I have created an order-column and i want to update the current values that is in that table.
CREATE TABLE public.publishroomcontacts
(
id integer NOT NULL DEFAULT nextval('publishroomcontacts_id_seq'::regclass),
publishroomid integer NOT NULL,
contactorder integer NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT publishroomcontacts_pkey PRIMARY KEY (id),
CONSTRAINT fk_publishroomcontacts_publishroom_id FOREIGN KEY (publishroomid)
REFERENCES public.publishrooms (id) MATCH SIMPLE
ON UPDATE NO ACTION
ON DELETE CASCADE
)
WITH (
OIDS = FALSE
);
What i want to do is to go through all rows, group by publishroomid and add a contactorder.
So if there is 4 contacts with the same publishroomid whey will have contact order 1, 2, 3 and 4.
How do i do this?
EDIT:
Related
I can not add a referential constraint, both tables has the two columns id and version as primary key. I will only check the integrity that the row is existing without checking version.
CREATE TABLE TABLEE
(ID INTEGER NOT NULL,
VERSION INTEGER NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (ID , VERSION);
CREATE TABLE CHAIR
(ID INTEGER NOT NULL,
VERSION INTEGER NOT NULL,
ID_TABLEE INTEGER,
PRIMARY KEY (ID , VERSION);
ALTER Chair
ADD constraint MYC FOREIGN KEY (ID)
REFERENCES TABLEE (ID)
ON DELETE RESTRICT
Got this error
[Code: -573, SQL State: 42890] A column list specified in the references clause of constraint "MYC " does not identify a unique constraint of the parent table or nickname "TABLEE".. SQLCODE=-573, SQLSTATE=42890, DRIVER=4.28.11
The problem here is that Tablee its primary key consists of two columns id and version. But the integrity check should only be made on the referenced id, not version.
To establish a foreign key on a table the referenced column needs to:
Be a primary key on the other table.
...or at least act as one.
Since you already have a primary key on the referenced table, you can use the second approach and add a UNIQUE and NOT NULL constraints on ID.
For example:
CREATE TABLE TABLEE (
ID INTEGER NOT NULL,
VERSION INTEGER NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (ID , VERSION),
constraint uq1 unique (id) -- added UNIQUE constraint on ID
);
CREATE TABLE CHAIR (
ID INTEGER NOT NULL,
VERSION INTEGER NOT NULL,
ID_TABLEE INTEGER,
PRIMARY KEY (ID , VERSION)
);
ALTER table Chair
ADD constraint MYC FOREIGN KEY (ID)
REFERENCES TABLEE (ID)
ON DELETE RESTRICT;
See running example at db<>fiddle.
Note: If you want ID to have repeated values over the table, then ID is not a key, and cannot be referenced as one.
CREATE TABLE employee (
id varchar(40) NOT NULL,
legacy_id varchar(40) NOT NULL,
short_name varchar(255) NULL,
is_deleted bool NOT NULL DEFAULT false,
CONSTRAINT employee_pkey PRIMARY KEY (id)
)
I want to plan for unique constraint like this
The table must have these constraint
1. Unique constraint is required on column 'legacy_id' and 'is_deleted = false'. Its okay to have multiple values with legacy_id and is_deleted = true.
Is there any way to achieve this
You cannot have a constraint for that, but a partial unique index will do just as well:
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON employee (legacy_id)
WHERE is_deleted;
cannot add foreign key constraint to table
create table users
(
user_id int auto_increment primary key not null,
username varchar(50) unique null ,
email varchar(50) unique ,
passwords varchar(50) not null,
login_status boolean not null
);
create table category (
category_id int primary key not null,
category_name varchar(50) not null
);
create table answers (
id_answer int auto_increment primary key not null,
answer boolean not null
);
create table questions (
question_id int primary key not null,
category_name varchar(50) not null,
content varchar(50) not null ,
foreign key (category_name) references category (category_name)
);
You get this error because there's no index on category_name in the category table. Change that CREATE statement as follows:
create table category (
category_id int primary key not null,
category_name varchar(50) not null,
KEY category_name_index (category_name)
);
From the docs (8.0 version, but the statement is true for older versions):
MySQL requires indexes on foreign keys and referenced keys so that foreign key checks can be fast and not require a table scan. In the referencing table, there must be an index where the foreign key columns are listed as the first columns in the same order. Such an index is created on the referencing table automatically if it does not exist. This index might be silently dropped later, if you create another index that can be used to enforce the foreign key constraint. index_name, if given, is used as described previously.
Also, you're using a varchar(50) as your foreign key, which is not usually a great idea for a variety of reasons. You probably want to use a numeric value, such as category_id, instead.
There is this field in a table:
room_id INT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT room_id_ref_room REFERENCES room
I have three 2 tables for two kinds of rooms: standard_room and family_room
How to do something like this:
room_id INT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT room_id_ref_room REFERENCES standard_room or family_room
I mean, room_id should reference either standard_room or family_room.
Is it possible to do so?
Here is the pattern I've been using.
CREATE TABLE room (
room_id serial primary key,
room_type VARCHAR not null,
CHECK CONSTRAINT room_type in ("standard_room","family_room"),
UNIQUE (room_id, room_type)
);
CREATE_TABLE standard_room (
room_id integer primary key,
room_type VARCHAR not null default "standard_room",
FOREIGN KEY (room_id, room_type) REFERENCES room (room_id, room_type),
CHECK CONSTRAINT room_type = "standard_room"
);
CREATE_TABLE family_room (
room_id integer primary key,
room_type VARCHAR not null default "family_room",
FOREIGN KEY (room_id, room_type) REFERENCES room (room_id, room_type),
CHECK CONSTRAINT room_type = "family_room"
);
That is, the 'subclasses' point at the super-class, by way of a type descriminator column (such that the pointed to base class is of the correct type, and that primary key of the super class is the same as the child classes.
Here's the same SQL from the accepted answer that works for PostGres 12.8. There's a few issues not only the CREATE_TABLE syntax mistake:
CREATE TABLE room (
room_id serial primary key,
room_type VARCHAR not null,
CONSTRAINT room_in_scope CHECK (room_type in ('standard_room','family_room')),
CONSTRAINT unique_room_type_combo UNIQUE (room_id, room_type)
);
CREATE TABLE standard_room (
room_id integer primary key,
room_type VARCHAR not null default 'standard_room',
CONSTRAINT roomid_std_roomtype_fk FOREIGN KEY (room_id, room_type) REFERENCES public."room" (room_id, room_type),
CONSTRAINT std_room_constraint CHECK (room_type = 'standard_room')
);
CREATE TABLE family_room (
room_id integer primary key,
room_type VARCHAR not null default 'family_room',
CONSTRAINT roomid_fam_roomtype_fk FOREIGN KEY (room_id, room_type) REFERENCES "room" (room_id, room_type),
CONSTRAINT fam_room_constraint CHECK (room_type = 'family_room')
);
NOTE: The SQL above uses constraints to enforce the child room_type values default to the parent tables' room_type values: 'standard_room' or 'family_room'.
PROBLEM: Since the child tables Primary Key's expect either the standard and family room Primary Key that means you can't insert more than one record in thsee two child tables.
insert into room (room_type) VALUES ('standard_room'); //Works
insert into room (room_type) values ('family_room'); //Works
insert into standard_room (room_id,pictureAttachment) VALUES (1,'Before Paint'); //Works
insert into standard_room (room_id,pictureAttachment) VALUES (1,'After Paint'); //Fails
insert into standard_room (room_id,pictureAttachment) VALUES (1,'With Furniture');
insert into family_room (room_id,pictureAttachment) VALUES (2, 'Beofre Kids'); //Works
insert into family_room (room_id,pictureAttachment) VALUES (2,'With Kids'); //Fails
To make the tables accept > 1 row you have to remove the Primary Keys from the 'standard_room' and 'family_room' tables which is BAD database design.
Despite 26 upvotes I will ping OP about this as I can see the answer was typed free hand.
Alternate Solutions
For smallish tables with less than a handful of variations a simple alterative is a single table with Bool columns for different table Primary Key fields.
Single Table "Room"
Id
IsStandardRoom
IsFamilyRoom
Desc
Dimensions
1
True
False
Double Bed, BIR
3 x 4
2
False
True
3 Set Lounge
5.5 x 7
SELECT * FROM Room WHERE IsStdRoom = true;
At the end of the day, in a relational database it's not very common to be adding Room Types when it involves creating the necessary related database tables using DDL commands (CREATE, ALTER, DROP).
A typical future proof database design allowing for more Tables would look something like this:
Multi Many-To-Many Table "Room"
Id
TableName
TableId
1
Std
8544
2
Fam
236
3
Std
4351
Either Standard or Family:
select * from standard_room sr where sr.room_id in
(select TableId from room where TableName = 'Std');
select * from family_room fr where fr.room_id in
(select id from room where TableName = 'Fam');
Or both:
select * from standard_room sr where sr.room_id in
(select TableId from room where TableName = 'Std')
UNION
select * from family_room fr where fr.room_id in
(select id from room where TableName = 'Fam');
Sample SQL to demo Polymorphic fields:
If you want to have different Data Types in the polymorphic foreign key fields then you can use this solution. Table r1 stores a TEXT column, r2 stores a TEXT[] Array column and r3 a POLYGON column:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION null_zero(anyelement)
RETURNS INTEGER
LANGUAGE SQL
AS $$
SELECT CASE WHEN $1 IS NULL THEN 0 ELSE 1 END;
$$;
CREATE TABLE r1 (
r1_id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY
, r1_text TEXT
);
INSERT INTO r1 (r1_text)
VALUES ('foo bar'); --TEXT
CREATE TABLE r2 (
r2_id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY
, r2_text_array TEXT[]
);
INSERT INTO r2 (r2_text_array)
VALUES ('{"baz","blurf"}'); --TEXT[] ARRAY
CREATE TABLE r3 (
r3_id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY
, r3_poly POLYGON
);
INSERT INTO r3 (r3_poly)
VALUES ( '((1,2),(3,4),(5,6),(7,8))' ); --POLYGON
CREATE TABLE flex_key_shadow (
flex_key_shadow_id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY
, r1_id INTEGER REFERENCES r1(r1_id)
, r2_id INTEGER REFERENCES r2(r2_id)
, r3_id INTEGER REFERENCES r3(r3_id)
);
ALTER TABLE flex_key_shadow ADD CONSTRAINT only_one_r
CHECK(
null_zero(r1_id)
+ null_zero(r2_id)
+ null_zero(r3_id)
= 1)
;
CREATE VIEW flex_key AS
SELECT
flex_key_shadow_id as Id
, CASE
WHEN r1_id IS NOT NULL THEN 'r1'
WHEN r2_id IS NOT NULL THEN 'r2'
WHEN r3_id IS NOT NULL THEN 'r3'
ELSE 'wtf?!?'
END AS "TableName"
, CASE
WHEN r1_id IS NOT NULL THEN r1_id
WHEN r2_id IS NOT NULL THEN r2_id
WHEN r3_id IS NOT NULL THEN r3_id
ELSE NULL
END AS "TableId"
FROM flex_key_shadow
;
INSERT INTO public.flex_key_shadow (r1_id,r2_id,r3_id) VALUES
(1,NULL,NULL),
(NULL,1,NULL),
(NULL,NULL,1);
SELECT * FROM flex_key;
To create table I use:
CREATE TABLE category
(
cat_id serial NOT NULL,
cat_name character varying NOT NULL,
parent_id integer NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT cat_id PRIMARY KEY (cat_id)
)
WITH (
OIDS=FALSE
);
ALTER TABLE category
OWNER TO pgsql;
parent_id is a id to another category. Now I have a problem: how to cascade delete record with its children? I need to set parent_id as foreign key to cat_id.
I try this:
ALTER TABLE category
ADD CONSTRAINT cat_cat_id_fkey FOREIGN KEY (parent_id)
REFERENCES category (cat_id) MATCH SIMPLE
ON UPDATE CASCADE ON DELETE CASCADE
But it falls with:
ERROR: insert or update on table "category" violates foreign key constraint "cat_cat_id_fkey"
DETAIL: Key (parent_id)=(0) is not present in table "category".
The problem you have - what would be the parent_id of a category at the top of the hierarchy?
If it will be null - it will break the NOT NULL constratint.
If it will be some arbitrary number like 0 - it will break the foreign key (like in your example).
The common solution - drop the NOT NULL constratint on the parent_id and set parent_id to null for top categories.
-- create some fake data for testing
--
DROP SCHEMA tmp CASCADE;
CREATE SCHEMA tmp ;
SET search_path=tmp;
CREATE TABLE category
(
cat_id serial NOT NULL,
cat_name character varying NOT NULL,
parent_id integer NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT cat_id PRIMARY KEY (cat_id)
);
INSERT INTO category(cat_name,parent_id)
SELECT 'Name_' || gs::text
, gs % 3
FROM generate_series(0,9) gs
;
-- find the records with the non-existing parents
SELECT ca.parent_id , COUNT(*)
FROM category ca
WHERE NOT EXISTS (
SELECT *
FROM category nx
WHERE nx.cat_id = ca.parent_id
)
GROUP BY ca.parent_id
;
-- if all is well: proceed
-- make parent pointer nullable
ALTER TABLE category
ALTER COLUMN parent_id DROP NOT NULL
;
-- set non-existing parent pointers to NULL
UPDATE category ca
SET parent_id = NULL
WHERE NOT EXISTS (
SELECT *
FROM category nx
WHERE nx.cat_id = ca.parent_id
)
;
-- Finally, add the FK constraint
ALTER TABLE category
ADD CONSTRAINT cat_cat_id_fkey FOREIGN KEY (parent_id)
REFERENCES category (cat_id) MATCH SIMPLE
ON UPDATE CASCADE ON DELETE CASCADE
;
This is quite simple.
Here the foreign key parent_id refers to cat_id.
Here a record with parent_id=0 exists but not a record with cat_id=0.