I've managed to successfully checkout a file using the https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/drives/{driveId}/items/{itemId}/checkout
Now, I'd like to get the information about the user, who actually perform the checkout operation.
It's possible to check if the item is locked:
https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/drives/{driveId}/items/{itemId}?select=*,publication
However, according to DOCs, publication doesn't provide information about the checked user. Without information who locked the file is the whole checkin/checkout logic is useless.
This kind of information could be retrieved via the metadata for an item in a list as demonstrated below:
https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/sites/{site-id}/lists/{list-id}/items/{item-id}?expand=fields(select=CheckoutUserLookupId)
Once you get checkout user id (CheckoutUserLookupId field) , user details could be determined via the following endpoint:
https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/sites/{site-id}/lists('User Information List')/items/{CheckoutUserLookupId}
where CheckoutUserLookupId is the user id from the previous request
https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/sites/{site-id}/lists/{list-id}/items/{item-id} can't work with folders.
Anyway, drive endpoint "Allows access to the list as a drive" (according to MS Graph Docs). It works with folders as expected.
So I have
get the drive-id: /sites/${siteId}/drives
list root folder: /drives/{drive-id}/items/root/children?select=name,publication
if an item is locked, it's possible to list the activity on the item:
/drives/${idObj.driveId}/items/${idObj.fileId}?select=id&expand=activities
return list of actions:
"activities": [
{
"#odata.type": "#oneDrive.activityEntity",
"#odata.id": "https://xxxxxxxxxx/v2.0/oneDrive.activityEntity2a3649d6-2xxxxx",
"#odata.editLink": "oneDrive.activityEntity2a3649d6xxxxxx",
"#sharePoint.localizedRelativeTime": "0|July 30",
"action": {
"checkout": {}
},
"actor": {
"user": {
"email": "XXX#XXX",
"displayName": "vladimir",
"self": {},
"userPrincipalName": "XXX#XXX
}
},
"id": "XXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"times": {
"recordedTime": "2018-07-31T04:59:03Z"
}
},
although no user ID at least a have the email....
Related
How to make child-card Discussion notes rollup to parent card in Azure DevOps?
The way we use ADO is like this:
User Story -> Task 1
-> Task 2
-> Task 3
Both User Story cards and Task cards contain Discussion fields, and we have hit a quandary as to "which cards' discussion fields should we use to enter ongoing notes and discussions"? The Parent (user story)? Or the child (task)? It makes more sense for devs to enter discussion notes in the tasks, but our Support people and managers like to just look at the parent User Story card where they hope to see all discussion notes.
For now I am double-entering discussion notes in both tasks and their parent user story cards, which is not only an inefficient pain, but also violates DRY.
Then it occurred to me that the ideal solution would be for user story cards to be able to display (within the Discussion section) all discussion notes from all child cards. So if I enter a note in a Task (child) card and save it, automatically it would appear as a discussion note within its parent user story card. Ideally I could still enter user-story-specific discussion notes on occasion, but all child cards' notes would be automatically pulled in and displayed (maybe readonly? editable only in the child?) in the parent card, in all cases.
Is there an easy way to make this happen?
If the answer to #1 above is no, then is there a difficult way to make it happen? Maybe via customizations or custom API calls? What would be the best way to achieve my desired result?
This is not possible out of the box in Azure DevOps (at least not to my knowledge).
However I can think of a few ways to get this done, but it requires some custom scripting, and have some drawbacks that may of may not affect your use case.
Option 1. Create a custom extension that aggregates the comments on the parent
This option gives you complete freedom of how to visually design the feature. It is also completely DRY
You can develop your own custom extension for Azure DevOps and create a dynamic section on the User Story card that pulls in the comments from all tasks.
Option 2. Setup a Web Hook for the event "Workitem commented on"
This option does is not completely DRY, but it will at least automate the copying of comments across work items.
By configuring a web hook in Azure Devops to post a json object containing information about the new comment to a REST endpoint of your choice. The payload posted looks like below.
{
"subscriptionId": "5be97cbc-ee4b-4c21-91ea-866a61d624c4",
"notificationId": 4,
"id": "fb2617ed-60df-4518-81fa-749faa6c5cd6",
"eventType": "workitem.commented",
"publisherId": "tfs",
"message": {
"markdown": "[Bug #5](http://fabrikam-fiber-inc.visualstudio.com/web/wi.aspx?pcguid=74e918bf-3376-436d-bd20-8e8c1287f465&id=5) (Some great new idea!) commented on by Jamal Hartnett."
},
"detailedMessage": {
"markdown": "[Bug #5](http://fabrikam-fiber-inc.visualstudio.com/web/wi.aspx?pcguid=74e918bf-3376-436d-bd20-8e8c1287f465&id=5) (Some great new idea!) commented on by Jamal Hartnett.\r\nThis is a great new idea"
},
"resource": {
"id": 5,
"rev": 4,
"fields": {
"System.AreaPath": "FabrikamCloud",
"System.TeamProject": "FabrikamCloud",
"System.IterationPath": "FabrikamCloud\\Release 1\\Sprint 1",
"System.WorkItemType": "Bug",
"System.State": "New",
"System.Reason": "New defect reported",
"System.CreatedDate": "2014-07-15T17:42:44.663Z",
"System.CreatedBy": {
"displayName": "Jamal Hartnett",
"url": "https://vssps.dev.azure.com/fabrikam/_apis/Identities/e5a5f7f8-6507-4c34-b397-6c4818e002f4",
"_links": {
"avatar": {
"href": "https://dev.azure.com/mseng/_apis/GraphProfile/MemberAvatars/aad.YTkzODFkODYtNTYxYS03ZDdiLWJjM2QtZDUzMjllMjM5OTAz"
}
},
"id": "e5a5f7f8-6507-4c34-b397-6c4818e002f4",
"uniqueName": "Jamal Hartnett",
"imageUrl": "https://dev.azure.com/fabrikam/_api/_common/identityImage?id=e5a5f7f8-6507-4c34-b397-6c4818e002f4",
"descriptor": "ukn.VXkweExUVXRNakV0TWpFME5qYzNNekE0TlMwNU1ETXpOak15T0RVdE56RTVNelEwTnpBM0xURXpPRGswTlRN"
},
"System.ChangedDate": "2014-07-15T17:42:44.663Z",
"System.ChangedBy": {
"displayName": "Jamal Hartnett",
"url": "https://vssps.dev.azure.com/fabrikam/_apis/Identities/e5a5f7f8-6507-4c34-b397-6c4818e002f4",
"_links": {
"avatar": {
"href": "https://dev.azure.com/mseng/_apis/GraphProfile/MemberAvatars/aad.YTkzODFkODYtNTYxYS03ZDdiLWJjM2QtZDUzMjllMjM5OTAz"
}
},
"id": "e5a5f7f8-6507-4c34-b397-6c4818e002f4",
"uniqueName": "Jamal Hartnett",
"imageUrl": "https://dev.azure.com/fabrikam/_api/_common/identityImage?id=e5a5f7f8-6507-4c34-b397-6c4818e002f4",
"descriptor": "ukn.VXkweExUVXRNakV0TWpFME5qYzNNekE0TlMwNU1ETXpOak15T0RVdE56RTVNelEwTnpBM0xURXpPRGswTlRN"
},
"System.Title": "Some great new idea!",
"System.Parent": 26
"Microsoft.VSTS.Common.Severity": "3 - Medium",
"WEF_EB329F44FE5F4A94ACB1DA153FDF38BA_Kanban.Column": "New",
"System.History": "This is a great new idea"
},
"_links": {
"self": {
"href": "http://fabrikam-fiber-inc.visualstudio.com/DefaultCollection/_apis/wit/workItems/5"
},
"workItemUpdates": {
"href": "http://fabrikam-fiber-inc.visualstudio.com/DefaultCollection/_apis/wit/workItems/5/updates"
},
"workItemRevisions": {
"href": "http://fabrikam-fiber-inc.visualstudio.com/DefaultCollection/_apis/wit/workItems/5/revisions"
},
"workItemType": {
"href": "http://fabrikam-fiber-inc.visualstudio.com/DefaultCollection/_apis/wit/ea830882-2a3c-4095-a53f-972f9a376f6e/workItemTypes/Bug"
},
"fields": {
"href": "http://fabrikam-fiber-inc.visualstudio.com/DefaultCollection/_apis/wit/fields"
}
},
"url": "http://fabrikam-fiber-inc.visualstudio.com/DefaultCollection/_apis/wit/workItems/5"
},
"resourceVersion": "1.0",
"resourceContainers": {
"collection": {
"id": "c12d0eb8-e382-443b-9f9c-c52cba5014c2"
},
"account": {
"id": "f844ec47-a9db-4511-8281-8b63f4eaf94e"
},
"project": {
"id": "be9b3917-87e6-42a4-a549-2bc06a7a878f"
}
},
"createdDate": "2022-07-03T12:30:03.0691717Z"
}
In particular you have the comment message under message, the author of the message under fields.System.ChangedBy, the date of the comment in fields.System.ChangedDate and the parent workitem id in System.Parent
Using this information your REST service that receives the json object can create a comment on the parent work item using the Comments Rest API or post an update to the workitem where you set the System.History field to the value of the comment. This also allows you to set the original comment time and author, given that the user account you use in your automation has the permission Bypass rules on work item updates granted.
Drawbacks
If tasks can be moved from one user story to another, then the task comments on the user stories need to be moved. The same idea as above can be applied to solve this. By configuring a webhook for WorkItem updated you can listen for all updates to tasks.
By fetching the previous revision (Revision is found in resource.rev) from the Revision Rest API and comparing the field System.Parent you can determine whether the task has been moved or not and add the comments to the new parent and remove them from the old.
Similarly if you want to propagate comment updates and reactions, you would need to extend the webhook functionality even further.
I need to retrieve analytics of my companies posts.
I do have the following rights:
r_1st_connections_size
r_ads_reporting
r_basicprofile
r_emailaddress
r_liteprofile
r_organization_social
rw_ads
rw_organization_admin reporting data"
w_member_social
w_organization_social
for my Bearer token.
But my request:
https://api.linkedin.com/v2/shares?q=owners&owners=urn:li:organization:*myOrganisationId*
does return:
{
"paging": {
"start": 0,
"count": 10,
"links": [
{
"type": "application/json",
"rel": "next",
"href": "/v2/shares?count=10&owners=urn%3Ali%3Aorganization%<myOrganisationId>&q=owners&start=0"
}
],
"total": 568
},
"elements": []
}
What is strange. Because it genuinely succeeds, and even returns a total > 0 but the elements are ALWAYS for ALL pages empty.
How can that be? Any insights?
I would appreciate also any input on which endpoint provied most easily the most metrics like click-rate, impressions, ... , of the posts?
Thanks a lot for your help.
If you need to retrieve the insigths from a share object you need to use the adAnalyticsV2 endpoint (here).
You can than retrieve the data by querying the endpoint in this way:
https://api.linkedin.com/v2/adAnalyticsV2?q=analytics&pivot=SHARE&timeGranularity=DAILY&shares=List(urn:share:XXXX)
to get a list of all shares I use this (replace the 00000 with your company ID):
https://api.linkedin.com/v2/ugcPosts?q=authors&authors=List(urn%3Ali%3Aorganization%3A00000)&sortBy=LAST_MODIFIED
That will actually give you a lot more, than you need but you will have a list of share urns as well as their texts and even authors. I wonder how are you planning to combine the two, cause that's what I am trying to figure out.
Thanks,
Piotrek
We are working on implementing a custom logging solution. Most of the information what we need is already present in log analytics from data factory analytics solution but for getting log info on data flows, there is a challenge. When querying, we get this error in output. "Too large to parse".
Since data flows are complex and critical piece in a pipeline, we are in desperate need to get data like rows copied, skipped, read etc of each activities with in data flow. can you pls help how to get those info?
You can get the same information shown in the ADF portal UI by making a POST request to the below REST endpoint. You can find more information and read about authentication on the following link https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/datafactory/pipelineruns/querybyfactory
You can choose to query by factory or for a specific pipeline run id depending on your needs.
https://management.azure.com/subscriptions/<subscription id>/resourcegroups/<resource group name>/providers/Microsoft.DataFactory/factories/<ADF resource Name>/pipelineruns/<pipeline run id>/queryactivityruns?api-version=2018-06-01
Below is an example of the data you can get from one stage:
{
"stage": 7,
"partitionTimes": [
950
],
"lastUpdateTime": "2020-07-28 18:24:55.604",
"bytesWritten": 0,
"bytesRead": 544785954,
"streams": {
"CleanData": {
"type": "select",
"count": 241231,
"partitionCounts": [
950
],
"cached": false
},
"ProductData": {
"type": "source",
"count": 241231,
"partitionCounts": [
950
],
"cached": false
}
},
"target": "MergeWithDeltaLakeTable",
"time": 67589,
"progressState": "Completed"
}
I'm trying to fetch all of my ad campaigns from Facebook whose objective is "WEBSITE_CLICKS" (ie, driving visitors to your site). When I make a GET request against the following:
/act_myaccountid/adcampaign_groups?fields=objective,name
or, using the official Python Ads SDK:
fields = [facebookads.objects.AdCampaign.Field.objective, facebookads.objects.AdCampaign.Field.name]
campaigns = my_user_account.get_ad_campaigns(fields=fields)
I get something that looks like:
{
"data": [
{
"objective": "NONE",
"name": "name1",
"id": "1234"
},
{
"objective": "NONE",
"name": "name2",
"id": "567"
},
I'd like to be able to only get campaigns with that particular objective. Is there a way to do this? I read through the Ads documentation but didn't see anything.
It's not documented as far I've seen but the FB Ads Manager UI allows such filtering which also happens to work in external Graph API calls.
Make a call to the API with a filtering parameter like so:
filtering=[
{
"field":"<FIELD>",
"operator":"IN",
"value":[
"<VALUE>"
]
}
]
For example, your request would be:
/act_myaccountid/adcampaign_groups?fields=objective,name&filtering=[{"field":"objective","operator":"IN","value":["WEBSITE_CLICKS"]}]
In GitHub when viewing my organization's user list I'm able to see how many teams a user is a member of.
Clicking on this count shows me which teams a user is in, putting me on the following page:
https://github.com/orgs/my-org/teams?query=%40username
However, I'm trying to achieve the same functionality via the GitHub API, but I've been unable to find an endpoint that lists what teams (within an organization) a user is currently a member of.
One workaround is to loop through all the teams in an organization and get their members list, but this can quickly go through my rate limit, so to be able to do this in one request would be useful.
You can do this with GraphQL API v4 filtering users in teams within an organization with userLogins :
{
organization(login: "my-org") {
teams(first: 100, userLogins: ["johndoe"]) {
totalCount
edges {
node {
name
description
}
}
}
}
}
which gives for instance :
{
"data": {
"organization": {
"teams": {
"totalCount": 2,
"edges": [
{
"node": {
"name": "Employees",
"description": "org employees"
}
},
{
"node": {
"name": "Developers",
"description": "active developers"
}
}
]
}
}
}
}
Source : platform.github.community forum
Unfortunately, GitHub does not yet provide a way to do this.
At the moment, like you suggested, you would have to loop through each team in the organization to get all members within each one, then you would need to loop through all users, and check if the users are members of those teams.
You can increase your rate limit if you use an API token, but the solution is still lousy if you have a large organization.
Heads up!
Providing an invalid/unknown "userLogin" sometimes results in all teams being returned.
Perhaps me doing something wrong, but I opened a ticket with GH about this, so lets see:
https://github.community/t/teams-userlogins-filter-is-not-working-as-expected/206251