pod replicaset.
When we create an nginx ingress controller and ingress definitions to route to each service, a loadbalancer is also setup automatically.
had read somewhere that creating nginx ingress controller means an nginx controller (deployment) and a loadbalancer type service getting created behind the scene. I am not sure if this is true.
It seems loadbalancing is being done by services. URL based routing is
being done by ingress controller.
Why do we need a loadbalancer? It is not meant to load balance across multiple instances. It will just
forward all the traffic to nginx reverse proxy created and it will
route requests based on URL.
Please correct if I am wrong in my understanding.
A Service type LoadBalancer and the Ingress is the way to reach your application externally, although they work in a different way.
Service:
In Kubernetes, a Service is an abstraction which defines a logical set of Pods and a policy by which to access them (sometimes this pattern is called a micro-service). The set of Pods targeted by a Service is usually determined by a selector (see below for why you might want a Service without a selector).
There are some types of Services, and of them is the LoadBalancer type that permit you to expose your application externally assigning a externa IP for your service. For each LoadBalancer service a new external IP will be assign to it.
The load balancing will be handled by kube-proxy.
Ingress:
An API object that manages external access to the services in a cluster, typically HTTP.
Ingress may provide load balancing, SSL termination and name-based virtual hosting.
When you setup an ingress (i.e.: nginx-ingress), a Service type LoadBalancer is created for the ingress-controller pods and a Load Balancer in you cloud provider is automatically created and a public IP will be assigned for the nginx-ingress service.
This load balancer/public ip will be used for incoming connection for all your services, and nginx-ingress will be the responsible to handle the incoming connections.
For example:
Supose you have 10 services of LoadBalancer type: This will result in 10 new publics ips created and you need to use the correspondent ip for the service you want to reach.
But if you use a ingress, only 1 IP will be created and the ingress will be the responsible to handle the incoming connection for the correct service based on PATH/URL you defined in the ingress configuration. With ingress you can:
Use regex in path to define the service to redirect;
Use SSL/TLS
Inject custom headers;
Redirect requests for a default service if one of the service failed (default-backend);
Create whitelists based on IPs
Etc...
A important note about Ingress Load balancing in ingress:
GCE/AWS load balancers do not provide weights for their target pools. This was not an issue with the old LB kube-proxy rules which would correctly balance across all endpoints.
With the new functionality, the external traffic is not equally load balanced across pods, but rather equally balanced at the node level (because GCE/AWS and other external LB implementations do not have the ability for specifying the weight per node, they balance equally across all target nodes, disregarding the number of pods on each node).
An ingress controller(nginx for example) pods needs to be exposed outside the kubernetes cluster as an entry point of all north-south traffic coming into the kubernetes cluster. One way to do that is via a LoadBalancer. You could use NodePort as well but it's not recommended for production or you could just deploy the ingress controller directly on the host network on a host with a public ip. Having a load balancer also gives ability to load balance the traffic across multiple replicas of ingress controller pods.
When you use ingress controller the traffic comes from the loadBalancer to the ingress controller and then gets to backend POD IPs based on the rules defined in ingress resource. This bypasses the kubernetes service and load balancing(by kube-proxy at layer 4) offered by kubernetes service.Internally the ingress controller discovers all the POD IPs from the kubernetes service's endpoints and directly route traffic to the pods.
It seems loadbalancing is being done by services. URL based routing is being done by ingress controller.
Services do balance the traffic between pods. But they aren't accessible outside the kubernetes in Google Kubernetes Engine by default (ClusterIP type). You can create services with LoadBalancer type, but each service will get its own IP address (Network Load Balancer) so it can get expensive. Also if you have one application that has different services it's much better to use Ingress objects that provides single entry point. When you create an Ingress object, the Ingress controller (e.g. nginx one) creates a Google Cloud HTTP(S) load balancer. An Ingress object, in turn, can be associated with one or more Service objects.
Then you can get the assigned load balancer IP from ingress object:
kubectl get ingress ingress-name --output yaml
As a result your application in pods become accessible outside the kubernetes cluster:
LoadBalancerIP/url1 -> service1 -> pods
LoadBalancerIP/url2 -> service2 -> pods