I've built a geographic report for a new system that has very little data in it so far. The report combines two maps into one image with dual axis.
The first map shows different regions identified by color. It's supposed to always be visible, no matter what values are selected in a filter.
The second map shows business-related data, e.g., geographical locations of offices and number of applicants per office.
The data set is a union of business-related data and geographic data containing nulls in business-related columns.
The problem is that the nulls are showing in the filters, and this is confusing for the users. Basically, the nulls always need to be selected in order for the general map to be visible. If a user deselects NULL from any of the filters, the map disappears.
How can I fix it? Ideally, the NULLs (or a value replacing the null) should always be included in the data and be always excluded from the filter.
Related
I have two calculated fields (HomeScore, AwayScore) and I grouped them by different dimensions(Home, Away). Now, I have TotalRuns per Team both in HomeGames and AwayGames. My problem is that I want to find the sum of TotalRuns per Team not separetely for home games and away games. I want to add these group-by fields somehow. I attach a screenshot to see my work. For example first column for both charts is "Arizona Diamondbacks" which has 263 Runs in first chart and 337 in the second one. I want to show the 263+337=600 Runs. Any Idea?
You'll want to create a LOD expression.
{FIXED [Team Name] : SUM([Total Runs])}
Think of your data as a big table (which it technically always is in Tableau). Every grouping, filter, etc. that you do narrows down the number of columns and rows you have left until you are left with your data set that contributes to your chart. LOD expressions allow you to back out of the filters, etc. in your calculation. In this case, you narrowed down to home or away games, and we are backing out of that to get a bigger picture of the data.
I am creating an interactive 'calculator' using tableau. I have a series of dataframes that I have crossed with one another, such that the resulting dataframe is every possible combination between the tables, and every row is unique.
Each column is its own worksheet as a table. Each table in the dashboard is a pane. So, here we have a series of tables with selectable units of measurement, and the final pane on the dashboard should filter to the cell for its respective column, on the unique row of the dataset that the user has selected and 'filtered out'.
I'm having some issues getting this to work and not sure why.
The closest I can think to solving this would be 'Cascading Filters.' Here are a couple resources:
General Use
In dashboard action-filter form
The critical piece, however, is that the filters must be selected in a specific order - therefore making them 'cascading.' This may differ from your presumed concept of clicking/filtering in any order on the worksheets to then arrive to a final answer. I do think that this may be a limitation of Tableau - I don't think that a 'many to many' type of relationship can be set up within Action Filters.
How can I extract the IN count portion of a Tableau set? I can see the IN/OUT counts when I drop the set into Text but can't figure out how to get at the IN value by itself.
Ultimately, I want to create a Pie Chart of three sets with just the IN counts as the measures.
I am using Tableau Public if that is a factor.
You have to be a little careful about specifying what you wish to count.
One way to think of a set is as a Boolean function that gives a value to each data record denoting whether that record is associated with the set.
Another way to think of a set is as a mathematical set whose members are a subset of the values for some discrete field. (Or Tuple of fields)
The difference between the two views is really just a mindset, whether you consider the set as a Boolean function whose domain is a data row in the data source, or whose domain is the field on which the set definition is based.
Say you are looking at Tableau’s Superstore data set where each data record is a line item for a product attached to an order.
If your set is based on the field Region, say its called [My Favorite Regions] and currently contains {“East”, “Central”} do you want your count to be 2 (i.e. the number of regions in the set) ? Or do you want your count to be in the tens of thousands (i.e the number of line items on orders from the regions in the set)? Or something in between, maybe the number of distinct orders (i.e. order ids) within the selected regions...
If you want to count data rows that are associated with the set, you can simply filter by the set and calculate SUM([Number of Records[). If you want to count the regions in the set even though the level of detail of the data is at the order line item level,then you’ll have to use either a COUNTD to count the distinct regions, or some approach to specify what it is you want Tableau to count.
For example, put your set on the filter shelf, and show COUNTD(Region) which could be slow for very large data sets. To get the same effect without an explicit filter, you can define a LOD calculation such as:
{ COUNTD(if [My Favorite Regions] then [Region] end) }
Or you could use a table calc with the SIZE() function to do the calculation in the Tableau client instead of by the data source.
Not sure what your data looks like but you could set a certain condition when creating a set or split the IN/OUT into two different sets.
Here's a link to sets in Tableau.
You can do this with an if statement
IF [set] = TRUE THEN 1 ELSE 0 END
Then I suppose you could sum this calculated field
The most common usage is when you have a lot of categories and want to create an 'Other' category based on the categories that aren't in a set, if the set is a "Top N Set"
To do this:
IF [set] = TRUE THEN [dimension] ELSE 'Others' END
I have a calculation and it outputs multiple values. Then I am creating a table on those values. For example, in below data my formula is
if data is 1 then calculation is `one`
if data is 2 then calculation is `two`
if data is 3 then calculation is `three`
as three doesn't really appear in the output, when I create a table, three is not displayed. Is there any way to display it?
I tried table layout >> show empty rows and columns and it didn't work
data calculation
1 one
2 two
Tableau discovers the possible values for a dimension field dynamically from the query results.
If ‘three’ does not appear in your data, then how do you expect Tableau to know to make a column header for that non existent, but potential, value? It can’t read your mind.
This situation does occur often though - perhaps you want row or column headers to remain stable, even when you change filters in a way that causes some to no longer appear in the query results.
There are a few ways you can force Tableau to pad ** or **complete a domain:
one solution is to pad your data to make sure each value for your dimension field appears in at least one data row.
You can often do this easily by using a union to append some extra rows to your original data. You can often add padding rows that don’t impact any results by leaving all your Measure columns null since nulls are ignored by aggregation functions
Another common solution that is a bit more effort is to make what is known as scaffolding data source that is not much more than a list of your dimension members. You can then use that data source as a primary data source with data blending, making your original data source secondary.
There are two situations where Tableau can detect the absence of data and leave space for it in the visualization automatically
for numeric types, you can create a bin field that will automatically pad for missing bins
similarly, date fields can show missing values because, like bins, Tableau can tell when a month doesn’t appear in the data and leave room for it in the view
I am building a (pivot) grid in Tableau and want to always include a data point (a row in the fetched dataset) in the resultant view, irrespective of any filters the user selects. Is this possible?