I have the following method to update a document in MongoDB:
public async Task UpdateAsync(T entity)
{
await _collection.ReplaceOneAsync(filter => filter.Id == entity.Id, entity);
}
Which works fine - I was just wondering if anybody has an example of how the UpdateManyAsync function works:
public async Task UpdateManyAsync(IEnumerable<T> entities)
{
await _collection.UpdateManyAsync(); // What are the parameters here
}
Any advice is appreciated!
UpdateManyAsync works the same way as update with multi: true in Mongo shell. So you can specify filtering condition and update operation and it will affect multiple documents. For instance to increment all a fields where a is greater than 10 you can use this method:
var builder = Builders<SampleClass>.Update;
await myCollection.UpdateManyAsync(x => x.a > 10, builder.Inc(x => x.a, 1));
I guess you'd like to replace multiple documents. That can be achieved using bulkWrite method. If you need generic method in C# then you can introduce some kind of marker interface to build filter part of replace operation:
public interface IMongoIdentity
{
ObjectId Id { get; set; }
}
Then you can add generic constaint to your class and use BuikWrite in .NET like below:
class YourRepository<T> where T : IMongoIdentity
{
IMongoCollection<T> collection;
public async Task UpdateManyAsync(IEnumerable<T> entities)
{
var updates = new List<WriteModel<T>>();
var filterBuilder = Builders<T>.Filter;
foreach (var doc in entities)
{
var filter = filterBuilder.Where(x => x.Id == doc.Id);
updates.Add(new ReplaceOneModel<T>(filter, doc));
}
await collection.BulkWriteAsync(updates);
}
}
As #mickl answer, you can not use x=> x.Id because it is a Generic
Use as below:
public async Task<string> UpdateManyAsync(IEnumerable<T> entities)
{
var updates = new List<WriteModel<T>>();
var filterBuilder = Builders<T>.Filter;
foreach (var doc in entities)
{
foreach (PropertyInfo prop in typeof(T).GetProperties())
{
if (prop.Name == "Id")
{
var filter = filterBuilder.Eq(prop.Name, prop.GetValue(doc));
updates.Add(new ReplaceOneModel<T>(filter, doc));
break;
}
}
}
BulkWriteResult result = await _collection.BulkWriteAsync(updates);
return result.ModifiedCount.ToString();
}
Or you go by Bson attribute:
public async Task UpdateManyAsync(IEnumerable<TEntity> objs, CancellationToken cancellationToken = default)
{
var updates = new List<WriteModel<TEntity>>();
var filterBuilder = Builders<TEntity>.Filter;
foreach (var obj in objs)
{
foreach (var prop in typeof(TEntity).GetProperties())
{
object[] attrs = prop.GetCustomAttributes(true);
foreach (object attr in attrs)
{
var bsonId = attr as BsonIdAttribute;
if (bsonId != null)
{
var filter = filterBuilder.Eq(prop.Name, prop.GetValue(obj));
updates.Add(new ReplaceOneModel<TEntity>(filter, obj));
break;
}
}
}
}
await _dbCollection.BulkWriteAsync(updates, null, cancellationToken);
}
Related
This is my sample model,
Name
Age
I have a list of records for which I will use Entity Framework Core AddRange. This is my sample data, say list 1
John, 21
Mike, 18
Rick, 19
Alex, 20
I have another query which is a list of the existing records, say list 2.
John, 21
Alex, 20
I want to compare these 2 lists to get what exists in list 1 but not in list 2.
Mike, 18
Rick, 19
I tried using LINQ except but it can't be used for complex types. I also tried to use .Any like below but it returns nothing.
var result = list1.Where(x=> !list2.Any(y=>x.Name == y.Name));
I do not want to check and insert one record at one time. I want to insert by list of objects using AddRange.
Is there any Nuget package that can easily get this?
For not so big amount of records, you can use the following extension:
var nonExistent = await ctx.Some.GetNonExistentAsync(list2, x => x.Name);
Or with complex key:
var nonExistent = await ctx.Some.GetNonExistentAsync(list2,
x => new { x.Name, x.Other });
It will generate effective SQL to check which records do not exist.
And implementation:
public static class QueryableExtensions
{
public static async Task<List<T>> GetNonExistentAsync<T, TKey>(this IQueryable<T> query, IEnumerable<T> records,
Expression<Func<T, TKey>> keySelector, CancellationToken cancellationToken = default)
{
var recordsList = records.ToList();
var keySelectorCompiled = keySelector.Compile();
var predicate = BuildPredicate(recordsList, keySelector, keySelectorCompiled);
var existent = (await query
.Where(predicate)
.Select(keySelector)
.ToListAsync(cancellationToken))
.ToHashSet();
var result = recordsList.Where(r => !existent.Contains(keySelectorCompiled(r))).ToList();
return result;
}
private static Expression<Func<T, bool>> BuildPredicate<T, TKey>(IEnumerable<T> records, Expression<Func<T, TKey>> keySelector, Func<T, TKey> keySelectorCompiled)
{
var members = CollectMembers(keySelector.Body).ToList();
if (members.Count == 0)
throw new InvalidOperationException("No key found");
Expression? predicate = null;
if (members.Count == 1 && keySelector.Body.NodeType == ExpressionType.MemberAccess)
{
// we can use Contains
var recordsSequence = Expression.Constant(records.Select(keySelectorCompiled));
predicate = Expression.Call(typeof(Enumerable), nameof(Enumerable.Contains), new[] { typeof(TKey) },
recordsSequence, keySelector.Body);
}
else
{
foreach (var record in records)
{
Expression? subPredicate = null;
var recordExpression = Expression.Constant(record);
foreach (var m in members)
{
var memberExpression =
ReplacingExpressionVisitor.Replace(keySelector.Parameters[0], recordExpression, m);
var equality = Expression.Equal(m, memberExpression);
subPredicate = subPredicate == null ? equality : Expression.AndAlso(subPredicate, equality);
}
if (subPredicate == null)
throw new InvalidOperationException(); // should never happen
predicate = predicate == null ? subPredicate : Expression.OrElse(predicate, subPredicate);
}
}
predicate ??= Expression.Constant(false);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>(predicate, keySelector.Parameters);
}
private static IEnumerable<Expression> CollectMembers(Expression expr)
{
switch (expr.NodeType)
{
case ExpressionType.New:
{
var ne = (NewExpression)expr;
foreach (var a in ne.Arguments)
foreach (var m in CollectMembers(a))
{
yield return m;
}
break;
}
case ExpressionType.MemberAccess:
yield return expr;
break;
default:
throw new InvalidOperationException();
}
}
}
Please note this error message :
System.NotSupportedException: 'Could not parse expression
'value(Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Query.Internal.EntityQueryable
This overload of the method 'System.Linq.Queryable.Except' is
currently not supported.'
Is supported in newer versions of ef core?
my code :
var tuple = SearchBrand(searchTerm);
var result = GetExceptionsBrand(tuple.Item1, categoryId);
return Json(new
{
iTotalDisplayRecords = tuple.Item2,
iDisplayedBrand = result
.Skip(page * 10)
.Take(10)
.ToList(),
});
public async Task<Tuple<IQueryable<BrandDto>, int, int>>SearchBrand(string searchTerm)
{
var result = _context.Brands
.Where(c => c.IsDeleted == displayIsDeleted)
.WhereDynamic(searchTerm)
return new Tuple<IQueryable<BrandDto>, int, int>(result,
filteredResultsCount, totalResultsCount);
}
public IQueryable<BrandDto> GetExceptionsBrand(IEnumerable<BrandDto> filteredBrand, int categoryId)
{
var query = _context.CategoriesBrands.Where(x => x.CategoryId == categoryId);
var selectedList = new List<BrandDto>();
foreach (var item in query)
{
var cb = new BrandDto()
{
BrandDto_BrandId = item.BrandId
};
selectedList.Add(cb);
}
IQueryable<BrandDto> ExcpetList = filteredBrand.AsQueryable().Except(selectedList, new ComparerBrand());
return ExcpetList;
}
I have a async web API that has services and a connection to the db using an EF context.
In one of the services, where I inject the context using DI I want to make a simple transactional service, like:
public async Task<int> ServiceMethod()
{
using (var transaction = context.Database.BeginTransaction())
{
await context.Table1.AddAsync(new Table1());
await context.SaveChangeAsync();
CallOtherservice(context);
await context.SaveChangeAsync();
transaction.Commit();
}
}
CallOtherService(Context context)
{
await context.Table2.AddAsync();
}
I have now mocked CallOtherService() to throw an exception and I expect nothing to be commited, but it looks like changes to Table1 persist, amid the transaction trhat should stop them. I have tried calling Rollback() in a try catch statement and using a TransactionScope() instead, but both were useless. Also, I have noticed that after calling .BeginTransaction(), context.Database.CurrentTransaction is null, which I consider a bit weird.
EDIT:
the method that I test:
public async Task<int> AddMatchAsync(Models.Database.Match match)
{
//If match is null, nothing can be done
if (match == null)
return 0;
else
{
using (var scope = new TransactionScope(TransactionScopeAsyncFlowOption.Enabled))
{
try
{
//If the match already exists, return its id
var dbId = await ExistsMatchAsync(match.HomeTeam.Name, match.AwayTeam.Name, match.Time);
if (dbId > 0)
{
log.Info($"Found match with id {dbId}");
return dbId;
}
//add computable data
match = await AttachMatchName(match);
match.Season = CommonServices.toSeason(match);
// Prepare the relational entities accordingly
match = PrepareTeamsForAddMatch(match).Result;
match = PrepareLeagueForAddMatch(match).Result;
//add the match and save it to the DB
await context.Matches.AddAsync(match);
await context.SaveChangesAsync();
log.Info($"Successfully added a new match! id: {match.Id}");
// Create new TeamLeagues entities if needed
leaguesService.CreateTeamLeaguesForNewMatchAsync(context, match);
await context.SaveChangesAsync();
scope.Complete();
return match.Id;
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
log.Error($"Error adding match - Rolling back: {ex}");
throw;
}
}
}
}
and the test:
[Test]
public void AddMatchSaveChangesTransaction()
{
//Arrange
var exceptiontext = "This exception should prevent the match from being saved";
var leagueServiceMock = new Mock<ILeaguesService>();
leagueServiceMock.Setup(p => p.CreateTeamLeaguesForNewMatchAsync(It.IsAny<InFormCoreContext>(),It.IsAny<Match>()))
.Throws(new Exception(exceptiontext));
leagueServiceMock.Setup(p => p.GetLeagueAsync(It.IsAny<string>()))
.ReturnsAsync((string name) => new League{Id = 1, Name = name });
var match = new Match
{
HomeTeam = new Team { Name = "Liverpool" },
AwayTeam = new Team { Name = "Everton" },
League = new League { Name = "PL", IsSummer = true },
Time = DateTime.UtcNow,
HomeGoals = 3,
AwayGoals = 0
};
var mcount = context.Matches.Count();
//Act
var matchService = new MatchesService(context, leagueServiceMock.Object, new LogNLog(), TeamsService);
//Assert
var ex = Assert.ThrowsAsync<Exception>(async () => await matchService.AddMatchAsync(match));
Assert.AreEqual(ex.Message, exceptiontext);
Assert.AreEqual(mcount, context.Matches.Count(), "The match has been added - the transaction does not work");
}`
```
I am using Mongodb database with .net core. I just want to moq insert method that using mongodbContext. Here is what I am trying to do but it's not working:
public void InsertEventAsync_Test()
{
//Arrange
var eventRepository = EventRepository();
var pEvent = new PlanEvent
{
ID = "testEvent",
WorkOrderID = "WorkOrderID",
IsDeleted = false,
IsActive = true,
EquipmentID = "EquipmentID"
};
////Act
//mockEventContext.Setup(mr => mr.PlanEvent.InsertOne(It.IsAny<PlanEvent>(), It.IsAny<InsertOneOptions>()))
mockEventContext.Setup(s => s.PlanEvent.InsertOneAsync(It.IsAny<PlanEvent>(), It.IsAny<InsertOneOptions>())).Returns("sdad");
var result = eventRepository.InsertEventAsync(pEvent);
////Assert
result.Should().NotBeNull();
}
Below is the method that I need to Moq:
public EventRepository(IFMPContext eventContext)
{
_eventContext = eventContext;
}
public async Task<string> InsertEventAsync(Model.EventDataModel.PlanEvent eventobj)
{
eventobj._id = ObjectId.GenerateNewId();
eventobj.CreatedDateTime = DateTime.UtcNow.ToString();
try
{
_eventContext.PlanEvent.InsertOne(eventobj);
return eventobj.ID;
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
string x = ex.Message;
}
return "";
}
Assuming
public class EventRepository {
private readonly IFMPContext eventContext;
public EventRepository(IFMPContext eventContext) {
this.eventContext = eventContext;
}
public async Task<string> InsertEventAsync(Model.EventDataModel.PlanEvent eventobj) {
eventobj._id = ObjectId.GenerateNewId();
eventobj.CreatedDateTime = DateTime.UtcNow.ToString();
try {
await eventContext.PlanEvent.InsertOneAsync(eventobj);
return eventobj.ID;
} catch (Exception ex) {
string x = ex.Message;
}
return "";
}
}
You need to configure the test to support the async nature of the method under test
public async Task InsertEventAsync_Test()
{
//Arrange
var expected = "testEvent";
var pEvent = new PlanEvent {
ID = expected,
WorkOrderID = "WorkOrderID",
IsDeleted = false,
IsActive = true,
EquipmentID = "EquipmentID"
};
var mockEventContext = new Mock<IFMPContext>();
mockEventContext
.Setup(_ => _.PlanEvent.InsertOneAsync(It.IsAny<PlanEvent>(), It.IsAny<InsertOneOptions>()))
.ReturnsAsync(Task.FromResult((object)null));
var eventRepository = new EventRepository(mockEventContext.Object);
//Act
var actual = await eventRepository.InsertEventAsync(pEvent);
//Assert
actual.Should().NotBeNull()
actual.Should().Be(expected);
}
The test method definition needed to be updated to be asynchronous to allow the method under test to be awaited. The mock dependency also needed to be setup in such a way to allow the async flow to continue as expected when invoked.
#Nkosi Thanks a lot for your help. Finally i found the way. i was missing extra moq param It.IsAny<System.Threading.CancellationToken>() below is the working test
public void InsertEventAsync_Test()
{
//Arrange
var eventRepository = EventRepository();
var pEvent = new PlanEvent
{
ID = "testEvent",
WorkOrderID = "WorkOrderID",
IsDeleted = false,
IsActive = true,
EquipmentID = "EquipmentID"
};
////Act
mockEventContext.Setup(s => s.PlanEvent.InsertOne(It.IsAny<PlanEvent>(), It.IsAny<InsertOneOptions>(),It.IsAny<System.Threading.CancellationToken>()));
var result = eventRepository.InsertEventAsync(pEvent);
////Assert
result.Should().NotBeNull();
Assert.AreEqual(pEvent.ID, result);
}
I am wondering how it is possible to add an OR condition to the Envers criteria api:
public IEnumerable<Guid> GetHistory(object id, params string[] props)
{
var auditQuery = AuditReaderFactory.Get(Session).CreateQuery()
.ForRevisionsOfEntity(typeof(T), false, true);
foreach (var prop in props)
{
auditQuery.Add(AuditEntity.RelatedId(prop).Eq(id)); // <-- adds AND, while OR is required!
}
return auditQuery
.GetResultList<object[]>()
.Select(i => ((T)i[0]).ID)
.Distinct();
}
Use AuditEntity.Disjunction().
In your example, something like...
[..]
var disjunction = AuditEntity.Disjunction();
foreach (var prop in props)
{
disjunction.Add(AuditEntity.RelatedId(prop).Eq(id));
}
auditQuery.Add(disjunction);
[..]
I did like this in Java as #Roger mentioned above. (Just in case if anybody needs)
public List<Employee> getAuditHistory(Session session, int id, String property) {
AuditReader auditReader = AuditReaderFactory.get(session);
List<Employee> employeeHistory = new ArrayList<>();
if (auditReader != null) {
AuditQuery auditQuery = auditReader.createQuery().forRevisionsOfEntity(Employee.class, true, false)
.add(AuditEntity.property(ResultsConstants.Employee_ID).eq(id));
AuditDisjunction auditDisjunction = null;
if (property.equalsIgnoreCase("FULL_NAME")) {
auditDisjunction = AuditEntity.disjunction().add(AuditEntity.property("FIRST_NAME".toUpperCase()).hasChanged())
.add(AuditEntity.property("LAST_NAME".toUpperCase()).hasChanged());
} else {
auditQuery = auditQuery.add(AuditEntity.property(property.toUpperCase()).hasChanged());
}
auditQuery = auditQuery.addOrder(AuditEntity.property("MODIFIED_DATE").desc());
if(null != auditDisjunction){
auditQuery = auditQuery.add(auditDisjunction);
}
if (auditQuery != null) {
if (auditQuery.getResultList().isEmpty()) {
// Log here or throw it back to caller
}
employeeHistory.addAll(auditQuery.getResultList());
}
}
return employeeHistory;
}