Related
I have an API that will sometimes return a specific key value (in this case id) in the JSON as an Int and other times it will return that same key value as a String. How do I use codable to parse that JSON?
struct GeneralProduct: Codable {
var price: Double!
var id: String?
var name: String!
private enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case price = "p"
case id = "i"
case name = "n"
}
init(price: Double? = nil, id: String? = nil, name: String? = nil) {
self.price = price
self.id = id
self.name = name
}
}
I keep getting this error message: Expected to decode String but found a number instead. The reason that it returns a number is because the id field is empty and when the id field is empty it defaults to returning 0 as an ID which codable identifies as a number. I can basically ignore the ID key but codable does not give me the option to ignore it to my knowledge. What would be the best way to handle this?
Here is the JSON. It is super simple
Working
{
"p":2.12,
"i":"3k3mkfnk3",
"n":"Blue Shirt"
}
Error - because there is no id in the system, it returns 0 as a default which codable obviously sees as a number opposed to string.
{
"p":2.19,
"i":0,
"n":"Black Shirt"
}
struct GeneralProduct: Codable {
var price: Double?
var id: String?
var name: String?
private enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case price = "p", id = "i", name = "n"
}
init(price: Double? = nil, id: String? = nil, name: String? = nil) {
self.price = price
self.id = id
self.name = name
}
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
price = try container.decode(Double.self, forKey: .price)
name = try container.decode(String.self, forKey: .name)
do {
id = try String(container.decode(Int.self, forKey: .id))
} catch DecodingError.typeMismatch {
id = try container.decode(String.self, forKey: .id)
}
}
}
let json1 = """
{
"p":2.12,
"i":"3k3mkfnk3",
"n":"Blue Shirt"
}
"""
let json2 = """
{
"p":2.12,
"i":0,
"n":"Blue Shirt"
}
"""
do {
let product = try JSONDecoder().decode(GeneralProduct.self, from: Data(json2.utf8))
print(product.price ?? "nil")
print(product.id ?? "nil")
print(product.name ?? "nil")
} catch {
print(error)
}
edit/update:
You can also simply assign nil to your id when your api returns 0:
do {
let value = try container.decode(Int.self, forKey: .id)
id = value == 0 ? nil : String(value)
} catch DecodingError.typeMismatch {
id = try container.decode(String.self, forKey: .id)
}
This is a possible solution with MetadataType, the nice thing is that can be a general solution not for GeneralProduct only, but for all the struct having the same ambiguity:
struct GeneralProduct: Codable {
var price:Double?
var id:MetadataType?
var name:String?
private enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case price = "p"
case id = "i"
case name = "n"
}
init(price:Double? = nil, id: MetadataType? = nil, name: String? = nil) {
self.price = price
self.id = id
self.name = name
}
}
enum MetadataType: Codable {
case int(Int)
case string(String)
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.singleValueContainer()
do {
self = try .int(container.decode(Int.self))
} catch DecodingError.typeMismatch {
do {
self = try .string(container.decode(String.self))
} catch DecodingError.typeMismatch {
throw DecodingError.typeMismatch(MetadataType.self, DecodingError.Context(codingPath: decoder.codingPath, debugDescription: "Encoded payload not of an expected type"))
}
}
}
func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
var container = encoder.singleValueContainer()
switch self {
case .int(let int):
try container.encode(int)
case .string(let string):
try container.encode(string)
}
}
}
this is the test:
let decoder = JSONDecoder()
var json = "{\"p\":2.19,\"i\":0,\"n\":\"Black Shirt\"}"
var product = try! decoder.decode(GeneralProduct.self, from: json.data(using: .utf8)!)
if let id = product.id {
print(id) // 0
}
json = "{\"p\":2.19,\"i\":\"hello world\",\"n\":\"Black Shirt\"}"
product = try! decoder.decode(GeneralProduct.self, from: json.data(using: .utf8)!)
if let id = product.id {
print(id) // hello world
}
Seamlessly decoding from either Int or String into the same property requires writing some code.
However, thanks to a (somewhat) new addition to the language,(property wrappers), you can make it quite easy to reuse this logic wherever you need it:
// note this is only `Decodable`
struct GeneralProduct: Decodable {
var price: Double
#Flexible var id: Int // note this is an Int
var name: String
}
The property wrapper and its supporting code can be implemented like this:
#propertyWrapper struct Flexible<T: FlexibleDecodable>: Decodable {
var wrappedValue: T
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
wrappedValue = try T(container: decoder.singleValueContainer())
}
}
protocol FlexibleDecodable {
init(container: SingleValueDecodingContainer) throws
}
extension Int: FlexibleDecodable {
init(container: SingleValueDecodingContainer) throws {
if let int = try? container.decode(Int.self) {
self = int
} else if let string = try? container.decode(String.self), let int = Int(string) {
self = int
} else {
throw DecodingError.dataCorrupted(.init(codingPath: container.codingPath, debugDescription: "Invalid int value"))
}
}
}
Original answer
You can use a wrapper over a string that knows how to decode from any of the basic JSON data types: string, number, boolean:
struct RelaxedString: Codable {
let value: String
init(_ value: String) {
self.value = value
}
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.singleValueContainer()
// attempt to decode from all JSON primitives
if let str = try? container.decode(String.self) {
value = str
} else if let int = try? container.decode(Int.self) {
value = int.description
} else if let double = try? container.decode(Double.self) {
value = double.description
} else if let bool = try? container.decode(Bool.self) {
value = bool.description
} else {
throw DecodingError.typeMismatch(String.self, .init(codingPath: decoder.codingPath, debugDescription: ""))
}
}
func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
var container = encoder.singleValueContainer()
try container.encode(value)
}
}
You can then use this new type in your struct. One minor disadvantage would be that consumer of the struct will need to make another indirection to access the wrapped string. However that can be avoided by declaring the decoded RelaxedString property as private, and use a computed one for the public interface:
struct GeneralProduct: Codable {
var price: Double!
var _id: RelaxedString?
var name: String!
var id: String? {
get { _id?.value }
set { _id = newValue.map(RelaxedString.init) }
}
private enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case price = "p"
case _id = "i"
case name = "n"
}
init(price: Double? = nil, id: String? = nil, name: String? = nil) {
self.price = price
self._id = id.map(RelaxedString.init)
self.name = name
}
}
Advantages of the above approach:
no need to write custom init(from decoder: Decoder) code, which can become tedious if the number of properties to be decoded increase
reusability - RelaxedString can be seamlessly used in other structs
the fact that the id can be decoded from a string or an int remains an implementation detail, consumers of GeneralProduct don't know/care that the id can come from a string or an int
the public interface exposes string values, which keeps the consumer code simple as it will not have to deal with multiple types of data
I created this Gist which has a ValueWrapper struct that can handle
the following types
case stringValue(String)
case intValue(Int)
case doubleValue(Double)
case boolValue(Bool)
https://gist.github.com/amrangry/89097b86514b3477cae79dd28bba3f23
Based on #Cristik 's answer, I come with another solution using #propertyWrapper.
#propertyWrapper
struct StringForcible: Codable {
var wrappedValue: String?
enum CodingKeys: CodingKey {}
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.singleValueContainer()
if let string = try? container.decode(String.self) {
wrappedValue = string
} else if let integer = try? container.decode(Int.self) {
wrappedValue = "\(integer)"
} else if let double = try? container.decode(Double.self) {
wrappedValue = "\(double)"
} else if container.decodeNil() {
wrappedValue = nil
}
else {
throw DecodingError.typeMismatch(String.self, .init(codingPath: container.codingPath, debugDescription: "Could not decode incoming value to String. It is not a type of String, Int or Double."))
}
}
func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
var container = encoder.singleValueContainer()
try container.encode(wrappedValue)
}
init() {
self.wrappedValue = nil
}
}
And usage is
struct SomeDTO: Codable {
#StringForcible var id: String?
}
Also works like -I think-
struct AnotherDTO: Codable {
var some: SomeDTO?
}
As you can see below, I downloaded an array of structures containing heterogeneous objects that were decoded into enums containing nested objects.
I would now like to put said objects into a generic Model structure, but the compiler won't allow this - the error is described below in the code comment. I am relatively new to programming in Swift, I would appreciate your help.
import Foundation
let jsonString = """
{
"data":[
{
"type":"league",
"info":{
"name":"NBA",
"sport":"Basketball",
"website":"https://nba.com/"
}
},
{
"type":"player",
"info":{
"name":"Kawhi Leonard",
"position":"Small Forward",
"picture":"https://i.ibb.co/b5sGk6L/40a233a203be2a30e6d50501a73d3a0a8ccc131fv2-128.jpg"
}
},
{
"type":"team",
"info":{
"name":"Los Angeles Clippers",
"state":"California",
"logo":"https://logos-download.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/LA_Clippers_logo_logotype_emblem.png"
}
}
]
}
"""
struct Response: Decodable {
let data: [Datum]
}
struct League: Codable {
let name: String
let sport: String
let website: URL
}
extension League: Displayable {
var text: String { name }
var image: URL { website }
}
struct Player: Codable {
let name: String
let position: String
let picture: URL
}
extension Player: Displayable {
var text: String { name }
var image: URL { picture }
}
struct Team: Codable {
let name: String
let state: String
let logo: URL
}
extension Team: Displayable {
var text: String { name }
var image: URL { logo }
}
enum Datum: Decodable {
case league(League)
case player(Player)
case team(Team)
enum DatumType: String, Decodable {
case league
case player
case team
}
private enum CodingKeys : String, CodingKey { case type, info }
init(from decoder : Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
let type = try container.decode(DatumType.self, forKey: .type)
switch type {
case .league:
let item = try container.decode(League.self, forKey: .info)
self = .league(item)
case .player:
let item = try container.decode(Player.self, forKey: .info)
self = .player(item)
case .team:
let item = try container.decode(Team.self, forKey: .info)
self = .team(item)
}
}
}
protocol Displayable {
var text: String { get }
var image: URL { get }
}
struct Model<T: Displayable> {
let text: String
let image: URL
init(item: T) {
self.text = item.text
self.image = item.image
}
}
do {
let response = try JSONDecoder().decode(Response.self, from: Data(jsonString.utf8))
let items = response.data
let models = items.map { (item) -> Model<Displayable> in // error: only struct/enum/class types can conform to protocols
switch item {
case .league(let league):
return Model(item: league)
case .player(let player):
return Model(item: player)
case .team(let team):
return Model(item: team)
}
}
} catch {
print(error)
}
You do not need generics here.
Change Model to accept any type that conforms to Displayable in the init
struct Model {
let text: String
let image: URL
init(item: Displayable) {
self.text = item.text
self.image = item.image
}
}
and then change the closure to return Model
let models = items.map { (item) -> Model in
If you want to keep your Model struct generic then you need to change the map call to
let models: [Any] = items.map { item -> Any in
switch item {
case .league(let league):
return Model(item: league)
case .player(let player):
return Model(item: player)
case .team(let team):
return Model(item: team)
}
}
This will give the following output when conforming to CustomStringConvertible
extension Model: CustomStringConvertible {
var description: String {
"\(text) type:\(type(of: self))"
}
}
print(models)
[NBA type:Model<League>, Kawhi Leonard type:Model<Player>, Los Angeles Clippers type:Model<Team>]
If you are only interested in name and the key representing the URL parse the JSON directly into Model by using nestedContainer this way
struct Response: Decodable {
let data: [Model]
}
struct Model: Decodable {
let name: String
let image: URL
enum DatumType: String, Decodable {
case league
case player
case team
}
private enum CodingKeys : String, CodingKey { case type, info }
private enum CodingSubKeys : String, CodingKey { case name, website, picture, logo }
init(from decoder : Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
let type = try container.decode(DatumType.self, forKey: .type)
let subContainer = try container.nestedContainer(keyedBy: CodingSubKeys.self, forKey: .info)
self.name = try subContainer.decode(String.self, forKey: .name)
let urlKey : CodingSubKeys
switch type {
case .league: urlKey = .website
case .player: urlKey = .picture
case .team: urlKey = .logo
}
self.image = try subContainer.decode(URL.self, forKey: urlKey)
}
}
do {
let response = try JSONDecoder().decode(Response.self, from: Data(jsonString.utf8))
let data = response.data
print(data)
} catch {
print(error)
}
I have an API that will sometimes return a specific key value (in this case id) in the JSON as an Int and other times it will return that same key value as a String. How do I use codable to parse that JSON?
struct GeneralProduct: Codable {
var price: Double!
var id: String?
var name: String!
private enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case price = "p"
case id = "i"
case name = "n"
}
init(price: Double? = nil, id: String? = nil, name: String? = nil) {
self.price = price
self.id = id
self.name = name
}
}
I keep getting this error message: Expected to decode String but found a number instead. The reason that it returns a number is because the id field is empty and when the id field is empty it defaults to returning 0 as an ID which codable identifies as a number. I can basically ignore the ID key but codable does not give me the option to ignore it to my knowledge. What would be the best way to handle this?
Here is the JSON. It is super simple
Working
{
"p":2.12,
"i":"3k3mkfnk3",
"n":"Blue Shirt"
}
Error - because there is no id in the system, it returns 0 as a default which codable obviously sees as a number opposed to string.
{
"p":2.19,
"i":0,
"n":"Black Shirt"
}
struct GeneralProduct: Codable {
var price: Double?
var id: String?
var name: String?
private enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case price = "p", id = "i", name = "n"
}
init(price: Double? = nil, id: String? = nil, name: String? = nil) {
self.price = price
self.id = id
self.name = name
}
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
price = try container.decode(Double.self, forKey: .price)
name = try container.decode(String.self, forKey: .name)
do {
id = try String(container.decode(Int.self, forKey: .id))
} catch DecodingError.typeMismatch {
id = try container.decode(String.self, forKey: .id)
}
}
}
let json1 = """
{
"p":2.12,
"i":"3k3mkfnk3",
"n":"Blue Shirt"
}
"""
let json2 = """
{
"p":2.12,
"i":0,
"n":"Blue Shirt"
}
"""
do {
let product = try JSONDecoder().decode(GeneralProduct.self, from: Data(json2.utf8))
print(product.price ?? "nil")
print(product.id ?? "nil")
print(product.name ?? "nil")
} catch {
print(error)
}
edit/update:
You can also simply assign nil to your id when your api returns 0:
do {
let value = try container.decode(Int.self, forKey: .id)
id = value == 0 ? nil : String(value)
} catch DecodingError.typeMismatch {
id = try container.decode(String.self, forKey: .id)
}
This is a possible solution with MetadataType, the nice thing is that can be a general solution not for GeneralProduct only, but for all the struct having the same ambiguity:
struct GeneralProduct: Codable {
var price:Double?
var id:MetadataType?
var name:String?
private enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case price = "p"
case id = "i"
case name = "n"
}
init(price:Double? = nil, id: MetadataType? = nil, name: String? = nil) {
self.price = price
self.id = id
self.name = name
}
}
enum MetadataType: Codable {
case int(Int)
case string(String)
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.singleValueContainer()
do {
self = try .int(container.decode(Int.self))
} catch DecodingError.typeMismatch {
do {
self = try .string(container.decode(String.self))
} catch DecodingError.typeMismatch {
throw DecodingError.typeMismatch(MetadataType.self, DecodingError.Context(codingPath: decoder.codingPath, debugDescription: "Encoded payload not of an expected type"))
}
}
}
func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
var container = encoder.singleValueContainer()
switch self {
case .int(let int):
try container.encode(int)
case .string(let string):
try container.encode(string)
}
}
}
this is the test:
let decoder = JSONDecoder()
var json = "{\"p\":2.19,\"i\":0,\"n\":\"Black Shirt\"}"
var product = try! decoder.decode(GeneralProduct.self, from: json.data(using: .utf8)!)
if let id = product.id {
print(id) // 0
}
json = "{\"p\":2.19,\"i\":\"hello world\",\"n\":\"Black Shirt\"}"
product = try! decoder.decode(GeneralProduct.self, from: json.data(using: .utf8)!)
if let id = product.id {
print(id) // hello world
}
Seamlessly decoding from either Int or String into the same property requires writing some code.
However, thanks to a (somewhat) new addition to the language,(property wrappers), you can make it quite easy to reuse this logic wherever you need it:
// note this is only `Decodable`
struct GeneralProduct: Decodable {
var price: Double
#Flexible var id: Int // note this is an Int
var name: String
}
The property wrapper and its supporting code can be implemented like this:
#propertyWrapper struct Flexible<T: FlexibleDecodable>: Decodable {
var wrappedValue: T
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
wrappedValue = try T(container: decoder.singleValueContainer())
}
}
protocol FlexibleDecodable {
init(container: SingleValueDecodingContainer) throws
}
extension Int: FlexibleDecodable {
init(container: SingleValueDecodingContainer) throws {
if let int = try? container.decode(Int.self) {
self = int
} else if let string = try? container.decode(String.self), let int = Int(string) {
self = int
} else {
throw DecodingError.dataCorrupted(.init(codingPath: container.codingPath, debugDescription: "Invalid int value"))
}
}
}
Original answer
You can use a wrapper over a string that knows how to decode from any of the basic JSON data types: string, number, boolean:
struct RelaxedString: Codable {
let value: String
init(_ value: String) {
self.value = value
}
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.singleValueContainer()
// attempt to decode from all JSON primitives
if let str = try? container.decode(String.self) {
value = str
} else if let int = try? container.decode(Int.self) {
value = int.description
} else if let double = try? container.decode(Double.self) {
value = double.description
} else if let bool = try? container.decode(Bool.self) {
value = bool.description
} else {
throw DecodingError.typeMismatch(String.self, .init(codingPath: decoder.codingPath, debugDescription: ""))
}
}
func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
var container = encoder.singleValueContainer()
try container.encode(value)
}
}
You can then use this new type in your struct. One minor disadvantage would be that consumer of the struct will need to make another indirection to access the wrapped string. However that can be avoided by declaring the decoded RelaxedString property as private, and use a computed one for the public interface:
struct GeneralProduct: Codable {
var price: Double!
var _id: RelaxedString?
var name: String!
var id: String? {
get { _id?.value }
set { _id = newValue.map(RelaxedString.init) }
}
private enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case price = "p"
case _id = "i"
case name = "n"
}
init(price: Double? = nil, id: String? = nil, name: String? = nil) {
self.price = price
self._id = id.map(RelaxedString.init)
self.name = name
}
}
Advantages of the above approach:
no need to write custom init(from decoder: Decoder) code, which can become tedious if the number of properties to be decoded increase
reusability - RelaxedString can be seamlessly used in other structs
the fact that the id can be decoded from a string or an int remains an implementation detail, consumers of GeneralProduct don't know/care that the id can come from a string or an int
the public interface exposes string values, which keeps the consumer code simple as it will not have to deal with multiple types of data
I created this Gist which has a ValueWrapper struct that can handle
the following types
case stringValue(String)
case intValue(Int)
case doubleValue(Double)
case boolValue(Bool)
https://gist.github.com/amrangry/89097b86514b3477cae79dd28bba3f23
Based on #Cristik 's answer, I come with another solution using #propertyWrapper.
#propertyWrapper
struct StringForcible: Codable {
var wrappedValue: String?
enum CodingKeys: CodingKey {}
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.singleValueContainer()
if let string = try? container.decode(String.self) {
wrappedValue = string
} else if let integer = try? container.decode(Int.self) {
wrappedValue = "\(integer)"
} else if let double = try? container.decode(Double.self) {
wrappedValue = "\(double)"
} else if container.decodeNil() {
wrappedValue = nil
}
else {
throw DecodingError.typeMismatch(String.self, .init(codingPath: container.codingPath, debugDescription: "Could not decode incoming value to String. It is not a type of String, Int or Double."))
}
}
func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
var container = encoder.singleValueContainer()
try container.encode(wrappedValue)
}
init() {
self.wrappedValue = nil
}
}
And usage is
struct SomeDTO: Codable {
#StringForcible var id: String?
}
Also works like -I think-
struct AnotherDTO: Codable {
var some: SomeDTO?
}
I have an API that will sometimes return a specific key value (in this case id) in the JSON as an Int and other times it will return that same key value as a String. How do I use codable to parse that JSON?
struct GeneralProduct: Codable {
var price: Double!
var id: String?
var name: String!
private enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case price = "p"
case id = "i"
case name = "n"
}
init(price: Double? = nil, id: String? = nil, name: String? = nil) {
self.price = price
self.id = id
self.name = name
}
}
I keep getting this error message: Expected to decode String but found a number instead. The reason that it returns a number is because the id field is empty and when the id field is empty it defaults to returning 0 as an ID which codable identifies as a number. I can basically ignore the ID key but codable does not give me the option to ignore it to my knowledge. What would be the best way to handle this?
Here is the JSON. It is super simple
Working
{
"p":2.12,
"i":"3k3mkfnk3",
"n":"Blue Shirt"
}
Error - because there is no id in the system, it returns 0 as a default which codable obviously sees as a number opposed to string.
{
"p":2.19,
"i":0,
"n":"Black Shirt"
}
struct GeneralProduct: Codable {
var price: Double?
var id: String?
var name: String?
private enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case price = "p", id = "i", name = "n"
}
init(price: Double? = nil, id: String? = nil, name: String? = nil) {
self.price = price
self.id = id
self.name = name
}
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
price = try container.decode(Double.self, forKey: .price)
name = try container.decode(String.self, forKey: .name)
do {
id = try String(container.decode(Int.self, forKey: .id))
} catch DecodingError.typeMismatch {
id = try container.decode(String.self, forKey: .id)
}
}
}
let json1 = """
{
"p":2.12,
"i":"3k3mkfnk3",
"n":"Blue Shirt"
}
"""
let json2 = """
{
"p":2.12,
"i":0,
"n":"Blue Shirt"
}
"""
do {
let product = try JSONDecoder().decode(GeneralProduct.self, from: Data(json2.utf8))
print(product.price ?? "nil")
print(product.id ?? "nil")
print(product.name ?? "nil")
} catch {
print(error)
}
edit/update:
You can also simply assign nil to your id when your api returns 0:
do {
let value = try container.decode(Int.self, forKey: .id)
id = value == 0 ? nil : String(value)
} catch DecodingError.typeMismatch {
id = try container.decode(String.self, forKey: .id)
}
This is a possible solution with MetadataType, the nice thing is that can be a general solution not for GeneralProduct only, but for all the struct having the same ambiguity:
struct GeneralProduct: Codable {
var price:Double?
var id:MetadataType?
var name:String?
private enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case price = "p"
case id = "i"
case name = "n"
}
init(price:Double? = nil, id: MetadataType? = nil, name: String? = nil) {
self.price = price
self.id = id
self.name = name
}
}
enum MetadataType: Codable {
case int(Int)
case string(String)
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.singleValueContainer()
do {
self = try .int(container.decode(Int.self))
} catch DecodingError.typeMismatch {
do {
self = try .string(container.decode(String.self))
} catch DecodingError.typeMismatch {
throw DecodingError.typeMismatch(MetadataType.self, DecodingError.Context(codingPath: decoder.codingPath, debugDescription: "Encoded payload not of an expected type"))
}
}
}
func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
var container = encoder.singleValueContainer()
switch self {
case .int(let int):
try container.encode(int)
case .string(let string):
try container.encode(string)
}
}
}
this is the test:
let decoder = JSONDecoder()
var json = "{\"p\":2.19,\"i\":0,\"n\":\"Black Shirt\"}"
var product = try! decoder.decode(GeneralProduct.self, from: json.data(using: .utf8)!)
if let id = product.id {
print(id) // 0
}
json = "{\"p\":2.19,\"i\":\"hello world\",\"n\":\"Black Shirt\"}"
product = try! decoder.decode(GeneralProduct.self, from: json.data(using: .utf8)!)
if let id = product.id {
print(id) // hello world
}
Seamlessly decoding from either Int or String into the same property requires writing some code.
However, thanks to a (somewhat) new addition to the language,(property wrappers), you can make it quite easy to reuse this logic wherever you need it:
// note this is only `Decodable`
struct GeneralProduct: Decodable {
var price: Double
#Flexible var id: Int // note this is an Int
var name: String
}
The property wrapper and its supporting code can be implemented like this:
#propertyWrapper struct Flexible<T: FlexibleDecodable>: Decodable {
var wrappedValue: T
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
wrappedValue = try T(container: decoder.singleValueContainer())
}
}
protocol FlexibleDecodable {
init(container: SingleValueDecodingContainer) throws
}
extension Int: FlexibleDecodable {
init(container: SingleValueDecodingContainer) throws {
if let int = try? container.decode(Int.self) {
self = int
} else if let string = try? container.decode(String.self), let int = Int(string) {
self = int
} else {
throw DecodingError.dataCorrupted(.init(codingPath: container.codingPath, debugDescription: "Invalid int value"))
}
}
}
Original answer
You can use a wrapper over a string that knows how to decode from any of the basic JSON data types: string, number, boolean:
struct RelaxedString: Codable {
let value: String
init(_ value: String) {
self.value = value
}
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.singleValueContainer()
// attempt to decode from all JSON primitives
if let str = try? container.decode(String.self) {
value = str
} else if let int = try? container.decode(Int.self) {
value = int.description
} else if let double = try? container.decode(Double.self) {
value = double.description
} else if let bool = try? container.decode(Bool.self) {
value = bool.description
} else {
throw DecodingError.typeMismatch(String.self, .init(codingPath: decoder.codingPath, debugDescription: ""))
}
}
func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
var container = encoder.singleValueContainer()
try container.encode(value)
}
}
You can then use this new type in your struct. One minor disadvantage would be that consumer of the struct will need to make another indirection to access the wrapped string. However that can be avoided by declaring the decoded RelaxedString property as private, and use a computed one for the public interface:
struct GeneralProduct: Codable {
var price: Double!
var _id: RelaxedString?
var name: String!
var id: String? {
get { _id?.value }
set { _id = newValue.map(RelaxedString.init) }
}
private enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case price = "p"
case _id = "i"
case name = "n"
}
init(price: Double? = nil, id: String? = nil, name: String? = nil) {
self.price = price
self._id = id.map(RelaxedString.init)
self.name = name
}
}
Advantages of the above approach:
no need to write custom init(from decoder: Decoder) code, which can become tedious if the number of properties to be decoded increase
reusability - RelaxedString can be seamlessly used in other structs
the fact that the id can be decoded from a string or an int remains an implementation detail, consumers of GeneralProduct don't know/care that the id can come from a string or an int
the public interface exposes string values, which keeps the consumer code simple as it will not have to deal with multiple types of data
I created this Gist which has a ValueWrapper struct that can handle
the following types
case stringValue(String)
case intValue(Int)
case doubleValue(Double)
case boolValue(Bool)
https://gist.github.com/amrangry/89097b86514b3477cae79dd28bba3f23
Based on #Cristik 's answer, I come with another solution using #propertyWrapper.
#propertyWrapper
struct StringForcible: Codable {
var wrappedValue: String?
enum CodingKeys: CodingKey {}
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.singleValueContainer()
if let string = try? container.decode(String.self) {
wrappedValue = string
} else if let integer = try? container.decode(Int.self) {
wrappedValue = "\(integer)"
} else if let double = try? container.decode(Double.self) {
wrappedValue = "\(double)"
} else if container.decodeNil() {
wrappedValue = nil
}
else {
throw DecodingError.typeMismatch(String.self, .init(codingPath: container.codingPath, debugDescription: "Could not decode incoming value to String. It is not a type of String, Int or Double."))
}
}
func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
var container = encoder.singleValueContainer()
try container.encode(wrappedValue)
}
init() {
self.wrappedValue = nil
}
}
And usage is
struct SomeDTO: Codable {
#StringForcible var id: String?
}
Also works like -I think-
struct AnotherDTO: Codable {
var some: SomeDTO?
}
This question already has answers here:
Using codable with value that is sometimes an Int and other times a String
(5 answers)
Closed 6 months ago.
I have to decode a JSON with a big structure and a lot of nested arrays.
I have reproduced the structure in my UserModel file, and it works, except with one property (postcode) that is in a nested array (Location) that sometimes is an Int and some other is a String. I don't know how to handle this situation and tried a lot of different solutions.
The last one I've tried is from this blog https://agostini.tech/2017/11/12/swift-4-codable-in-real-life-part-2/
And it suggests using generics. But now I can't initialize the Location object without providing a Decoder():
Any help or any different approach would be appreciated.
The API call is this one: https://api.randomuser.me/?results=100&seed=xmoba
This is my UserModel File:
import Foundation
import UIKit
import ObjectMapper
struct PostModel: Equatable, Decodable{
static func ==(lhs: PostModel, rhs: PostModel) -> Bool {
if lhs.userId != rhs.userId {
return false
}
if lhs.id != rhs.id {
return false
}
if lhs.title != rhs.title {
return false
}
if lhs.body != rhs.body {
return false
}
return true
}
var userId : Int
var id : Int
var title : String
var body : String
enum key : CodingKey {
case userId
case id
case title
case body
}
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.container(keyedBy: key.self)
let userId = try container.decode(Int.self, forKey: .userId)
let id = try container.decode(Int.self, forKey: .id)
let title = try container.decode(String.self, forKey: .title)
let body = try container.decode(String.self, forKey: .body)
self.init(userId: userId, id: id, title: title, body: body)
}
init(userId : Int, id : Int, title : String, body : String) {
self.userId = userId
self.id = id
self.title = title
self.body = body
}
init?(map: Map){
self.id = 0
self.title = ""
self.body = ""
self.userId = 0
}
}
extension PostModel: Mappable {
mutating func mapping(map: Map) {
id <- map["id"]
title <- map["title"]
body <- map["body"]
userId <- map["userId"]
}
}
Well it's a common IntOrString problem. You could just make your property type an enum that can handle either String or Int.
enum IntOrString: Codable {
case int(Int)
case string(String)
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.singleValueContainer()
do {
self = try .int(container.decode(Int.self))
} catch DecodingError.typeMismatch {
do {
self = try .string(container.decode(String.self))
} catch DecodingError.typeMismatch {
throw DecodingError.typeMismatch(IntOrString.self, DecodingError.Context(codingPath: decoder.codingPath, debugDescription: "Encoded payload conflicts with expected type, (Int or String)"))
}
}
}
func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
var container = encoder.singleValueContainer()
switch self {
case .int(let int):
try container.encode(int)
case .string(let string):
try container.encode(string)
}
}
}
As I have found mismatch of your model that you posted in your question and the one in the API endpoint you pointed to, I've created my own model and own JSON that needs to be decoded.
struct PostModel: Decodable {
let userId: Int
let id: Int
let title: String
let body: String
let postCode: IntOrString
// you don't need to implement init(from decoder: Decoder) throws
// because all the properties are already Decodable
}
Decoding when postCode is Int:
let jsonData = """
{
"userId": 123,
"id": 1,
"title": "Title",
"body": "Body",
"postCode": 9999
}
""".data(using: .utf8)!
do {
let postModel = try JSONDecoder().decode(PostModel.self, from: jsonData)
if case .int(let int) = postModel.postCode {
print(int) // prints 9999
} else if case .string(let string) = postModel.postCode {
print(string)
}
} catch {
print(error)
}
Decoding when postCode is String:
let jsonData = """
{
"userId": 123,
"id": 1,
"title": "Title",
"body": "Body",
"postCode": "9999"
}
""".data(using: .utf8)!
do {
let postModel = try JSONDecoder().decode(PostModel.self, from: jsonData)
if case .int(let int) = postModel.postCode {
print(int)
} else if case .string(let string) = postModel.postCode {
print(string) // prints "9999"
}
} catch {
print(error)
}
You can use generic like this:
enum Either<L, R> {
case left(L)
case right(R)
}
extension Either: Decodable where L: Decodable, R: Decodable {
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.singleValueContainer()
if let left = try? container.decode(L.self) {
self = .left(left)
} else if let right = try? container.decode(R.self) {
self = .right(right)
} else {
throw DecodingError.typeMismatch(Either<L, R>.self, .init(codingPath: decoder.codingPath, debugDescription: "Expected either `\(L.self)` or `\(R.self)`"))
}
}
}
extension Either: Encodable where L: Encodable, R: Encodable {
func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
var container = encoder.singleValueContainer()
switch self {
case let .left(left):
try container.encode(left)
case let .right(right):
try container.encode(right)
}
}
}
And then declare postcode: Either<Int, String> and if your model is Decodable and all other fields are Decodable too no extra code would be needed.
If postcode can be both String and Int, you have (at least) two possible solutions for this issue. Firstly, you can simply store all postcodes as String, since all Ints can be converted to String. This seems like the best solution, since it seems highly unlikely that you'd need to perform any numeric operations on a postcode, especially if some postcodes can be String. The other solution would be creating two properties for postcode, one of type String? and one of type Int? and always only populating one of the two depending on the input data, as explained in Using codable with key that is sometimes an Int and other times a String.
The solution storing all postcodes as String:
struct PostModel: Equatable, Decodable {
static func ==(lhs: PostModel, rhs: PostModel) -> Bool {
return lhs.userId == rhs.userId && lhs.id == rhs.id && lhs.title == rhs.title && lhs.body == rhs.body
}
var userId: Int
var id: Int
var title: String
var body: String
var postcode: String
enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case userId, id, title, body, postcode
}
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
self.userId = try container.decode(Int.self, forKey: .userId)
self.id = try container.decode(Int.self, forKey: .id)
self.title = try container.decode(String.self, forKey: .title)
self.body = try container.decode(String.self, forKey: .body)
if let postcode = try? container.decode(String.self, forKey: .postcode) {
self.postcode = postcode
} else {
let numericPostcode = try container.decode(Int.self, forKey: .postcode)
self.postcode = "\(numericPostcode)"
}
}
}
try this extension
extension KeyedDecodingContainer{
public func decodeIfPresent(_ type: String.Type, forKey key: KeyedDecodingContainer<K>.Key) throws -> String?{
if let resStr = try? decode(type, forKey: key){
return resStr
}else{
if let resInt = try? decode(Int.self, forKey: key){
return String(resInt)
}
return nil
}
}
public func decodeIfPresent(_ type: Int.Type, forKey key: KeyedDecodingContainer<K>.Key) throws -> Int?{
if let resInt = try? decode(type, forKey: key){
return resInt
}else{
if let resStr = try? decode(String.self, forKey: key){
return Int(resStr)
}
return nil
}
}
}
example
struct Foo:Codable{
let strValue:String?
let intValue:Int?
}
let data = """
{
"strValue": 1,
"intValue": "1"
}
""".data(using: .utf8)
print(try? JSONDecoder().decode(Foo.self, from: data!))
it will print "Foo(strValue: Optional("1"), intValue: Optional(1))"