Is there a maximum limit to the amount of metadata that can be incorporated in an individual field of TIFF file metadata? I'd like to store a large text (up to a few MB) in the ImageDescription field.
There's no specific maximum limit to the ImageDescription field, however, there's a maximum file size for the entire TIFF file. This maximum size is 4 GB. From the TIFF 6.0 spec:
The largest possible TIFF file is 2**32 bytes in length.
This is due to the offsets in the file structure, stored as unsigned 32 bit integers.
Thus, the theoretical maximum size is that which #cgohlke points out in the comments ("2^32 minus the offset"), but most likely you want to keep it smaller, if you also intend to include pixel data...
Storing "a few MB" should not be a problem.
Related
Most posts i read just give info about the maximum file name length's. But, i want to understand why there's this limit. Why can't file name's be big. I see that few file systems have put a limit of 255 bytes. Why not 1 MB or anything more than 255 bytes. I probably would never have a file name of length more than 100 characters. But, this question is about why the limit?
long file name costs much more space and time than you can imagine
the 255 bytes limit of file name length is a long time trade off between human
onvenience and space/time efficiency
and backward compatibility , of course
back to the dark old days , the capacity of hard drive capacity was count by MB or a few GB
file name are often stored in some fixed length C structs ,
and the size of the struct was mostly round by the factor of 512 byte,
which is the size of a physical sector ,so that it can be read out by a single touch of the head
if the file system put a limit of 1MB on filename, it would run out of harddisk space with only a few hundred files. and memory limits also applys.....
I am preparing training images in Matlab. The problem is the number of images are too much and the size of variables are huge as well. Here is the specification of work:
There are 10 .mat files each contain in average 15000 images. It is in format of 1x15000 cell and the size of each file is in average 1.35 GB.(900 kilobytes average per image)
Average size of each image is 110x110 pixels, each image has different dimensions. Each cell is saved as single type with value between 0 and 1.
Loading all 10 .mat files at once is impossible because it makes Matlab freezes. My questions are:
Isn't the file sizes are too big? 900 kilobytes in average for small 110x110 pixel image is really too much,isn't it?!
Is usage of cell of single variable is the best practice for training images? or there exist a more convenient alternative variable type?
update: to compare the image size, this icon file with 110x110 pixel is around 2kb in comparison to 900 kb images in matlab!!!
I have searched some posts and cannot find what the maximum filesize is under iPhone.
max size of an iOS application
maximum size of sqlite or database on iOS
As the above posts said, the maximum filesize depends on the free disk space. So, can I store everything into sqlite file and it's filesize can exceed 4GB or 10GB ?
According to the following links I found,
Mac OS, HFS File System volumn and file limits
iOS filesystem, HFSX
HFS, Wiki
As the first link says, "The theoretical maximum file size for a Mac OS Extended file system is millions of terabytes. In practice, the maximum file size is equivalent to the maximum volume size, except for a small amount of disk space reserved for file system information."
Because the maximum filesize is equal to the maximum volumn size, and consider the factor about the free disk space.
So, in my conclusion, the maximum size of single file depends on the free disk space.
Here I have binary image,and I need to compress it using Run-length encoding RLE.I used the regular RLE algorithm and using maximum count is 16.
Instead of reducing the file size, it is increasing it. For example 5*5 matrix, 10 values repeating count is one,that is making the file bigger.
How to avoid this glitch? Is there any better way I can apply RLE partially to the matrix?
If it's for your own usage only you can create your custom image file format, and in the header you can mark if RLE is used or not, and the range of coordinates of X and Y and possible the bit planes for which it is used. But if you want to produce an image file that follows some defined image file format that uses RLE (.pcx comes into my mind) you must follow the file format specifications. If I remember correctly, in .pcx there wasn't any option to disable RLE partially.
If you are not required to use RLE and you are only looking for an easy to implement compression method, before using any compression, I suggest that you first check how many bytes your 5x5 binary matrix file takes. If the file size is 25 bytes or more, then you are saving it using at least one byte (8 bits) for each element (or alternatively you have a lot of data which is not matrix content). If you don't need to store the size, 5x5 binary matrix takes 25 bits, which is 4 bytes and 1 bit, so practically 5 bytes. I'm quite sure that there's no compression method that is generally useful for files that have size of 5 bytes. If you have matrices of different sizes, you can use eg. unsigned integer 16-bit fields (2 bytes each) for maximum matrix horizontal/vertical size of 65535 or unsigned integer 32-bit fields (4 bytes each) for maximum matrix horizontal/vertical size of 4294967295.
For example 100x100 binary matrix takes 10000 bits, which is 1250 bytes. Add 2 x 2 = 4 bytes for 16-bit size fields or 2 x 4 = 8 bytes for 32-bit size fields. After this, you can plan what would be the best compression method.
Is there a theoretical maximum to the amount of metadata (EXIF, etc) that can be incorporated in a JPEG file? I'd like to allocate a buffer that is assured to be sufficient to hold the metadata for any JPEG image without having to parse it myself.
There is no theoretical maximum, since certain APP markers can be used multiple times (e.g. APP1 is used for both the EXIF header and also the XMP block). Also, there is nothing to prevent multiple comment blocks.
In practice the one that is much more common to result in a large header is specifically the APP2 marker being used to store the ICC color profile for the image. Since some complicated color profiles can be several megabytes, it will actually get split into many APP2 blocks (since each APP block one has a 16bit addressing limit).
Each APPN data area has a length field that is 2 bytes, so 65536 would hold the biggest one. If you are just worried about the EXIF data, it would be a bit less.
http://www.fileformat.info/format/jpeg/egff.htm
There are at most 16 different APPN markers in a single file. I don't think they can be repeated, so 16*65K should be the theoretical max.
Wikipedia states:
Exif metadata are restricted in size to 64 kB in JPEG images because according to the specification this information must be contained within a single JPEG APP1 segment.